New blockchain snapshot: https://mega.nz/#!BVAwgJYY!ZMRKcyzvYijWruSlpJ8BVPMcoAXMv4Bm7ZBaOA6fcRE |
|
|
|

[node list]
that is the peer info i get if you may shed any light on it , cheers.
my peer list looks similar to yours, I don't see anything wrong with it, except that there are a lot of clients on low height. but, that is to be expected, given the infamous sync bug ;-) please have a look at your debug.log and see if there is anything weird to report. thanks |
|
|
|
I think that, when the sync bug is fixed, we will have no more issues with exchanges, hence why I'm having a dev work on it, and I will pay him bounty from my wallet (and from the people who will contribute).
I could do the fix myself, I just do not have enough time.
hey man, just reading.. what is the actual sync bug? does it halt/freeze at a given height on some nodes? also, curious as to why you can't release a windows wallet, just strikes me as odd. willing to help out if you can provide some details. james (starpost was the best game on vic20) There is an explanation at the end of the OP. In brief: when you sync from scratch, at times even when you already have a chain db in your data dir, it stops syncing at a certain height. When using the QT wallet, closing it may corrupt the wallet database. About the windows wallet, I'm waiting for the bug to be fixed before releasing any new binary. ok; yes i saw it at #161, but notice that the hash it fails on is the same in the complete (downloaded from elsewhere) chain. also noticed both liblmdb and leveldb, is there a cutover? or is only one used. just looking through the source now. about the hash: looks suspicious, I will look thru it, time permitting :-) please share the block height and hash. |
|
|
|
i am having a wierd issue today , headers seem to be stuck at 3 days behind in my wallet , even tho i tried a backup of a synced blockchain from yesterday , it started at 28 hours behind on headers then went to 3 days behind and is stuck , bit of a worry . any1 else having this issue?
how many connections have you got? try running "getpeerinfo" and see what's your peers height (if they are up to date). |
|
|
|
I think that, when the sync bug is fixed, we will have no more issues with exchanges, hence why I'm having a dev work on it, and I will pay him bounty from my wallet (and from the people who will contribute).
I could do the fix myself, I just do not have enough time.
hey man, just reading.. what is the actual sync bug? does it halt/freeze at a given height on some nodes? also, curious as to why you can't release a windows wallet, just strikes me as odd. willing to help out if you can provide some details. james (starpost was the best game on vic20) There is an explanation at the end of the OP. In brief: when you sync from scratch, at times even when you already have a chain db in your data dir, it stops syncing at a certain height. When using the QT wallet, closing it may corrupt the wallet database. About the windows wallet, I'm waiting for the bug to be fixed before releasing any new binary. |
|
|
|
To ESPERS communityIf we wish to really help CryptoCoderz and Espers than we have to get ESP to https://www.zpool.caHow?We have to move ESP to one of this exchanges: Bittrex, Poloniex, BLEUTRADE, Yobit, Cryptopia or CCEX We can forget about Yobit as it still on old ESP chain and will not move to new until they see profit, so the best chance is to win voting at C-CEX. Whit 307 votes there is a good chance to be listed in next weeks, but you all have to vote: https://c-cex.com/?id=vote&coin=esp Here is the condition from zpool to add ESP: https://twitter.com/_zpool_/status/837660603279884288 (Maybe DEV could also help herewith some bounty) Why?If we win voting at C-CEX and start trading at C-CEX zpool will add ESPERS and HMQ1725 algo to their multi-pool. This means that you all could mine in any algo listed (at the moment 30 supported algho) and be paid in ESP or BTC. If you choose to be paid in ESP zpool will buy ESP at C-CEX and send to you wallet! This way the price will for sure increase and maybe we will help also DEV to finish next steps in development! What do you think about this idea!? Will you help? I'm against being on zpool. It will only bring casual miners which use their BTC address and that will mean constant dump and price down. Even if you use an esp address, zpool will not buy any coin on the exchange, it will only wait for the coins to be mined. |
|
|
|
I can make you a GPU miner, any bids? ^^
and same here, for amd cards  rx480 can 700Mhs in double sha256, so in my calc, it can ~350Mhs for tripple sha256 GTX 1080 = 1 GHs Guess you are not the guy in my post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1801129.msg18073756#msg18073756 or will you shock us all and release the damn thing. I dont need it so we are clear i just want to see if there is any open source spirit in the cryptocoding world left. Jure, that is why some are very rich in and others dont... This is ruled as normal life - 1% very rich, 99% slaves And funny is that some guys are always defending that btc is freedom... you are mistaking freedom for income. No Im not. Lets make One another big ponzi again then, where the master ponzi man/miner, has the best weapon to kill their opponents... And we are still in the mining process... I dont want imagine if this hits an exchange with this low supply so far... I guess I made the phrase too brief for most. What does the freedom, which bitcoin and the other crypto currencies bring, have to do with the immutable income distribution? |
|
|
|
I can make you a GPU miner, any bids? ^^
and same here, for amd cards rx480 can 700Mhs in double sha256, so in my calc, it can ~350Mhs for tripple sha256 GTX 1080 = 1 GHs Guess you are not the guy in my post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1801129.msg18073756#msg18073756 or will you shock us all and release the damn thing. I dont need it so we are clear i just want to see if there is any open source spirit in the cryptocoding world left. Jure, that is why some are very rich in and others dont... This is ruled as normal life - 1% very rich, 99% slaves And funny is that some guys are always defending that btc is freedom... you are mistaking freedom for income. |
|
|
|
I think that, when the sync bug is fixed, we will have no more issues with exchanges, hence why I'm having a dev work on it, and I will pay him bounty from my wallet (and from the people who will contribute).
