Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 04:26:20 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 ... 165 »
1881  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: What exactly is "taint" with bitcoins? on: December 27, 2016, 09:24:08 PM
Generally, the word taint can be used in the two context.
1) The Bitcoins were once related to a known theft/hack and is thus tainted by that. For example, X coins are spent from an UXTO which is related to a  transaction which was compromised in a Bitstamp hack.
2) The analysis which can be done to determine if the two addresses are correlated to each other.

The context you are talking about is 2). If there is a taint from your origin address, that means that your mixer is not doing anything to secure your privacy.

Ahhh ok. So it can really be either but it depends on the context. I saw someone say on the forum oh this mixer is 52% taint analysis so not too bad. Does that still mean that it's for security of a mixer?

With a mixer doing its job you should get back coins with zero taint. That means there is no correlation between the coins you sent and the coins you got back. Blockchain.info has a taint analysis tool anyone can use to measure taint.

The problem with mixers is this: mixers are popular with gamblers and customers of dark net markets so there is a high probability the coins you get back, while not traceable to the coins you sent, may be traced to the bitcoin wallet addresses of a gambling site or darknet market. When you try to sell those coins for fiat the chainanalysis tools that a company like Coinbase use may raise a red flag.
1882  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Tails not persistent volume how save electrum on: December 27, 2016, 12:45:20 AM
As long as you save your seed you can recover Electrum each time you start TAILS if you do not want to turn persistence on.
1883  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: December 26, 2016, 11:59:18 PM
Yes there is some uncertainty if your work will be saved if you exit the GUI before sync is done. If you go to settings in the GUI you will see 'Manage daemon' with buttons to start, stop and show. If you hit the show button you can see progress.

There is no option to type commands in the daemon log but you can stop the daemon with the stop daemon button. That should save your progress but no guarantees. I think a developer would have to chime in here. When I first downloaded the GUI I on purpose started cli from the gui folder so I could use the exit command with the daemon until synced.
1884  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 24, 2016, 03:48:50 PM
Happy Holidays! I would prefer to see price action take a break and hover around $900 for a week or two then a new ATH in the New Year. I hope we could have steady increase and avoid the parabola, but I expect that will be the case, a sharp spike up then a crash once again.
1885  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Which Bitcoin Mining Cloud Mining To Choose, Which Is Profitable In Long Term on: December 24, 2016, 03:39:43 PM
For beginners are very important to choose right BTC cloud mining company for long term profit. There are many Bitcoin cloud mining sites all over Web, it is very hard to choose. Some offer even free BTC mining, if you register with them. The first question can be - if this site is stable and profitable ? I heard that one Swedish BTC mining company even close - see info here https://www.miningsweden.se/news/, so that's mean Bitcoin mining is not so simple.   
Someone told me that it was a scam. You should not trust unknown cloudmining. Trust only the legitimate cloudmining site only. Look at this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1151110.0
As of now genesis, hashflare and hashnest are good and legit cloudmining. But stay away at miningsweden. Its just a ponzi scam.

That is why you should only buy hosted mining from reputable companies with a few years of good service, and then only if the provider has an exchange built in to their site so you can sell your TH when you want to. Hashnest and HaoBTC are the largest. They will not run off with your investment. Hashflare promises unreasonable returns so they are either a ponzi or a fractional miner (selling more hash then they actually own.) Hashflare is owned by Sergei Potapenko whose history looks pretty suspicious not someone you would want to invest into.

Mining Sweden started as a legitimate company but appears to have gone scam see this thread here at the forum.
1886  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Hackers Have Stolen Millions Of Dollars In Bitcoin -- Using Only Phone Numbers on: December 23, 2016, 10:11:28 PM
When you spend from a paper wallet your private keys are exposed briefly and bitcoin could be stolen if malware is waiting. Many early adopters used to use Armory and two computers for cold storage. That is still probably the most private way to do it and some still swear by it. Using two computers has largely been replaced by hardware wallets like Ledger Nano S and Trezor. There has never been a reported theft of bitcoin from a Trezor or Ledger. As a bonus using Nano S or Trezor you can use your hardware wallet for secure U2F login to a number of services like Google, Dropbox, Github, etc.
1887  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: December 23, 2016, 09:54:15 PM
Hey gang... just wondering if this is normal or maybe I have something set wrong:

I'm running the new GUI on my MacBook Pro circa mid-2012 model with spinning-disk HD not SSD.  Apple 'home' partition 100Gb with 36Gb free now... and other partitions set up 'different' for a dual-boot Win7 native option.

