there is a big difference between equity owners that live from passive income and people that are forced to sell their time.
besides back to topic,
if the nazis where socialists why did they kill socialists and kommunists then and put them into the KZ or ausschwitz?
why did hitler attack the socialist soviet union then?
there are many rich, powerful and influential people in the west nowadays who need for their economic survival, to get a rumor like that around. but i doubt it will work. nazis were national kapitalists.
regards The same reason Stalin put other socialists into the gulags. Power. Socialism is simply the means to an end for dictatorial power. Collectivizing all the resources inherently is flawed because it makes it so easy for a dictator to step in and take over everything, let alone the plethora of other flaws with socialism. thats because stalin was in power, the king also puts his fellow citizens into slavish work, in the west instead of stalin there is the masonic banking cartel, and they are having everyone else being their salary/wage slaves. thats how life is. majority of people dont have power they have to give power to others. regards |
|
|
|
|
i like kamala harris, the most, but i don't think democrats will win, democrats have made america hedonistic and unsustainable, they are now for greed reasons hate russia.
joe biden is the biggest trash american's can vote for, he is just a career politician, claims he is fighting racist injustice but defacto thinks "after me the flood" and just turns race relation upside down, instead of seeking to boost equity.
trump is unknowingly the most communist candidate.
biden represents whats wrong with democracy
|
|
|
|
there is a big difference between equity owners that live from passive income and people that are forced to sell their time.
besides back to topic,
if the nazis where socialists why did they kill socialists and kommunists then and put them into the KZ or ausschwitz?
why did hitler attack the socialist soviet union then?
there are many rich, powerful and influential people in the west nowadays who need for their economic survival, to get a rumor like that around. but i doubt it will work. nazis were national kapitalists.
regards The same reason Stalin put other socialists into the gulags. Power. Socialism is simply the means to an end for dictatorial power. Collectivizing all the resources inherently is flawed because it makes it so easy for a dictator to step in and take over everything, let alone the plethora of other flaws with socialism. socialism is simply a more precise realisation of "egalitee" fraternitee, equality and brotherhood, and it didnt started in russia it started in france with the french revolution, the socialism kommunism hatred is nothing else but the greed for power of the westerm burgois rich elite. that where konfronted with stalin, stalin is nothing else but a russian napoleon/hitler. they came to power by removing the king and spreading socialist propaganda (egalitee, fraternitee) and once they where in power and ran the banks in france, they where confronted with socialism. regards |
|
|
|
"An empire"  maybe since it's not it would have place if not for US geopolitical interestsempires can indeed exist like networks overlapping each other in a big planetary city, the problem is, how is the limited financial sovereignty being distributed. we currently think in geographiy states and laws, made by law writing institution, in europas christian past it was more about the religion and selfappointment. |
|
|
|
you are wrong capitalism, is subservence and obediance and trust under a ruling capitalist.
muslims are also capitalists in a way, actually all human cooperation turns out being capitalist sooner or later
jews managed america quite well in the last 200 years but its not sustainable jews opened doors for unsustainable hedonism
How do so many "servants" become wealthy when they learn a valuable skill or when they produce something of value? How come all the big companies started from a garage?  You're only a servant to your bad habits. Don't try to find enemies to justify your failures. there is a big difference between equity owners that live from passive income and people that are forced to sell their time. besides back to topic, if the nazis where socialists why did they kill socialists and kommunists then and put them into the KZ or ausschwitz? why did hitler attack the socialist soviet union then? there are many rich, powerful and influential people in the west nowadays who need for their economic survival, to get a rumor like that around. but i doubt it will work. nazis were national kapitalists. regards |
|
|
|
New anti-money laundering (AML) regulations are coming into force by January 10 in Europe. The rules, which address cryptocurrency companies for the first time, look set to have a large impact on the industry.
The Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5AMLD) is set to take full effect in less than a month. It was first detailed in May last year.Source link hereIt means that they're clearly in a war against decentralization.They are doing whatever it takes to "take over" and make centralized payments dominant once again. Bitcoin was created for us to have no limits in cross-border payments. Now they're trying to take it away from us, because of KYC. There's very little freedom on how much BTC and altcoins are we gonna withdraw, especially within the European union. It's just that these lawmakers are doing something to make sure we do not prosper, but only them. oh i am not afraid about the euro banking cartel, they are after all unable to manage loaning nowadays. and are unable to invest into the future and security of the europeans, by finally closing the border the the enslavement by the neverendingly broken third world. |
|
|
|
so you want to run american economy without a state, you must be some kind of a savage anarchist, who is going to provide education, defense and police? who is going to be the capitalist of those people in america currently its a jewish ran banking cartel, but what do you want? you want to work for gold? thats not reliable, for foreign currencies? cryptos?
get ready to feel what capitalism in truth is. its chaos. and competition between individuals for financial sovereignty. no more professional jewish market managment for americans.
I didn't say what I want, I said goverments are centrally planned and have nothing to do with the private market. Capitalism is a system of voluntary cooperation between consenting individuals. Goverment does not fall into that equation because of it's threat of force. I didn't say we should abolish our mixed economy goverment. I said how things stand. But your questions are funny though. If the goverment was providing you with food, you'd ask "who's going to provide food?", if it was providing water, you'd say "who's going to provide water?" like those things wouldn't exist without the threat of violence mandated by the goverment. Just because goverment does something, you think that thing can't be done without it. Astonishing. The banks run a fractional reserve banking system only because the goverments have decided to issue a guarantee on their reserves. They only have 17% of the money deposited on their accounts in reality, but they lend all of it because it just switches accounts and becomes a number rather than a value. You do know that this fractional reserve banking system came down crumbling in 1933 and The Great Depression but do you know what we did about it? We guaranteed the banks reserves with tax payer money if they go crumbling down again. The state supported the fractional reserve banking after it was supposed to disappear in 1933 like every other ponzi scheme that existed. you are wrong capitalism, is subservence and obediance and trust under a ruling capitalist. muslims are also capitalists in a way, actually all human cooperation turns out being capitalist sooner or later jews managed america quite well in the last 200 years but its not sustainable jews opened doors for unsustainable hedonism |
|
|
|
How to live comfortable in an over populated environment?
become the capitalist let the lazy skumbacks work for you, you have to tell them somehow that thats good for them, or better, that god told them to do that and you are some kind of a religious nobility |
|
|
|
ever heard of currency imperialism? every national central bank does that, including the usa.
capitalists need wage slaves. the moment other capitalists rise up and take away parts of their financial sovereignty the older capitalists lose their power
besides that capitalist usa also invaded and annexed regions
capitalism doesnt mean peace and democracy it means seeking to empower a banking cartel, as much as possible also at the expense of other and their freedom, communism/marxism is doing the same btw.
Who uses coercion in order to enforce that monopoly? It is the state, not the private market. It's the centrally managed entity that is funded by forceful theft of its citizens. Those are not capitalists, they are statists. They didn't earn that money, it's not their money. It's money they got through taxation from their subjects. free market
noun
noun: free market; plural noun: free markets; modifier noun: free-market
an economic system in which prices are determined by unrestricted competition between privately owned businessesso you want to run american economy without a state, you must be some kind of a savage anarchist, who is going to provide education, defense and police? who is going to be the capitalist of those people in america currently its a jewish ran banking cartel, but what do you want? you want to work for gold? thats not reliable, for foreign currencies? cryptos? get ready to feel what capitalism in truth is. its chaos. and competition between individuals for financial sovereignty. no more professional jewish market managment for americans. |
|
|
|
if nazis where socialists, why did they attack other socialists then?
or in other words,
nazis might rather be capitalists, since they tried to capitalise themselves on the territory they seeked to controll.
people that strive and want power, cant tolerate others that strive and want power next to them.
