 I dunno really; guess it's mostly newer guys and especially those from stricter backgrounds and cultures who take offence easily. |
|
|
|
|
I think don't worry about scammers and their alts, mic. They haven't seemed to try to join twice, as it were, so far in your previous competitions. You would have heard all about it! Everyone would tell you instantly 'oh x is likely an alt of y scammer, he's trying to join twice'.
|
|
|
|
|
Fire up the block eruptors!
|
|
|
|
|
fuck those little dweebs
edit i mean not literally
|
|
|
|
Fuckery
 |
|
|
|
Or what?
He ends up looking like yet another butthurt whiny scammer. |
|
|
|
|
Answer the questions. They're relevant to the thread. This is not a suggestion.
|
|
|
|
This is the way.
I have spoken. Is the poll OK enough written ? Can't find the proper words or is it OK to understand It's good enough. Maybe swap 'aloud' for 'allowed'. People should be able to say, 'I'll take the 751-800 slot because my ocelot oscillator and 1337 ma indicator says 777 dollars on the due date' afaiu |
|
|
|
I wouldn't say the RED is blocked, but the ones with 10.000 and the one with 10.075 just have there full range if someone says anything inbetween, then they just have the range inbetween the already chosen ones (what is the RED prices in your post)
The other option would be to make set ranges of $50, such as 9501-9550, 9551-9600, 9601-9650, and so on, and let everyone pick a single range (and only have one person per range). If a range or set of ranges goes unpicked, then the users on each side simply absorb the excess. Personally I prefer the "tick box" solution with tight ranges, so that if many members want to bet the same price they can, and subsequently split the winnings instead of miss out from being a dozen dollars of the correct price.
This doesn't solve the problem you pose, though. Multiple members could pick the 9976-1025 range, and if the price is 1026, then they will all lose. I much prefer a "winner takes all" style rather than letting multiple people pick the same price. This is the way. |
|
|
|
|
What the fuck did you do? 'support the development of a shitcoin'
wtf does this mean?
no one in their right mind touches shitcoins.
ok so you were new?
fucking idiot
write a massive long explanation of what went on when
also tell us why and when you stopped supporting the onion shit
how many btc's did people lose in that scam and how did your 'support' grease those wheels?
|
|
|
|
|
There's been arguing in here since the beginning and it hasn't destroyed it, obviously.
At one stage it got so dramatic that the price went up. 'Bitcoin thrives on drama' was once a mainstay.
Nobody gives a shit what these scammers, retards, detectives and babies cry and bitch about in some obscure section of the place. Except perhaps newbies who think being a legendary carries some weight of morality. Bollocks to that, we are all individual little chaps of largely equal abilities and ambitions.
Much more 'embarassing' is the long-standing state of the prominent areas like 'bitcoin discussion' and dev'n'tech, which certainly must affect outsiders' views of the place.
|
|
|
|
|
Normally you would be happy for anyone to win one of these games that mic is so kind to sponsor, except maybe a scammer but mercifully they don't seem to join.
But I'd hate for one of these arrogant-assed TA soi disant experts to win a goddam penny. They are useless at predicting price, they never admit when they are wrong which is way more than half the time otherwise they'd be quiet and would've fucked off.
If they win one of these it will be pure coincidence and annoying.
'Oh I'm doing it to help you (poor souls), you need to learn my method'
er no we need you to fuck off and learn humility for the next 17 years then don't bother coming back.
present your TA, fine, but do it without your arrogance.
be like water my friend
|
|
|
|
It's my birthday. crypto
ADA
I never ever said that "it's all about the shitcoins now". Happy Birthday Raja and many happy returns of the day. I do apologise for mischaracterising your shitcoins wishes. In my defense, I nodded off fairly early on in your diatribe, sorry. I do hope you will visit Charles Hoskinson in his prison cell, as that would be most charitable. |
|
|
|
 bollocks
|
|
|
|
Parabolic down
Somebody doesn’t want us to hit $7500 Nah we've been chipping away at it. We'll get there soon this week. |
|
|
|
Gosh brave little ETH with the tiny growth spurt today. Maybe raja is right and it's all about the shitcoins now.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
