Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 10:32:44 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 [100] 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 ... 330 »
1981  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: Sportsbet.io's "Australian Open Prediction Contest" on: February 20, 2021, 01:45:54 AM
a) Djokovic, Brady
b)  15, 6
c)  2:49 , 1:30
1982  Economy / Gambling / Re: Stake.com - Casino & Sportsbook - Play Smarter 🚀 🎰 🏀 ⚾ 🏈 🎾 🥊 🎲 on: February 19, 2021, 09:54:37 PM
Quote

If you can provide evidence of this claim, you'd have a lot more support:

Quote
In the end, they confessed that they had stolen my money and posted some fake positive reviews here. Just a bunch of scammers.

Obviously you won't though, because it's a lie.

What exactly do u mean? That they stole my money and laugh at me...It's a lie? Or the fact that positive reviews on trustpilot are more like fake than real?

They didn't confess to stealing your money.  That's the lie.
1983  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Do you think COVID19 is a scam? on: February 19, 2021, 08:04:23 PM

just like cases dropped 70% in 6 weeks from april to may last year
it dropped again from january/february

the reason
soclal restrictions

yep its caused by the lockdown. not by immunity.

if you just look at the case numbers and calculate the under 1% spread per fortnight. then to get to 60% would be more then 60 fortnights(120 weeks(2.4 years))

the true test of vaccination effectiveness in the community is not case drops during lockdown. but lack of case increases when lockdowns relaxed.
but they cant just relax lockdown fully in one go and 'wait and see' they need to get the cases down to a safe level. and then slowly relax the lockdown and keep the hospitalisation R rate below 1



Also, Thanksgiving/Christmas bump.
1984  Economy / Gambling / Re: Stake.com - Casino & Sportsbook - Play Smarter 🚀 🎰 🏀 ⚾ 🏈 🎾 🥊 🎲 on: February 19, 2021, 07:42:43 PM
newbie account with 1 single post claiming that you have been compromised by stake? I believe other people will not believe this claims if you cannot show some good proofs about what you have said here and also if you think you encounter that issue and been compromised by them better go on scam accusation section and post a relevant thread about your issue about them.

If you cannot provide any of that we will think that you are just trolling here.
There has been a constant attack on stake lately, I guess it is a bit about how stake grew way too big very quickly for the recent year and considering people have been gambling more and more lately (combining a lot more people in crypto due to the increase in price and a lot of people bored right now at home because of covid) and that is why the opponents are probably sending people to spread hate towards stake in order to make people stop gambling here, with a mix of people who are newbies and idiots who do not know how casinos work come here and they make sure they say bad stuff about stake even if they just straight up lost money here.

At the end of the day stake was already big, and grew even bigger, which is why we knew that these kinds of things would happen, even the biggest companies in the world have haters (I hate apple for example) so it is not really that shocking.

There are 2 options, 1. you are one of them  2. you are mentally retarded
If you are one of them, I hope you will go to jail for a long time, if you are mentally retarded, my condolences, try all methods to get well and don't give up.

If you can provide evidence of this claim, you'd have a lot more support:

Quote
In the end, they confessed that they had stolen my money and posted some fake positive reviews here. Just a bunch of scammers.

Obviously you won't though, because it's a lie.
1985  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump for prison. on: February 19, 2021, 04:43:04 AM
Easy win for Trump in 2024.

I'll take that bet Grin

When people reference Marjorie Taylor Greene as a right wing nut job (which she totally is), I don't think they realize AOC is on the same level with the amount of dumb shit she says on a routine basis. And because the way the media works, I don't think I've ever seen anyone ask her any tough questions on her stupid proposals ever. So moral of the story, people on the left and right have lost their minds and it's the ordinary average Americans that suffer from the tribalism.

There is a big difference between being dumb and having opinions that you don't like. I don't like AOC, and I don't like McConnel (or rather their political positions; I don't really know them personally) but I think both are quite intelligent. I think MTG is genuinely crazy or acts crazy to pander to the base, same thing. I've noticed that AOC is a favorite villain for right wing media but when you dig into what she's actually saying - there is nothing on the level of Jews using space lasers to start wildfires. There are some fabricated quotes being attributed to her, maybe that's what's confusing you.

Exactly this.

Equating AOC to MTG is just as wrong as saying Biden and Trump are equally bad when it comes to sexual assault allegations. Whether you're rationalizing it that way to yourself or trying to convince others, it serves only to make make Democrats appear worse and Republicans less awful than reality.
1986  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump for prison. on: February 18, 2021, 08:52:37 PM
I figured when Trump "lost" the election that we would at least get a break from these public TDS attacks

I suppose it's possible that everyone from Mitch McConnel to AOC have lost their mind, but have you considered the possibility that the people who are still falling for Trumps lies are the ones deranged?

