OK, so does anybody else on the forum reading this think that Mike Pompeo's letter to the house infer that he did not receive a subpoena?
Of course he got a subpoena. If he hadn't of the WH lawyers would have been all over that and they would have made statements to the press etc. TECTARD is nothing more than a conspiracy nut troll who can't even keep his argument straight half the time and pulls in bullshit "proof" that has nothing to do with what's being discussed half the time. He's fun for some entertainment sometimes and that's about it. |
|
|
|
Good morning community, I recently invested in the project because its concept seems interesting to me, I would like to help not only to buy the currency, but also what they consider useful, the community is what differentiates a dead project from one that still has Hope, then it is necessary that the community be more active, we all have the same common objective and that this currency has its rightful place (it is necessary that people who have several currencies participate more, if the project does not work that amount of the coins will be worth 0 )
Community support is shown in something as necessary as paying the explorer block
1) It is necessary to have a roadmap with marked objectives, in this way it would facilitate the inclusion of some developer, which would also help us to start a good exchange
3) Monetary liquidity is needed for this reason a new exchange is urgently needed
2) Coinmarket is a place where many people go, so it is necessary for the currency to reappear
3) Modernize the website design, I know that Bitcoin FX created a new one, we would try to redesign it to make it easier for the next investors (thanks bitcoinfx and Graham for the great support offered to the currency in recent years, without you this currency would forget)
With regard to the development of the currency that is the most important, what are the priorities at this time
regards
You want a coin that is run as a centralized business. This is a grassroots coin where the tech is more important than money. i.e. what Bitcoin used to be before all the money hungry leeches latched on and bastardized all of this stuff. |
|
|
|
In reality he probably could've just sent a letter saying THIS IS YOUR SUBPOENA and it would still be binding.
Probably not. Unlike TECH, I went and dug through a whole lot of government documents and, although I didn't read through all the various exception clauses, I think there is at least one particular requirement. But wanted to see if he was actually interested in and capable of coming up with it or not. He wasn't. |
|
|
|
It says "we are hereby transmitting a subpoena". When he says "this subpoena" in the next paragraph, he's referring to the subpoena that is being transmitted, not the actual document you're reading. The same language "this subpoena" is used in the letter to Epser, which is clearly not a subpoena since it concludes with "the enclosed subpoena".
It's totally standard to include a letter explaining what the subpoena is all about since the actual subpoena doesn't have much detail.
I've been subpoenaed.
Oh good lord. So are you telling me that his reams and reams of posting about this thing can be summed up by as him deflecting to the cover letter as opposed to the other piece of paper which is the enclosed subpoena? He could have simply said that and ended the entire topic? I do note that the other letter also had enclosures. So much wasted time. I imagine TECSHARE really believed that Schiff decided to send a 'fake subpoena' because he knew that the whole thing was an illegal witch hunt but maybe they'd think the fake subpoena was a real subpoena. In reality he probably could've just sent a letter saying THIS IS YOUR SUBPOENA and it would still be binding. That letter used the same terminology and some enclosures. I'm still waiting for TECH to provide proof of what the subpoena is supposed to contain/look like. Not going to hold his hand though. It was entertaining for awhile to play his game but I'm over it. |
|
|
|
It says "we are hereby transmitting a subpoena". When he says "this subpoena" in the next paragraph, he's referring to the subpoena that is being transmitted, not the actual document you're reading. The same language "this subpoena" is used in the letter to Epser, which is clearly not a subpoena since it concludes with "the enclosed subpoena".
It's totally standard to include a letter explaining what the subpoena is all about since the actual subpoena doesn't have much detail.
I've been subpoenaed.
Oh good lord. So are you telling me that his reams and reams of posting about this thing can be summed up by as him deflecting to the cover letter as opposed to the other piece of paper which is the enclosed subpoena? He could have simply said that and ended the entire topic? I do note that the other letter also had enclosures. So much wasted time. |
|
|
|
Don't know what you're saying. The "letter" he claims is not a subpoena says it's a subpoena and is authorized by the committee via all those sorts of signatures. |
|
|
|
You're right, that's a letter not a subpoena. The subpoena would've been sent along with the letter explaining everything. (idiot  ) The document he provided is for a court of law, not for oversight/impeachment. The "letter" states it's a subpoena and has all the information required in it. The government form he provided as "proof" was just the form. On the page itself it states it is only meant as a sample for the information required for a hearing. I provided the senate handbook which has an impeachment subpoena in the form of a letter. He has yet to provide any government documents that states exactly what is required for a subpoena and has said he won't. So basically, he refused to back up his claim and dances around it instead. So now there's no point continuing. |
|
|
|
We must have went back and forth on the subpoenas 30+ times. I absolutely disagree with your logic and I'm fairly confident the subpoenas are enforceable.
