Hi. I was wondering if anyone can help me out here??? I just generated a new coinomi wallet and it gave me two of the exact same words back to back in my 24 word recovery phrase. The penultimate two words before the last one in my phrase are the exact same. I thought that was weird as I was under the impression that they're meant to be randomly generated and the odds of that happening must be astronomical. Then when it asks me to confirm my seed on the next page I get all the way to the last three and when I click on the first same word both of them disappear when I click one of them but only one is logged which then leaves me with the last word, but when I click that it won't let me proceed, so I'm guessing this is an error. I can skip the step but if I've got a faulty seed then obviously that's very bad, so does anyone know whats gone wrong here??? Hope that makes sense. Thanks.

Reminds me of the Ross Ulbricht situation where he was a smart guy but got by one simple screw up that was tied to him personally.


I don't have any sympathy for them. They knew what they were doing and they were trying to scam innocent people (though you had to be pretty stupid to fall for their obvious doubler scam). They were apparently making a lot of money hacking into old and abandoned twitter accounts and selling them for big money. If you have a twitter with an in demand name or and 'OG' account you can sell them for quite a lot.


Why would he have to work for them? He'll get a prison term not a slavery deal.


Maybe he should have used his talents better in the first place and got a good paying job rather than becoming a cyber thief.

Wat??? I think you're either on the wrong forum or a bot. Are you a bot??? If you answer this we'll soon find out.

So who's going to go down in the Premier League??? SkySports have laid out the issues and hurdles each threatened team have to face:

https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11661/12027448/who-is-staying-up-in-the-premier-league-aston-villa-watford-or-bournemouth


Anything could happen, but I think it's going to be Watford and Bournemouth who goes down. Bournemouth absolutely need to win to have even a chance of staying up. Aston Villa should be able to get a point from West Ham which would save them if Watford lose which I think is likely unless they have that fighting for their life mentality but without a point from the Arsenal game Watford will likely go down.

I'm skeptical of the actual usefulness of facemasks too but we're being forced to wear them now where I live in most stores. I just bought a pack of 5 bandanas from ebay with elasticated bands for less than $10 so I just wear one round my neck and then pop it over my face if a shop requires me to do so. Much better and more stylish than wearing a mask and they can be washed as well.




It gives the illusion of safety to some. I've also seen people wearing them in a car when they're by their self. I've also noticed that people actually cross the street to avoid you or give you a four meter wide birth like you have the plague or something. It's crazy. I think I'd pretty much have to sneeze directly into your path or face for you to catch it outside.

I realize it, but people trickling away can grow into a ravenous ravine gushing users away eventually, especially when more and more users are being censored and even banned which forces them to go elsewhere. These big companies can lose their dominance also. Remember myspace??? If something better comes along then social media sites can go the way of the dodo or myspace. I don't think Facebook and Twitter are invincible, though if anything did threaten their dominance they'd probably just buy buy them out like Facebook bought Instagram and Whatsapp amongst other things.


I think this is more of an issue of how those companies advertising system works and they should be able to find a way not to show ads for Coca Cola and McDonalds on problematic users or pages. I remember the first youtube adpocalypse and they the just kind of did a blanket ban on anything that might barely cross the line, including using profanity and so on, but what they should have done it just let advertisers choose what sort of channels or content they want to be associated with. I get that Coca Cola and Disney don't want to be advertising on ISIS videos and people with edgy content, but there are also advertisers who do want to advertise with the edgier crowd and there is a huge market for that content.



Yup, this stuff is getting very pathetic. There should be some sort of statute of limitations on this sort of stuff. People shouldn't have to apologize for things they said ten years ago. I mean how far back do we go??? I used to piss the bed and suck on my mom's tits so should that be held against me at some point? Back in high school practically half the school used to use the word 'gay' to mean something shitty. If I'd have had twitter back then I'm sure I would have used it, but I wasn't homophobic then and I'm not now. People say stupid shit but it's their intent that should be looked at. The blackface controversy is another thing. There's a very big difference between actual blackface which is obviously meant to denigrate and mock an entire race based on gross stereotypes and then comedians doing an impression of a person who happens to be black. I mean, there are actual KKK members and people who would love to hurt you because of your skin color but I don't think Jimmy Kimmel and Jimmy Fallon are two of them. I actually think it would be more discriminatory if comedians actually did a blanket ban on making jokes that involve black people bbut libtards are gonna libtard.