1987  Economy / Gambling / Re: Stake.com - Casino & Sportsbook - Play Smarter 🚀 🎰 🏀 ⚾ 🏈 🎾 🥊 🎲 on: February 18, 2021, 01:13:14 AM
Yesterday I made a mistake while depositing BTC in Stake.com. The amount involved was really large (equivalent to 4 months of salary). I was really worried, but the support team resolved the issue in less than two hours. All it took was a few emails back and forth. Many thanks for the support team for such a prompt response. In many of the other gambling sites, this would have gone unresolved for many weeks.
Being on the top of the available gambling platforms, it'll give the best to keep the reputation high. What you've encountered is one such example for the same. Mistakes are common, and when things get resolved in a short time period without much complications it'll add more value to the platform.

The support members who communicates through the chat option is much friendly and are ready to help anytime. If we've contacted a person and if he's away the next person available online picks our ticket and gives support. This is very rare to be seen on other gambling sites.

You make them look bad with these obv sig spam/shill/word salad posts.  
1988  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Coronavirus Outbreak on: February 17, 2021, 08:45:35 PM
...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/09/18/fact-check-staph-infections-common-not-caused-face-masks/5692064002/

That isn't true.

By the way, I don't think masks actually do too much to stop the spread of COVID because people don't wear them right or they'll use cheap masks that don't create a proper face seal, but you can get staph infections from anything.
Didn't do a ton off research, but seems like its the anti masker/covid hoaxers that are the source of the staph infection claim that doctors are refuting.

Who you choose to believe is up to you I guess.  Tash gonna tash.

Quote
As calls to wear masks to protect ourselves and others from COVID-19 grow, so do online conspiracy theories making false claims that masks cause other health risks. The latest conspiracy claims that face masks cause staph infections.

According to the Mayo Clinic, staph infections are caused by staphylococcus bacteria, types of germs commonly found on the skin or in the nose. Symptoms vary, but boils are the most common type of staph infection. Most staph infections are harmless but can become deadly if they go untreated.

Doctors interviewed by USA Today and Lead Stories agreed that masks cannot cause staph infections.

Dr. John Soderberg, a dermatologist with experience in medical, surgical, and cosmetic services, told Lead Stories that face masks do not cause staph infections. However, people who already carry the bacteria in their nose could potentially see it spread to their faces, particularly if they’re wearing a mask that’s already previously been used.

“No, masks don’t cause staph,” Soderberg said. “Now, some people are staph carriers in their nasal passages, so potentially those people could have more staph infections from wearing a mask—potentially—but not across the board.”
https://coronavirus.nautil.us/face-masks-cause-staph-infections/
1989  Economy / Gambling / Re: Stake.com - Casino & Sportsbook - Play Smarter 🚀 🎰 🏀 ⚾ 🏈 🎾 🥊 🎲 on: February 16, 2021, 03:37:34 AM
For the 3rd time now.

The discussion here is about multi accounting. According to a lot of members in stake chat and stake forum (even the mod says alt accounts are allowed) it is ok to have multiple accounts.

Explanation? Stake?

https://forum.stake.com/topic/34482-how-many-alt-account-do-you-have-in-stake-casino/page/2/
https://forum.stake.com/topic/30479-how-to-use-alt-account-without-get-ban/

If you use multi accounts to evade a ban, gain an edge (promo abuse, getting around bet limits, pretending to be 2 diff people in chat for tips/scams/rain) or do something they told you not to do, that's bad.

Otherwise, it's fine.

But thats not what they say. They say "we take multi accounting seriously" or something like that.
Also Dusan said something like " if you dont have multiple accounts there should be no problem" .

just read the links you posted dude

mods:

Quote
Mute evasion is a bannable offense.

Quote
Alt = alternative account. Means that you can create more than one account for use as a bank, for play or for what you want to do.

But you cannot use these accounts in the chat at the same time with the main account.

Using an alternative account during 'mute' and 'ban' is not allowed.

Quote
Using an alternate account is not allowed if you plan to use this account for chat ((simultaneously with the main account)) or similar things. You can have more than one account only for playing.
If you want to chat with your alt account, you need to log out of the main account and wait at least 30-40 minutes to chat with alt.
1990  Economy / Gambling / Re: Stake.com - Casino & Sportsbook - Play Smarter 🚀 🎰 🏀 ⚾ 🏈 🎾 🥊 🎲 on: February 15, 2021, 11:51:14 PM
For the 3rd time now.

