I work as a secretary in a law firm and often times I have to go to the court to file cases of divorce. You find out that during the time my boss will try to resolve the dispute or disagreement between the couples, you will begin to hear and see all sorts of insults and abuses from both parties. I just cant stop imagining how two people who claimed to be in love with each are now their own enemies. What are those factors that could result to such irreconcilable differences? Your creative inputs is highly welcome.
violence, war and conflict exists, because people want other people to do certain things something |
|
|
|
but most importantly nature has clear homosexual features,
bee and ant states are almost 100% lesbian(feminist homosexuality).
termite states are almost 100% gender neutral.
so american evangelics, if you don't understand nature. or feel threatened by homosexuals, dont talk trash about nature.
I think you don't get the point right: The thread is about humans in particular not other creatures where homo is indeed a natural thing  Pls do not compare apples with bananas! humans are also just individuals, acting if you look into historic human history most humans lived genderneutral all the roman soldiers where basically either gay or gender neutral, few of them married especially islam has a broad band of genderneutrality. all mujahedin dying in wars, where gender neutral individuals, and those few males that owned harems with several thausand women where the only ones reproducing. tech advantage will create even more possibilities, reproduction might become some kind of a product, buyable by everyone singles; corporations, etc. traditional marrier male and female partnerships might get into competition, just because judeo christian history dominance destroyed all evidence on the existence of genderneutral living human beings, doesn't mean it never existed. christian church simply was bigotted and fanatic regarding that marriage model, and it was also pushed by christian nobility to have a huge reproduction. regards |
|
|
|
Just keep in mind in evaluating things, that the USA does not need Middle East oil anymore. Thanks to fracking, those days are over.
Because oil is a fungible resource, it is likely that no part of this fracas with affect oil prices.
the problem is imperialism, attacking us embassies revealed that treaties with iran are worthless they are no partners they are imperialists |
|
|
|
attacking us embasy was so stupid, everybody instantly knew after that, that iranian regime is imperialists and treaties with them are worthless these damn idiots what where they thinking, usa was about to leave and focus on internal issues |
|
|
|
|
usa/nato doesn't need ressources from the middle east anymore, venezuella has more oil than the gulf, and no one is using it an venezuelans are starving and are jobless.
the problem that is escalating the ware is an iranian polci to obtain a religious fanatic nuclear weapon.
|
|
|
|
many topics have shown you got no clue what nazism or slavery really is. time you invest in a couple history books
iran just dont want the yanks being the puppet masters. iran is not threatening america. they just want the yanks out of iran.
it america that want to be a superpower by invading other countries and weaken the inhabitants
i know very well what nazism is, its nationalist socialism a langauge based group creation that then ads race, history and geography to the mix, unfortunately iran is obsessed with nuclear weapons, and thats why conflict is escalating. So does North Korea and i don't see any escalation there... For what reason Trump ordered the assassination of some random general but to provoke them even more? Maybe he needs more support back home. Hey just like what they say happens in North Korea all the time "to keep the masses united behind the great leader" isn't? the problem with north korea is that it is not religious, religious regimes are expected to be much more dangerous, as they consider the world some kind of a virtual reality, or video game. additionally a north korea konflikt might still escalate. |
|
|
|
why are democrats in the us so upset about a possible iran war,
....
Right, that's what they wanted.... Until Trump wanted it... Then they have to NOT WANT IT!!! There were posts in facebook that Trump only did it because he wants to delay the impeachment proceedings. It could be true. He seem afraid of this impeachment when he seem to have the numbers supporting him. Demo still doesn't like what is happening since its Trump that's doing it. They hate and disagrees everything he do. They really should not hate EVERYTHING he does. democracy starts to suck, this constant public pupulism, democrats heve become a racist party again, they switched from anti black racism to anti white racism, its every time the same, democrats always fall through their need for populism towards racism. democrats should be banned in the us, the party just is trash |
|
|
|
Didn't this general did a lot against ISIS (who were attacking Shias)? What's weird about Iran was it was partly or fully a result of American policy (depending on who you ask). It was very secular monarchy and then it went nationalist which didn't please Washington. And then the Ayatollah America fostered bit their hands once he returned to Iran.
We can only speculate how far this will escalate and that will hinge on whether Iran truly have nukes to retaliate with.
well muslims have their conflict around who holds the chalifate since a long time, it needs a lot of understanding how it works. shia islam started with the slaughtering of an insurgency against the chalifate. Haven't read the full history but I remember reading somewhere that this is the true problem of the Middle East... Unlike with Western culture where America pretty much reign supreme (the rivalry between Catholicism/Protestantism pretty much made irrelevant by secularization) Islam is a "culture" without a figurehead. Hence the Arabian/Persian struggle for hegemony. There's enough enmity between these two that I don't think it'll just disappear even if both turn into secular democracies. jes it is a struggle, but it hasn't something to do with arabian persian its shiite/sunnite, the fact that it became arabian/persian has something to do with how islam expanded, the once proud persian empire collapsed and got exploited by the savaging arabians, that sold persian girls into the slave market etc. it was impossible for the entire persian nation to just join sunnite islam, for the persians the arabian sunnite islam was something extremely cruel, and so they absorbed shiite islam which was an opposition movement against the established sunnite khaliph |
|
|
|
America is continuously invading countries in the name of terrorism and restoring democracy since 9/11 and it doesn’t matter who is in power whether its democrats or republicans. They both doing the same thing. The main player crafts the future plan and coming governments only execute that plan. You can easily guess who that main player is.