But do you want them to get popular??? If they did then maybe the level of discussion would also drop so be careful what you wish for  . . As you said however, I think that because people can't monetize their posts in there that will be a big factor in why they're not as popular, but there are also a lot of people who post elsewhere that don't have a paid signature. I think the fact that they're out of the way down at the bottom of the 'other' section of the board also makes them harder to find and less likely to be posted in. All the sub boards in the 'other' section are probably the least popular and the further down you go they get even more so like Off Topic and then obviously below that is Serious Discussion and then Ivory Tower within that.

Not everyone is happy. Some people are happy when it falls because they buy the dips. Then you hold. Not much point buying in when its skyrocketing but crypto is all about timing. People tend to either go all in and hold their bags for fear of missing out, or then panic and FOMO when a coin starts to rise suddenly and madly pile in but lose all their gains when people start to dump it and then they're left with a bad they overpaid for. 

I have a small amount of Tron on Binance and want to move it into staking there. Does anyone know how I can do that as I don't see any option to do so.

This exchange is such a slow piece of shit. I'm trying to withdraw some coins to a new address but to do so I have to confirm it via my email. No problem, but it states I need to do this within the hour as it will expire, but the emails don't come for hours if at all so the links are expired by the time I get them. I tried to do this again this morning and the same thing happens only the email hasn't come through at all yet. So frustrating.

I think companies like Youtube and reddit and so on will just end up shooting themselves in the foot with these bannings as people will just flock to other competitor sites so all this is doing is bolstering them. It's futile anyway as you can't shut everyone up. Unless people are posting things that are illegal they should just let people be and encourage people to just block users on sites like YouTube and Twitter if they don't like what people are saying. Banning people just because they say something liberals don't like shouldn't be going on and I hope people do start using other sites where they allow free speech. Places like Twitter have just become like an echo chamber for idiots and people screaming into the void desperate to be heard. Half the time the only things that are trending negativity and trying to get people 'cancelled'.

I've been seeing this Elon Musk scam on youtube the past few days or so. They were using another celebrity as well but I can't recall who it was right now, but I was surprised youtube was pushing these ads. They weren't on the actual videos themselves but the image adverts to the right of the video. Don't they have people vetting these before they go up? They should be liable if people start to lose money on them as they're essentially promoting scams.

Well the technical definition of a pedophile is someone who has sex with a pre-pubescent child but people often use the term pedo or nonce colloquially for anyone who has sex with people younger than them. I do think doing it merely by age isn't always right. That makes it ok to have sex with someone on their 18th birthday but you do it a day before and you're a sex offender? Obviously that isn't right and there's lots of factors that should be considered. For instance, it probably isn't ok to sleep with an 18 year old who has some sort of mental deficiency or is very immature but if you go just by age then apparently there's nothing wrong with that.


The age of consent in the UK is 16 and I assume you're talking about Prince Andrew??? If so, I think the controversy was more around him being a married Prince and Epstein possibly having groomed/trafficked these girls than having sex with a 17 year old which wouldn't have been a crime, but might have been if it happened in the States. Either way it doesn't look good for the Royals.


"Cousin". I'm not sure if this will stand up in court  .


Speak for yourself. I'm a very long way off 50 but I doubt I'd be turning many 30 year old's away if they were interested.

I doubt it. Under what grounds??? But I guess you can say they've already made the first move now with this attack but they'll just wait for a retaliation rather than a direct invasion. A lot of buzz about Iran retaliation with 'asymmetrical warfare' rather than with direct military response:

https://twitter.com/ColinPClarke/status/1213071969719115777
https://twitter.com/lindseyhilsum/status/1213101525893074949

Either way I think this is just going to escalate things across the middle east which isn't good. I don't think it's any secret that the US has wanted to invade Iran for a while and I'm surprised they haven't already. Trump previously seemed like he was against needless wars but he's got an ego so big that I think that would soon change if there was retaliation. I'm sure he'll have war hawks whispering in his ear as well. I don't think going to war would be good for his reelection campaign either assuming he isn't impeached before then.