additonally you have to understand there are also capitalists in communism/socialism
If Russia is capitalist why did it invade Ukraine? If Serbia is capitalist why did it invade Kosovo? If Austria-Hungary is a monarchy why did it invade Serbia? National Socialists didn't produce nearly enough oil and needed the oil fields in Ukraine and the Caucuses to power their war machine. After the Soviets eliminated half of their generals in the purges, their military was terrible. The most capable were killed. Hitler saw how weak the Soviet army was in their invasion of Finland. They suffered terrible defeats at the hands of a few Finns. He considered the resource rich region to be easy pray, especially after he absolutely destroyed Czechoslovakia, Poland and Yugoslavia with their new blitzkrieg type of warfare. Entire countries crumbled in less then 2 weeks. nazis might rather be capitalists, since they tried to capitalise themselves on the territory they seeked to controll. That literally doesn't make any sense. Capitalism is a voluntarly system of cooperation between consenting individuals. There's nothing voluntaristic here. It's implication of force. Statism. ever heard of currency imperialism? every national central bank does that, including the usa. capitalists need wage slaves. the moment other capitalists rise up and take away parts of their financial sovereignty the older capitalists lose some of their power besides that capitalist usa also invaded and annexed regions capitalism doesnt mean peace and democracy it means seeking to empower a banking cartel, as much as possible also at the expense of other and their freedom, communism/marxism is doing the same btw. for example american capitalism discriminates nonamerican capitalism and vice versa. |
|
|
|
As long as the goverment backs the banks with their fractional reserve banking they'll be the only ones able to provide loans at such low rates and therefore will keep operating.
They could essentially work with crypto but then they wouldn't be able to lend 5x more money than they actually have.
accepting crypto might backfire and end in chaos, thats why they are afraid of accepting it, if they accept one token brand, they have to accept all, sad thing for them that new capitalists don't want to chop of the heads of the old ones anymore like during napoleon/hitler |
|
|
|
|
if nazis where socialists, why did they attack other socialists then?
or in other words,
nazis might rather be capitalists, since they tried to capitalise themselves on the territory they seeked to controll.
people that strive and want power, cant tolerate others that strive and want power next to them.
additonally you have to understand there are also capitalists in communism/socialism
|
|
|
|
Yes its always the imperialist foreign forces. Communists can never do wrong, ever. Its always the external enemy and sometimes the internal enemy. Their ideas cannot be wrong, because they are perfect, and the fault always lies elsewhere, its never theirs.
Quite open until someone tells them they did wrong, then clearly that someone needs re-education...
Communists are like a person trying to scuba dive with a garbage bag filled with air over their heads, then when the bag breaks they blame the ocean for flooding in. are you a traditionalistic british royalist? |
|
|
|
as a christian kingdom uk should theretically have much stricter rules on stem cell research than atheist communist democracy EU
have you not read the news of what the church lets its priests do to little kids. and how the BBC media employed many.. i dont think christians actually care about the morals of that stuff, else it woudnt happen or get covered up. after all they dont even pay alter boys to sing. so that makes me (sarcasticly) aware that 'britains got talent' a capitalist non-religious organisation has more morals than the church. atleast singers on the telent show get paid well thats because you have tied your moarch from doing his work. lack of christianity is responsible for low birth rates, and the greed of brits to need to exploit foreigners, get ready to feel capitalist reality once you will see the economy to betray the people because it needs workers to exploit. |
|
|
|
wealth creation is the goal.
having no 'eu quotas' means we can create more things and then be able to sell them to many countries instead of being limited to how many items we can create due to the eu rationing policies
imagine under eu if we were only allowed to produce 1000 tonnes of wheat. well outside the eu we can produce 10,000 tones and sell just 1000 to the eu to not upset their balance but then have 9000 to sell to whomever else wants it outside the eu
thus more wheat farmers and more exports
as for trade deals we wont have to make every product conform to eu standards just because we were eu. instead when trading with the eu we just have to make sure the produce going into the eu meets their standards where as the same product can have other tweaks done to it to fit other countries needs. and no longer a one size fits all policy.