that's because those countries are constantly threthening each other, they aren't all as smart and sneaky like germany or russia (economic expansion, cyber) iran acts like a savage, iraq (sadam hussein) acted like a savage, usa had to interfere. regards |
|
|
|
snip
there is no big difference actually between serfdoom to financial nobility (bank/billionaires/equity billionaires with passive incomes) and official nobility (kings, firsts, barons, etc) A serf cannot be king. A salaryman can become a banker or billionaire, etc. Life still sucks but there are more options to rise up in the ladder or at least life comfortably. Know the rules well and get your game up. thats true, but only if the money the servants/salary slave money/capitalist earns is being treated with wisdom, in a corrupt republic you money gets inflated away quickly, and only hard currencies count, All societies devolve and they collapse eventually. The current system can too. We have come to the point where competition can easily be quashed by the big players, that has already gained enough power to influence politicians. We use their fiat because we have to but that doesn't mean we shouldn't prepare for whatever trainwreck they'll throw us next to steal the value of our money away. jes stealing value away is a big issue with spineless EU plutocrats. |
|
|
|
what is wrong with iranians why are they upholding nazism so much?
This has nothing to do with Nazism, that's nonsense. Iranian pursuit of nuclear power (and nuclear weapons) is entirely logical. Possession of nuclear weapons is the closest you can get to a guarantee that the US won't invade. thats not true, then the hatred in the west against mullahs with nukes will turn to an asymetric war, with nonstate actors, states will not be possible to blame. regards |
|
|
|
|
stupid iranians, attacking the us embassy was such a stupid idea, now everybody knows that they are no communists seeking to produce energy but simply imperialists disguising themselves like kommunists with a religious head. the treaties everybody is making with them are worthless. now everybody sees that even stupid and naive EU.
now there are very good reasons to invade and destroy their nuclear facilities.
sucks to think about that, i would have had no issue about middle east developing itself but running a nazi imperialist religious extremist agenda that is not acceptable and war is at gates.
|
|
|
|
What are the chances of the drone strike in Iran starting a chain of reactions that leads to another World War? I know that political relations are in general always tense, so will the drone strike catalyse another war to come?
the chain of reactons started long time ago that drone strike was just an event in it, it started with the iranian nuclera program, attacking the american embassy with violence by the iranian leadership showed the entire world that they are not trustworthy treaty partners, now there will be a war. the question is weather the usa can sell the war successful as a war against the nuclear program of the islamist leadership in iran. |
|
|
|
Nuclear power is the most reliable carbon free energy source. Renewables don't come close in terms of reliability and gross energy production.
but renewables are cheaper and less complicated regarding the maintenance, plus they dont create a potential environmental hazard target. having islamic mullahs obtaining nuclear weapons is nothing great either. |
|
|
|
you dont even know what socialism is..
here is a todler explanation
capitalism is where corporations control the government for the benefit of corporations enrichment
communism is where governments care more for the benefit of government enrichment
socialism is where democratic elected governments by people run the country for the benefit of the people
nazi was communist
america is capitalist/communist (you can tell by the lack of social care)
iran is communist/socialist
UK was socialist but now swaying more towards capitalist
as for iran and nuclear weapons.. its their country. if they want to protect themsevles they should. the only thing they shouldnt do is threaten other countries. by thi i mean distant lands.. not american politicians within iran who try to pretend they own iran
by america overstepping their boundaries its america that are in the wrong in this case
america is the nazis' trying to take over other countries and convert people to american ways
such nonsense, communism seeks infrastructure development nazi is national socialist, it is an economic system that seeks to benefit a lingual cooperation. i live in germany i know what nazism is. i was teached about that in my school years, and unlike you i am able to listen all nazi documentaries and adolf hitler speeches in the original langauge -> german |
|
|
|
why are democrats in the us so upset about a possible iran war,
....
Right, that's what they wanted.... Until Trump wanted it... Then they have to NOT WANT IT!!! @OP I don't think anyone really wants war. Not The USA or the Iranians. Well they didn't until their top general got taken out, but war is only good for the war profiteers. Both sides of a war lose in the end. ofc there are many people that want a war, do you seriously want to live in a world in which iranian mullahs al qaida and hamas own nuclear weapons? |
|
|
|
|
the conflict is actually not with the middle east, the conflict is with the iranian nuclear program
|
|
|
|
many topics have shown you got no clue what nazism or slavery really is. time you invest in a couple history books
iran just dont want the yanks being the puppet masters. iran is not threatening america. they just want the yanks out of iran.
it america that want to be a superpower by invading other countries and weaken the inhabitants
i know very well what nazism is, its nationalist socialism a langauge based group creation that then ads race, history and geography to the mix, unfortunately iran is obsessed with nuclear weapons, and thats why conflict is escalating. |
|
|
|
|
what is wrong with iranians why are they upholding nazism so much?
|
|
|
|
Science has been wrong in the past about hundreds of thousands of things that they validated in the past.
Science has never been wrong. Scientists do make mistakes. like the data scientists who said trump can't win the election including obama. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
