|
welcome to bigotted west, it never was about liberty and human rights for the us government it always was just about usd imperialism
|
|
|
|
Racist or not racist? Does it matter? Well, i don’t believe it should. Mostly because “race” is actually a social construct rather than I biological or genetic occurrence. ALL of the information that I have previously researched seems to indicate that race is a social creation based off of perception rather than anything of a scientific basis.
With that idea in mind, now ask the question of whether he is racist or not? —— well “race” is just a social fabrication - just like uhhhhh - religion... so no it doesn’t really make
A difference. In my opinion.
jes it does matter because racism is wrong, we where told that in the west long time. christians aren't allowed to be racist actually. they still appropriated ideals like beauty, in various kingdoms. the devil was considered ugly, light and brightess as good and holy and darkness as evil, from that racism manifasted itself |
|
|
|
media did not get hurt and neither did trump by the drama your trying to bait about racism.
and why live with constantly being accused of racism, by people that want to destroy you? if your talking about trump again (i know your a foolish superfan).. then trump is not being destroyed. take it like an employment contract. his impeachment is just a employment reprimand that could lead to him having to resign. and after wards. he will be more successful than ever for showing off he has had the top seat and america didnt burn under his watch. so investors will happily invest in his future ventures. nope you are wrong, only the election is a legitimate impeachment, everything else is simply deep state lobby trash. democrats know exactly that they can't win an election against trump thats why they are desperate trying to impeach him |
|
|
|
media did not get hurt and neither did trump by the drama your trying to bait about racism.
and why live with constantly being accused of racism, by people that want to destroy you? |
|
|
|
well then white people today can say, they dont want immigrants from africa/asia and other regions of the world because those are not diverse and the poplation there could be racist.
If they are in America then yeah, they can say that - and it doesn't matter what race they are. Freedom of speech is vigorously defended here. freedom of speech is pointless if a violent mob around you will limit it. |
|
|
|
you are speculating
There's nothing wrong with speculating. Unless you have absolutely all information that could possibly be available (almost never the case, especially when it comes to what a public figure actually thinks), you have two options: speculate || stop thinking about it. When you say 'Trump is not a racist' you are speculating. Of course, I'm also speculating that you aren't one of Trumps closest confidants, family members, or Donald Trump himself. well white people are also speculating on potential racism of nonwhite people. can't be the case forever that only black people are allowed to defame others or speculate on racism There's nothing wrong with speculating. Unless you have absolutely all information that could possibly be available (almost never the case, especially when it comes to what a public figure actually thinks), you have two options: speculate || stop thinking about it. well then white people today can say, they dont want immigrants from africa/asia and other regions of the world because those are not diverse and the poplation there could be racist. why else should white countries be open for everyone and all other countries only for the ethnicities living there. |
|
|
|
|
i never pretended and said girls should behave equal to men but i find it sexy that there are women that earn money in countless different jobs, and are not just trapped at home with children and kitchen, although i think many women would be fine with it.
i would be quite excited seeing women run their own community.
