Having worked in development for many, many years, I'm not surprised by the delay as my gut said that the 10th date was far too optimistic for what they were going to try and accomplish.  Programmers are just terrible for meeting deadlines and estimating realistic completion date.  A big part of my job in the past was to figure out what what "buffers" I had to build into schedules based on the historic accuracy of the programmers working for me.  lol

He's on twitter https://twitter.com/Pumper_Ryan

The dev said something about the email account used for it was hacked but then somehow they got it back.  Pretty strange but not the first thing strange to happen in crypto land for sure.  lol

Oh look.  The twitter is back.  Gotta love guys who run around with new accounts spreading FUD so they can drive the price of a coin down.  lol

I believe you had mentioned setting a 2.5% stop loss.  However, how do you deal with just typical price fluctuations when you're taking a position that you expect to yield results in a few days as opposed to just trading on the daily dips in a coin?

For example, let's say you buy a coin at 1000 expecting it to get to 1500 in a few days. But once you buy it, it could easily drop below 975 occasionally within a few hours of buying it.

This guy has a site that lists probably all of the Doge faucets by now

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=742201.0

As for a wallet, I'd recommend you go with the full blown official one.  I've been using MultiDoge but it has some problems with connecting to peers consistently and also sending when you have a lot of small inputs (like from faucets).  These problems have been brought up by others as well but the dev only seems to update it when he absolutely has to.

How many pages is your ignore list up to?

This made me laugh.  The p-n-d guys are all over this coin, not to mention your FUD (which serves to manipulate the price as well).  So it's not like the devs have to actually do any manipulation. lol

Besides, all the "popular" coins are manipulated and what cryto is all about it seems.

No one can really answer your question since we're not sitting in the devs house watching what he's doing.  I do know that 100% of Qora was distributed to something like 150 investors via an IPO.  But for all we know, the dev could have bought in as well.  Frankly, it makes me nervous if a dev doesn't have a sizable stake in their own coin as I don't see them being as married to the long term success of the coin if they don't.

You've gotten a bit off topic here lol

And letstalkbitcoin.com has a participation reward as well.

Someone had posted this the other day, I think it was in the Monero thread and I'm wondering if there's any truth to it.

http://da-data.blogspot.com.au/2014/08/minting-money-with-monero-and-cpu.html


I don't know much about the history of Monero but what little I know leads me to believe what Melbustus had to say is a big part of it, especially #1.

Oh my lord. You're FINALLY going do what you should have done in your very first post in this thread instead of letting your obvious friendship with Jasin prevent you from doing your job.  For someone who likes to present himself as superiorly intelligent it sure took you long enough to figure out how to do your job.

In what way am I "dumb as a rock"?  Can't argue with XC's own document.  Seems as if you're the one that has problems due to your puppy dog blinders.

Anything you might have to say regarding XC can safely be ignored since it would be completely self serving.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600706.msg6845023#msg6845023

And by the way.  I have no stake in all this (wasn't involved with the ASIC stuff, not involved with XC, not seriously involved with any specific "competitor"), just putting out facts.

I'll just leave this here since the XC team seems to want to rewrite history.  The one thing I really dislike is when people spout some morally superior ethics and then try and hide things.  I also find it strange that the website blocks robots like archive.org from crawling it.  That's always a sign people want to hide things, especially historic things that could be used against them in the future.

http://xc-official.com/assets/pdfs/14-07-08%20The%20XC%20Team.pdf

Hey Bob AltcoinsMessiah.  Have you finished playing with XST and if so what's the play for next week? LXC, GB or maybe CLOAK?  When's your ban expire?

So you equate volume with quality devs/coins?  Strange as most of the coins with a lot of volume only have it because of market manipulators and pump and dumpers. Go through the top 10 volume coins on Bittrex and other than maybe BitcoinDark, they've all been pumped this week and have nothing to do with quality devs/coins..

Why would you need to leave?  Not like anyone with a brain wouldn't know how these things really work.  Besides which, you can just look at the charts he's posted to see that if you're not quick out the gate then you have a good chance of losing out.  Regardless of whether or not he or anyone else prebuys, anyone that knows what they're doing can make money from the pump.

I sat in a chat room for some other public pnd a week or so ago and was amazed at the stupidity of some people.  They didn't have a clue when they should buy or sell despite it being known it was a pump and dump.  People that don't understand how these things work shouldn't be getting involved in the first place.

This thread is entertaining.  Seems like Synechist is the PR person for jasinlee as opposed to XC.  As an outsider, he's done more damage than good here IMO. Frankly, I don't get it as usually businesses/companies etc will distance themselves from people that have controversy swirling around them and yet here they're embracing him.

I'll just put this here and perhaps some people should think about it "Thou doth protest too much".

Nice to know I'm not the only one that thinks AltcoinMessiah is bob, or at the least one of his minions.