Ethereum 1.0 and Ethereum 2.0 are 2 different blockchains with different algorithms. I think the developers will make a bridge for transferring coins from one network to another, until Ethereum 1.0 loses its relevance. More news will be closer to the launch of Phase 1. If you have some Ethereum, you will be able to do this operation through a cryptocurrency exchange.
both could survive in parallel for reason of wealth creation ? and with different functions? Ethereum is changing its algorithm. 2 parallel blockchains will only exist until phase 1.5. Eth 1.0 will be a Shard of Eth 2.0. If you have your own private key than your are good to go, there is no need to any switch.
I think it will depend on which phase you want to move your coins from one network to another. If you want to do this after phase 1, you may need to use a bridge this discussion is important. outside the probable functional difference in both, i would suspect that if you have now one ETH1, you will arrive progressively to possess one ETH1 and one ETH2. do you agree ?
|
|
|
Ethereum 1.0 and Ethereum 2.0 are 2 different blockchains with different algorithms. I think the developers will make a bridge for transferring coins from one network to another, until Ethereum 1.0 loses its relevance. More news will be closer to the launch of Phase 1. If you have some Ethereum, you will be able to do this operation through a cryptocurrency exchange.
both could survive in parallel for reason of wealth creation ? and with different functions?
|
|
|
Owner of this site is not responding to any request to revive deleted premium accounts, mine too, site was not functioning a lot of time, I suspect there was some hack in a while, leaking users data including exchanges api keys, or even the owner is using it. https://twitter.com/alganonim/status/1180059696574713856?s=19no very encouraging news.. seems to work now. anybody has experience ?
|
|
|
Well, what do folks on this Litecoin thread think of the coinbase CEO's rumor of BTC/crypto regulations requiring exchanges to know the ins/outs of KYC for not only an account but you prove? somehow your paper wallet or Trezor or whatever and keep track of all addresses in/out with KYC? (I assume that is the crux of this stupid supposed regulation? Correct me if that is a few steps beyond what it is really) indeed..impossible indeed..it would be the same thing as China tried to do more than a few years back and all the China exchanges just picked up and left...then views changed and all came backM Indeed, I can easily go to an exchange in Canada and use KYC and skip the entirety of the above regulation....I assume this is just another 'burnt earth' policy of dubious regulations left by the Trump Administration to make things difficult for the incoming Biden Administration and will..if implemented by Trump Administration would be overturned promptly. (knock wood) But, indeed, IF such a rule was made...Mimblewimble would be soooooo beyond dead in the water for Litecoin as to be 'undo'able' IMHO even if all the exchanges did leave the USA for What do you think? Not a slam, just saying, if it stands, the next shot would be against Mimblewimble and anon coins IMHO. Again, I can't see it working..in that it is a USA law only, but damn I can see it slapping the price of BTC/Crypto down to sideways or much lower sideways on the next year into 2021 as this is addressed by Biden Administration and threats of US exchanges bailing out of the USA ASAP. Anyway, thoughts on how you think this all will shake out? I myself would be my own money that Trump Administration, like Coinbase CEO says, will do this rule before Biden Administration takes over. Likely, with a 'timeline' impossible to do by say Jan 1st, 2021. Sh*t, this will be quite the clusterf**k...I hope I'm dead wrong, but dubious Trump Administration rules seem to be the way of things till Biden Administration takes over, so I hope not in this case...but with all our success this year, we would be a likely target of such idiocy IMHO. Again, beat me up, give me some hope, say I'm wrong on my view it will go through and will get fixed by Biden Administration eventually but making 2021 more uncomfortable than it otherwise would be price/regulation wise. BTC/Crypto/LTC always drama! Brad centralization is good for you ?
|
|
|
does leasing on TN network actually function? what are the present providers?
recently I have leased to H2ox.io , but there is no revenue. so i cancelled.
|
|
|
It seems important that the waves team can easily verify my words, because I still have access to the bitcoin wallet from which I participated in ico. Yes, I didn’t hit the deadline, so it’s really at their discretion whether to meet me halfway or not.
so waves support could recognize the transaction you made for ICO ?
|
|
|
Notice email sent out
is aeonLW ready for the november fork ?
|
|
|
@extasie don't you think that, out of an attack on bitfinex/tether/usdt, an analogous crisis could be engineered by an attack on defi and stablecoins, whose generalization results in a big problem for central banks of the world?
|
|
|
yeah, it is very interesting topic and number of projects on Polkadot is rising, although it is bold to say that this number is even close to Ethereum, and most of the projects are in early stage or test phase, Ethereum projects are developed, used and live at the moment nevertheless, one should look for the future, and there is a tone to see on Polkadot network, which could propel it to new frontiers for those not willing to read the whole article, since it is a long one, i will mention best projects currently developed on Polkadot: live and trading: - Edgeware - self-upgrading smart contract platform on Polkadot, currently not doing well after some hype early on ( https://edgewa.re/) - ChainX - inter-chain bridge, that is also down 70% from the top in August ( https://chainx.org/) - Stafi - Stacked Finance, first DeFi on Polkadot, down almost 80% from a month ago ( https://www.stafi.io/) from the article, ones that are not traded at the moment: - Acala - para-chain optimized for DeFi, currently on test-net, all-in-one DeFi service center ( https://acala.network/), it is important to note that there will be no public sale of tokens, beware of any scams - Moonbeam - provides Ethereum compatible smart contract network on Polkadot (trying to get dApps from Ethereum), as well in testnet ( https://moonbeam.network/) - Kilt - web3.0 credentials protocol project, started in Germany, Demo client is live, foreseen for IoT on web3.0 ( https://www.kilt.io/) - Plasm - scaling dApp platform on Polkadot Substrate, PLM native token is distributed through lockdrop, in two waves to ETH stackers, with more than 137k ETH locked ( https://plasmnet.io/) - Litentry - identity authentification and aggregation project, there is no public sale as well ( https://www.litentry.com/) - Interlay - bringing BTC to Polkadot DeFi ( https://www.interlay.io/) so, there is a lot to choose from, but one should be careful, since the destiny of top three currently active project is that they were down a lot after hype in the beginning thank you for explaining. the present status does not justify the position on capitalization.
|
|
|
Weird thing just happened the last few days. I verified a withdrawal 2x with 2fa and email confirmation and they did not let the withdrawal go through either time.
are they still alive ?
|
|
|
i understand that this new version has numerous improvements and modifications among them there is confirmation of removing mining page specifically from GUI (GUI will no longer support cpu mining)
|
|
|
@bigslimvdub. Is that the good type of movement or is that the bad? We would never know if this was the miners sending their coins to an exchange or investors sending their coins from the exchange hehehe.
The price has been stable, however. This is good for accumulation.
with montero waking up, some reaction of aeon price on bittrex.
|
|
|
des news récentes de ce projet ?
|
|
|
thread has become nearly 100% publicity with almost zero discussion.
|
|
|
|