Not worth discussing it with him. The court has ruled that the congress are within their legal rights to conduct their oversight/impeachment inquiry etc and thus their subpoenas are legal. When asked to provide government documentation of proof of his claim he has failed to do so and just founders around with non applicable stuff. |
|
|
|
At least I made an argument. You substituted Tumblr in lieu of having independent thoughts. Bruh... that's deep. Don't forget to include some yoga pants shots.  |
|
|
|
Is there a windows compiled cpu miner available for Grin?
Anyone have an answer for this or is it SOL and compile your own? |
|
|
|
why is it so hard for cryptopia to just press the "enable withdrawal button"?
1. There is no cryptopia anymore to push any buttons 2. The government is now involved and they have pesky things like laws and regulations and the like. |
|
|
|
I don't need an entourage, you seldom travel without one.
Nobody has an "entourage", and neither is anybody traveling anywhere. This is a forum. I can't stop other people from writing comments, nor encourage them, nor do I try to. Anybody is free to do as they please. Thanks for again proving you have trouble separating your personal feelings about discussions in Politics & Society and forum policy discussion in other sections.
Your projections don't change the fact that you're the only one here trying to do any censoring. How long did the Russia-gate investigations last? 3 years? When did these accusations about manipulation in the 2016 elections start surfacing? Very recently.
Don't know, don't care. Its irrelevant to this discussion. Democrats only allow investigations of their opponents though, investigations of anyone they support is just meddling of course.
 Whatever you say, here comes one now... ^ I don't have the power to censor anything. I am not a moderator. Also I report people when they break the rules, not because they make a point I think should be hidden. What? 2016 election meddling via Ukraine by the Bidens is irrelevant to the discussion, but posts about nothing but personal attacks is "on topic" and "censorship" if reported? Yeah ok buddy. When did these accusations about manipulation in the 2016 elections start surfacing? Very recently.
You either have selective memory or are just out of the loop. https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446One has to wonder why NOW is when Trump decided to make it an issue when he's had 2 1/2 years to have investigations happen. Oh wait. Election season. Gotcha. It's clear from one of the transcripts that Trump has a bone to pick with Ukraine saying "They screwed me". But now is the time for some pay back time for him and gain political advantage out of it cause that's what he does. Use his office to settle personal scores. One has to wonder how dense you have to be to not notice the connection between the investigations into Biden, and Ukraine meddling with the 2016 elections. Why make it an issue now? Might have something to do with the 3 years of Russia gate investigations making it difficult to do his job and run investigations of his own. So rather than immediately jumping into it and surely facing accusations of political interference, he let the investigation conclude, exposing itself as completely baseless, before exposing the ones involved with his own investigations. The 3 years of Russia gate of COURSE were not politically motivated right? Nor were the investigations of everyone who ever did Trumps landscaping or laundry. Now of course Trump thinks investigations of the other party are prudent, well of course all of that can only be motivated by politics right? You have so many holes in your brain when the wind blows it whistles.  |
|
|
|
When did these accusations about manipulation in the 2016 elections start surfacing? Very recently.
You either have selective memory or are just out of the loop. https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446One has to wonder why NOW is when Trump decided to make it an issue when he's had 2 1/2 years to have investigations happen. Oh wait. Election season. Gotcha. It's clear from one of the transcripts that Trump has a bone to pick with Ukraine saying "They screwed me". But now is the time for some pay back time for him and gain political advantage out of it cause that's what he does. Use his office to settle personal scores. |
|
|
|
"I now recall speaking individually with Mr. (Andriy) Yermak, where I said resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks," Sondland said.
