Need a comparison of "shitcoin" word count against non-BTC marketcap along the years.
I'm willing to bet its more than "tits." Do I dare ask why? Tits crash after a certain age. Bitcorns are the opposite
|
|
|
How about Opera instead of Chrome?
Chrome is pretty much spyware at this point. I think all Google users should use their data download to see a fraction of how much data Google has on them. (because of course you're not going to be given *all* of it)
|
|
|
Each one can draw its conclusion; but on a single month; user could earn 15$ or more. Since no one will give a no collateral loan to a recently created account; I think it's way much more hard work to create an account, far it a bit so that it's not "suspicious" and the default a small loan; than farming an account a bit and starting doing sig campaigns Bear in mind... a loan is instant (more or less) whereas signature campaigns take time and effort.
It's a situation where the user expects to have more gain out of the short-term despite the intrinsic calculations. I believe in some cultures, it is quite common to take a lower-reward short-term gain as opposed to a higher-reward long-term gain.
|
|
|
Simply evident Common sense decrees for us Price at twenty K
Just to know you also mean 20,000 for a guess? Yes sir!
|
|
|
Simply evident Common sense decrees for us Price at twenty K
|
|
|
It is the keep trying part that I am worried about. What if someone truly naive comes and lends these people? Money gone. Bitcoin and Bitcointalk blamed. Should this not stop? Someone that naive will eventually get scammed, with or without our help. Unfortunately, some people need to learn the lesson the hard way whether it takes 1 time or 1000 times.
|
|
|
Lock this thread, it’s fucking embarrassing. @ArmandoComellas it's in the bottom-left corner of this page.
|
|
|
Shouldn't enable smileys :)
|
|
|
For now I'm using online bitcoin based games and it's great because you can resize the chips well and work out when youre most likely to make something on it (I've read this can't be done at brick and mortar ones). I'm not aware of anything online that is good for counters. The best I've played at still only gives a pittance of a return. What are you playing on?
|
|
|
Nice 2-million transaction wallet. https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/1e8c4515b50aadaaDo you want to sign an address with the private keys that you don't own, because this is probably some high-volume service/business and not yours? Might be an exchange or a gambling site. Pretty dumb to use the hot wallet so much, though.
|
|
|
Am I being heavy handed by giving out a neutral rating and posting in the NastyFans thread to give them a warning? Certainly not. But this doesn't call for any flag action above that. In my opinion.
|
|
|
i follow Theymos' rules here, thx, take care bye
Thank god you do follow ( theymos's imaginary rules on this topic?... ) because your own moral compass for sure is missing. It delegates the responsibility to someone else. That's the idea.
YoBit is known to enable their own pump and dump schemes. They are known to have very ponzi-like programmes and some actual ponzis (correct me if I'm wrong). Their IEO email spam and other items also add to this fire. Don't be a part of something you don't support.
|
|
|
Although, to have concrete evidence, I think you need to have traderpolo tell you on bitcointalk what his telegram is, as opposed to on telegram claiming that he's traderpolo on bitcointalk. Because anyone can claim to be someone bitcointalk on another platform. Exactly. It's an A->B link... not an A<->B link. Does anyone happen to have a private message, on Bitcointalk, from TraderPolo212? I am very close to supporting the tag but there isn't enough for me to pull the trigger. Cheers.
|
|
|
If the account has not been proven to belong to a hacker/seller then nothing should happen to it.
nonnakip did change their password and email however that is not evidence for a hack/sale. It's a warning sign.
|
|
|
This is kind of rough, innit?
A third-party user Bob must give tier-1 flags to shady user Craig lest they risk entering a contract with Craig to which any violation results in a tier-2 or tier-3 flag against Bob. It doesn't matter if Craig is a scumbag: Bob violated the contract.
On the other hand, this prevents abusive flags and negative ratings if we establish concrete regulations to fall under. Two birds, one bush.
I do hate account sales, but TECSHARE has a point here.
|
|
|
Concept is fresh. I like that. What I don't like is the UI. It looks like you had mobile design in-mind when creating this, which is great. But for any resolution above ~1550px width, your buttons get so ludicrously big compared to the dice that it looks very off. (width capped to 650)
Moreover, the gradients could do with a bit of a touch-up. It's very unfitting with the rest of your site's aesthetic. One more thing to note is that your provably fair, rules and settings sections should have a higher height. If you're going to be scrolling, at least let the view of the canvas expand past a couple lines. It's fine if it just covers the screen: they aren't going to need to see the game page when they're reading up on rules/provably fair. The fingerprint as an account button is kind of unintuitive. The fact that it also redirects you to another page is a bit of an annoyance. (and that there's no "game button" where instead you have to either click at the top or the "redirect" button). There are also some typos in your rules tab. Examples include "we can proof it", "beeing"
I also don't see you on the Crypto Gambling Foundation's home page despite you having it in the bottom-right corner.
|
|
|
My gambling strategy seems to yeild 25% profit on blackjack somehow (repeatedly)... I don't put much into it but its quite nice when I put a small amount on it. Don't want to be a buzzkill but you've been charmed by Lady Variance.
Unless you're a counter, even basic strategy only drops HE to ~0.5% (with good rules)
Certain combinations of rules are +ev for play, but you have to know the game quite well. Uston's APC system is actually not too difficult after learning it for a bit.
|
|
|
Nah, i'm pretty sure that these one-liners will do yobit more harm than good in the long term. Both for their own wallet and how they're perceived by the community(->Although.. could that get any worse at this point?). Reminder that guests can view the forum too, as well as people who have never heard of YoBit. They might see the exchange in the signature and be interested in its bright colors. \
|
|
|
Some of the golden rules I've discovered.
1. Don't keep your savings in an exchange account. 2. Don't speculate with more than you can afford to lose. 3. Don't beat yourself up if the price goes up after you have sold. Nobody ever went bust by taking profits. 4. You haven't made a profit or a loss until you sell, or close the position. 5, Don't follow the herd, and do your own research. 6. Don't use a dodgy exchange that won't let you withdraw your money. 7. The best move when you're gambling is not to play. ** unless you are +ev... then play!
|
|
|
|