What records have they broken??? All I can see is a passing one: https://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/liverpool-break-record-for-most-premier-league-passes-in/rkktr4oxe8i61bsh1pw2uvuj6 lol


I wouldn't count them as a sure bet for every match, especially not against troublesome teams. Liverpool can afford to take their foot off the gass especially with such a strong lead and a game in hand and they might do when they've got champions league games. They certainly fieielded a

I agree. The season Leicester won it it was probably the most exciting league in years. I was actually watching as many games as I could and I was cheering them on like they was my own team.I even remember being quite deflated and depressed when they lost to Arsenal quire late in the season and it looked like they might have given the title to them.


I don't see Spurs getting a top 5 spot this season. I don't think Manchester United will either unless they can turn their forum around. Beating Norwich isn't a surprise though. Looks like they've got a run of easy games coming up now, or not necessarily easy but lower-table teams like Bournemouth, Brighton, Sheff United & Villa.


What if the game gets called off?  If Manchester City win both their fixtures against Liverpool then I think they will be equal on points. BOth games will likely be close and I would go for maybe both home wins or draws on either leg. Maybe a draw at Anfield and a win  for City at the Etihad.

I don't think it proves he's a better manager as there's lots of factors involved. I don't think Man United's bad form is just down to Ollie. They're just not playing well as a team and its been the same for all their managers since Fergie left really. I don't think sacking him will do much good and I'm sure whoever they get would just go on to have the same run of form more or less. The game against Liverpool will be crucial for him. I don't think anyone expects United to win, but if they can or at the very least scrape a point from the match then maybe that will give Ollie a lifeline. Who would even want to manage United at this point??? Seems like career suicide at this point.



Well I wasn't sure whether it was some sort of fantasy thing where you have to pick the best player. It doesn't seem to say anywhere that it's the goalscorer and they include the keeper so that's what had me questioning. Is it to score anytime or be the first scorer?

Instead of Zucerkberg billing this as a new crypto he should have just announced some sort of blockchain-backed payment processor instead. Basically like a blockchain Paypal and make money like they do with fees. Trying to create your own currency is just asking for heat from the fed and the powers that be. They're going to come down on him hard because basically anyone creating their own currency is a huge threat to them, but the great thing about bitcoin is that there's no point of attack because there's no figurehead or central authority to go after. When something goes wrong or people start using the currency in a way the authorities don't like there's someone they can go after and fine or imprison or lean on to try shut it down since there is a company/person behind it. Good luck with that, Mark. Long live Bitcoin and true crypto.

I'm not betting on it but I can see it being low scoring. 1-1 or maybe even goalless. On the other hand though I wouldn't be surprised if it's a goalfest as both teams are unpredictable right now. I think if United lose though Solksjar will be in big trouble. How long can he go on losing, especially at home???


Lol. Absolutely comical. Almost looks like a comedy sketch or something. Is that on youtube?


They lost to both Crystal Palace and Cardiff City at Old Trafford this season. I don't see Arsenal winning but it could be close and I'd go for a draw if I was betting as Arsenal are playing better than United right now.


How do you win? Doesn't seem to say how its scored.


Just use a proxy. Tor is far too slow for things like using gambling sites. Gambling sites will probably think you're up to no good using tor. Just get a proxy and log in from the same one each time so you don't get locked out.


I wouldn't bet on it but I don't think that game will be easy for them. Same with the Sheffield/Liverpool game. I wouldn't be surprised if one of them drops a point or even 3.

What does anyone expect from a guy who forgets that he wrote the whitepaper??? 


I think he's a very special person with a unique set of balls. You'd have to have a huge pair to be so confident in pulling off such a fraud.I get the feeling that this guy will go unpunished and will probably just slowly sulk off into obscurity. If he's found guilty and has to pay huge sums of money he'll probably just go on the run as opposed to facing justice.