Updated his testimony. Reading these transcripts is a slog. But interesting. I love how Trump is all. Talk to Rudy. Talk to Rudy. Talk to Rudy. I'm starting to feel sorry for Rudy. He's being made the patsy in order to try and insulate Trump. Soon enough I can see Trump starting to say he didn't know what Rudy was doing/saying. |
|
|
|
But those on the right are more like cult followers who just blindly follow along and aren't objective about anything. No wonder the US is so fucked up.
It think it would be more accurate to say Trump supporters. My bad.. Although I know plenty on the right that would fall into that category as well. |
|
|
|
 This is the conclusion I've come to when it comes to Tech and Spend. You know the one thing I've noticed. Most of those that are more on the left are perfectly willing to change their opinion and viewpoint on things when someone makes rational arguments and acts like a grownup to show them real facts. But those on the right are more like cult followers who just blindly follow along and aren't objective about anything. No wonder the US is so fucked up. |
|
|
|
Polls, always with the polls. Polls are easily manipulated. It amazes me how many of you forgot all the polls with 90%+ saying Hillary was going to win already. Keep dreaming, the Democrats don't have anyone with a chance in hell of beating Trump.
Polls are the only way to figure out the opinion of a large number of people without asking every single person. A single poll can have quite a wide margin of error, but when you consider the results of many polls taken frequently they provide a pretty accurate representation on what people are thinking and how certain events are affecting their opinion. As long as there aren't any major flaws in your method of collection, it's just math. And if there are flaws in your method of collection, it will become apparent over time. It amazes me how many of you forgot all the polls with 90%+ saying Hillary was going to win already.
Those weren't polls. They were models based on data collected from multiple polls. An electoral college model would have to figure out how to calculate the results of several different polls in each of the 50 states and then consider every scenario. It's way more complicated than "a poll". Most of the reputable national polls for the 2016 general were actually within .5 % of the actual result. And while there were a bunch of states that Trump won that most of the polls had Clinton winning, they were mostly pretty close calls. Polls, always with the polls. Polls are easily manipulated. It amazes me how many of you forgot all the polls with 90%+ saying Hillary was going to win already. Keep dreaming, the Democrats don't have anyone with a chance in hell of beating Trump.
It amazes me how many people think they are better at determining the opinions of millions of people all over the country better than any of the well established Political Polling Organizations that have a proven track record of being very accurate over a period of decades. Also worth noting, Don't let Trump fool you. pollsters really don't give a fuck about trying to help or hurt Trump by cooking the numbers. They are in the business of being accurate. The most accurate polls are the ones that get the most funding. In case it's not obvious, Trump isn't attacking them for not being accurate, he's attacking them because they don't have him winning. This is the definition of bias. Yep. And you have to look at the big picture. When I watched Moore's movie and then heard how Clinton was being warned and told to get her ass to the states she lost I knew she was in trouble despite the polls. And then watching her and her surrogates preaching morality while Trump was talking economy, that even more so made me feel like she was in trouble. Shocking given "It's the economy stupid" and that voters "vote with their pocket books". They all should have known better but got caught up in the "outrage" culture. The Comey thing was just the nail in the coffin as there was simply not enough time to recover. The Biden polls are "interesting". If you listen to the media you would think Warren was potentially pull ahead etc. But a little while ago I went and looked at polls from a bunch of states and he was ahead in most of them and well ahead. But of course that can change. It's far to early to give much weigh to polls. How much money you can raise is far more important at this point as that's a better gauge right now. |
|
|
|
BSV goes more use cases.
