TV is garbage anyways. Constant reruns and more ads than content. It's highest time TV broadcasters took the shaft and moved their resources into literally anything else.

Your English is really broken so I'm not sure what exactly you're asking.

But you can convert cryptocurrencies to any fiat currency, as well as exchange any fiat for any other fiat. In the beginning there'll only be BTC, ETH, MCO, BNB or something like that if I recall correctly, but this will expand to cover ERC20 tokens and other cryptos as well.

He probably "lost" a couple million and is now suicidal due to lack of foresight and understanding. "Lightning is online" (no it's fucking not). He either doesn't know what he's talking about or it's like you're suggesting and he's trying to manipulate markets. Without any success.

No it isn't, that guy talks about random bullshit buzzwords, not fundamentals or technicals.

> Everybody who's got money is in
> Total market cap of $463 Billion

Just lol.

Hello!

Thank you for the kind words, I'm sure the team at Blocklancer will be happy to read them.

As for your question. There was a soft cap and a hard cap for the ICO. The soft cap indicated the minimal amount of funds needed to run this project. The hard cap is the maximum and reaching it would make things a lot easier (more aggressive marketing for example).

The soft cap has already been reached 6 times over by now, so even if the hard cap isn't reached the project will go off as planned. The remaining unsold tokens will be burnt.

From an investor's perspective not selling out isn't a negative thing as long as enough funds were raised to launch the project properly and to reach its full potential, as a lower market cap implies a greater upside potential for early token buyers. On the other hand, more funds mean slightly less potential gains but at a possibly much faster rate.

Hope this answered your question.


Welcome to the campaign!

I checked for you and you are fine since you've posted your respective signature code. Your posts will be counted from your application onward.

Keep in mind that the dev team updates stakes manually and that the team is currently very busy with the ICO and with negotiations, so you might not see your stakes immediately. This is perfectly normal and nothing to worry about.

Welcome to the campaign!

That's why you're still not popped corn!

That's hard to answer. If the ICO doesn't raise enough funds to cover marketing and development it could die and reduce your profits to ashes. On the other hand, if it raises too much then the multiplier will be smaller.

Basically, there's a sweet spot in which an ICO raises the perfect amount of money to turn into a successful company while granting the maximum possible profits to early investors. However, this optimum is not known by anybody and can only be estimated.

For example, if a company would be worth $1 Billion if it reached its full potential but the ICO raised over $100m, then the maximum possible multiplier would be 10x. If the same company raised only $10m during its ICO, you could earn a 100x return on your investment. But if the company only raised $1m during its ICO, there's a chance that it would not even be able to cover its cost and then turn your investment to 0.

But since every ICO is different you can't put any exact number on this, since some companies would be fine with even a $50k investment while others need much more. The potential market valuation of a company after its growth phase also varies from product to product and from market to market, as well as from company to company. So while some companies are lucky to be worth a few million USD, others can be worth hundreds of billions.

Figuring this kind of stuff out is a process that is called fundamental analysis.

Vitalik hasn't logged on here in years. Not sure why he should care either?

Is that even possible? I would've assumed that there'd be an endless void beyond the edge. Maybe Batman can help us out on this one, he seems like a smart guy.

Are you saying the UN pushed him off?

He moved a little too far and fell off the flat disc.

I believe you only get half a sMerit for each Merit that you get. Since you only have one merit you'd need one more to be able to send any.

That's just gold. Is that the real Roger Ver or just a troll? In either case, 11/10.

Chinese within the US can't really do any significant damage even if they wanted to. And the US has been a superpower for a very long time now and had nuclear bombs way before China. It would be quite strange to assume that China would've overtaken their military. The US has been in decline for a while now thanks for ridiculous partisan and identity politics as well as victim culture. But their military is largely independent of that anyways and has a massive budget.

I wouldn't even care about BCash if it was just any other alt or fork. But the way they are willing to put trust in Bitcoin as a whole at stake for profiteering and/or egomaniac reasons is despicable.

Even without governments accepting Bitcoin, society would accept it once enough retailers choose to accept it as payment. And with prices constantly rising there will be more and more incentive for retailers to accept BTC as means of payment.

Also, one of the US states is thinking about accepting Bitcoin for tax payments in the future, forgot which one it was though.

Just buy Bitcoin and hold it. No counterparty risk and you don't end up paying for the profits of somebody else. By the way, 5 GH is nothing when it comes to Bitcoin, a $2000 ASIC miner will get you 13000 GH.

I don't know shit about either of these. But in general, if you're torn between two implementations of the same idea and you don't have any emotional investment in either of them (e.g. a friend owns one of them), then just invest in both of them. If you really have no clue just invest in both equally, if you think that one has a better chance than the other then you can change the proportions up a bit.