I'm watching threads on the lending section today and I saw a lot of people getting a red trust in their profile immediately just because they asked a loan with a collateral that doesn't match up the amount. I just think people in here can talk first and clarify why he can't get a loan rather than giving a negative trust immediately without any warning.
Newbies can get the red tag, they deserve it specially when they can't provide any good reasons but members and up maybe they do deserve some warning first before jumping to the feedback button. If they didn't fix they wrongs then go ahead and give them what they deserve.
This is just my opinion. Does any one in here also about this?
Trust system isn't moderated by the staff, so I don't think this is a real problem. I think only the 'potential scammers' will receive a negative trust, due some facts : - lack of activity here in the forum (participation), - funny/weird loan requests (with a non valid-collateral). PS: At the end it's only a red warning.
|
|
|
Loan Amount: 0.02 BTCAmount to be repaid: 0.025 BTCRepayment Date: September 3, 2015 Collateral: 10 LTC Reason: Want to take a loan from Redsn0w Bitcoin Address: 17mDV8SawaQ8iap7UWuzZG1ne6iHjVNhiJ I will have LTC at my address very soon. My LTC address is: LWne8d3uL3R2opENvvC9HYqKjih5Bpk519 Signed message: LWne8d3uL3R2opENvvC9HYqKjih5Bpk519 need a loan from Redsn0w (UID# 550933) needs a loan from Redsn0w 31 Aug 2015 HBIvRtCp6p8F8cfmmwjuSmomcfRkjwEY6Vo7NRWixrNOZTQ6s15qavJL8+nft+OOBJL33ZGA9v3eDkFjfIvBTLc= - You need to sign the address to repay to with PGP key 920D E630 024D B5EB 2C68 0616 31CA 2DE7 9E76 68D that you posted here. You need to give a address that is signed before I get the loan
- Escrow = Tomatocage or OgNasty
Do we have a deal? Yes, please contact one of the two escrow or send me directly the ltc here: LPqWoZhQ28JGwf1qP8RDVJiCixELLdvvhG
This is the signed message : -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
redsn0w here! This is the repayment address: 1GkGt3218AM8FU7ZGDCeZS4LWZR8xeZcjf -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Keybase OpenPGP v2.0.43 Comment: https://keybase.io/crypto
wsBcBAABCgAGBQJV5fY6AAoJECQNASzkL4DPAPUIAKBVFh7xyd0kgUhhiQWUQG8e jnQH5te0Xjnn5hHb3t5zySWBQwL9rq9GMveZX6tU7+kkKwDfT+OCTqy2ERpk+P4w ZopFei9TlvBnTgHe88kX6EztDAUMqR9B7/9zn5ELg0L3sAJqCr53hFIt7AhS88Se MN3ncmohUpPEkoDwtdDlaf0C3fBxe57PXsTmr78eN9Cr1GrkggKnD2ftvOW25u9u Lwkyet1UKAFapIrXWcd4IgVe4VewgFXKKH4x5wkE/AZ8OvOctbtLzvC2xBzLL8b7 s4YlNgH3Z3OLUvaSAEkxx9fUpOiHBxbNgrQEY4Khc3Jx3H6pmwT2ux/96Wn61vM= =SItB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
Yeah, most probable he will not repay the loan but fruito has already given the 0.025 btc to raysa (good luck ).
|
|
|
I can loan you but the interest is a bit too low. care to raise it to 0.005?
No sir i cannot, i just can with 10% interest oh well, that's alright. I'm sure someone will be nice enough to give you this loan. Thank you sir I will give you this loan.
Yes sir feel free to do it I sent you 0.03btc - https://blockchain.info/address/15B9e7LeCTdKhRdjtTroi12DmamYgYWinoPlease payback to this address - Bitcoin address: 3Kk2AGS7Dspjh1KPc4mNWzc9JdVsFarueA Quoted as reference.
|
|
|
Thanks.
#WorstSituation #AbuseOfPower
Congratulation for your promotion! That rhyme .
|
|
|
are they still paying? im afraid to play it after these cold storage moves
If you don't trust the site, simple... don't 'use' it .
|
|
|
@turtlehurricane , good luck my friend... and I only want to say :
WTF, another thread about 'Quickseller', really? It seems the defaultTrust is working 'very well'.