Yep. Especially for criminal activity... https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47130268How many of you are now in possession of pedo material cause you have the blockchain. CW is such a moron massively increasing how much data could be stored in the block chain. That was NOT the satoshi vision. He said only increment AS NEEDED. I can see it now. They'll come up with a solution that tosses out the rule of the blockchain being immutable and try and justify it as the "real" satoshi vision. But hey. Continue with your illegal activities. I'm sure it will all turn out well for you. - If -  So if crime happens on BitCoin - it happens with signed keys - how stupid is such? -> Jailtime incoming More crime happens on the internet, where u do not have to sign your shit - so metanet will fix that. good u asked - thx but sure - we cannot fix stupid - but transparent BitCoin can mitigate better than dumb interent. Internet (except metanet) / other shitcoins should be closed following ur own logic - now! What's "stupid" is you thinking someone can't stick things into the blockchain while remaining completely anonymous. You create a brand new wallet and do your dirty work. You can even fund that wallet completely anonymously if you're smart enough. You can't stop real criminals that know what they're doing. Nor can you stop people from writing their own stuff to access the blockchain. And since they've made a big deal about not wanting criminal activity on there, they've made it so people are going to want to do it. Hell, someone could setup a service in some country that the US can't get to and let people upload and view shit on there if they wanted to. There's a huge difference between people using a coin for illegal activities as opposed to it being PART of the illegal activity which is what BSV now is. It is technically distributing child porn to everyone that uses the full blockchain. I love how you skipped over the fact that everyone who has the blockchain is now breaking the law cause they have pedo material. Nor have any of you disputed the fact that satoshi said AS NEEDED and yet CW is not doing that. Not only did the idiot CW increase the block size, he increased the arbitrary data to 100k compared to 40 BYTES for bitcoin and 230 bytes for BCH which is why it's now possible. And despite these moronic decisions you still put your faith in CW. Nope - there is no 100% anno - especially not in BitCoin. WTF. Are you truly stupid? Of course there is. Holy crap. No wonder you buy into everything CW spews. Do I have to educate you on how it can be done? Ever heard of anonymous coins? Using non KYC exchanges to convert that anonymity into bitcoin and transferring it into your fresh wallet while sitting at some library or coffee shop etc using proxies/VPNs etc. And that's just one way. |
|
|
|
while remaining completely anonymous You may can do it now, you have to be a total moron to believe technology will not improve. Blockchain is forever it does not forget. Second upload is useless without a link, again internet is not Metanet. Link to it in Metanet and your done, (for life). BSV is honest MetaNet and distance itself from criminal Internet content. Internet is full with nasties. lol. You're so naive.. Maybe you didn't understand when I said that ANYONE can write tools/clients etc to read/write to the blockchain. But ok, we'll see then how far CW will go to bastardize the decentralized vision and the like with his "solutions" while still claiming it's the original "vision". Given the disaster of his current solutions, I doubt things will turn out well. Criminals will always find a way around things and unless you can think like them, you can't come up with solutions to combat them. That's why law enforcement hires hackers/criminals to help them. |
|
|
|
BSV goes more use cases.
Yep. Especially for criminal activity... https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47130268How many of you are now in possession of pedo material cause you have the blockchain. CW is such a moron massively increasing how much data could be stored in the block chain. That was NOT the satoshi vision. He said only increment AS NEEDED. I can see it now. They'll come up with a solution that tosses out the rule of the blockchain being immutable and try and justify it as the "real" satoshi vision. But hey. Continue with your illegal activities. I'm sure it will all turn out well for you. - If - So if crime happens on BitCoin - it happens with signed keys - how stupid is such? -> Jailtime incoming More crime happens on the internet, where u do not have to sign your shit - so metanet will fix that. good u asked - thx but sure - we cannot fix stupid - but transparent BitCoin can mitigate better than dumb interent. Internet (except metanet) / other shitcoins should be closed following ur own logic - now! What's "stupid" is you thinking someone can't stick things into the blockchain while remaining completely anonymous. You create a brand new wallet and do your dirty work. You can even fund that wallet completely anonymously if you're smart enough. You can't stop real criminals that know what they're doing. Nor can you stop people from writing their own stuff to access the blockchain. And since they've made a big deal about not wanting criminal activity on there, they've made it so people are going to want to do it. Hell, someone could setup a service in some country that the US can't get to and let people upload and view shit on there if they wanted to. There's a huge difference between people using a coin for illegal activities as opposed to it being PART of the illegal activity which is what BSV now is. It is technically distributing child porn to everyone that uses the full blockchain. I love how you skipped over the fact that everyone who has the blockchain is now breaking the law cause they have pedo material. Nor have any of you disputed the fact that satoshi said AS NEEDED and yet CW is not doing that. Not only did the idiot CW increase the block size, he increased the arbitrary data to 100k compared to 40 BYTES for bitcoin and 230 bytes for BCH which is why it's now possible. And despite these moronic decisions you still put your faith in CW. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