I could do the fix myself, I just do not have enough time.
I will send you some XCN that I have, I don't have a whole lot so I might just send you all of it. I appreciate you guys trying to keep this coin alive in my absence. Thanks, but I prefer any contribution you can make to the coin ;-) I'm working with a dev friend to find the sync issue and fix it, 3 heads are better than 2 at solving a problem! Some time ago I did try to figure out the sync issue by looking at the source code but it's so hard to understand such complex code especially when you didn't write that code yourself. I've been thinking seriously about writing a new coin from scratch using the MBC scheme along with some other stuff such as a quantum resistant signature scheme and the homomorphic encryption proposal by B.F. Franca (see this and this). I feel like if XCN did anything it has proven that the MBC scheme can work and isn't easy to exploit since it hasn't been done. I also think that when a coin is created from scratch it feels less like a simple clone of Bitcoin and people can appreciate it more, and it allows us to avoid all the issues inherent with the Bitcoin code. So much of the Bitcoin core code is also made redundant within the MBC scheme, like everything to do with scripts. The goal would be to create simple and elegant code that makes it easier to understand and modify. I would also prefer to avoid using Qt altogether, since the creation of GUI's should be a job for wallet software developers. That would also mean using a robust networking library instead of the one that comes with Qt. This is all just an idea right now, I'd like to hear what you guys think before going ahead with anything. I think that the two projects can cohexist. I will support your new coin if you make it, but XCN has been running for almost 3 years and, despite the sync bug, it's been pretty stable so far, which is a great achivement by itself, nonetheless. Besides, I agree with you to separate the GUI code from standalone wallet. |
|
|
|
There are currently 0 connected peers.
I have 38, here are some: 101.127.169.209 106.186.126.57 113.53.148.11 137.189.91.64 137.189.91.71 155.143.193.174 158.69.27.82 178.26.208.109 180.253.249.183 182.71.181.102 183.63.48.118 188.252.239.4 193.106.171.8 211.149.194.156 24.246.60.145 46.105.118.15 68.193.116.54 77.233.244.74 79.155.232.191 81.0.115.79 82.116.52.170 84.201.247.230 85.14.250.2 86.127.154.22 89.99.27.94 91.152.122.132 93.122.250.57 95.25.80.210 96.127.136.18 |
|
|
|
|
The fix will come, and then all the rest. The price will go up again, just hold in this bad moment.
|
|
|
|
I have 51 connections .. I'm finding blocks and staking  I'm on same chain as novaexchange and espv2.miningalts.com How in the world do you guys ever get any more than 16 connections?That's the most I get with any coin EVER By enabling incoming connections. Open the port on the router or use upnp. |
|
|
|
The dev should be happy to hear that you are going to pay him,
thanks pallas, for the new thread, and the miner, but still wanted to ask about this miner,
is this the super fast ultra xcn miner, the ones that are there for sale, or is it a bit you'r own old miner updated by ?
can't you just for sake thate someone's pc over with teamviewer or so and then fix its pc with a freshly compiled windows 64bit version,
or something like that, and send this file to bt38 and or put it on the site to be found. |Thanks a bit|
when the fix is ready, we will provide a new windows wallet binary that should make all the exchanges happy ;-) |
|
|
|
|
I think that, when the sync bug is fixed, we will have no more issues with exchanges, hence why I'm having a dev work on it, and I will pay him bounty from my wallet (and from the people who will contribute).
I could do the fix myself, I just do not have enough time.
|
|
|
|
I have a couple of transactions totaling about 40 million espers that are sitting with 0 confirms.. Can I assume this will sort itself out once the nodes are fixed?
-Rog
I think so. And I know Cryptocoderz is working on the issue right now. The fix is coming, hold on ;-} |
|
|
|
Why asic 150 mhs in x11 and performer gpu same gtx 1070 only 15 mhs .
And why asic SHA256D performance is measured in terahash, and gpu in gigahash? :-) |
|
|
|
|
The only problem is time. If I had enough, I could compile it myself. I've been using Microsoft products since vic-20 basic in '84, ms-dos 3 and windows 2.
|
|
|
|
Can someone please provide a "daemon" (textual) wallet for windows?
I want to send it to BTC38 as it may fix their issue.
I will do. but tell me, do I need to synchronize wallet? or can I just send you wallet.dat ? and what you mean by "daemon" (textual)" I don't need the wallet.dat file, but the wallet "application", i.e. build it for windows, without QT. |
|
|
|
|
Can someone please provide a "daemon" (textual) wallet for windows?
I want to send it to BTC38 as it may fix their issue.
|
|
|
|
i dont i think i have change with solo mine at this time when every single block come to suprnova. i missed the beginning day of solo mine XCN  Go solo, u will find 3 block per 300 years, guaranteed. Looking at the recent events, chain is not sustainable anymore and may pose a significant treat to altcoin chain consortium which would be highly undesirable given the amount of hard work we have put into establishing its governing body. There is just a problem with qt, the chain is pretty fine. If exchanges compiled their own wallet daemons, they wouldn't have had any problems. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
