In both cases, could be profitable IF Bitcoin changes prices and on the second case, if you are trading it well. I don't really know the right decision between the two I guess it depends on the person. Maybe a risk taker or not? Isolate into a cold wallet and a trading wallet. I would consider it either going with the flow or trying to steer yourself, rather than risk-taking or not.
There are clear trends in certain scenarios which can provide a profit or mitigate losses. Perhaps not always due to the current nature of crypto, but the ev is high enough to induce pragmatic trades.
|
|
|
Total count: 364 -> 911. +547 to the list.
|
|
|
What % should it be? In a perfect world, 100% of people would repay the loans they're given. The real percentage is probably lower than 0.1%. I 100% plan on paying the loan back once my paycheck comes in but I get everything you're saying and I knew this would be a long shot. What did you need the loan for, anyway?
|
|
|
KYC won't be fake, but I can understand your cause for concern. Even if KYC is real, how is anyone expected to get their money back? It's too low of an amount to chase down, but your account's value is even lower than that. Anyone can register an account and ask for a loan. The % that repay from that initial circumstance of anonymity is extremely low.
|
|
|
No.
KYC can be fake. There is no guarantee of repayment. There is infinite risk for a finite reward.
|
|
|
You already have a bad experience, isn't that be your capital to fight harder in order to get the following year's profits to recover losses. People cannot predict whether the price of bitcoin will explode at the end of this year but I am sure the price of bitcoin will be growthing over time. starting to moving forward and forget the bad past
"the price of bitcoin will be growthing over time"
|
|
|
How's that being a ponzi? They are an exchange. They do what exchanges does, if they pump coins I guess they are just vulgar to what they do but at least you knew the shitcoins there are shitcoins. One issue so far that's very disturbing to them is making a hardtime for withdrawals of altcoins. I do think they are giving a favor to those who wanna withdraw altcoins though, its better to withdraw BTC.
I'm still joining! Don't they literally have IEO ponzis and pump/dump emails?
|
|
|
My avatar and personal text are available for rent.
PM me offers or post via this thread.
I post around 30 to 60+ posts each week. I may reject offers for any reason. If your advertisement turns out to be a scam/shady/etc then it will be removed. Escrow is available if you want: minerjones preferred.
|
|
|
Bump. Doubled my reports over two days. Notched the accuracy up 1%.
|
|
|
Seems like this thread is different enough. Dark theme != quote style change
|
|
|
Reinstall your whole OS, download Electrum ONLY from ELECTRUM.ORG and create a brand new wallet.
This vulnerability explained in this thread was fixed months ago, so probably it doesn’t have anything to do with your case. Let's not forget to verify the signature. If you don't have software that can do so already, grab OpenGPG and do yourself a favor.
Even if the website appears safe, you should verify at every step.
|
|
|
This is the first time you're asking for a loan because this is your second post.
Your only collateral is your own token which is Just Another CoinTM How are your funds stuck? Why do you need to deposit? What site is this?
|
|
|
I also got scammed of $50 yesterday from TraderPolo212 over skype.
He's not the best at covering his tracks and i've tracked down his genuine facebook profile. I'm sure Doxxing isn't aloud on here and i'm also sure that if this guy has scammed a couple of members already he will see this post.
Not indorsed by bitcointalk I will be messaging all linked friends and family from Hassan's facebook to let them know that he is a con man unless my $50 is returned to the wallet address already provided to him Doxxing is allowed in the Investigations board, which requires a higher rank. Public doxxing is disallowed. And in general, it's discouraged.
|
|
|
How surprising. Most have little to no merit and a significant number are banned. Heh.
If we had spoiler tags it would make it a lot better. We can compromise with this: if you create [anchor] tags and [iurl] tags that point to the top and bottom of your post, it'll allow for easier page-surfing. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
Updated. sort | uniq'd and now we have a number on how many there are.
|
|
|
I believe these are going to be farmed accounts. They all seem to have Russian emails linked to them (@mail.ru) and account farming/selling is fairly big in their Local board.
I know the marketplace section is brimming with Jr. Members, so perhaps they're just letting the users accumulate activity under-the-radar and then they're going to gift large portions of merit.
|
|
|
It doesn't matter how much you're offering in return if you have nothing to offer initially.
There is infinite risk for a finite reward. Saying you'll repay $750 is no different from promising that you'll repay $75000.
|
|
|
I agree with this I suppose. It is just a lot of topics to moderate that nobody gets to.
Did Satoshi use a Dell computer? Does Satoshi's third cousin live in Delaware? Is Satoshi alive right now? I believe hilariousandco trashed a number of useless threads that were only really used for spam. They might be willing to do the same this time, on those threads, if you report the first post. Any thread that exists so that spammers can subsist upon it should be immediately removed.
|
|
|
There is a useless Satoshi topic on practically every page of the Bitcoin Discussion forum.
What color tshirt did Satoshi wear? What was Satoshi's IP address? Does Satoshi drink coffee with cream and sugar? Report so they can be trashed. Don't move the problem somewhere else: get rid of it directly. Plus, unless it's making up a significant chunk of each page (and hence the board) it's not worth it. I'd say that if it's not covering more than 30% of the pages on average, then it's not a concern. (or at least big enough to address a prospective sub-board)
|
|
|
|