lol



Look up "Default Trust"

I know this thread is old, but just wanted to point out everything OG has said is a lie.


“If you tell the truth, then you don't have to have a good memory”

― Judge Judy Sheindlin

np.   You should move this to scam accusations since it's an active scam and the profile is likely a throw away one that does not care about their reputation.

tagged.

Sorry for your loss, OP, but think of this of a positive opportunity.

You get to go rescue an abandoned and possibly abused dog from a shelter!

Don't compare him/her to the old one - just love it and soon you'll be cuddling it and relieving stress again. 

I think this is too complicated to ever work - but ideas are always great!

Take your idea and wrap it in an easy to use GUI with clear instructions in each automatic email sent out.

Your technical solution is not unique or difficult, but you need to sell it.  

Bryan, I'm so sorry about your situation, but no one wants to buy your account for 0.015 btc.  :/

Done!   Og's trust went from (about) 80 originally, to a high of 86 today, and now down to 75.  I look forward to seeing what happens as more people understand how he's been padding his trust.  My 36 actual trust score could be 10x that if I cheated the way he did.

Excellent work by the OP to point out this obvious abuse, as well as flush out a few more rats.  Obviously, the scum is trying to deflect.   I guess he chooses you because BPIP makes it so easy to catch abusers.  

Why would anyone buy it?   You are selling because you can't afford to re-register, right?

OG also doxxed Vod many times, called him a pedophile and tried to get him beat up.  

But you can still trust him cause you traded with him?  

I guess that makes you a hypocrite to me - too bad since we never had any interaction.   Take care.

Edit:  I had you on my trust list for some reason.  You were probably a good guy.

Getting rid of signatures will stop most of the problems you describe, including the negative trust you left me.  

Problem is, I've never worn a paid sig, as I'm happy with my financial status.  

You'll have to think of a new excuse why I fight scammers like OG and don't get paid for it.  :/

Hey phillip, you've picked the wrong member to base your trust on.

I'm just refuting you calling me a liar.    You said you lost 6,500 btc, now you are saying you didn't?

Your story just changed from Theymos knowing the truth and trusting you in your ponzis to Theymos being immature and irresponsible.

I don't lie, Mr. Ogn, and things will only get worse for you if you continue to use me as your deflection.


Silly OG.  You've already posted you paid out the 65btc insurance fund.  I leave this here as proof you don't have a good memory.   Liars need a good memory.

See?  Anyone who remembers his scam is called a liar, even though he admitted he paid out a 1% insurance fund of 65 btc.  

Do the math if you are not mentally challenged.   OG has an agenda.  




People may have believed that if Theymos hadn't called you "tacky" for stealing. 

I will agree that is is Theymos's fault for trusting you, but how could he have known?




Loyce cannot doctor the evidence.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5298464.0

On two occasions, OG commented on things that had happened to RMC as if they happened to him.

Probably an alt.

Dozens are saying he can't be trusted.

7 years ago he proudly announced he paid back 1% of a total loss of 6,500 btc.   Now he's posting like it never happened, and even denying he ran that pirate passthrough ponzi. 

Now you may say ok he lost more than anyone ever has, but that was many years ago.

Then he held 500 btc of forum funds, got paid 6btc a year to safeguard them, instead he treated them as if they were his own and stole value from them.

Fast forward to last month - a users pulls out after he finds out OG is the escrow.  OG loses pennies (due to his own reputation) but still flags and leaves negative trust.

So NO - OgNasty cannot be trusted with large or small amounts.  Anyone who says otherwise, or says I lie about it, has a political agenda.

This is the accusation thread - did he mention your name here just to deflect?

What you did is not the same as OG.  I also am not aware of years of you lying/scamming like I am with OG.   

If you would like to compare your imagined persecution, can you start up another thread?

What you've done is fine, and does not compare to adding inactive and thieves to people you trust.   But back on topic...


OG does good:  OG / RCM flagged a user for scamming a couple pennies by pulling out of a deal.
OG does bad:  OG says he "lost" over 6,000 coins, but he probably stole them.

In his case the bad far outweighs the good.   His actions have been self-centered for three decades.

Community disagrees with you.  You trust people when you had nothing to risk, simply so they trust you back.  My trust is earned. 

Can you try to help peloso understand that adding TMAN to my trust list months before he left is not the same as you adding an account months after it left?

I received all my trust despite not having traded on this forum.  

Anyway can buy/sell/escrow and build up such a list.   It's much more difficult to have people trust you based on something other than $$.

On topic:   If this latest round of abuse doesn't help Og, he'll do it again to more inactive users that left him trust one time.

achtung082 hasn't been online in over three months.