regards
|
|
|
|
you are speculating
There's nothing wrong with speculating. Unless you have absolutely all information that could possibly be available (almost never the case, especially when it comes to what a public figure actually thinks), you have two options: speculate || stop thinking about it. When you say 'Trump is not a racist' you are speculating. Of course, I'm also speculating that you aren't one of Trumps closest confidants, family members, or Donald Trump himself. well white people are also speculating on potential racism of nonwhite people. can't be the case forever that only black people are allowed to defame others or speculate on racism |
|
|
|
there is something called, innocent till proven guilty
To successfully sue someone for defamation, you need to prove they are guilty of defamation, meaning you have to prove their statement was false. You can't prove Trump isn't racist, and even if you could, you'd still have to prove that the person calling him racist didn't believe he was racist. If you think Trumps a racist, it's not defamation to call him a racist. so why is it then allowed to insult trump to be racist then, if it could be a lie, targeting to destroy him? shouldn't "racist" then not become an illegal word similar like the "n word" "n word" isn't illegal. There are no illegal words in America, you can say what you think. I do agree with you there should be consequences for someone who just makes shit up to hurt someone else's reputation, but I don't think calling someone a racist is a good example of that. There are lots of people that truly believe Trump is a racist, and I think they should be able to say so. nope trump is not a racist, he is a strict christian capitalist. I totally respect your opinion on Trump not being a racist. It is just an opinion though, you can't know that he isn't racist. Your perception of him is a combination of what he wants you to see, and what other people want you to see. Unless you've had a personal relationship with him for a long period of time, I don't think you have enough info to conclude he's not racist. Also, I imagine there are many racists that are also strict Christian Capitalists. To become a member of the KKK, for example, you have to swear to uphold American values and Christian morality. you are speculating, and with your accusation of him being racist you only defame him, racism defamation has become a big part of american western culture. if it will not stop many white people will simply stop taking "racism" allegations serious, and will ignore you, and you will even be ignored when you need the attention the most. |
|
|
|
there is something called, innocent till proven guilty
To successfully sue someone for defamation, you need to prove they are guilty of defamation, meaning you have to prove their statement was false. You can't prove Trump isn't racist, and even if you could, you'd still have to prove that the person calling him racist didn't believe he was racist. If you think Trumps a racist, it's not defamation to call him a racist. so why is it then allowed to insult trump to be racist then, if it could be a lie, targeting to destroy him? shouldn't "racist" then not become an illegal word similar like the "n word" "n word" isn't illegal. There are no illegal words in America, you can say what you think. I do agree with you there should be consequences for someone who just makes shit up to hurt someone else's reputation, but I don't think calling someone a racist is a good example of that. There are lots of people that truly believe Trump is a racist, and I think they should be able to say so. nope trump is not a racist, he is a strict christian capitalist. |
|
|
|
there is something called, innocent till proven guilty
To successfully sue someone for defamation, you need to prove they are guilty of defamation, meaning you have to prove their statement was false. You can't prove Trump isn't racist, and even if you could, you'd still have to prove that the person calling him racist didn't believe he was racist. If you think Trumps a racist, it's not defamation to call him a racist. so why is it then allowed to insult trump to be racist then, if it could be a lie, targeting to destroy him? shouldn't "racist" then not become an illegal word similar like the "n word" |
|
|
|
both is defamation, if jow is not a racist he should be able to sue the defamer, because racism accusations have defaming effekt on people.
both are an accusation. the important parts are HOW THE ACCUSATION EFFECTS people in america they love to put a price on 'mental stress' which makes it easy in america that the harm/loss caused has a financial value. other countries however think only true financial loss should be valued. eg loss of income, shelter theaccusation alone is not that unlawful. its the impact that accusation caused. lying. by itself in public is not a crime. if it was then there would not be a special custom to when in court ned to swear on a bible and commit to a contract of telling the truth or be punished when standing in court. again if lying by itself was a crime there would be no need for the special perjury condition using certain words is not a crime in of itself for instance i as a white man have good friendships with people of other ethnic backgrounds. if i called one of them the N word. well thats just being part of the banter.. yet if i said it to a stranger and said it in a derogatory way that then caused someone negative affect that can be proven as some form of harm/loss. then that can lead to trouble saying the N word in of itself is not a crime.. who, how, why and what impact it caused. could be a crime if you accuse someone of being racist in an egalitarian minded society, you can literally destroy his image and career, happened often in germany especially to celebrities and politicians. if that person is racist, it is not a defamation but if he is not racist, like for example trump, then it is massively defamatory. You can't prove that anyone isn't a racist though. And even if you could, you'd also have to prove that the person calling someone a racist didn't actually believe they were racist. At least that's how the law works in America. so how is it then allowed to defame someone to be racist if it can't be proven? it is clear defamation to use the "r word", it would be complete against the spirit of martin luther king and nelson mandela that demanded that people are supposed to be judged on their character and not on their skin color. trump was judged and defamed a racist based on his skin color, by the democrats. that was clearly an abuse of power. Are we talking the legal definition of defamation (in America), or your opinion of what the legal definition of defamation should be? western legal traditions are pretty much the same, defaming someone to be a racist, although it has not been proven weather he is racist, is absolutely wrong, and can be highly destructive discriminatory and defaming for that person. there is something called, innocent till proven guilty, trump was continuously defamed being a racist, although he was just trying to be a president/administer of a piece of land. |
|
|
|
This could be my wrong idea. A girl complaining of her life, say to me her mums life was more appealing.
