-snip- My personal opinions should not affect your decision. If you have an issue to discuss, privately messaging theymos would be the best way to create a change. If they do not happen to respond, then it must mean one of two things: 1) your issue is not an issue notwithstanding your vehemence. 2) theymos is ignoring your issue, consciously or not.
If your plan was to facilitate community discussion then you would certainly avoid any and all ad-hominem approaches to discourse, of which the thread has several examples. To continue with a thread in which your are berated and shuffled into indignation and responses that disengage your from your original premise would be an act of insanity - repeating that which has been seen in anticipation of a divergent result. |
|
|
|
|
Please PM theymos with your concerns.
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin SV, basically built on the foundation of a cult.
Look at the parallels of Craig's claims compared to that of a cult leader.
Rather than directly prove something that grants him (perceived) power, CSW goes down a path of unreliable, improbable and (possibly) deceptive methods of verifying evidence.
Rather than directly prove that the cult leader has a connection to a deity, the cult leader provides unreliable, improbable and innocuous evidence (which could be done by someone else in a similar position).
Religion of BSV
|
|
|
|
ok boomer modern-day equivalent of "umadbro?"
Am I just OOTL or has this situation been continuing on and on without reprieve? Maybe we've got a Vod vs. OgNasty renaissance. |
|
|
|
If anything, I would suggest to send a personalized message to "repeat offenders". BPIP's Most Posts/Topics Deleted by Moderators shows a long list of users with hundreds of deleted posts. If they would stop making posts that have to be deleted, Mods can spend their time on other things. That would be good. Beyond BPIP I have a list of over 60 users that have had 100+ good reports filed against them and I've already mentioned previously that most of these come from consecutive posts (or pages) worth of posts. A few users have been able to continue despite having over 300 deleted posts. |
|
|
|
|
Requiring a reason on ALL posts provides a marginal positive in response to a significant time consumption increase. If any reports are to be contested, it would usually be a somewhat-ambiguous one wherein a thread creation would be the best route of discourse.
Streamline the process.
|
|
|
|
How was this off-topic?
-snip-
Just because some of you are moderators doesn't mean you're not also spammers.
Cowards. I'd argue that yours deserves to be on the thread, though it's a meta observation linked to the original content. 
However, as I've posted above... rules are enforced at a moderator's discretion. Also. Welsh has no jurisdiction over Meta. A Global Moderator must have deleted it. |
|
|
|
I dare go a step further, and I don't remember who said it before I did, but: "Being offended is a choice!". Google brings me to the Chicago Tribune, but it's literally tells me it's unavailable in Europe. I've heard something along the lines of, "others should not take responsibility for your reactions." There is always a common denominator for your actions, thoughts and desires. You. |
|
|
|
Thinking out of the box if ever signatures are banned, how can you still show the signatures in your every post. Here is one idea in my mind. After every post , display a screen shot of your signature image.  That is not going to happen. 22. Advertising (this includes mining pools, gambling services, exchanges, shops, etc.) in others threads' is no longer allowed, including, but not limited to, in altcoin announcement threads. [8]
23. When deciding if a user has broken the rules, the staff have the right to follow their interpretation of the rules.[e]
24. Advertisements (including signatures within the post area) in posts aren't allowed unless the post is in a thread you started and is really substantial and useful.[9][e] |
|
|
|
What you said that is true mate because i have more than 90 tokens and coins with me they have nothing in crypto market but as per the team's it value is more than $20k so I am happy with rich on spreadsheet.
Just ridiculous. |
|
|
|
|
Shame on you for falling to your ego. Did your hubris grow so much out of control that you couldn't keep yourself from the psychological masturbation of unlocking the thread and sperging out your horseshit?
|
|
|
|
But in my opinion, there is no such thing as absolute freedom of speech in public places (like this forum) because your freedom sometimes will violate someone else's rights. Do you have an example? Your answer would depend on what you consider "rights". -Utilitarian: do we need to calculate the cost/benefit analysis (for the greater good)? Morality is subjective but I think utilitarianism is the worst way to plan out morality. "Happiness" is very loosely defined and if you really want to maximize it, you would mass-produce humans, force them to do meth constantly, and enslave them to happiness. A cult of happiness. -Negative rights: should "x" be left alone? What does that mean? Negative rights? -Moral sentiments: how about we put ourselves in the "x" shoes? An apt way to look at it, though what happens when you put yourself in the shoes of an unstable or mind-atrophying individual? |
|
|
|
I wonder how many of these posts would have been written if the poster wasnt part of a campaign of sorts. If theymos decided to try out my experiment of a one-month signature ban, we would find out. This forum is largely campaigners just talking to themselves. I don't understand how anybody makes money advertising here. It must, since long-running campaigns would not bother continuing when they are shown to be unprofitable. Its almost like they feel the need to run a charity to absolve themselves of their sins. especially Chip mixer. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
|
|
|
I'm not saying you have to report, but the tools are there to deal with the issues we have in the community, as a community by reporting, and bringing certain users to the attention of the signature campaign manager. My problem with reporting is that despite having more than a hundred reports (76 users), most of them are left unaffected by the deleted posts. I think that some of the offenders at the top of this list are banned, but they have over 200 deleted posts. 562| Vinaa77
379| ardentvolcanoes
362| Fredomago
331| Irvinn
330| joshy23
308| zhekinsp
295| goaldigger
267| thirdlight
261| Adriano2010
248| syamster
216| horrifiedx1
214| mersal
199| Rufsilf
179| rachman mahesa
179| Klausi
179| Cherylstar86
176| Vaculin
172| MFahad
169| Dhoe
168| Bagaji
164| iMark
157| Indrawan77
155| Karmakid
152| yvesp110
151| Ayiranorea
149| MonaLeeTracy
148| kayvie
144| whirlcoin
143| Xampeuu
142| ShowOff
142| Moiyah
140| logicgate
140| iamzill
139| Wawa2013
137| avarnet
135| cribusen
134| bobby1776
133| semobo
133| quality.crypto
132| Noilee
129| coin_1122
125| XCANA
125| trauchot
125| Bitfling
124| leetcoiner
124| FlightyPouch
123| prof7bit
123| Finestream
122| btccoffee
120| xSkylarx
120| CaptainKid
120| ajeef
119| Tungsten-1
119| coingrowth
119| breathlessz
116| partysaurus
114| cvasy
113| radjie
113| Kay94
112| S4VV4S
109| zidanw
109| Pamadar
108| bitcoinposts
107| Best Dreams
106| Ranly123
106| nur rochid
104| Panchum
104| immortal4now
103| pungopete468
103| miklesm
101| TIDOVEE
101| SaidNurs
101| Prompyboo
101| ILScoin
100| wahyu wida
100| devis9990i
It just feels like there's been a lot of leeway. I remember seeing more temp bans for spam in the past. |
|
|
|
0.041 c'mon mate, you know we will never stop  |
|
|
|
I don't see any 1 line spam trash posts in my profile. Can you please re-check?
Just because you space out a one-liner across multiple lines in your post itself does not mean that it is no longer a one-liner |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