I've never had the CLI or any full XMR blockchain on this machine before now (always managed with just MyMonero, Polo, etc) and only previously ran that "pre release" download of the compiled GUI wallet for OSX, a couple months ago, which always worked fine.

Anyway, I downloaded the Beta 1 GUI release and it's running now & been downloading the big file since yesterday, almost 24 hours.

Yet I'm only at about "Synchronizing Blocks 269505 / 1207936" so far.

Seems a lot slower than I expected... so... something wrong or this is par for the course?

TIA for any info.

P.S. Also not sure if it'd be a good idea BUT after I have the full blockchain downloaded I was considering moving it to my home network NAS... since this Apple HD partition doesn't really have a *ton* of free space left.  But given if this system is slower than expected would that be manageable? OR maybe having the blockchain on my home network NAS would really be even more intolerably slow to actually use? Anyone try a setup like this yet...?

On a late model Win7 machine took just over 24 hours. I think if you move the blockchain you would have to open the wizard and tell the GUI where to find it.
1888  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: December 23, 2016, 07:43:36 PM
PSA: If the beta GUI is not working on your Windows system, please follow this guide

https://monero.stackexchange.com/questions/2928/how-to-change-the-monero-core-rendering-mode-for-older-computers/2929#2929

Thanks @dEBRUYNE some newer computers need it also
1889  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Which Bitcoin Mining Cloud Mining To Choose, Which Is Profitable In Long Term on: December 23, 2016, 12:17:25 AM
There are no guarantees. HaoBTC might return your investment in about a year, might not. Hosted mining is for enthusiasts who want to have a little fun mining. Maybe invest $150 and buy one TH. As long as you buy from HaoBTC or Hashnest when the new wears off you can always sell your TH on the internal exchange. Buying at Genesis Mining is never recommended, once you buy there is no way to sell. Just buying and holding bitcoin will probably give you a better return than mining.
1890  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Which Bitcoin Mining Cloud Mining To Choose, Which Is Profitable In Long Term on: December 22, 2016, 06:07:19 PM
Genesis Mining is a for profit company that charges high daily fees of $0.35 per TH and is the last place you would want to invest. If you want to buy cloud mining use a provider like HaoBTC where fees are $0.17 per TH and also has an internal exchange where you can sell your hash when you like. Hashnest also has started selling hosted S9 mining but fees are higher than HaoBTC.
1891  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: December 22, 2016, 06:01:15 PM
Windows users are reporting problems with the GUI on GitHub. The article at Bitcoin Magazine reporting only 2% adoption of Monero on AlphaBay was lower than expected.
1892  Other / Archival / Re: [banned mixer] — the Fast, Secure and Reliable High Volume Bitcoin Mixer! on: December 22, 2016, 03:58:59 PM
@[banned mixer] good luck with your venture. Since you have published the addresses of your cold wallet what steps have you taken to prevent coinanalytics software from identifying and monitoring your send addresses? Once identified companies like Coinbase could close accounts for depositing bitcoin received from a mixing service.
I am not aware that the use of a mixing service is against the terms od use of a coinbase wallet. Can you link me to a referrence that makes you think they may close accounts for using mixers? I'm just curious. I'm using a similar wallet to coinbase but mixers is not against any of their terms.

I have seen several posts from reddit users who had difficulties with Coinbase because they used shapeshift or mixers will try to find the links.
1893  Other / Archival / Re: [banned mixer] — the Fast, Secure and Reliable High Volume Bitcoin Mixer! on: December 21, 2016, 08:11:38 PM
@[banned mixer] good luck with your venture. Since you have published the addresses of your cold wallet what steps have you taken to prevent coinanalytics software from identifying and monitoring your send addresses? Once identified companies like Coinbase could close accounts for depositing bitcoin received from a mixing service.
1894  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: I think the download link for Windows Electrum is broken. Help! on: December 17, 2016, 02:14:36 AM
Just to be clear, you tried the Windows Installer link?

Thank you.

Yes no problem. Are you behind a firewall? You should be able to download any version of Electrum in less than a minute.
1895  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: I think the download link for Windows Electrum is broken. Help! on: December 17, 2016, 02:08:53 AM
Hi all, I want to download Electrum, but the link always times out.  I have windows 7.  I've tried the link with both Firefox and IExplorer.  I tried weeks ago and again today, which is weird.  I would think you've heard about this by now, so I'm wondering if something else is wrong.

I've tried to find contact info on the page but can't find an email.  

Can anyone tell me how to contact the developer(s)?

Thanks.

Here is the Electrum download page.

