Es wäre wirklich schade, wenn nach 4 Wochen Schluss wäre. Hab mich schon irgendwie auf 8 Wochen eingestellt. 

Dann muss ich mir wohl doch mal die Mühe machen und schonmal nach einer neuen Signature Campaign umschauen. 

Name on bitcointalk: CoinEraser
Telegram username: @CoinEraser
ETH wallet address: 0xdF18C632aCDfaf6889311f48A002B55aD0B89eFd

Round 2 - Week 3 Posts:
1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5141043.msg51012056#msg51012056
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5131910.msg51010872#msg51010872
3. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5131910.msg50995978#msg50995978
4. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5139635.msg50966850#msg50966850
5. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5140858.msg50966515#msg50966515
6. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5140952.msg50966368#msg50966368
7. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5140370.msg50952208#msg50952208
8. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5140477.msg50951795#msg50951795
9. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5082026.msg50951502#msg50951502
10. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5082026.msg50937919#msg50937919
11. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5140101.msg50937606#msg50937606
12. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5137618.msg50937328#msg50937328
13. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136944.msg50924101#msg50924101
14. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5137618.msg50923738#msg50923738
15. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5139366.msg50923548#msg50923548

Even though I will never use a Facebook token, it is certainly good for crypto if Facebook brings its token to the market. This will surely make many people use crypto for the first time and the degree of popularity of crypto will certainly increase. So I think it's good and I'm curious if a Facebook token will be released by the end of 2019. 

Yes, you guys are right. The bear market seems to be over and the bullish signals are strong to see. I don't know why I didn't want to see it yesterday. I guess it wasn't my day. So let's hope together that it will go on like this, even if there will be one or the other correction up to 10k+. 

I don't believe in a real bull run until we're over 10K. 

Anyway, prices are going up, and that's good. Nevertheless I am still sceptical about the current price increase and hope that the prices will keep the direction, but I will not rejoice too soon and continue to wait. 

It's kind of good that we don't know more about Satoshi. It is a mystery who or what Satoshi is and that makes Bitcoin somehow unique. So I don't really care who Satoshi is. Hopefully his true identity will never be found out. But even if we knew who he was, would it change anything about Bitcoin? I'd say no. 

The price of Bitcoin is rising again and that is good. It was clear that the price would go up again, but the time until then is always hard to bear. I am already very curious whether we will also see again a price over 10k bucks this year. I remain optimistic in any case and hope as always for the best. 

In my opinion, it makes no difference whether IEO or ICO. If the project does not pay the bounty participants, an IEO does not change anything about it. So I wouldn't rely on it. An IEO guarantees that the token will really be traded on an exchange afterwards, but if bounty participants weren't paid, it won't do them any good.  

---

___ANN Designed by DgCarlosLeon    |   BITCORE BTX - 2019   |   Original Post
___

I think the same thing. Altcoins are an integral part of Bitcoins eco-system and will remain so forever. Surely many shitcoins will die, but good and well known coins like Litecoin and others, will certainly not die because of a high Bitcoin price. Max Keiser has already met many statements that have not come true. Therefore I would not believe everything he claims. 

Unfortunately you can see again through this hack that no system is really safe and everything and everyone can be hacked. Although the hack is certainly a shock moment for Binance, but through SAFU fund will certainly make everything go well. I'm sure Binance will handle the hack well and it shows, that not every hack in the Bitcoin world will end in a disaster.  

Yes, I can understand that people want to protect their money and preferably through a bank, but what makes a bank safer than an exchange? A bank can also get hacked and lose the coins. The coins are then gone, whether from a bank, exchange or from an individual. That is certainly a disadvantage of a decentralized system, but if you want to take advantage of the benefits, you have to live with the risk at the moment. Otherwise you can continue to use fiat money with paypal or other service providers if you prefer a centralized system. That already exists. But anyway, crypto banks will come and we agree on that. 

---

___ANN Designed by DgCarlosLeon    |   BITCORE BTX - 2019   |   Original Post
___

Crypto's motto has long been: be your own bank. But most people seem to have forgotten them already. Through crypto we could do without banks, but apparently the people do not want that. Many people are already waiting for a bank to take care of their coins. Therefore I believe already that there will be sometime also crypto banks. I don't think that's good, but apparently people don't want change and prefer to use banks for their money and crypto. 

I don't think Max Keiser will be right about that. He's made a lot of statements that weren't right and that's how it's gonna be this time, I'm pretty sure. It has often been said that when Bitcoin breaks these or that price markets, altcoins die, but so far it has not happened. Altcoins are an important part of the Bitcoins ecosystem and therefore they will not simply die. This does not apply to all altcoins. The useless ones will die with time, no matter what price Bitcoin has at the time.
The last few years have simply shown that one should not believe everything that Max Keiser claims. 

Hmmm, ok, if he would really only develop Bitcoin further and not destroy his original creation, it would certainly be interesting. But if he started a completely new blockchain, the old Bitcoin blockchain would be dead and worthless overnight. Windows 95 has no value today either and is useless. With an operating system that's ok, but with a currency like Bitcoin it would be a disaster. Developing further or starting a new blockchain are two different things for me. I am for further development of the Bitcoin blockchain, but never for a start of a new blockchain, even if it would still be called Bitcoin. 

Through staking you also make the network stronger and better and that's why I stake some Coins. Yes, you don't really make a profit with it, because such coins usually have too high an inflation, but if you believe in a project, that shouldn't bother you. Token over a smartcontract I don't stake, because I don't give anything back to the network and only push the inflation. 

If Satoshi would do something like this, how could you trust his words in the future? He would destroy his own creation, Bitcoin. So a decentralized currency would be destroyed by only one person and Satoshis idea is that such a thing is not possible. And why should I use Bitcoin 2.0 if Bitcoin 3.0 maybe comes on the market at any time and Bitcoin and Bitcoin 2.0 become worthless? If Satoshi should come back (which will probably never happen), he should rather develop his creation further and not replace Bitcoin with a new coin. That would destroy the trust in crypto. 

Freut mich zu lesen, dass das Problem gelöst ist und nun wieder alles funktioniert. Werd versuchen mir zu merken, dass so ein Problem auch durch ein defekten Sektor auftreten kann. So habe ich dabei auch was gelernt.

---

___ANN Designed by DgCarlosLeon    |   BitSend BSD - 2019    |     Original Post
___