Your screenshot does not even have China on it...
|
|
|
Yes. Makes sense. I think the recent 136 is an important level. If it can top it then the bull-market is still very much on. Similarly, if the recent 88 is breached then a real bear-market is underway.
|
|
|
Everyone who holds anything else as investment except bitcoins has diversified to the detriment of their financial interest.
well done. Hope you have managed to keep hold of most of them. Yes, I haven given away about 2,000,000 and 1,000,000 has been stolen but I still have some. Sorry for usage of millibitcoin just fine. I remember your preference for that. Looks like next up-leg underway as $110 crumbles.
|
|
|
Everyone who holds anything else as investment except bitcoins has diversified to the detriment of their financial interest.
well done. Hope you have managed to keep hold of most of them.
|
|
|
Really great site, I use it all the time now. The 50c increments for the wall totals are excellent. Going to send a donation... Suggestions a price on the white horizontal crosshair would be nice also, the green/red pressure bands should be reversed as the red should really indicate sellers and green as buyers.
|
|
|
Someone mentioned it recently, that the 2013 "bubble" deflate is more like the August 2012 shock than the 2011 bubble. If so, then it could easily oscillate around $100-$120 for the rest of year, only to begin a further climb in 2014.
|
|
|
Yes LTC will solve much of the problems that BTC has. 0.9 LTC should be significantly different from BTC and should be able to deal with micro transactions much better than BTC.
0.9? Jesus, still waiting for 0.7! Watch it, or you'll be a marked man by the army-sized LTC dev team..."
|
|
|
What about the word "fiats"
collective noun for debt-based government-issued toilet paper.
example usage: "Where can I unload my fiats as quickly as possible?"
|
|
|
Cool. hm.. xe.com is using XBT to represent BTC, and not milliBTC / microBTC. yeas. but at least this gets the ball rolling. Other financial sites will take this lead...
|
|
|
Those virtex buy orders are hilarious. Like trying to hide some elephants in long grass!
|
|
|
Accepting bitcoin as payment should be able to stand on its own merits, not because of an obvious campaign ramp
Well, there's "should", and then there's the real world Campaigns, awareness, and promotions are all a necessary evil. I see you have your Bitcoin address in the sig. Shouldn't donating bitcoins to you be able to stand on its own merits? I agree. But the target is the dropbox team, not a general promotion for the public. It's just that they might continue to ignore something which is ramped, and they feel has not got grassroots support. I like the whole initiative, and hope it succeeds.
|
|
|
Most popular Dropbox requests:
#1: 176884 (watch any folder) #2: 154061 (sharing permissions) #3: 119225 (better prices) #4: 113258 (accept Bitcoin as payment)
This was a great initiative. We're now beyond the one-month mark, and initial voters haven't flocked back to re-vote. We're close. What if we renamed this thread title:
Voted this month? 5,967 Votes Remain until Bitcoin is #3 Dropbox Request Ever!
Update the count as appropriate, moving to #2, #1. The title at least implies that, with Dropbox, voting is not a one-time thing.
I've been a dropbox user for awhile, and was not aware of the renewed votes per month. I think it's significant enough to this effort, it may be worth being the very first thing stated in this thread. "We can vote again? Shoot, I better do that."
We've got the people to make this the #1 request. Hell, we could theoretically do it this month.
Accepting bitcoin as payment should be able to stand on its own merits, not because of an obvious campaign ramp
|
|
|
It doesn't. I am looking at the most recent formation at the end of the current down move which is consistent with how the previous two major down moves ended. There is no point identifying a turning point long after it has turned. I am saying that this is evidence that sentiment is changing.
|
|
|
Alright, bullish wedge. Clearest on the 12 hour chart.
We require more charts! Certainly (12 hour bars)
|
|
|
I'm talking about living with terrorism since man existed. There's no way to create objective and universal definition of "terrorism" that will include the people and groups commonly associated with the term without also snagging governments into the same category. Living with the threat of terrorism is a complete walk in the park compared to living with the threat of nuclear annihilation which was a major concern in the 1970s and 1980s, and has not completely gone away.
|
|
|
Anyone need 8k BTC ? because i must sell it urgently
What is it with you and these bullshit posts ? Edit : I'm beginning to think you're a 'bot' He has my record as the fastest ignore. Basically soon after his first posts. What is a "bullish" triangle? Triangles do not have bullish/bearish bias, IMO. I also see a bearish wedge that is itching to break downwards, not a triangle.
Alright, bullish wedge. Clearest on the 12 hour chart.
|
|
|
i'm not crazy i'm telling you 180$ in about 2 weeks time, deal with it The only way I can see that happening will be if it dips quite low and everyone buys back in starting a huge rally. I don't see it. On 1 to 12 hour charts you can see a massive bullish triangle forming. If the price reaches $110 and sits there it will be a launchpad to $180 Edit: Mainstream FX firms looking seriously at Bitcoin now: http://www.xe.com/currencyconverter/convert/?Amount=1&From=XBT&To=USD
|
|
|
First step on the road to victory!
|
|
|
No bet means no gamble.
When mining bitcoins there is no bet or stake. Instead, a mathematical problem is solved and this earns a monetary reward.
|
|
|
I think we're going to go WAY HIGHER than the NASDAQ did since that crash. Even the bears (I think) will agree. There is no way that bitcoins will exist five years from now without being $5,000+ per coin or $0. This $100-$200 stuff will look like a barely noticeable speed bump.
Indeed, and has anyone else noticed how the 2011 peak is a barely noticeable speed bump?
|
|
|
|