|
well i'll gladly make the pool if we're making onecoin merged mined. (add it onto MyriadCoin's PolyMYR pool)
@Barwizi i heard you were doing the revival
|
|
|
|
mining away gracefully on the current FNU only pool  |
|
|
|
|
myriadcoin. first coin with 5 independent algorithms. currently implementing SMS wallet's. PolyMYR pool. 3 Click Mining Wallet. Prypto Partnership and various others
|
|
|
|
so who's reviving it? who's putting the pool up? and who's makin the dough?  |
|
|
|
|
have you tried not putting quotation marks around the hex string?
|
|
|
|
|
good ideas but it doesnt check out. (i explained it to foodies)
|
|
|
|
|
not checked if im honest.
|
|
|
|
|
fusioncoin/60E's fork of stratum mining can supposedly merge mine 1 chain. however i personally prefer eloipool (and thats what im adding to my pool (which will also have HUC when its finished syncing))
|
|
|
|
|
and you debunked it how? yeaaaa
|
|
|
|
NOTE: For now can everyone keep off the poolerino mining pool. they are at > 1000% round shares and they dont have a stuck cron. which for MYR looks like something fishy is going on at their hashrate.
I don't understand why anyone would continue mining on a pool where someone is leeching from their block rewards?! Why isn't this pool simply DOWN? Could it be the pool op stealing with plausible deniability? What worries me is that ahmed, the noob behind mamamp project, is trying to cover for the pool op with block witholding fairytale... Goold luck mining at his pool when mamamp is up, if ever..... ha troll. if you checked 3~ posts behind i told everyone to stay away from poolerino just incase |
|
|
|
there is nothing us devs can do. if this is a fake share attack then that needs to be handled by poolerino. they seem to be the only pool with the issues on sha256 and by default they shouldnt have that issue anyway. stratum uses the diff1 recommended by luke-jr (one of the bitcoin devs) and afaik so does NOMP
Ahmed
Thats the problem, there are if's... The very least you can do is verify exactly what type of problem it is. Not what its likely to be, but what it is. And if its confirmed to be a fake share, and if thats resolved by the pool operators, then the next least thing you can do is make sure that the pool operator addresses it in a timely manor. If they are not able to do this, then you advise your mining community to stay off that pool and you remove them as an official mining pool for MYR until they have sufficiently addressed the issue on their end. no pool operator is going to give us access to their pool database to take a look. that is the issue. Infact to put your mind and everyone elses at rest. im going to speak to poolerino myself and then have them move to either another mining software or help to fix it. that way us devs cant be accused of not helping to solve the situation. NOTE: For now can everyone keep off the poolerino mining pool. they are at > 1000% round shares and they dont have a stuck cron. which for MYR looks like something fishy is going on at their hashrate. |
|
|
|
there is nothing us devs can do. if this is a fake share attack then that needs to be handled by poolerino. they seem to be the only pool with the issues on sha256 and by default they shouldnt have that issue anyway. stratum uses the diff1 recommended by luke-jr (one of the bitcoin devs) and afaik so does NOMP
Ahmed
Why can not Srypt algorithms and sha-256 to replace such as x11 and x13 as Asicstable?
This would could solve a lot of problems with the same price.
Who support such a move?x11 and x13 are not good algo's. They dont solve anything regarding this "issue" (Which realistically isnt our issue its poolerino's issue which they need to solve) |
|
|
|
|
there is nothing us devs can do. if this is a fake share attack then that needs to be handled by poolerino. they seem to be the only pool with the issues on sha256 and by default they shouldnt have that issue anyway. stratum uses the diff1 recommended by luke-jr (one of the bitcoin devs) and afaik so does NOMP
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
I know multipools have been present on the scrypt algo, but there is another issue with the sha algo which I cant figure out.
For weeks now there is a 40TH/s miner on the poolerino pool, now thats way more speed than all the sha miners and all the pools as well.
What doesnt make sense is that this sucker never hits any blocks, I mean he should be hitting far more than anyone else but he never does, yet I can confirm he does get a piece of the pie when his pool hits a block.
