First is to mention its advantage or pros to get their interest. Then use of situations for them to comprehend it correctly; not all people would be able to understand, perhaps, volatility and supply-demand relationship. Then don't forget to mention about the disadvantages of this technology. When explaining something, one dhould avoid biases especially if you are just aiming to explain domething and not to persuade them. Usage of examples in line with what they are doing will simply make them understand things on an easier manner than to use technical terms.Indeed age should also be a factor because there is a difference with generations. Also literacy I guess. Not all people are in line with technology in particular with advancements.

As others have mentioned, if your intention is to encourage people to do so, it would be much better showing proofs or hints of the progress. Not to doubt but I really think it will be hard to sustain a business such as what you have said; you did not spend any amount, then how come you have sustained your hardware shop? How did you manage to buy stocks for your store? This would only be possible if your supllier also accept crypto as mode of payment but would still be in contrast of not spending any amount. You may enlighten people having the same question.

Accepting this technology as a mode of payment is just okay as long as you will be able to sudtain it such as with maintaining it in general. On my end, i view the possibility of doing so, thru service-baded business wherein dervice is being paid but I doubt if it would be on sales 'coz you'd be needing to refill what your customers have bought from your store. Keep in mind that converting your crypto is situational due to the market price volatility wherein there is always a better time to do so and times you'd hesitate.

Every coin has a tendency to recover from a downfall on their market value but only few coins has the assurance to do so. If you are into altcoins which are good for long term investment, then engage with the big names in this industry such as Ethereum, XRP, LTC and such because these coins are always able to follow uptrend during bullish run or even with sudden recovery in this market in general. But new projects are also an option IF you are really that willing to take the risk. There are times wherein a project is promising but is still ending up to fail on their token sale especially if they won't have that much of a hype from this industry. Popularity of a project I guess, is the best determinant of a successful project even at this point, given that demand controls almost everything in crypto industry.

You just have to invest more in order to make your capital, larger. But it won't be as easy as that. There'll be hesitation especially if you are well aware of the risk from engaging into a certain investment. Perhaps in this industry and you have already invested an amount to Bitcoin, as an example. The market price has a tendency to go up but what could make you hesitate is the amount of time you will have to hold and wait for an increase. Also, the idea of investing an amount you can afford losing. As also in line with hesitation, if you cannot afford bigger risk of losing an amount you have alloted for other thing, then that would give you second thought to enlarge your capital. Best way on such cases is to prioritize making your salary or the amount of money entering on your wallet, bigger which would also expand your capability to invest, eventually making your capital larger. You may find other ways to earn money than a job or seek for a higher paying company.

I was before having multiple wallets to segregate my funds from different investments but eventually, I only settled into one and is now just tracking transactions on a database. There is really nothing wrong with having multiple wallets, it will just be requiring bigger effort to execute transfering funds if you are needing to do so.
Whatever amount it is, worrying of your asset's storage should be normal. Not everyone has the capability to invest large amount of money in this industry. Whether it is dmall or big amount of investment, one should take good care of it and prioritize to to be negligent of their fund. When it comes on partition of funds, as I've mentioned, it will be depending on the individual's effort to do so but will never be a mandatory to do so.

I'd probably still won't. Not because you have the skills to create something, you would rush doing it already. It would be better to always manage the risk. I am aware that there are many gambling sites which are existing at this moment which means there is already a large competition serving as risk whether my new platform would stand out over existing ones or not. Also, capital; it will always be considered. Building your own casino won't be cheap especially if you are aiming for quality or if you have long term vision of it; team or management expenses, maintenance of the platform, monetary reserve and such.

To put it simply, not because you can do something, you'd do it already. Many people knows how to 'box' or fight, but it doesn't mean that they have to list themselves on pro-boxing. Considering the outcome of a decision would be always important than to be reckless.