House price gone expensive. Girls working all full time. No time for relax at home with children.
Because 2 wages house gone 2x more and worse with low interest mortgage and long term.
Some girls can be clever with a lot of help and patience just as smart as some men. It is true. Some have a nice salary. Most working supermarkets and shops. They are worse off now. They don't have time with their own children and enjoy relax go to th park, picnic, knitting and needle work. Mothers gathering and fun.
Did they fight to get equal and now it is gone bad for them and men. Now no kids people can have house each and be alone with more bills to pay each one not together.
Should we have been firm and kinder to them for the longer benefit of all?
This is not a sexism post. Girls are equal or best for their own suited tasks.
This is my honest answer. Put them back to more female natural role but how? Both need to work or debt will accrue.
Children can be suffering the parents both work long weeks
i don't pretend that, women could also do all job positiones men do, but men can't get pregnant and give birth to children. as long as the society is sustainable and its economy sustainable i am fine with women being equal. many western societies have literally destroyed their own reproductive behavior by allowing the mass exploitation of women as a labour source |
|
|
|
damit, now we soon can only trust married men, since they would have wifes that are surveiling them. except their wifes are satanic |
|
|
|
both is defamation, if jow is not a racist he should be able to sue the defamer, because racism accusations have defaming effekt on people.
both are an accusation. the important parts are HOW THE ACCUSATION EFFECTS people in america they love to put a price on 'mental stress' which makes it easy in america that the harm/loss caused has a financial value. other countries however think only true financial loss should be valued. eg loss of income, shelter theaccusation alone is not that unlawful. its the impact that accusation caused. lying. by itself in public is not a crime. if it was then there would not be a special custom to when in court ned to swear on a bible and commit to a contract of telling the truth or be punished when standing in court. again if lying by itself was a crime there would be no need for the special perjury condition using certain words is not a crime in of itself for instance i as a white man have good friendships with people of other ethnic backgrounds. if i called one of them the N word. well thats just being part of the banter.. yet if i said it to a stranger and said it in a derogatory way that then caused someone negative affect that can be proven as some form of harm/loss. then that can lead to trouble saying the N word in of itself is not a crime.. who, how, why and what impact it caused. could be a crime if you accuse someone of being racist in an egalitarian minded society, you can literally destroy his image and career, happened often in germany especially to celebrities and politicians. if that person is racist, it is not a defamation but if he is not racist, like for example trump, then it is massively defamatory. You can't prove that anyone isn't a racist though. And even if you could, you'd also have to prove that the person calling someone a racist didn't actually believe they were racist. At least that's how the law works in America. so how is it then allowed to defame someone to be racist if it can't be proven? it is clear defamation to use the "r word", it would be complete against the spirit of martin luther king and nelson mandela that demanded that people are supposed to be judged on their character and not on their skin color. trump was judged and defamed a racist based on his skin color, by the democrats. that was clearly an abuse of power. |
|
|
|
Woke up to the news of Akon's city project (in Senegal) been approved by the government of the country, he has been given the go ahead to build a city that its official currency would be cryptocurrency but sadly that cryptocurrency won't be bitcoin, although it'll be a great avenue to create awareness about the concept of cryptocurrency both in the country and continent (Africa). I see some positive development from this project as the government are already onboard but it worries me that many uniformed Senegalese will be misinform and denied the privilege of enjoying true financial freedom that cryptocurrency is meant to introduced to the masses through bitcoin.   