Try to find something about Chipmixer and try to draw some conclusions. Was in a much stronger position than you expect it to be, and yet funds were frozen/seized, the domain and website seized as well as the TOR page.
You understand these things too easily for someone who pretends to gain trust for keeping other people's money.


If you re-read what I say, you will see that I am pointing out some of the illogicalities you present, and it is related to your years of operational work and experience. Through such little things, I can see that you are not honest and for me, it is a big red flag when it comes to your service.


Seriously?


But you have an incredible plan to avoid all that knocking on the door, something that no one has thought of yet? At least that's what you say in your reply FatFork.

I have a better question.
What kind of impact can a new, never used address (without balance) have on anonymity, mining or anything? Isn't the whole thing designed so that the mixer has more funds from different sources?

I probably didn't express myself in the best way.
I just wanted to point out the holes in the Timelord2067 research. How realistic is it that someone who is aware (judging by the quoted HedgeFx feedback, he certainly is) of the bad sides of the Ponzi business, at the same time takes a loan to invest in another Ponzi? If he had at least thought a little before he got involved in this whole circus...

An additional thing is that it is completely wrong to tag someone for the reason where he spent borrowed money, without even researching the accuracy of this insinuation.

Probably neither you nor any of us will get any answer here. The OP is present but seems to lack arguments for a concrete discussion.


We all know about Binance, but who is Imperiume, and see their first presentation here.
Also, imagine a potential scenario, in some ideal world they have a lot of users, and many people stake their coins with them. But then suddenly, the authorities decide to seize them for bitcoin mixing and money laundering (which is a very realistic scenario). All funds that are ordinary users' stake are confiscated.
Isn't this a very serious and thoughtless risk?

OP, _act_ if you follow this discussion that you started, you will see that almost everyone suggests that you move this topic from the reputation section to the service discussion. I'm not sure why you associate things like this with reputation, I guess because of signature campaigns. You should understand that any service does not exist to have its own signature campaign, but it is only part of its promotion.

I really don't know how many times we will return to the story about the responsibility of any mixer for the origin of the bitcoins that come to it.
Now I see the "confession" of a victim of the Atomic wallet hack, where he says that his wallet has been emptied, but the funds have not yet been transferred. Are they the same Lazarus Group hackers? What if those funds go through another mixer, how will we position ourselves in that case?
Will Cointelegraph and Elliptics make special analyses, or are such amounts of only 1BTC not interesting to them because they are not sensational enough?




source: https://twitter.com/Thomas_Hunter11/status/1666054742412345345?s=20

It looks like there are serious operational issues with [banned mixer]. OP, I saw that you were there, I assume that you are following the development of the situation.
Many complaints about long delays in the withdrawal of funds, and transactions stuck for days.


Okay, that can happen, but what catches my eye are a few newly created accounts, which confirm that the funds have arrived.



It is clear that it is a common phenomenon that people register on the forum only when they have a problem, so this may be the explanation for this occurrence. However, this raises a flag for me for now

Also, a Newbie who comes to "calm down" the matter with praise for [banned mixer] looks like an ordinary shill

Jel se samo meni cini da je SEC krenuo u agresivnu kampanju protiv kripto servisa? Ili mozda samo negativne stvari imaju jaci odjek pa se vise o tome prica. Vecina stvari koje sad pokusavaju da isteraju na cistac funkcionisu tako vec godinama, zato se ceka toliko za bilo kakvu reakciju? Ako nesto nije u skladu, valjda to seces u korenu, ne cekas da vidis kako ce se stvari odvijati.

I hope you have learned that there is no place for emotions when you are in a discussion with an unknown person on the Internet. Emotions most often influence the making of wrong decisions.


And this negative tag is in response to the negative feedback that ps34 left for you. It can also be interpreted as some kind of revenge, which is not a proper use of the trust system. Maybe you can say that it's not a big deal, we all know about ps34 and there are already several similar tags, but you don't need to react to every feedback like that.

---

Did you notice that HedgeFx left a negative tag to member @N30W_414 for promoting Ponzi, a month before the Timelord accused him of investing in a Ponzi scheme?  What kind of Pantomime of truth is involved in TL analysis?

I have seen some changes and it seems to me that he is trying to adapt the network exclusively to his ideas and needs. Twitter is definitely not the same place anymore.
I can't say I feel sorry for his losses if they are real. The whole thing seems to me like when a rich kid buys his favourite toy, and such ambitions are often not successful. Whatever, they'll post a few tweets about Doge or something and cover the loss.


He made a lot of money by manipulating the Dogecoin price through his influence on Twitter, he probably thought about what power he would have if he owned the entire network.


But it's a completely new type of income that they didn't have before. Quite a good solution to generate profit from ordinary users, not only from companies and marketing campaigns.