I don't know one but it would be a good thing I guess if there is any, especially a groupchat wherein players from different gambling platforms and different gambling gamed could meet and talk about things or share things with one another. This forum for example, wherein investors and gamblers are interacting with one another. But for sure there will be people to be up against such concept throwing questions such as "why and what for". Advantages could be sharing of strategies or picks perhaps. But inspite of these advantages, groupchatd could also promote FUDs which would put the money of new ones at risk if they'd follow those informations. So I hope down ends are being limited if such groups do really exist.

To put it simply; anything could happen in a match. What OP is trying to emphasize is bias with one's team or single player. Ofcourse stats would be a betting factor but to be hundred percent sure and to bet all in one bucket will never be advisable. It is gambling we are talking about and risk will always be present. Therefore, playing it safely would be better than to pour that much and eventually losing all of your assets on a single bet. Ofcourse we all have our own biases perhaps in sportsbetting. But the best example I guess is that, no team who became champion ever made it to the top without losing. On boxing there's Mayweather without a loss, but would you limit yourself into it? such as betting only on his fights. Ofcourse it would be better to balance and manage the risk.

For sure maby players of the platform are aware of the 'glitch' in particular with UI lag. Unfortunately such thing won't be prevented in an instant given how many users are playing on the said platform. Enlargement of a network or platform server won't be done in a single snap and for sure management would be doing something from this problem, now that it is raised. Moving to another would be a good thing to do especially if you are no longer interested on a certain platform but for me it would be better to atleast wait for a little longer for team to be able to address this; OP's cooperation for sure would help.Others have also mentioned of such thing but they have managed to adapt with this downside. They also had a chance to engage with other platforms but chose to stay for a reason. I myself have also experience lags but I'd more prefer adjusting and waiting for things to be solved than to move and be problematic with risk of being scammed afterwards by fraudalent platforms.

Why would you be seeking for a clone if you can engage with the original one? It could because you are wanting more, in general, but you are also seeking for risk of losing money from doing so. Take note that clone gambling sites are simply not affiliated with the original and that is an enough reason to be cautious with engaging into such platforms. If you are really into such concept then stick with it than to find an alternative offering the same thing you have liked from the start. Most of the people here are not even familiar with the mentioned platform so what more of its clone.

There are many gambling platforms to choose from and for me, they are all offering the same set of games and almost the same promotions. The only thing wherein they differ is how the site itself is being managed as a whole. Keep in mind that it is money you are using to engage with such platforms so you better be careful; sometimes the urge to save will cost you more.

It simply opens up bigger opportunity; monetary and connections I guess. Monetary because entrepreneurship won't be something big if you won't have the capital so atleast if you would be able to have a degree it would be easier on your end to accumulate fund and to feed your market interest. Connections on the other hand speaks for professionals on the same field wherein you would be able to have contacts with them which could help establishing your idea.

There are indeed successful entrepreneurs who did not go to college but still managed to have a big name in the field of entrepreneurship but why would you be doing the same thing if you have the option to be even greater or atleast have a better way out of it? It would be a gamble just doing the same thing because opportunities won't be the same for everyone.

Would be hard to be honest especially if it is circumstances which is the main factor which prohibits you. If forcing through would consume that much of effort, then that would solely depend on you whether to continue or not. Also, investment is not limited in this industry; it is everywhere. You may choose to look around you and look for an alternative which would be more efficient on your end. This is somehow a misconception on investment field; many people would only look on a single perspective and not on the industry in general. Indeed this industry is profitable but if you'd be limited in some aspect, maybe pushing through won't be the better option.

Depends; if you are not new in this industry, you'd appreciate token rewards from bounties. Way back 2017 many people earned huge money from token rewards. But I won't say things would be the same as with the present. Most of the projects before are succeeding with their token sales which results to bigger profit for the investors. At this moment, most of the projects being promoted are failing on its start which somehow changed the market. So for now, I guess it is just a good thing to pay on other chain such as Bitcoin than to be patient of the rewards and eventually earning less than expected. Simply because it generates a more stable payout from projects.