The number of threads created relates in no way to the trustworthiness of the user. If 50 threads appeared about YOU, it wouldn't make you a worse person, would it? I only wrote the trust sytem is working very well, the problem is not about Quickseller (what are you talking about?).
|
|
|
Where are you vit1988 ?
|
|
|
Primedice username: redsn0w Primedice join date: Nov 12th 2014 Price you are guessing: $ 215.56
|
|
|
I am looking for a 0.3 Bitcoin loan. I have Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Gold (worth in Ebay 400 $) for collateral. Payback 0.4 btc will be with in the next week. Maybe someone is interesting? 1C98nP4YbmgZorQoUqTQqJpxd6GoNWPbqB
Stop this comedy now , because no one will give you this loan. You are registered only from 1/2 days and you asked a loan very 'quickly'.
|
|
|
Under local: why is there no UK or US?
I think because in the main forum the primary language used are english (UK and US) ... so it's not necessary a local board (I suppose).
|
|
|
@turtlehurricane , good luck my friend... and I only want to say :
WTF, another thread about 'Quickseller', really? It seems the defaultTrust is working 'very well'.
|
|
|
I can't tell if your trolling or not but I don't see any death threats there, and this definitely isn't something you should be crying wolf about nor should it be in meta if its a joke.
Exactly, this thread should be moved in the OT section.
|
|
|
Tsp asked me to rethink my opinion about the issue and I did.
My overall assessment of the situation is (boiled down): - the issue is from the ancient (in internet terms) past - there has been no other issue since - there is no concrete proof, just assumptions and interpretations - the circumstances under which QS dug up an old post as well as the behavior[2] after the rating was left, indirectly removed (BadBear removing QS from DT) and reinstated (TC adding QS) along the several[1] ratings make me question whether this is personal or not.
Yes, there are no rules regarding the DT List, but I would suggest to remove the rating or at the very least change it to neutral.
[1] @QS Im not sure whats wrong with that word, but you left 3 ratings, as QS, as ACCTSeller (now removed) and as FunFunnyFan. [2] Both sides seem to be locked in some sort of vendetta now. This is does effect other threads and posts.
Yes you are right, there is no solid proof and even if it is, as dooglus said, it΄s not really fraud? I mean after all quickseller was selling accounts with DT, which i would consider fraud. He should change it to neutral and leave it like that.But no one can really force him to change his negative feedback, maybe one day he will retract and change it to a neutral one or better delete it. No one remember this sentence : Trust system is not moderated.
However I don't think that tspacepilot is a 'bad' person and the -ve trust is not necessary in my opinion (Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer.) Maybe Quickseller thinks that tspacepilot IS a scammer, but I think he is wrong.
|
|
|
thank you Gavin for losing me money Why Gavin? Is he holding your private keys and selling your stash or what? If not you meann the people who are selling their coins. It's their decision to sell if they want. And it's also their decision if they choose to run another client. This is how open source and free market works. +1 , exactly... it is only a 'free market'.
|
|
|
Loan Amount: 0.02 Amount to be repaid: 0.03 Repayment Date: 2days from now Collateral: aws account with 100$ credit on it or runescape account that member Reason: buying an item off purse.io Bitcoin Address: 1BJECpBYUhcmGejRaiwHVgbUJDtDDcaPyD
Loan Amount: .1-1 Amount to be repaid: .15-1.5 Repayment Date: 2-5 Days Collateral: 120 GH/s cloud mining account Reason: Build trust and use in exchange Bitcoin Address: 13u5e9F7Azq2k3juxhtms67pUgn8gKAsR2
Denied, sorry.
|
|
|
Bitcoin or bitcoin 'futures'? Do you mean the coin or the technology?
The coin. If enough people get on board then Bitcoin will become XT even if that causes much strife. I dunno what the right course is but suppressing its discussion leaves a very odious taste. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effectBut (for first) you have said the blockchain and then changed to 'coin'. Damn I didn't quote the post...
|
|
|
... if you want a site with no editorial responsibility you will have to wait for some autonomous ethereum- or sidechain-driven site. There's a limit to how long a company can condone their business being the platform for pedos and racists to promote their activities.
Regardless of whether anyone likes it or not, XT is one of Bitcoin's potential futures. That's a much more important and valid thing to be discussing than the latest announcement about a vaping shop accepting BTC. Bitcoin or bitcoin 'futures'? Do you mean the coin or the technology?
|
|
|
|