although we were in the eu we were not completely locked to them. otherwise our electricity regulations would require our house wall plugs be eu plug sockets and the currency would be euro not pound. so we already kind of had a half a foot step out of the eu anyway and we survived. so taking the other step out wont require anything big changing
for instance if EU is anti-stem cell research the UK can do it. but then not trade any research with the eu because they dont want it. instead we can trade it with other interested countries. in the past if in the eu and they were anti-stem cell research we wouldnt have even been able to research it in the first place
so now its question of what new things can we do previously forbidden and what other countries would be interested in it
as a christian kingdom uk should theretically have much stricter rules on stem cell research than atheist communist democracy EU after brexit there will be 2 choices for uk, either, exploit the own population, or get destroyed by trying to exploit african, muslim, indian immigrants. after a while we then could see a completely broken and disintegrated UK that will be ruled by the EU banking cartel. |
|
|
|
Why does everybody keep saying that Britain outside the EU will be nothing. The City of London is the major financial city in the World, even more important than Wall Street. Wall Street handles stocks, but the City of London controls the long term investments of the really wealth, and if you haven't got 300 years of tradition behind you, then they won't trust any parvenu. Britain has a very long history of international trade, and it built the largest empire that has ever existed, and it still controls most of the world. It is heavily involved in wealth transfer, and the EU was one of its creations to take corporate asset stripping up to the stripping of assets from counties. This has been obvious from the 1970s, and people are starting to realise this. A real Brexit will never happen, the real question is how far will Boris go before the puppet masters call a stop.
Bitcoiners understand many of the problems of fist currencies and the central banks. It always surprises me that they don't research the political motivation behind fractional reserve banking, zero interest rates, derivatives, and the creation of the central banks. It's time to forget about the EU. It is a globalist banking concept, and it has run about as far as it can go. I just hope we get free before the damage that toxic debt failures will cause.
you are so damn stupid outside of EU you are just a bunch of islanderists, with an economy that needs foreign trade to work, you will return to tribalism or worse. besides, the problem with economy is that it is also political, thats what brits dont get. economy and politics can't be seperated your society is at risk to be torn apart, by the greed of private enterpreneurs that want to attract foreigners use their labour for private enrichment for 20 years and then throw them into the welfare system of the society, and blame the state |
|
|
|
|
did you realise 2 things in politics that are very important,
as long as things are just ideas they have many friends but almost no visible enemies,
as soon as they become real and specified, hell breaks over them and they get a lot of enemies
i give you 4 big examples of our time
1. crypto, -> as long as it wasnt attacking the financial sovereignty of established banking cartels no one cared about it and many promoted it,
as soon as crypto started running its own pyramid system it became evil of many
2. Communism/socialism
in nation state europe many people with mixed national identities and also many jews seeked to free themselves from cross national hatred the national banking cartels where spreading, so they seeked to create real socialism
as soon as that one got real and the formation of communist parliament, central banks and other started to form, the usa allied itself with all that felt threatened by it to fight it.
3. EU, the european union had long time no enemies as soon as the currency system started to more and more interconnect european economies and european central bankster cartel realised itself of holding the power, eu that was an angel of morality globally started to have many enemies, the joke among the enemies are also the in shambles nationalists that destroyed europe with their racism and nationalism hatred in 2 worldwars. although they always promised the world peace once the kings where removed and the nationalist as nazi banking cartel dictators over the population in power.
4. american captialism/liberalism
once a defense system against the so called "communist threat" american capitalism after the end of communism and also islamism, has become the symbolisation of angolo geographic discrimination against the rest of the world, the truth about the american capitalism has realised itself.
from that perspective it doesnt really matter weather people critice stuff or not,
people will always be unhappy except they rule and dominate everyone else.
regards
|
|
|
|
banks as institutions aren't racist, they simply support the accumulation of wealth and execute power in a systematic manner, the problem is they have the power, they are certain all others live uncertain. thats the problem all banks sooner or later end up tyranic or racist. american banks aren't racist btw. they are communist. arabic banks or african banks are racist. in many societies banks are effectively kings, |
|
|
|
|
cryptotalk.org hat bitcointalk.org mittlerweile überholt
|
|
|
|
|
why are people still classyfy things into good and bad, its purely idiotic.
good and bad are often accompanied with humanism, religion, nationalism and even racism.
then good thing for someone can be a bad thing for someone else.
this makes people go mad that try to be politically correct, in order to survive.
regards
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
