OG probably extracted some fat Bcash from the forum funds. I don't remember theymos making any comments about that.
Sorry Vod, This was your line. I stole it this time.
I think Theymos called him "tacky" but he continued to allow him to scam here. But you make a good point mindrust - there are still people out who believe coins are safe with Mr. OG. Mr. OG is guilty. There was 2,600 BTC he had taken in from investors that just disappeared. Mr. OG won't say where it went. That's why Mr. OG is going to prison.
|
|
|
You are really letting your imagination run wild with this. I have not paid any employment taxes for a driving school like you claim but I have paid employment taxes on behalf of my work for this forum...
Imagination? I'm looking at your report right now, and everyone will be looking at it soon. The only employment you have paid taxes on in the last seven years is a driving school. Your finance duties are limited to depositing checks in a bank. BTW - there is an important question outstanding for you. Please answer it. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5268418.0
|
|
|
Frankly, I think that he wrote this man a new mud, he is very lucky and the policeman was able to save him in the last moments. He is a very brave man and deserves all respect and appreciation.
It was actually a police woman.
|
|
|
ie. instead of the metric being "is a real person completing the task", you could sidestep the hassle of involving cameras and just change the metric to "is the task being completed to a satisfactory level" which is much easier to check and won't involve messy privacy stuff.
I like your continued interest; helping me flush out ideas. I need to verify that the user is unique - they cannot complete the task successfully if I don't know they are unique. When I get into mediation, for example - a person could paste an address that isn't correct. The system won't know, but a person can look at the evidence and say "yes, that is his address" or "no, that is not his address". If you get one person running dozens of tasks, he can easily skew the results in his favor. If I want to be able to pay per hour, I need to make sure the person is the same as they were before, and that they are in front of the computer.
|
|
|
Just yesterday a 24 year old was killed on the 401 highway (busiest in the world) when a tire flew off a truck and hit him. That's the way I want to go. Instantly.
|
|
|
Sorry, but if you don't know who you are, I'm not going to give you any more attention.
|
|
|
There is no credibility. There is no concrete evidence that OG stole anything.
So you know what he did with the 2,600 BTC? Tell us because he has forgotten. Right now he's guilty, and I doubt the law will care about your "opinion".
|
|
|
Vod now take it slow and provide the evidence I have asked for. Let's save time. You won't.
I'm sorry, who are you?
|
|
|
There is not incontrovertible proof of of stealing 2600btc accept this.
I appreciate your opinion, seeing as it boosts my credibility. It's not a question if he did it - only the exact amount he stole. I'm happy to discuss my stroke - this is not the thread for it.
|
|
|
It's difficult to see any success/failure rate in that thread. :/
|
|
|
Vod has suffered serious brain death by his own admission so that is something to consider.
You sound a lot like Mr. OG, making up things I say. My stroke happened in the balance center of my brain, and was a result of a birth defect and a surgery I had in 1983. Despite very very dizzy and foggy a year ago, there are no lingering effects. If you can't see this obvious crime, that's fine, but there is no need to make up lies.
|
|
|
I Get the people to own companies and open bank accounts and deposte boxes for you and Will Give full access to you
Take a look at this scammer's trust rating.
|
|
|
right now one of my skills are predictions of the correct btc prices with the right time
You'll do well on my Machine Learning Price Prediction project. (MLPP, not as easy to say as BPIP) If you guess well, you'll have a provable stat and you'll be more likely to get investors to trust you. Anyone can say they are good at price prediction, just like anyone can say they are in finance. Price prediction can be a profitable career for you - you don't need 100% success - just more than everyone else.
|
|
|
This member jollygood seems to have given me a red tag based on ideas he pulled out of his turd world asshole.
Actually, I find his feedback spot on. My ego is so fat that it can't be defeated with puny insults.
You are showing your age - phat.
|
|
|
as with modern silicone masks one can easily hide his/her true identity in front of Web camera.
While it is true that current AI algorithms are fooled by the mask, there is still enough bio metric information to 100% identify you - the AI just needs to be retrained. Edit: Found a link: https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/12/tech/face-recognition-masks/index.htmlThis service will be one of many in the club. No one will have to use their camera if they don't want to earn money this way.
|
|
|
Ok, so you've got task providers you're partnering though, and your business model is that the more tasks workers complete, the more you make. What would stop people from collecting the $1 per hour and deliberately not doing much/any work? Also what kinds of tasks are you expecting them to do? Captcha completions, link clicks etc?
No. I am creating my own tasks. With automation as one of my goals, I need to deal with situations that AI cannot handle yet. The club has many services. When a service needs verification, there would be a task created for an odd number of users. The task will have links, and the link that is clicked on the most is considered the solution. Re your last point, I work on my laptop 14 hours a day on average and even with a tab open on a different window and a noise, there's a good chance I would miss a lot of jobs because of the normal everyday things that people do - toilet, food, breaks, etc. you couldn't expect people to be proactively responsive all day, and when they miss opportunities they're being paid for nothing.
If you step away from the computer, or do not accept/reject a task, you will go unavailable. You are only paid when you are available to do tasks. I will prob need to adjust my numbers to pay a bit per task as well.
|
|
|
I just find it weird that nobody talks about OG's scam in the forum other than you. Maybe it is because people don't understand what happened well enough. I don't think I understood it well enough too.
That has been the biggest issue - presenting the crime in a way people will understand. Simply put: OG collected deposits separately from pirate, and when pirate collapsed, he used that opportunity to keep the deposits and pay out an "insurance' fund that no one had agreed to. "Mr. OG - I sent you 100 BTC" "Sorry, pirate's ponzi collapsed. ( I've taken your 100 BTC but) I saved 1 BTC for you!" "Well, I guess that's 1 more BTC than I would have received. You are a hero!" I should add that TwitchySeal did most of the research (see my sig). I'm just running with it.
|
|
|
Instead of paying someone a guaranteed $1 per hour irrespective of whether or not they complete any tasks though (but as long as they are "available" for the whole hour), why not pay a lesser amount as a basis (or even no base rate) and then pay per completion? There will still be a lot of people from 3WC that will complete the tasks, you'll still have a queue of people waiting to complete them, but you won't be having to pay out $1 per hour * the length of the queue in order to get the workload pushed through.
I appreciate these ideas, as I'm still working on the details. I don't expect people to be available for long periods of time. When you first become available, you will get some tasks, and it will slow down. The system will not pass a second task from the same person to you right away. Remember that I'm not going to have hundreds of people expecting to be paid hourly. The club is private and will grow as people start to use the services. When you signal availability, you could go into a queue waiting until someone else becomes unavailable. In other words, you people won't be available for hours a day at the start. whether or not they'll be able to respond in 15 seconds to a request I'm not sure
There will be two timers - the first one is to accept the task. Then, depending on the task, you have a second timer to complete the task. I don't see any reason why a person working on their computer could not click a link within seconds, if they were expecting one.
|
|
|
Is there any chance the BPIP.org pages time's can be manually set to either GMT, Local PC clock or even match BitCoinTalk.org 's default time?
BPIP should be on UTC, just like the forum. When I first programmed it, I did not take time zones into account. So any lingering issues are probably my initial fault. :/ BPIP Team - I'd love to make a suggestion for a feature that could help in the fight against spam. Maximum words per minute.When you parse a recent post, calculate the length of the post and the time from their last post, to produce their typing speed. Keep the highest value, and sort by that metric. You'll easily be able to see people who cut and paste, or just spew out words without context.
|
|
|
|