Things happen breaking patterns. The market itself is too unpredictable; there'll be times for sudden increase and as well as crash. Trend is only determine whenever the hype is established or if there is a strong enough reason for an increase to be continuous. News for example could create a wave  with the demand and ofcourse with the price. Same thing goes with market price downfall. The month has just began and there are many things that could happen. Strategies won't work if there is no actual pattern for a market behavior. The only thing investors could do, as usual, is to just wait for the right time to enter a certain coin.

Whether it is cryptocurrency or fiat, such action is dangerous. It is like welcoming the bad guys or challenging them to charge at you. We will never know who has bad intentions until such thing happen. It is better be preventive and with wealth, being secretive would be a good thing to do. But most of the users are right; never blame the victim. If someone is bad, he will do things no matter how you try to hide something from them. Such thing for sure happens on a daily basis. In my country, there was a city wherein news related to this topic made noise last year but the offenders are people with authority. It was not officially broadcasted which somehow makes it sketchy but looking at possibility, such thing may really happen.

If it is from the majority, then it is worth giving a shot. Remember that the market price is determined by demand and demand on the other hand is determined by majority's engagement on that particular asset.

Also, BNB could be a bigger token in the future given that they are about to relase their next launchpad. It made a huge increase on its price due to its development on the recent years which makes it also a promising token. One of the launchpads are MATIC, ALPHA, LAZIO, PORTO and more (have read on an article). Also, it is an exchanger token which means that as long as the reputation of that exchanger would be remained good, then its downfall would be blurry.

Always the idea and that is enough. The only point is to adjust especially if the situation would push you to do so. We are going through different circumstances basically, and even if you are earning on above average lifestyle, once a problem affects the majority, you will need to somehow adapt with changes. On my end, I tend to make alternatives whenever I am saving up to something. Perhaps making my own food to be brought at the office for me to avoid eating on fast food chains which are basically more expensive. Also, walking if the distance isn't that far and lastly, not wasting any food. Sometimes it just depends on the individual.

Indeed it is tough to think "why should we adjust? governments should be doing these things for us". Waiting for governments to aid economic related problems would cost you forever. So better start it with yourself to save you time. Also it would be you, to benefit from it so I think it would be just fine.

Whether phising site, greed, or what, it is imprtant to be knowledgeable of what you are doing especially if it involves your money or an amount you just cannot let to slide in an instant. Greed? everyone wants to earn huge money like who does not want to? It is a normal response to a stimuli; better life. But problem arise due to negligence of one's action. There's no such thing as an easy way to earn profit, it should be embedded to us that in order to earn it, efforts should be exerted first and that does not include clicking suspiscous links. There are airdrops and faucets one could earn money from but not all are obviously paying so what more with money multipliers in general right?

Partial works well on me, I'd say better than bulk aside from the fact that i cannot afford buring that much on a single roll. Bulk bankroll indeed will generate bigger profit; higher risk means higher reward. But question is; how long would your capital last? On my case, partial bankrolls allow me to extend my capital to few more bets than it was supposed to. If you have a large capital, and if you are really down of embracing the risk, bulk could work on such instance. At the end of the day, it would be one's fate to determine the outcome. If you are really unlucky for that day, no matter what strategy you will use, you'd end up with loss; will only vary whether it would be big or tolerable.

Other than money and entertainment, are there any ither reason to do so? Well, players who are here for entertainment are few for sure. Most of the people here engaged to gambling simply because of the belief that this is a way to be rich. Well, indeed there are really people who made fortune out of gambling such as with lotteries but unfortunately, it is quite 1:1000000 probability for an individual to be in such situation. More players are losing; let us face the truth. But for players, the slightest chance is enough for them to believe that the one of a million individual could be them.

Money is that powerful but never the root of all evil; it is one's intention. Money could almost give you everything which makes it an enough reason to take risks or to simoly gamble their fate. Who doesn't want to be rich anyway? Also if there is an "easy" way to do so, why not? These ideas are simply pulling people towards this industry. And we just cannot stop it that simple. It takes one's initiative to do so whether to engage or not.