Oh no, you've done it now. Black helicopters incoming. It was nice knowing you. I have no idea who this person or anyone in this thread is.

Oh shit, if only we had something to compare against, like perhaps if the other half of Europe or even part of Germany itself was also liberated but not fucked. Unfortunately in your fantasy land everything west of Elbe is still ruled by Hitler apparently.


Right, so in said fantasy land we have Ukraine attacking Russia and "reclaiming" territories since 2014 or even earlier, is that what you're trying to say here in these absurd contortions of whataboutism?

What difference does that make? There is nothing in the contents of that PM that can help you.

This whole thread seems pointless. Are you trying to convince the admins that the account you had abandoned is suddenly so important to you and it's totally not your fault that it was banned? You're doing a shit job at that. Even if we believe your story, it looks like you knew the account was compromised and did nothing to secure it. But weirder things have happened, like serial plagiarisers getting their bans lifted so what do I know.

Sure you can ask. It's just that as with all your "questions" the only reason you're doing this is so that you could bury it in a pile of fallacies... "these weren't really countries"... "you've only been to 2 countries so the other 198 haven't been devastated"... "it was USSR not Russia"... "they would have been worse off if US did it"... am I right?

Despite the obvious facts of how e.g. half of Europe was fucked by Russia for 45 years after WWII, you will continue to deny everything.

Of course it's AI... the prompt was probably something like "write the most useless generic text about 49ers vs Lions without knowing anything about either team except that 49ers have someone named Deebo".


No one accused you of being one, try more reading and less bullshit next time. Or don't, DW will delete it anyway.

Fallacies is all you got, isn't it?

You must be fun at funerals. Or weddings probably too.

Priest: "Speak now or forever hold your peace".
Kruw: "The bride criticized the wallet I'm shilling. And other people have weddings".

Someone dying seems like a good time to let go of your grudges against that person. Try that.


Except you didn't provide proof, merely a collection of cherrypicked BS, fallacies, and offended fee-fees. It's a waste of time to argue with people who are as detached from reality as you are, particularly when you're doing that just to stir up more shit against a person who you know can't speak for themselves anymore. Way to win an argument, tough internet guy.


There is a difference between lack of mourning (no one forced Kruw or Timelord or any of the other shitheads to mourn) and actively attacking a dying person. I wish that neither yourself nor your loved ones get to experience the latter.

Does he though... wouldn't be a big surprise to find out that all he has to his name is a couple of NFTs and a MAGA hat. All the other stuff is probably shielded by impenetrable layers of LLCs.

Brilliant move, comrade. So paid2 can speak of devastation only if visiting the places in person?

Time to pack your bags and visit Ukraine before you start spouting next round of bullshit about it. Procure a time machine while you're at it, because if you didn't get the 2014 freedom cookies in person - it never happened.

Edit: wrong name.

I blame my parents, the society, this forum and Satoshi in particular, because it's obviously everyone else's fault that I turned out this way.

You post something that another member thinks is bullshit, so they say that. You both expressed your opinions. However you feel the other member is insulting and bullying you, even though they never said anything against your person, just disagreed with your opinion. You have an option to respond to their opinion but you choose to resort to fallacies (tone complaint etc) in a chickenshit roundabout way by creating a thread about non-existent bullying.

You can oppose flags. No such option for trust feedback. It's almost as if you have no idea what you're talking about but feel the need to rage against something.


I take it there also no one more modest than you. Or more capable of punching someone's teeth out.

This has very little to do with laws. As defined in the constitution (i.e. 1st amendment), one is allowed to speak, have religious beliefs, criticize the government, etc without being prosecuted by said government. Being banned from a website does not really impede freedom of speech. Surely Google would remove content and/or ban creators if they did break laws but platforms like youtube also have their own rules, which may be (and usually are, even in this forum) stricter than the laws theoretically allow.


Are you serious? Blocked in what media? There are entire TV channels broadcasting trumpism 24/7. Freedom of speech doesn't mean they must be allowed on EVERY channel/website/etc, just as it doesn't mean that Biden must be allowed on Newsmax etc.

Even if that was true, which it doesn't sound like it is, you might be confusing being "civil" with being a vapid spammer who posts generic garbage with no personal insight, opinion, or anything of value at all. Then if someone posts something like a real person would do, e.g. calling said spammers out for what they are, it "sounds like bullying". I'd say various fake newbies tend to be unreasonably abusive far more often than more senior members.

It would be quite difficult to implement for a third party (like TryNinja). There is no place to pull recent feedback, like there is for posts or merits. And I doubt it's a priority for theymos to implement as a built-in forum feature since we don't have even the basic "@" notifications. So please for the sake of your health don't hold your breath.

I have no words, at least not ones that would matter here.

I can go on about how much you contributed to this forum, and how much it's appreciated... but I hope you already know that because otherwise we failed miserably if we didn't make it clear before this thread.

Farewell my friend. It's a sad goodbye but I can't stop smiling thinking of our interactions on this forum. Thank you for the great memories.

This makes no sense. Can tell by the percentage of loaded and otherwise idiotic questions with relation to the total content of your post, in this case 100%.

You can stop pretending, I doubt anyone here believes that you just found the article browsing Guardian's website and thought "hm, this sounds credible". You lifted this from whatever sewage you lift all your Kremlin talking points and thought that those western idiots in this thread would surely believe anything coming from their western media because obviously all western media works the same and does only what Biden tells it to do.

Hate to disappoint you, but this is so ludicrous outside of Putinstan that you're really wasting your time trying this cherry-picking shit over and over again. Just post links to Medvedev's drunk telegram posts and we'll at least know that you're being honest.

Where did I say that I categorize media as "totally credible" etc? Rhetorical question of course, because I didn't, you're just making this up as you always do.

Media can be biased. You are cherrypicking. Incredibly difficult concept to grasp but give it a shot: more than one of those statements can be true.

Be careful with this shit, don't end up like this guy:

What does this have to do with your neo-nazi fetish?

The point is that you choosing which of e.g. Guardian's or any other "western" media articles are credible or not is pretty much a textbook definition of cherry picking. Regardless of any convoluted rationalizations you're making up.