You can contact the developer on the Electrum thread here at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=98.0

I just checked the download links and they worked fine.
1896  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: December 14, 2016, 08:12:21 PM
Ledger uses a smartcard element that is proprietary so Ledger is not fully open source. Trezor has already stated they have no time for Monero ATM as they are working on getting Trezor 2 to market. Next to Ledger Jaxx has been making noise about integrating Monero but found it way more complicated than they expected, if they actually do they have the Ice Cube hardware wallet planned for early 2017.
1897  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: December 14, 2016, 07:05:24 PM
Any news on when the Q1 GUI project is going to be completed. Eagerly waiting for it.... Hoping it by January or early..

I was very wrong at all kind of Crypto speculations. But I give tiny chances that GUI will be out after 5th January.

the gui is likely already priced in
xmr is a nice project ,my only worry is so many other coins are coming to the party
with privacy features ......
hopefully the XMr network effect will be too strong.......


Really, any already announced features have already been priced in by the market...

In my opinion it is not even possible to price in GUI. You see, there are people who are refusing to buy Moneros before they can store them in a safe and sound manner. Therefore, once the wallet is out, they can buy into Monero.
That being said, this can create a speculative bubble and drive the price of Monero literally nuts like we have never seen before.

The GUI will be no more secure than running the wallet from command line. Strong passphrase is essential but Monero could really use adoption by Trezor or Ledger. Ledger is more likely as they have more manpower than Trezor and btchip has already mentioned he is interested. Monero app is not on Ledger's public roadmap yet though. GUI is nice yes but using command line is not really a bother. Paper wallets have a point of failure when you have to import private keys to spend.
1898  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] ViaBTC Cloud Mining on: December 14, 2016, 04:15:46 PM
Eric, not everyone wants to buy a full miner and host in a colocation center. I keep tabs on the cloud mining providers, own 1 TH at most of them and ViaBTC pays out more per day than HaoBTC 150W Hash-Ex or Hashnest S9. Even though you can get a higher payout with ViaBTC you can't sell the hash like you can with the other providers. That is a downside. I also see no reason to go through a distributor when you can buy direct.

For someone wanting to invest $150 ViaBTC is fine. They only charge $0.05 for power at 100 W per TH/s with a 6% management fee on top of that. I don't consider that greedy like Genesis Mining that charges $0.35 per TH/s in fees. Total fees from ViaBTC average $0.16 per day per TH/s.

If I was to buy a miner and host it I would choose your service sinohash.com but I also would buy the most power efficient miner and that is S9. Many can not justify $1600 for an S9. Avalon 721 costs less but is much less power efficient than S9. After the halving it only makes sense to mine with the most power efficient miner you can buy.

Why don't you take some of the S9s you own and sell hosted S9 mining at 1 TH increments yourself? If you can set the fees so you are rewarded for your time and still have a daily payout higher than ViaBTC you would have a winner. ViaBTC daily payouts averaged .00067450 btc per TH/s over last seven days.
1899  Other / MultiBit / Re: Weird error, Trezor, Multibit, Low spendable balance detected. Please help. on: December 13, 2016, 09:01:49 PM
Are you saying you used the same seed in Multibit as your Trezor? If you typed in your Trezor seed in Multibit to restore a wallet your Trezor is now compromised. Tip: don't do anything in a panic you may make matters worse.
1900  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Security - My look at the KeepKey on: December 12, 2016, 07:03:46 PM
KeepKey forked Trezor source code and built a business off of SatoshiLabs original hard work. I think you should support and buy Trezor instead.

If Trezor was cheaper, a lot of people would actually do this. Existing hardware wallets may be convenient for some users, who are afraid of malware on their computer. Personally I'm not that enthusiastic about hardware wallets as a longterm storage solution. Reason is that you effectively rely on the continued services of startup companies. If your hardware wallet is breaking down, you must rely on replacement hardware that might not be available when the companies have vanished. In addition, native support for these wallets is not widespread, so you have to rely on app services as well.

Paper wallets are a much cheaper and even more secure alternative to hardware wallets. You can print as many you want and store them in different places to minimize the risk of loss. Of course, you can encrypt them as well.

I would use a hardware wallet only, if it would work as a standalone Bitcoin wallet, meaning that you could receive and broadcast transactions with it without the need for a secondary device. That would be very convenient.

ya.ya.yo!

Paper wallets can be dangerous for new bitcoin users because you expose your private keys when spending and there is always the change problem. Paper wallets are not safer than hardware wallets quite the reverse. As long as a hardware wallet user keeps the seed safe if the hardware wallet provider happened to go out of business the seed can be recovered in Mycelium. There is no downside to using a Ledger Nano S or Trezor.
Pages: « 1 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 ... 165 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!