Now I dont know if this is a multipool or an individual or some game played by the pool operators but none of this makes sense to me.
contact mike, it's most likely a fake share bug in the stratum implementation. Im guessing thats the dude behind the pool. Sent them an email. Hopefully its something innocent. naa its not possible. its been tested against that bug numerous times. that looks to me like a block witholding attack. (the same one that btcguild and eligius got hit by) So how do you stop something like that. Cant believe no one noticed it, especially the miners on that pool. fake share has been a big bug for a long time as we know and never resolved by dev and pool owners, miner could earn MYR coins always less than 75% value shown on the statistic data of pools, sometimes less than 50% of the statistic data. And now multipool problem raises, seems that Scryt and SHA algo had more blocks more than others, this is unfair to MYR miners who believe Myriad [1st Multi-PoW] with high innovations, but MYR becomes an unfair coin for losing balance to five alogs. Dev could you please face those problems and fix them? incorrect im the current dev of python stratum mining and zone117x is the dev of node stratum mining. neither stratum software is exploitable on sha256 or scrypt. theyre tried and tested algorithms. im 100% this is a block holding attack. (the litecoin network had a fake diff attack during mid 2013 where it was fixed by 1 of the ltc devs "pooler") I've seen the same phenomena on suchpool's sha-256 pool as well. They're running mpos like poolerino. Hopped on irc a few weeks ago and talked to the pool op. It turns out some dude was faking shares and not submitting blocks. He had over 60% rejected shares IIRC. The pool op said he was going to update their stratum and banned the user, but he got away with about 20k myr/day from the others that were mining there. Any pool ops reading this please take a look at your pools and see if there is anything fishy going on! Ahmed, I do understand that your stratums are quite well tested, I actually run zone117x's nomp myself for my soloing as well. But these attacks seem to be happening on MPOS pools. TBH I'd prefer is this just a recurring stratum attack rather than block withholding, which could have much farther reaching implications, especially with merged mining on the horizon. - Suchpool owners a good friend of mine. And I've been under the Impression he runs nomp behind mpos in mpos mode |
|
|
|
oh yeaaa faulty hardware. thats total bullshit. you really expect people to believe its possible for hardware to submit completely valid block solutions but absolutely no valid blocks dream on troll
Why would anyone withold myr blocks, to ruin the pool income for other miners ? You need a reality check - you're mad. yep and to make people leave pools |
|
|
|
|
oh yeaaa faulty hardware. thats total bullshit. you really expect people to believe its possible for hardware to submit completely valid block solutions but absolutely no valid blocks dream on troll
|
|
|
|
I know multipools have been present on the scrypt algo, but there is another issue with the sha algo which I cant figure out.
For weeks now there is a 40TH/s miner on the poolerino pool, now thats way more speed than all the sha miners and all the pools as well.
What doesnt make sense is that this sucker never hits any blocks, I mean he should be hitting far more than anyone else but he never does, yet I can confirm he does get a piece of the pie when his pool hits a block.
Now I dont know if this is a multipool or an individual or some game played by the pool operators but none of this makes sense to me.
contact mike, it's most likely a fake share bug in the stratum implementation. Im guessing thats the dude behind the pool. Sent them an email. Hopefully its something innocent. naa its not possible. its been tested against that bug numerous times. that looks to me like a block witholding attack. (the same one that btcguild and eligius got hit by) So how do you stop something like that. Cant believe no one noticed it, especially the miners on that pool. fake share has been a big bug for a long time as we know and never resolved by dev and pool owners, miner could earn MYR coins always less than 75% value shown on the statistic data of pools, sometimes less than 50% of the statistic data. And now multipool problem raises, seems that Scryt and SHA algo had more blocks more than others, this is unfair to MYR miners who believe Myriad [1st Multi-PoW] with high innovations, but MYR becomes an unfair coin for losing balance to five alogs. Dev could you please face those problems and fix them? incorrect im the current dev of python stratum mining and zone117x is the dev of node stratum mining. neither stratum software is exploitable on sha256 or scrypt. theyre tried and tested algorithms. im 100% this is a block holding attack. (the litecoin network had a fake diff attack during mid 2013 where it was fixed by 1 of the ltc devs "pooler") |
|
|
|
I know multipools have been present on the scrypt algo, but there is another issue with the sha algo which I cant figure out.
For weeks now there is a 40TH/s miner on the poolerino pool, now thats way more speed than all the sha miners and all the pools as well.
What doesnt make sense is that this sucker never hits any blocks, I mean he should be hitting far more than anyone else but he never does, yet I can confirm he does get a piece of the pie when his pool hits a block.
Now I dont know if this is a multipool or an individual or some game played by the pool operators but none of this makes sense to me.
contact mike, it's most likely a fake share bug in the stratum implementation. Im guessing thats the dude behind the pool. Sent them an email. Hopefully its something innocent. naa its not possible. its been tested against that bug numerous times. that looks to me like a block witholding attack. (the same one that btcguild and eligius got hit by) |
|
|
|
|
was asking more in the sense if its a known issue.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
