I hope your new HW wallet is not Ledger again.


I'm not sure what exactly you mean here.
You need new addresses, from the new HW. After that, you definitely need to access your old Ledger wallet to send BTC to the new addresses. There is NO difference compared to sending anywhere else, here only you know that it is your new HW wallet.


It also depends on the quantity you have and your later needs, but I guess it's better to send everything to one address. He could use the transaction as a consolidation of funds if they were collected from several smaller transactions. It has nothing to do with safety if they are in the same wallet


If your coins are already "KYC" as you say, you've already lost your privacy there. If such a status suits you, then it is enough just to move the coins and there will be no significant changes in that matter. Anyone who knows that your address is A and all the funds on it is yours will certainly know that you sent them to address B and it will be easy to determine the connection of those addresses with your KYC information.
In case you want to increase the privacy of your BTC, then when moving from old to new HW, use one of the mixer & tumbler services.

Be sure to ask here before taking any more serious steps if you are not sure, it's better that way than to feel bad for you later.

Uh, first I would change the title of your book. When I first read "After Bitcoin" I thought it was some text predicting the crash of bitcoin. The next thing that goes in the title is some kind of exodus, so when I combine it with the first impression, I conclude that the book is about the mass abandonment of Bitcoin and the transition to virtual money. Pretty confusing isn't it?
According to the cover you posted, and without reading your further explanation, I would say that it is another book about conspiracy theories through Bitcoin.


I honestly wouldn't mix any church (religion) and Bitcoin much. Bitcoin is an open space and all similar markings are unnecessary.


I support this proposal. No matter whether the book is free to use, a blog or website is a much better solution. From both sides, both as a reader and as an editor.

OP, as a support to you, I offer you a domain and hosting as a donation for this idea, if you seriously want to commit to the whole thing.

He deleted one inappropriate negative feedback, only to leave another also inappropriate. 

Looking further accuracy of feedback, I would say that GazetaBitcoin also got the wrong label (even only neutral). Following the given reference, I'm not sure where there is a racial insult here.
btw. what race are baboons?

---

To be clear, I'm not condoning any kind of insult.

Not all pornography is exclusively perversion, people have different reasons for watching it.


I would like to see any segment of society where abusers are completely excluded.
The porn industry is one of the most powerful in the world, huge money is in circulation, that is a fact. It is probably a matter of time before the door to cryptocurrencies will be completely opened there, and considering the size of the porn market, it will be a significant step for everyone.

Maybe something similar exists, but I'm not in it enough to know. What I feared, for example, was that the porn industry would start spamming the Bitcoin blockchain with something like BRC20-Onlyfans NFT, it would indeed bring new troubles for Bitcoin enthusiasts.


I am not surprised that the highest percentage is from Germany, as far as I know, it is one of the most liberal countries when it comes to sexual freedom.
btw. Any chance to share more about the ongoing scandal which you mention?


Again, enjoying pornography does not automatically mean that someone is a pervert.

OP offers to send advertising messages that can be seen by a maximum of 12 million people. Most of them are people who can and are willing to pay something online. Isn't that a much better potential than what bounty campaigns offer, where Twitter accounts of users from "third" world countries are engaged, where, for example, the use of Paypal is not allowed?


I guess you don't expect the invasion of these perverts on the forum, where all of a sudden they will exclusively present some sick and perverted suggestions here?
How can we even be sure that some of them are already among us on this forum?


I can say with certainty that there have already been users on the forum who run that "perverse" business (I've worked with some of them).

As far as I have noticed, they have done much less damage to Bitcoin than various investment platforms, which put the shady "pyramid scheme" sticker on the crypto world.

---

In conclusion, we definitely cannot limit who will use Bitcoin, certainly not if we consider it the future global currency. Limiting Bitcoin only to "nice" people seems to me to be completely opposite to the story of financial freedom.

Also, the copper member membership is there for those who do not want to open new topics with "Newbie how to..." guides in order to earn some merit and upgrade their rank. 


In fact, the biggest problem here is that everything is quite transparent, so everyone can see how much someone earned this week in the signature campaign. Imagine in the offline world, a company that pays salaries in front of everyone (employees, associates, casual passers-by...) and clearly emphasizes how much someone earned. Crazy, right?

Final repayment of $41 (messed up with a $1 withdrawal fee in last payment) to TFDsiykiaAB8GeoZxVFz8MM2P4Ed9cYrfN
Once more internal transfer, note 138319135386

Thanks shasan for this deal.

Try to find something about Chipmixer and try to draw some conclusions. Was in a much stronger position than you expect it to be, and yet funds were frozen/seized, the domain and website seized as well as the TOR page.
You understand these things too easily for someone who pretends to gain trust for keeping other people's money.


If you re-read what I say, you will see that I am pointing out some of the illogicalities you present, and it is related to your years of operational work and experience. Through such little things, I can see that you are not honest and for me, it is a big red flag when it comes to your service.


Seriously?


But you have an incredible plan to avoid all that knocking on the door, something that no one has thought of yet? At least that's what you say in your reply FatFork.

I have a better question.
What kind of impact can a new, never used address (without balance) have on anonymity, mining or anything? Isn't the whole thing designed so that the mixer has more funds from different sources?

I probably didn't express myself in the best way.
I just wanted to point out the holes in the Timelord2067 research. How realistic is it that someone who is aware (judging by the quoted HedgeFx feedback, he certainly is) of the bad sides of the Ponzi business, at the same time takes a loan to invest in another Ponzi? If he had at least thought a little before he got involved in this whole circus...