The discussion here is about multi accounting. According to a lot of members in stake chat and stake forum (even the mod says alt accounts are allowed) it is ok to have multiple accounts.

Explanation? Stake?

https://forum.stake.com/topic/34482-how-many-alt-account-do-you-have-in-stake-casino/page/2/
https://forum.stake.com/topic/30479-how-to-use-alt-account-without-get-ban/

If you use multi accounts to evade a ban, gain an edge (promo abuse, getting around bet limits, pretending to be 2 diff people in chat for tips/scams/rain) or do something they told you not to do, that's bad.

Otherwise, it's fine.
1991  Economy / Gambling / Re: Stake.com - Casino & Sportsbook - Play Smarter 🚀 🎰 🏀 ⚾ 🏈 🎾 🥊 🎲 on: February 15, 2021, 05:02:34 PM
All recent reviews have been negative, and they were from real people, obviously. And then suddenly - 3 very weird positive reviews appeared ... well, you can see that they are fake.  

Why would you write this if it weren't true:
Quote
In the end, they confessed that they had stolen my money and posted some fake positive reviews here. Just a bunch of scammers.

When people make shit up online about casinos to pressure the casino to give them money (whether they're entitled to the money or not) all they're doing is helping the shady casinos and hurting themselves, other players, and honest casinos like stake.  There's a reason everyone is skeptical of you.  Just like there are shady casinos that rip off players, there are shady players that rip off casinos.  And the first stop for shady players is often this forum.



review from trustpilot

"Funds frozen for 5 days already, no response
Saturday the 2nd of January 2021 my funds (balance) got frozen meaning I can't withdraw my money. I e-mailed accounts@stake as I was advised to do. One day later they mailed me back stating I had to perform KYC and that I should do so within 24 hours. I did the KYC in an hour because I don't think doing that is a problem.

It's now Thursday and I haven't heard a thing. My money is still not withdrawable. I don't get any responses. If I e-mail support@stake I just get generic replies saying it's not their jurisdiction. I understand that. I just want someone to do something.

Please, can someone get back to me. I did what I was asked. I want to withdraw my money."


I believe that thousands of people have been scamed by these crooks. People give up and quietly leave. I will warn others what awaits them at this cheap casino. Imagine someone stole your money, all your attempts to establish contact are ignored and then they accuse you without evidence of multi-accounts and they (anonymous thieves) demand your personal data and just laugh at you. Dirty cheap casino!

Best way to warn people here is to create a scam accusation thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0

Then create a flag against them.

If your accusation is credible (I don't think it is),  people on the default trust list will leave neg rep for stake and support the flag.  The negative rep will appear under their name and the flag will be displayed above any thread they create, including this one.
1992  Economy / Gambling / Re: Stake.com - Casino & Sportsbook - Play Smarter 🚀 🎰 🏀 ⚾ 🏈 🎾 🥊 🎲 on: February 15, 2021, 01:54:27 PM
All recent reviews have been negative, and they were from real people, obviously. And then suddenly - 3 very weird positive reviews appeared ... well, you can see that they are fake.  

Why would you write this if it weren't true:
Quote
In the end, they confessed that they had stolen my money and posted some fake positive reviews here. Just a bunch of scammers.

When people make shit up online about casinos to pressure the casino to give them money (whether they're entitled to the money or not) all they're doing is helping the shady casinos and hurting themselves, other players, and honest casinos like stake.  There's a reason everyone is skeptical of you.  Just like there are shady casinos that rip off players, there are shady players that rip off casinos.  And the first stop for shady players is often this forum.

1993  Economy / Gambling / Re: Stake.com - Casino & Sportsbook - Play Smarter 🚀 🎰 🏀 ⚾ 🏈 🎾 🥊 🎲 on: February 15, 2021, 08:03:55 AM
They ignored me for 48 h. After my review on trustpilot (take a look) they contacted me and accused without any proofs. When I asked them to introduce themselves, they answered me - we are stake integrity team. This is not an answer. Anonymous people blocked my balance, ignored me, accused me without proof (one account, I logged in with one IP, and made all deposits from my personal binance wallet) and they will require my personal data?? Pure scam.

From your review:
What rules were you accused of breaking:
Quote
I waited 48 hours to be accused of breaking some rules and having multiple accounts?


You're clearly lying about this:
Quote
Typical scammers, that's who you are, who take money and do not allow them to be withdrawn and only pretend that want to help. In the end, they confessed that they had stolen my money and posted some fake positive reviews here. Just a bunch of scammers.

It's tough to take you seriously to be honest.  Stake does not have a history of freezing funds or abusing KYC requests and you've demonstrated you're willing to lie in order to make them look bad.  If you're innocent, share the whole story - including the parts that don't look good for you, like why they asked you for documents or why you think they asked you for documents.
1994  Economy / Gambling / Re: VerveCasino.com - Daily Rakeback, Weekly Lossback - New bitcoin/crypto casino on: February 15, 2021, 05:00:58 AM
@Verve, Not a good look the way you're handling most recent scam accusation.
1995  Economy / Gambling / Re: Stake.com - Casino & Sportsbook - Play Smarter 🚀 🎰 🏀 ⚾ 🏈 🎾 🥊 🎲 on: February 15, 2021, 04:58:21 AM

Also IF he has alt account, why is that a problem?
Doesnt seem to be for all those people and even the mod says its ok.
Explanation? Stake?

https://forum.stake.com/topic/34482-how-many-alt-account-do-you-have-in-stake-casino/page/2/
https://forum.stake.com/topic/30479-how-to-use-alt-account-without-get-ban/

Guessing it's not simply because multi accounts.  Probably evading a ban, or bet limits, or exploiting promos with multi accounts.
1996  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Joe Biden is President of the United States of America on: February 15, 2021, 04:31:04 AM

Pissident at the "new" White House
https://youtu.be/YL7iXkQLAdk

This is raw sewage.

Tash, how do you keep getting tricked into eating turds?

Somebody covers a turd with a few sprinkles of QAnon-inspired fear porn, and you wolf it down, at least twice a week for the last half year.

So what I wanna know is, what's wrong with you?

Have you ever heard of the "smell test"? You might want to learn what that is before accidentally ingesting any more fecal material.

I'd love to know what's really going on in their head. (tash/mindtrust/badecker/tzup)

I think it's most likely they realize they were duped and at some point over the past several weeks transitioned from making claims they believed were true to spite trolling.

Maybe badecker belongs in a separate category.
1997  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump Impeachment Public Hearings [serious discussion] on: February 15, 2021, 03:21:09 AM
Pretty bummed they ended up not calling any witnesses after getting my hopes up.  I doubt it would've persuaded 10+ Republicans to convict, but it would've been good to have McCarthy on the record regarding his phone call with Trump as the protestors were breaking into his office through the windows and being told by Trump they cared more about the election than he did.

Overall I think the house managers did a really great job (especially the guy from Colorado) at laying out the time line of events and sharing a bunch of information that would still be unknown otherwise.  Hopefully it will result in an independent council to take a much closer look at exactly what happened, who was involved, and what their intent was.

It is probably more accurate to say that Judges didn't want to get involved in the election dispute.
There's a reason that Trumps defense didn't bother re litigating the 'stolen election' argument.  It's a bullshit argument that's already been litigated.  Over and over.
You're conflating judges unwillingness to overturn an election based on nonsense arguments and judges not wanting to get involved with election disputes.  They listened to Trumps arguments and made a decision.  A few examples:
"This Court has allowed plaintiff the chance to make his case and he has lost on the merits."
"The plaintiff asked for the rule of law to be followed, It has been.”
“Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so.”
“Plaintiffs have not moved the needle for their fraud theory from conceivable to plausible, which they must do to state a claim under Federal pleading standards,”
“This Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence,”
“What we saw here were a bunch of overzealous lawyers trying to make the transition from the political realm, where facts and law have ceased to be very important, into the judicial realm, where the norms are still hard and fast,”

If you still think what Trump did was something worth defending, or that he is a victim somehow, or that because he said the word 'peaceful' once means he's innocent, there's obviously no way any argument by someone you've diagnosed with TDS could change your mind, hopefully Mitch McConnel can:

Quote
January 6th was a disgrace.
American citizens attacked their own government. They used terrorism to try to stop a specific piece of democratic business they did not like.
Fellow Americans beat and bloodied our own police. They stormed the Senate floor. They tried to hunt down the Speaker of the House. They built a gallows and chanted about murdering the Vice President.
They did this because they had been fed wild falsehoods by the most powerful man on Earth — because he was angry he'd lost an election.
Former President Trump's actions preceding the riot were a disgraceful dereliction of duty.
The House accused the former President of, quote, 'incitement.' That is a specific term from the criminal law.
Let me put that to the side for one moment and reiterate something I said weeks ago: There is no question that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of that day.
The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their President.
And their having that belief was a foreseeable consequence of the growing crescendo of false statements, conspiracy theories, and reckless hyperbole which the defeated President kept shouting into the largest megaphone on planet Earth.
The issue is not only the President's intemperate language on January 6th.
It is not just his endorsement of remarks in which an associate urged 'trial by combat.'
It was also the entire manufactured atmosphere of looming catastrophe; the increasingly wild myths about a reverse landslide election that was being stolen in some secret coup by our now-President.
I defended the President's right to bring any complaints to our legal system. The legal system spoke. The Electoral College spoke. As I stood up and said clearly at the time, the election was settled.
But that reality just opened a new chapter of even wilder and more unfounded claims.
The leader of the free world cannot spend weeks thundering that shadowy forces are stealing our country and then feign surprise when people believe him and do reckless things.
Sadly, many politicians sometimes make overheated comments or use metaphors that unhinged listeners might take literally.
This was different.
This was an intensifying crescendo of conspiracy theories, orchestrated by an outgoing president who seemed determined to either overturn the voters' decision or else torch our institutions on the way out.
The unconscionable behavior did not end when the violence began.
Whatever our ex-President claims he thought might happen that day... whatever reaction he says he meant to produce... by that afternoon, he was watching the same live television as the rest of the world.
A mob was assaulting the Capitol in his name. These criminals were carrying his banners, hanging his flags, and screaming their loyalty to him.
It was obvious that only President Trump could end this.
Former aides publicly begged him to do so. Loyal allies frantically called the Administration.
But the President did not act swiftly. He did not do his job. He didn't take steps so federal law could be faithfully executed, and order restored.
Instead, according to public reports, he watched television happily as the chaos unfolded. He kept pressing his scheme to overturn the election!
Even after it was clear to any reasonable observer that Vice President Pence was in danger... even as the mob carrying Trump banners was beating cops and breaching perimeters... the President sent a further tweet attacking his Vice President.
Predictably and foreseeably under the circumstances, members of the mob seemed to interpret this as further inspiration to lawlessness and violence.
Later, even when the President did halfheartedly begin calling for peace, he did not call right away for the riot to end. He did not tell the mob to depart until even later.
And even then, with police officers bleeding and broken glass covering Capitol floors, he kept repeating election lies and praising the criminals.
In recent weeks, our ex-President's associates have tried to use the 74 million Americans who voted to re-elect him as a kind of human shield against criticism.
Anyone who decries his awful behavior is accused of insulting millions of voters.
That is an absurd deflection.
74 million Americans did not invade the Capitol. Several hundred rioters did.
And 74 million Americans did not engineer the campaign of disinformation and rage that provoked it.
One person did.
1998  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Statement of President Joe Biden on Safely Reopening Schools on: February 14, 2021, 07:48:59 PM
So far, I think the one thing Biden deserves to be criticized the most for is claiming that 'A majority of schools would be open within his first 100 days' back in December and now back tracking to 50% of schools having 'some in person learning at least 1 day a week'.

That's a huge backtrack, there was obviously some miscalculation somewhere.
The miscalculation was the teachers' unions. They dont want their members having to actually work or be held accountable.

If you're implying teachers don't actually work when teaching remotely than you're flat out wrong.  The miscalculation was done by whoever told Biden in December that 100 days was a reasonable timeline to get a majority of schools open safely.
1999  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Pro-Trump rioters breach Capitol, forcing lockdown; one person shot... on: February 14, 2021, 01:34:38 AM
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DYlb92zMkj41/

I suggest you to watch this one.

Was the capitol riot an orchestrated fake event?

Please don't come and spew shit without watching the video.

Nope. Definitely not a fake event.
2000  Economy / Gambling / Re: Stake.com - Casino & Sportsbook - Play Smarter 🚀 🎰 🏀 ⚾ 🏈 🎾 🥊 🎲 on: February 13, 2021, 06:34:27 PM
Funny thing is, in stake chat long time players say multi accounts are allowed and they talk about it openly in the chat for everybody to see. Would love to see a statement of stake about this.

Here is a screen of the chat:

https://imgur.com/a/DWvgFbL
It's true though you can have another account and gamble without any problem. It only becomes an issue for stake when you use the accounts at the same time to participate promotions and other types of giveaways that always give you an advantage with two or more accounts.



So why do they freeze accounts then? I had the same thing with a friend. His account got frozen because I once sent him btc and he used those btc to deposit at stake.
They backtracked his deposit and saw my wallet address which I used to deposit as well.
He had to do kyc and even asked me if I can do it as well.

If multiple accounts are allowed why would they do that? We never bet on the same thing, never participated in races or any other promos. Only "promotional" stuff we ever got was boosts or reloads and new vip rank bonus and according to several sources thats not an issue.

Still they made it an issue.

Were you maxing out your limits on any bets?  My guess is it has something to do with getting around the limits with multiple accounts.
Pages: « 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 [100] 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 ... 330 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!