|
Most people try to play safe by investing in those DeFi projects that have been in the space for a long time, but do you know that they also started from somewhere. The same is what is happening to those that are new. Although, I would not advise investing without knowing well enough about the DeF project. Now that DeFi projects are succeeding and people expecting so much from them. Some even believed that Defi will aid the bull run. It might be surprising that cameras might adopt the strategy. They are always after new things and use that as baits for investors.
|
|
|
|
Bounty distribution which is done in stages in my opinion is good enough to keep the price of the Coin from going down drastically and will provide benefits or confidence for investors because there is no large-scale coin disposal.
It could work, but not in all cases. If a project is still the moral shot project that has nothing good to offer than to siphon funds from investors. Even if it succeeds in raising some fund, it will still dump after listing. Also, if all projects teams decide to adopt this method, their inexperience in other key areas will still make their tokens to dump, because scheduling bounty distribution in phases is not a guarantee that the token will not dump. |
|
|
|
|
These hackers have been targetting these big names for quite some time now. I believe that they already succeeded before it was made public or evident to all. They only just made those giveaway posts almost at the same time. Many would have fallen victim. I think twitter management should do something about it. At least, i believe that they also know the real owners of those accounts.
|
|
|
|
I would not be in a hurry to say that these two managers are part of the best managers so far.
We await whether their project is successful and the bounty hunter is worth it.
I think the OP has only accessed them based on the experiences he had with the projects they managed in the past and have ended and truly speaking, these two managers or managing teams have done well. Although, that does not mean others are not doing good and there are upcoming managers who have a good relationship with hunters and are ready to listen to their complaints. |
|
|
|
the project you promote 2years back can still come up and give you awesome reward, delays takes place sometimes that makes project team keep postponing listing on exchanges, imagine promoting a project in 2018 paid you big reward in 2020 after you've already zero your mind that it's over? I want bounty hunters in the house to verify this, true or false??
Anyways, do not underestimate projects you promote a year or two years ago, they can still pay up and secondly do not leave or exit their telegram channel no matter how many years it's been, if you do you might be denied of your rewards
I came to understand that good project which didn't meet up their goals when they drop off the market and later on pick again they come with full force. HODLING good project is a future rewarding sacrifice. You might later be happy that they came back, but the experience most times is not always good. Imagine if all projects should do that, it means that bounty hunters will get tired of promoting projects. In fact, those coming in newly will easily get discouraged. Also, not every one of them eventually come back. |
|
|
|
|
I will not be surprised if the project comes out with something better, in terms of price, after listing. However, that does not mean you should be hasty to invest in te second turbo sale. It is better to be late than being late with a lost fund.
I will still reiterate again that PayAccept has a unique idea, so i will not be surprised if those who wait for listing before investing, end up buying at a higher price than the turbo sale price or even the ICO price.
|
|
|
|
we will never know if they are really doing any research before advertising. we will understand this when one of the projects that they advertise turns out to be a scam
That is just it. No one can tell and CZ will not disclose if they do research or not. Even if he does that, that should not stop us from doing our own research too. Just like you should not just buy from a project because it is listed on Biannace launchpad, so also should you not just accept any ad hook line and sinker, just because CZ and his team now control coinmarketcap. |
|
|
|
As much as possible we have to do research so that it is not in vain in participating in the bounty and of course a manager will try as much as possible to choose the best project but if at the end it remains scam in not the wrong manager but the team's promise is not consistent to build the project.
The manager should share maximum information and feedback he gets from the project. I've experienced participating in bounty that last for 3 months and turned to be scam. When hunters started to blame bounty manager, he told that he had not received his payment for second and third month, so he also "suffers" from scam project. What makes me sad is that this manager did not tell the situation with his due date payment. If I knew that, I would not continue participating in this bounty. Because if they treat BM like that, they wont treat hunters well as well. I think the bounty manager was never experienced as at that time, else he would have backed out since he already saw the signs of what might happen at the end. If he had raised an alarm early enough, surely he would get people to join him in fighting such a scam project team, who are cameras themselves and that might make them change their mind. They won't want their project to fail because of such accusation. I just would have learnt his lessons. |
|
|
|
it is impossible to even imagine. It is possible that the launch of ETH 2.0 will not even affect the price, because the whales have already purchased a large amount of coins for staking and I will receive passive income.
You cannot be sure that they already bought what they needed to buy. In fact, that is not enough determinant, whether it will pump, or not. Even if it pumps, it will be of great advantage to the whales and others like. I am still optimistic about the launch and it is possible we see a remarkable difference. |
|
|
|
|
The ratings were done based on their own perception and do not mean it is the most correct. That is why there are no discrepancies between the. Had it been they are accurate, there would have been many similarities. So it is very obvious that they are only expressing their personal minds and not the correct general opinion.
|
|
|
|
Are you trying to make a pump and dump group? It doesn't make sense to make one and just rely on its movement alone.
And while relying on, you have to understand the market so you can create your analysis.
Those whales can't be dictated and they were playing in their own way. In fact that if those whales are always doing random pump for sure. he didn't know how the crypto market works but I hope what he was hoping will happen very soon Even though it does not happen soon, with time, those coins will pump. If he truly has those coins in his wallets, he will definitely get his desired pump with time. I have the feeling that even if those coins pump, no one will alert the OP, because this is not a pump and dump group or forum. It would be better he goes to check out things by himself and be very much sensitive to market movement. |
|
|
|
|
Two major factors or areas that astute traders look for when investing in crypto are, ability to make swift and big profit fro crypto, as well as the ability to hedge when thee crypto market seems unfavourable. Therefore, the volatile nature of cryptocurrency has its own merits and demerits and with the integration of less volatile assets, it means that hedging won't be a problem and one of the most interesting things when it comes to ventures like this is diversification.
|
|
|
|
|
It is what you are familiar with that you will support most. Most folks in the crypto space tend to be more familiar with Binance than any other exchnage. This is why more people would agree that Binance is the best. Sentiments aside, I also agree that Binance exchange has really been trying and they are doing everything in their capacity to be the best. many exchanges would have been able to compete favourably with Binance and maybe be better than Binance, bt they already missed it at one point or the other. So, I agree that Binance deserves to be at the top.
|
|
|
|
I hope Tron block chain is kept updating their community through the Justin sun twitter account, I see many potential coins are being launched under this block chain which seems to be very promising on, in future, we might see more active developments from this TRON company.
the TRON project is getting some bad news this year. not much improvement has happened in the market, I think TRX will also be difficult to develop in this year's market. looking at prices and Tron market movements, I wouldn't think the adoption would increase shortly. I have not found any bad news about Tron, except for how Justin has been bringing both ETH and TRX side by side. At a point, he was trying to involves Ethereum Vitalik Buterin. If Buterin comes out to support Tron, know that something good is about to happen and they are already preparing for that. |
|
|
|
if from my observation people only like ICO to the extent of 20%, 80% is to follow IEO in large exchanges,
because ICO has a bad history of investors will not take the same risk
that's quite interesting to see that and i guess if we can take a conclusion from there if OP needs IEO rather than ICO to give more guarantee for him to get a better profit. So many people have been migrating from ICO to the IEO and so far they have been getting a lot of profit too. The like for ICO has seriously diminished. Although, the name ICO is nothing bad. It is those who use it for their bad scheme that made of bad. Actually, it could have been the best, because when it first came in and then , when developers really meant business, everything was working fine. What happens to ICO is already happening to IEO, except for the intervention of some reputable exchanges |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