It would probably be good if you get a little more involved here and explained all the doubts about your service. Long breaks in absence here are not something that contributes to gaining trust in you, especially in the mixer industry where the competition is severe.
Everything I read here did not attract me to think of using your service.


Perhaps you should think about a review campaign, there is no better way than to stimulate users to test the platform and express their observations and remarks.

Quoting this from whirlwind.money ANN

Shilling about your service in other mixers' ANN threads is entirely wrong. Imagine that we are discussing the advantages of other mixers here, do you want something like that?

Bitcointalk username: examplens
Forum rank: Legendary
Earned merit: 66
bech32 address: bc1qkte05aepm8eey0uvcfpju5y7lmvmkh0hf5jvpj

---

Royse777 It would be good to emphasize if there are restrictions for certain regions and whether it is allowed to use a VPN in that case. Some game providers have such restrictions and this can affect the selection of participants.
Ignore it if there is no such prohibition.

Sharing a telegram username is not a big deal nor does it intrude that much on privacy. If you share here, it is much more likely that someone will be found who has contact with that person. Perhaps you can also set up an email with a partially *** hidden name, so that those who know can recognize it, and still not expose it to unnecessary spam.
This way you only have guesswork, no useful information that would help you.

I added him to my distrust list.
I really tried to give him space to think and still make a rational decision, but he decided on the strangest move, adding another neutral feedback, while leaving controversial negatives. Obviously not understanding the trust system, or knowingly violating it.
As such, he cannot be selected in DT.

It is also very important to present all the evidence in one topic, which would later become a reference for potential feedback. The flag he created leads to his lending topic, where the accused user can change his posts and complicate the recognition of real facts.

Also, @CYBER_COWBOY, when you leave feedback to someone, regardless of whether it is positive, neutral or negative, you must provide a reference to some proof. Otherwise, it's just your word, and that's not enough. We have seen abuses of the trust system many times.

For example, without proper references, it sounds like you're trying to falsely create positive trust:

What happened:: 100% Plagiarised content on website

FLAG created https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3177

Scammers Profile Link: _Freeclimber__
Reference Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5455191.new#new
Amount Scammed: N/A
PM/Chat Logs:


Additional Notes:

Like the best of the ICO days, an irresistible offer dawned. There is no significant information about who is behind the whole thing, contact addresses do not exist. Random address and map posted on the site.

Terms and Conditions, the only page that has some text, is completely plagiarized.



I'm leaving it here for reference, I'm not sure if it deserves a ban, given that plagiarism is outside the forum.

You and HedgeFx are certainly right, but I completely agree with LoyceV, it is also wrong to use the trust system on your part if you leave feedback or a flag carried by personal emotions.
Timelord2067 topic certainly does not belong to the Lending section (as already said several times), I reported to the moderators to move it, but that's already a question for Cyrus and hilariousandco, why is it still there?

In the meantime Timelord is locked his topic in the lending board, I assume that in this way he wants to stop further discussion there, or at least only temporarily as he himself says. It would be good to leave this whole drama to one topic.

---

Now I see that he decided to post another neutral feedback to alterra57 and HedgeFx with the same reference, without deleting the previous negative one. Totally twisted, I wonder why it is so hard to admit that you were wrong and rash.

I had respect for all the good things Timelord did, he really did a lot for the forum, but unfortunately, such a stubborn attitude, defending wrong decisions, forces me to put him on my distrust list.

It seems that this member is still new here and maybe he didn't get to know all the things on the forum very well, so let me help him.

User CYBER_COWBOY opened scam accusations 63$ Loan defaulted by Rohan Kotkar

Scam accusation thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2690537
Proof of loan accepted: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5445759.msg62144289#msg62144289
Reason: Loan default
FLAG https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3175

Please support or oppose.

He is just hoping for some kind of referral profit through you.


The Pi sect has been repeating this for years. It is true that fraudsters using the name Pi came into trading before them.


It is not possible to mine any currency by phone.


Again, will be tradeable soon, and so for 4 years. He's right here, it doesn't cost anything, but it's not worth anything either.


They don't even have their own mainnet, how is it even possible to mine a coin that doesn't exist?


This is probably the closest to the truth. By collecting a large database of KYC data, Pi fraud organizers will have the opportunity to make money by selling it.

Pre bih rekao da je u pitanju pregovaranje oko cene. Mozda su tek kasnije saznali o kolikoj svoti se radi, pa zasto da ne iskoriste. Malo zastrasivanja tek da opravdaju zahtev za povecanje oslobadjajuce svote.

First, move this topic to the Reputation board, it belongs there, not here. It will also be more visible to a larger number of members there, many do not come to the Lending board. Likewise, the thread opened by Timelord does not belong here, but in the reputation section.
Next, There is no need to enlarge fonts, it will not increase the importance of the whole thing. It is perfectly fine to use the default forum font size.
Also, if you can reduce the size of the images you posted it would be much more pleasing to the eye.
Instead of tag, just add
So for example your images can be shown as