An additional thing is that it is completely wrong to tag someone for the reason where he spent borrowed money, without even researching the accuracy of this insinuation.

Probably neither you nor any of us will get any answer here. The OP is present but seems to lack arguments for a concrete discussion.


We all know about Binance, but who is Imperiume, and see their first presentation here.
Also, imagine a potential scenario, in some ideal world they have a lot of users, and many people stake their coins with them. But then suddenly, the authorities decide to seize them for bitcoin mixing and money laundering (which is a very realistic scenario). All funds that are ordinary users' stake are confiscated.
Isn't this a very serious and thoughtless risk?

OP, _act_ if you follow this discussion that you started, you will see that almost everyone suggests that you move this topic from the reputation section to the service discussion. I'm not sure why you associate things like this with reputation, I guess because of signature campaigns. You should understand that any service does not exist to have its own signature campaign, but it is only part of its promotion.

I really don't know how many times we will return to the story about the responsibility of any mixer for the origin of the bitcoins that come to it.
Now I see the "confession" of a victim of the Atomic wallet hack, where he says that his wallet has been emptied, but the funds have not yet been transferred. Are they the same Lazarus Group hackers? What if those funds go through another mixer, how will we position ourselves in that case?
Will Cointelegraph and Elliptics make special analyses, or are such amounts of only 1BTC not interesting to them because they are not sensational enough?




source: https://twitter.com/Thomas_Hunter11/status/1666054742412345345?s=20

It looks like there are serious operational issues with [banned mixer]. OP, I saw that you were there, I assume that you are following the development of the situation.
Many complaints about long delays in the withdrawal of funds, and transactions stuck for days.


Okay, that can happen, but what catches my eye are a few newly created accounts, which confirm that the funds have arrived.



It is clear that it is a common phenomenon that people register on the forum only when they have a problem, so this may be the explanation for this occurrence. However, this raises a flag for me for now

Also, a Newbie who comes to "calm down" the matter with praise for [banned mixer] looks like an ordinary shill

Jel se samo meni cini da je SEC krenuo u agresivnu kampanju protiv kripto servisa? Ili mozda samo negativne stvari imaju jaci odjek pa se vise o tome prica. Vecina stvari koje sad pokusavaju da isteraju na cistac funkcionisu tako vec godinama, zato se ceka toliko za bilo kakvu reakciju? Ako nesto nije u skladu, valjda to seces u korenu, ne cekas da vidis kako ce se stvari odvijati.

I hope you have learned that there is no place for emotions when you are in a discussion with an unknown person on the Internet. Emotions most often influence the making of wrong decisions.


And this negative tag is in response to the negative feedback that ps34 left for you. It can also be interpreted as some kind of revenge, which is not a proper use of the trust system. Maybe you can say that it's not a big deal, we all know about ps34 and there are already several similar tags, but you don't need to react to every feedback like that.

---

Did you notice that HedgeFx left a negative tag to member @N30W_414 for promoting Ponzi, a month before the Timelord accused him of investing in a Ponzi scheme?  What kind of Pantomime of truth is involved in TL analysis?

I have seen some changes and it seems to me that he is trying to adapt the network exclusively to his ideas and needs. Twitter is definitely not the same place anymore.
I can't say I feel sorry for his losses if they are real. The whole thing seems to me like when a rich kid buys his favourite toy, and such ambitions are often not successful. Whatever, they'll post a few tweets about Doge or something and cover the loss.


He made a lot of money by manipulating the Dogecoin price through his influence on Twitter, he probably thought about what power he would have if he owned the entire network.


But it's a completely new type of income that they didn't have before. Quite a good solution to generate profit from ordinary users, not only from companies and marketing campaigns.

It would probably be good if you get a little more involved here and explained all the doubts about your service. Long breaks in absence here are not something that contributes to gaining trust in you, especially in the mixer industry where the competition is severe.
Everything I read here did not attract me to think of using your service.


Perhaps you should think about a review campaign, there is no better way than to stimulate users to test the platform and express their observations and remarks.

Quoting this from whirlwind.money ANN

Shilling about your service in other mixers' ANN threads is entirely wrong. Imagine that we are discussing the advantages of other mixers here, do you want something like that?

Bitcointalk username: examplens
Forum rank: Legendary
Earned merit: 66
bech32 address: bc1qkte05aepm8eey0uvcfpju5y7lmvmkh0hf5jvpj

---

Royse777 It would be good to emphasize if there are restrictions for certain regions and whether it is allowed to use a VPN in that case. Some game providers have such restrictions and this can affect the selection of participants.
Ignore it if there is no such prohibition.

Sharing a telegram username is not a big deal nor does it intrude that much on privacy. If you share here, it is much more likely that someone will be found who has contact with that person. Perhaps you can also set up an email with a partially *** hidden name, so that those who know can recognize it, and still not expose it to unnecessary spam.
This way you only have guesswork, no useful information that would help you.

I added him to my distrust list.
I really tried to give him space to think and still make a rational decision, but he decided on the strangest move, adding another neutral feedback, while leaving controversial negatives. Obviously not understanding the trust system, or knowingly violating it.
As such, he cannot be selected in DT.

It is also very important to present all the evidence in one topic, which would later become a reference for potential feedback. The flag he created leads to his lending topic, where the accused user can change his posts and complicate the recognition of real facts.

Also, @CYBER_COWBOY, when you leave feedback to someone, regardless of whether it is positive, neutral or negative, you must provide a reference to some proof. Otherwise, it's just your word, and that's not enough. We have seen abuses of the trust system many times.

For example, without proper references, it sounds like you're trying to falsely create positive trust: