Cool. Where did h4ns say that he was donating?

Calling it a donation doesn't make it a donation, just like how calling others braindead doesn't change the fact that you are merely projecting your pathetic insecurities upon others online, where you believe you can find fulfillment in your pseudo-anonymity.

1 @ 0.075

There are two paths that we can foresee:

1) referencing the thread -> deflection -> tirade about a different subject -> "please show the written contract"
2) changing to a different topic -> deflection -> "please show the written contract"

But this is a false dichotomy.

3) refusing to humor game-protect -> end

Unfortunately, game-protect is either unable to deduce the false equivalency or is unable to honestly admit to their faults.

There is no problem, though, as we can gather that game-protect's values prioritize deceptive manipulation of semantics and repetitive indignance and deflection.

1 @ 0.072

1 @ 0.07

Reminder: this deflection hinges not on the actual substance of the flag but rather is an argument of semantics.

Pragmatically meaningless.

1 @ 0.067BTC

1 @ 0.065

1 @ 0.057

1 @ 0.052

Make it easy, krog

1@0.05BTC

1 @ 0.044

1 @ 0.041

1 @ 0.037
2 @ 0.03

1 @ 0.035

1 @ 0.032
2 @ 0.025

1 @ 0.029
2 @ 0.021

They're not forming a contract with me -- they were merely donating money in return for services provided.

How ridiculous that you assume the services would have been successful!