I've not used XMR, the coins I consider useful are probably BTC, LTC, ETH and maybe XRP (for its international use). Dash and Decred aren't bad but just seem to keep sinking. Everything else is pretty much useless. Read into Monero, it's a very interesting coin. There were also some that were focused on "pooling" computing power and cloud-drive space. Most others are rehashes or stupid ideas (IOTA) that are completely unnecessary. |
|
|
|
The actuality of the represent cryptocurrency marketplace is that the new samson amble was refueled close to plug and care of avoiding away from a plenty of newbees in the crypto place, that nevertheless is not the example this age round and representing thither to be added bullshit amble of that equivalent proportions, so thither has to be a authentic growth in the viewpoint of adjustment and utilization to valid being stages.A plenty of crypto plans are forming extremely great progression on the other hand a plenty of additional juts arrange hither representing the alcohol of it and representing the aim of trading their mints as it has no valid service.
What actuality are you conversation almost? You publish does not talk even. On the other hand, what I am presuming supported on your publish is that you are expression that the cost and the marketplace ups and downs are wholly aleatory. Yea, its right. We buoy not forecast what's loss to bechance to the cost anytime. Looking at the cost during the change of 2017. The cost were heavens rocketing and so humans jumped into the ballyhoo. Those who got away other were capable to create a profits and anew, those who craved to create many profits, conceiving that the cost desire hold on uprising endured any hurt. This are the actuality they require to visage : The cost won't hold on rise eternise because the marketplace is absolutely aleatory.
What actuality are you conversation about? Hahahaha |
|
|
|
It doesn't have many useless coins There are only a few that are really of significance outside of BTC and XMR. Most coins are there for whatever reason. First-mover bias and FOMO, I guess. |
|
|
|
|
Would it be possible to introduce a population of bacteria that are not as resistant to antibiotics in order to increase the competition of resources in the space?
The key point would be to keep them around long enough to start having a drift towards non-superbugs but not enough to induce dangerous health conditions. If you had a resource-heavy bacterium that was not dangerous to humans, it might do some good.
I'm no biologist, though, so feel free to blast this idea out of the water.
Waiting on CRISPR.
|
|
|
|
110 words is huge to do in a second. I probably can't think that fast though. Do they teach you do to that .
Typsey is also a paid service so I'm out already... Drop into typeracer some time. It takes real sentences from various media (be it games, books, movies)
From what I've heard, Trezor is king when it comes to the hardware wallets.  |
|
|
|
We have a banner at the top of our post due to one person's negative feedback:
I can't see that? You don't have any active flag nor any negative trust from a DT user. There's some strange trust settings that are enabled, causing either liuwei88 or by rallier's feedback to count as Trusted. They were pre-flag and thus count towards that warning. |
|
|
|
Although, they've been rehashed over, and over again. I still think they were perfectly legitimate questions to begin with, and there was some decent discussion in the older topics. Nowadays these types of threads just invite low quality answers which have been repeated several times over by now. The only thing worth collecting is Satoshi quotes, which I believe we've already got a thread that just does that. Most threads with good intentions should be locked within the first page. Anything more than that and you are already in spam territory if the subject matter is as typical as "will price reach n" or "is satoshi x" |
|
|
|
More standard examples:
What do you think Satoshi had for breakfast?
Is Satoshi really Bill Clinton?
I think Satoshi lives next-door to me.
How many Bitcoins do you think Satoshi has? Sub-boards should be able to stand on their own. They shouldn't be 1-2 pages long.
But the problem is, those threads are such crap anyway. That could be easily-truncated to a maximum of two threads. |
|
|
|
|
No, they should just be locked and trashed.
|
|
|
|
so. he's not getting flagged?
i think there are enough reasons..
that guy isnt even answering. Somebody who does not scam its suppose to appear and give his explanation isnt it? Can you take a screenshot of the skype profile, username included? It would also be good if you attached the PM from Bitcointalk, so we can truly link TraderPolo212 with this transaction. |
|
|
|
This is total bull shit. Nobody is an expert at gambling. Gambling is gambling, sometimes you lose, what are you going to do if you lose, run away and not pay the money back? That's exactly the implication. OP makes sure to say that they will return the money ONLY if they win. Later, they added the 50% split from the bet winnings. But I'm not sure how good the odds are. They need to be over 1.5x for a positive expectation. |
|
|
|
People like you guys wont understand the struggle of those who arent native speaker like me,english was never the basis of your knowledge and ability.Dont give me the crap that this is english forum,try to join to spanish forum and try to communicate.Racist twats like you will only see one thing ,we are the primary race because we are using the english language  and those who cant speak our language are rubbish clowns. Why are you bringing race into this? |
|
|
|
|
Best shitpost of the month.
|
|
|
|
NO , i dont have any bad attitude , he was to first to be impolite , re-read his quote plz Like a child retorting to their parent, "but they started it," in order to justify their personal faults. This is not happening. It's Lending, not Gambling. |
|
|
|
|
So this is basically gambling.
Except you have only risk and no gain.
Since we're only expecting the loaned amount back, even if btcearning's odds are correct, our expected value is 0.75 * input = 0.1875 BTC return.
|
|
|
|
Do you have any proof that the telegram member @GT501 that you talked to is connected to TraderPolo on the forums? TraderPolo doesn't seem to have been active for that much for the past two months on the forum. Not active in posts, but in PM's. I didn't see TraderPolo's name in the Telegram logs so OP must have some PM's with them, right? |
|
|
|
That doesn't make sense.
Your private key belongs (and should) to you and you only. Unless they're alluding to the fact that some sellers provide the staked key along with the account sale? Wrong "t" bruh. Ah, so mintrus right? |
|
|
|
okei thnk. i ll post it later. What a miserable guy . Scam for 60$. Can you tag him here or something Without any evidence, which you say you're going to post later, I cannot do anything to TraderPolo212. Even if your accusation is legitimate, one can't tag solely based on the word of another. Hearsay is insubstantial. |
|
|
|
Yeah, I'm really surprised. I have no explanation for that but my account is NOT for sale! And I changed the password a few minutes ago.
How can I find out wheter I got hacked? I don't have these messages in the outbox, I haven't even used this account for weeks... Unfortunately, there is no way to prove that you did not send that message unless we pry into your every detail of your life during the surrounding period. There is no way to differentiate a user that sent the message and is now lying about not sending the message and one that didn't send the message (where some other entity did) And it is mindrust.
The T is silent. Cool, thanks mindrus' |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
