Definitely. Many will just buy what is number one just because is number one. But that dont mean is most valuable. One Million Bitcoins that Satoshi mined, dont give any value nor to Bitcoin nor to any Bitcoin blockchain fork.  The same with millions of ETH that were sold in ICO cheap. Not to mention IOTA where they had to even change units since price is now so much higher as it was in ICO. Those bulks of coins dont move just inflate coins marketcap. If they would hit exchange price would deflate.

There is nothing to manage. You buy and spend, that is it.  How be able to full fill my thirst about cryptocurrenies technology is different and way more interesting subject to talk about.

You can always sell your AEON on https://aeon.to/   You of course cant buy them there. They are to afraid of tainted Bitcoins to selling AEON for them.

You can mine Monero with your CPU. You also can with GPU, but I am sure there are can be better options for your GPUs. If you have more questions you should ask guys here: https://old.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/

As economic value they took coinmarketcap. Comparing coins coimarketcap with revenue of a market is totally pointless. It dont give you any useful data.

On that list is everything. Coins/tokens/whatever whose marketcap is not comparable. Teteher, XRP, Ethereum, ....  It has nothing to do with how Bitcoin or Monero got its marketcap.  If you cut out ICOs and Bitcoin blockchain forks, there are only 3 left. Bitcoin, Litecoin and Monero. Three coins that was fairly launched and PoW mined. And after these big 3 is Dogecoin.

There will be more forks of Bitcoin blockchain and there will be more ICOs and more premined coins and tokens in future. Monero will on CMC ranking keep going down. Will be out of top100 sooner or latter. But that dont means it will not be in top3 of the normal coins.

Most did. Well unless were a scam and ICO organisers never planed to do anything.  But thing is that coins are not shares. Coins were just to get founding and that is it. When company have profit, owners of that company takes that profit, not that it get distributed to coin owners.

I think XAURUM was first. They launched around 2015. They should have gold but. Why trust third party with your gold?  What is the point? You just rick when you will want your gold they will say fuck you and not deliver. Why risk if you dont need? You just go to gold store and buy some gold and that is it. Or some gold website. Most take Bitcoin and give you even discount when use Bitcoin.  Buying any real world backed cryptocurrencies is super dumb. Blockchain is to secure digital asset and not real world.

Definitely a FER  Ferengicoin. Look how cute it is. Launched almost 5 years ago. It is perfect for you. Imagine that all Ferengi will use it.

We need someone to make statistic who have average closest price so far. In all games that he was part of. I see Globb0 close again.  I was only once close and played like 5 games so far.

Have you ever heard of RandomX? RandomX is not against anything. It just dont give advantage to anything. No one can build an ASIC that have double efficiency as top CPUs you can buy in computer stores all around the world.



Monero should not change mining algo anymore. If RandomX works as is intended to that is it.

I dont look at RandomX as fighting ASIC miners. I look at RandomX as giving chance to CPUs that are everywhere to be able to mine. If we can, why not. If we cant as we could not with CryptonightR or how was called old algo, then not. As long as RandomX will work I am super glad we have it.

It is to optimistic. Price of Bitcoin should start grow in Spring next year, but to reach $20-50 in only few short months is a bit to much. If price will be close to $15000 I will be more then happy. If it will be over $10000 will be totally fine.

2020 will be quite similar as 2019. A tiny bit better.  2019 was better then I expected it will be. It is not over yet so can still get worse to be closer to my expectations.  But I dont believe we will see much changes.

Bitcoin dominance over 65% is not unusual. It is total normal. I believe its place is between 55% and 75%.  Bitcoin dominance was for long time over 90%. Thinking that at 65% is unusual is a bit silly.

Someone said that testnet should start in December. So we will not need to wait much longer to get the first impressions. Or at least read about them.

Best is to have them on both or even more places. If one place gets taken off you still have others. Decentralization means to remove points of failures. Decentralization is never black and white, but of all shades of grey.

Tech.  Those ranklists are made to favourite the in the coins. Coins you mention are more like asset platforms that were developed way latter then Bitcoin. None of them is payment coin like is Bitcoin. And none of them compete with CNY.

By far biggest use case of blockchain is money. It enables trustless and permissionless digital money. They fail to understand this fact. It is totally fine. They still have plenty of time to realise.

0.21 BTC will be way more then you ever need. Only 100 million people can have that much.  Not to mention things like this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5206249.0  They hold a million by them self. Satoshi holds another million. Cheap old bastard!  Everyone that have more then 0.21 BTC should consider to donate them to those that have less or even none.

You need to understand that there are many companies with enormous budged, researching was to do block chain analysis. If there is a way they will find that out. In theory, no second layer solution could offer us sufficient unlinkability of transactions.