Image credit: https://mobile.twitter.com/Akon/status/1216803497057931264The proposed Akoin currency is likely going to be another centralized cryptocurrency that transaction would be closely monitored and moderated like the fiat. The whitepaper haven't been published (to my knowledge) as I don't have any idea how the coin will be operated. What's your take on this project, do you think it'll add some positive feedback to how cryptocurrency is been viewed in the continent, increase adoption of cryptocurrency in the country and continent and probably create more awareness for bitcoin as the king of the cryptocurrency industry?. In general, what's you take on this project? PS: I'm having this feeling, the Chinese are behind this project and Akon's reputation is just been used to gain acceptance. I might be wrong though lol. senegalese government? in africa every idiot forms his own government, and tries to found banks. no point giving a damn about any african "governments" |
|
|
|
It is finally official. "As expected, the House of Representatives officially voted Wednesday to send the articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump to the Senate and approved the House’s impeachment managers. The vote to send the articles of impeachment to the Senate and approve the impeachment managers was 228-193." Gee what were they voting on if it was already official? I guess you tards demanding that it was already official before today were wrong. That is unless you still want to argue this vote they had today was totally meaningless and arbitrary. "House Delivers Articles Of Impeachment To Senate, 'Trial' To Start Tuesday" https://www.zerohedge.com/political/pelosi-announces-house-managers-trump-impeachment-trialpah nothing of this has any meaning, democrats are same trash like they where during lincoln area, when they joined the slavers in the south. impeachment will be their end https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvAN3iaYEiE&t=383shttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGb3N91sOpc |
|
|
|
both is defamation, if jow is not a racist he should be able to sue the defamer, because racism accusations have defaming effekt on people.
both are an accusation. the important parts are HOW THE ACCUSATION EFFECTS people in america they love to put a price on 'mental stress' which makes it easy in america that the harm/loss caused has a financial value. other countries however think only true financial loss should be valued. eg loss of income, shelter theaccusation alone is not that unlawful. its the impact that accusation caused. lying. by itself in public is not a crime. if it was then there would not be a special custom to when in court ned to swear on a bible and commit to a contract of telling the truth or be punished when standing in court. again if lying by itself was a crime there would be no need for the special perjury condition using certain words is not a crime in of itself for instance i as a white man have good friendships with people of other ethnic backgrounds. if i called one of them the N word. well thats just being part of the banter.. yet if i said it to a stranger and said it in a derogatory way that then caused someone negative affect that can be proven as some form of harm/loss. then that can lead to trouble saying the N word in of itself is not a crime.. who, how, why and what impact it caused. could be a crime if you accuse someone of being racist in an egalitarian minded society, you can literally destroy his image and career, happened often in germany especially to celebrities and politicians. if that person is racist, it is not a defamation but if he is not racist, like for example trump, then it is massively defamatory. |
|
|
|
You have to prove that a false statement about someone is actually false.
It's impossible to prove someone is or is not a racist.
"Joe is a KKK member, he is in charge of bringing bagels and coffee to the weekly meetings, and burns a cross in his yard every year on July 4th" <=== defamation
"Joe is a racist" <=== nope
both is defamation, if jow is not a racist he should be able to sue the defamer, because racism accusations have defaming effekt on people. regards |
|
|
|
why is there now law in the usa, that allows someone who has been accused of racism, to sue the defamer, if he is absolutely not racist?
many big american tv and newspapers like cnn nyt, washington journal constantly defame others of racism. why can't they be sued, easier
regards
Did you stop to think about it for one second before posting this thread? Being racist isn't a crime, that's why. When did CNN, NYT or Washington Journal defame others of racism? It may very well have happened, but you should at least provide an example before shitposting into the wind. it is highly offence, and i am not talking about being racist, i am talking about accusing someone publicly of racism, because thats highly damaging for someone's image. being racist is highly unpopular. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
