Well the monetary system is a giant scam that is run by a small group.  These people essentially have unlimited money, all they have to do is type some numbers into a computer screen.  The biggest scam ever.

If everyone be free happy share n fair.  There is no need for rich n poor.

I'm telling that the problem is that those people publicly declare that they are fighting terrorism and some other shit and getting huge money for it while doing absolutely nothing.
This is not about racism and greed. Current international political system is not working and it is full of shit.

Meinst mit "unsicher" wohl eigentlich "volatil" und ja, deswegen sind wohl viele hier!  

---

Ich persönlich halte 90% meines bescheidenen "Vermögens" in Krypto. Getreu dem Motto "wer nichts hat, kann nichts verlieren".
Werde auch so oft es geht nachkaufen, da ich fest an eine positive Entwicklung glaube.

[...]
As a scientist myself, it became clear to me that the contrarians were not capable of providing the science to support their “skepticism” on climate change. The evidence simply does not exist to justify continued denial that climate change is caused by humans and will be bad. There is always legitimate debate around the cutting edge of research, something we see regularly. But with climate change, science that has been established, constantly tested, and reaffirmed for decades was routinely called into question.

Over and over, solid peer-reviewed science was insulted as corrupt, while blog posts from fossil-fuel-funded groups were cited as objective fact. Worst of all, they didn’t even get the irony of quoting oil-funded blogs that called university scientists biased.

The end result was a disservice to science and to rational exploration, not to mention the scholarly audience we are proud to have cultivated. When 97 percent of climate scientists agree that man is changing the climate, we would hope the comments would at least acknowledge if not reflect such widespread consensus. Since that was not the case, we needed more than just an ad hoc approach to correct the situation.

The answer was found in the form of proactive moderation. About a year ago, we moderators became increasingly stringent with deniers. When a potentially controversial submission was posted, a warning would be issued stating the rules for comments (most importantly that your comment isn’t a conspiracy theory) and advising that further violations of the rules could result in the commenter being banned from the forum.

http://grist.org/climate-energy/reddits-science-forum-banned-climate-deniers-why-dont-all-newspapers-do-the-same/



---------------------------------------------------------------------
In other scientific news CRYOSAT SATELLITE FINDS ARCTIC ICE INCREASED 50% IN VOLUME


Around 90 per cent of the increase is due to retention of older ice
This year’s multi-year ice is now around 30 cm thicker than last year
Experts claim increase does not indicate a reversal in long-term trends

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2524770/ESA-satellite-reveals-polar-ice-INCREASED-50-year.html

Deutsche Welle documentary:



Venezuela: Humanitarian crisis and the fight for power | DW Documentary

Covers the events during the attempted delivery of humanitarian aid, and the status of Venezuela in general.

Hey guys! I've recently found some interesting read that tells us about one of the cases, that demonstrate how UN bureaucracy works and how they are helping people.
Those people got a great power in their hands but no one is going to use it in order to help people when it is needed.
Link: https://quillette.com/2019/04/03/the-scars-of-rwanda-25-years-on/

Well the monetary system is a giant scam that is run by a small group.  These people essentially have unlimited money, all they have to do is type some numbers into a computer screen.  The biggest scam ever.

Well I think this thread is a perfect proof.

I was trying to make peace between commies and nazis. I even sent apologies and peace messages in PM. The result is just another agression without any legitimacy from the nazi.

Thanks TECSHARE for showing that extreme right is just too stupid to take an opportunity when they see it.

The most amazing thing is that you don't even seem to understand what you're saying but well...
It seems the only possibility will be to kill each other while letting the bankers rule. As you're clearly rejecting any peace offer and insulting me as soon as you have the chance.

Cheers.

Slicing a country in half does not work. You only need to look at the troubles between Ireland and Northern Ireland or Israel and Palestine to see that.  Britain don't need to be in the EU and nor do the majority want to be part of the EU.  Without Britain's contribution It falls on France and Germany to support all of the other failing countries economies. That is why the EU is so scared and doesn't want us to leave.

I actually voted to stay in the EU but if mainland europeans really have an attitude like yours towards us it is a good thing we are leaving.

In any vote there’s a divide , Yugoslavia is a war torn mess, that accepted Being occupied by Germany in WW2 it would take a lot more than a referendum to end up like Yugoslavia loooooool.

Are you deluded , do you think we’re going to have British refugees running from the UK and dividing into 6 parts, shooting each other up on the news because of leaving a customs union . Get real .

It’s not disruptive to exit a union which has clauses that give rights to exit the union. This is available to all countries and what is “mob politics” is having the EU drag a country through bad press for three years because they want to leave. You might think that’s the appropriate way to behave, well it’s not. Sure being fair and accepting the UK into the single market will be lovely. But don’t think if that option is taken away that there are no more options on the table. It’s very easy to get more business when you change your tax tariffs and become a tax haven, lots of businesses would love to take advantage of lower taxes and relocate for that purpose.  Liechenstein , Iceland , Switzerland and Norway are not in the EU and they pay into the single market. Liechtenstein is the 8th richest country in the world and have you seen how successful the Swiss are in business?

The EUs attitude is very clear now, we can see it for what it is through this experience of pettiness and threats of economic isolation. The UK will power through long term without a deal and open itself up to global trade

The UK are still Europeans, the vote was to exit the EU which is a customs union. Article 50 states that any country wishing to return to the customs Union can do so after 2 years of exiting. It’s EU law and already discussed and accepted. As one of the largest contributers and being a nuclear power plus our plan to become a tax haven to make ends meet , not only do the EU have to accept as stated in article 50, they would be grateful to have the UK back. The hostility received is because they don’t want the UK to leave at all.

There should not be a second referendum. You’re right there’s no point . The only thing worse than leaving is taking away power from the people and having parliament take away democracy by setting a precedent that we now overturn voting results if we don’t like what the result is.  The vote is a privilege and should be precise and executed regardless of the result with no tantrums accepted. It maintains order and consistency.

This three year long tantrum needs to stop. There are other countries in Europe that are not part of the EU and are doing just fine and have bought into the customs union. This has been a very important lesson for every country to see that this “union” which was signed is infact the equivalent of an abusive relationship where one is punished if they want to leave and become independent .

...because they want nazis cattle, commis cattle, and extremist cattle for the big cattle fight?

Well articulated argument against the recent abortion laws: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqS4qFc_I6A

Hey, what did UK expect, that EU will reward it and give it all sorts of benefits for leaving? It is only natural that EU will protect its interests. Personally, I would not grant the UK customs union. It only wants benefits of the EU but non of the obligations. I hope it doesn't happen.

The EU did not try to make it hard to leave for you, but to protect itself from UK's disruptivness.

And that's about a contract, that has nothing to do with the City of London's "spooky" autonomy



Stick with that sort of thing. City of London companies almost certainly do bribe UK politicians, you now sound credible

(but no evidence I am aware of has ever linked City of London with bribery of EU or US politicians, where is the evidence? You need evidence, or you look crazy)