Bien vu, merci Esternity. J'ai regardé un peu et c'est vrai qu'il faut quand même avoir un bon petit stock de WAVES pour toucher assez "d'interets" de notre leasing Mais c'est vrai que pour ceux qui hold, c'est mieux que rien !
Exactement ils sont dans le wallet pour un hold très certainement long voire très long vu le marché actuel en attendant un gros pump. Je lease depuis le 1er jour chez http://wavesgo.com/, patience... merci, il y a quand même 15 exchanges qui cotent waves actuellement ! dont binance
|
|
|
Looks great Sasha! News logo's and graphics Turing has locked the old thread and added a link to this new, official topic. yes, good to have a new official thread thanks to Turing and Magnet for having assured efficiently the interim for more than six months
|
|
|
estenity, what's your support ticket ID?
it is 265062
|
|
|
I send a lot of mined Monero to HitBTC everyday and do a lot of high frequency trading which they make a lot of money in fees from... But now, they changed my Monero address without even notifying me!!!!
So I had 28XMR sent to what had always been my XMR address, but it's not showing up on my account as they changed my XMR address. I assume HitBTC just keeps it, because I've raised a support ticket, 266121, and they haven't responded!
Why would they change my address without notifying me?? And then just keep a serious amount of money for themselves!
my problem is also a monero deposit that does not show in my account after 8 days. i have already recently used the address and it had been OK, so i am sure of the address. i have got 2 ticket numbers and i have put a complaint on the site, however hitbtc support does not respond.
|
|
|
I see that many are complaining here !
I have also a deposit problem, and support is slow to respond.
|
|
|
Franchement vu ce que rapporte le leasing, ça ne vaut pas vraiment la peine... Waves est nettement sous évalué par rapport à ses concurrents, j'espere que cela va remonter car le projet est sympa.
je crois que c'est "indexé" sur le volume de transactions du DEX qui reste bas, dommage car ce système fonctionne. et l'avenir est aux DEX ! de plus si les exchanges sont de plus en plus contrôlés, les DEX croitront forcément..
|
|
|
Hey team.I may be interested in seeing the progress of the project and looking this ICO success. Project indeed cool, let's see how the team in the project can make this ICO run smoothly.
there is not any ICO there, but an important code rebase, showing a big progress.
|
|
|
what will be the marketcap at launch approximately?
My numbers might be out but around $US 11 million sold at approx $5.50 = 2 million coins sold which is 2% of total coins. 2% of the coins have been sold. 100 mill coins in total, so 50 x $11 mill = $550 000 000. Half a billion which is top 10 material, just ahead of Monero. nearly one year later, still consequent gains with VERI at 125 usd in spite of the profound altcoin crisis. but happily MOUs have been signed.
|
|
|
No one knows from the rebounding will start from but there is something good in bad events as well. The lower the price are the higher the profit will be because neither Ethereum nor other altcoins will go away but they have to stay here and evolve with steady growth over the time. May be change of month bring us back on track again.
ok but many useless alt coins will die during this bear market, of course Ethereum won't because it's here to stay but some tokens built on top of ethereum will die natural selection.
|
|
|
impressive, in this organisational scheme, still no room for ICN bearers, that should constitute a whole main axis, with the same importance as DAA, users and platform.. we are tired to say the same thing all the time. but the current price of the token says it all. Jani will squeeze out 99% of the hardcore holders and then when he has most of the ICN tokens, he will pump this shit to the moon. Only thing is most people can't be bothered to hold on to ICN since there's so much more opportunities available. You made him rich. You've only got yourselves to blame. there are two problems: the individual one, our personal attitude vis-a-vis ICN, thats a private question, we buy or sell. and the general debate concerning the coin: thats what this thread is about; we are free to discuss it from the elements of truth that we are allowed to know, and say what seems important.
|
|
|
yes, we are the first of April 2018 today.
|
|
|
Afternoon all, I'm a VERI holder and wanted to share a few thoughts on here to see how other people perceive the project. I'm starting to get a red flags that give me concern, I'll try to explain:
Beta testing was open to private testers, large VERI holders and was abruptly suspended and restricted to just employees or contractors of Veritaseum. This was after SEC review. Legal review has been ongoing since February and has no definite plan or communicated strategy to get approval from regulators in the US. It seems that the product was developed as 'software' which may have been naive as working lockstep with the regulators from an earlier phase might have helped deliver a compliant product that could go live in the US. With this inability to go live in NY the focus now seems to have shifted to locations outside of the US, such as Jamaica and somewhere in Africa. Should that be a cause for concern? Isn't go live in a developed nation with strong regulations a good target? We were promised public beta testing in Q1, which didn't happen and there's no indication on when it might. Something is clearly very wrong, we just don't have information on how wrong.
The Jamaican Stock Exchange signed an MOU in October but 6 months on there is no contract and no information on a potential go live. By way of explanation Reggie blamed politics, it would have been good to get more information on what the issues were so its transparent what kinds of issues Veritaseum is facing to get deployed. Especially as there's no public beta testing in Q1 as was promised and no JSE go live; are they impacted by the same issues? Different issues? Are they technical or legal and regulatory? Or are they business related? What does that mean for the product strategy and roll out? Remember your tokens are only of value if you can use them and right now we have no insight into when they can be used. This glaring fact seems to have been glossed over.
The news of two MOUs in Africa is not really news because it is not a contract. Also, its very vague to say 'somewhere' in Africa, no specifics at all. Add to that it would be a licensing deal which means a separate instance of the Veritaseum platform will be delivered to the customer to use on their own servers, this could be a closed environment meaning your tokens are worthless unless you're part of the user base of that particular licensed Veritaseum platform. Its great for Reggie as he sells software and tokens and consultancy and research to the customer, it doesn't have a lot of value to token holders if it happens to be a closed environment. We don't know if it is closed or not, heck we don't even know the country.
I'd also add that it could be seen as a risk to focus your business outside your country or region or timezone in a different continent such as Africa where there is no Veritaseum office or local presence. Add to that there was mention of a 'smart city' application of the platform in Africa, this is also a little off the originally stated goal to disintermediate the financial markets. Maybe there is a strategy, its just that it hasn't been articulated to faithful token holders; the ideas seem to be many and scattered, we even had a medical application that was due to deliver in December but nothing more was said about that (it was mentioned in a video around October or so).
Perhaps some of this could be solved with a more explicit strategy overview or roadmap or business plan that can be tracked or reviewed and adapted periodically. Right now I don't think there is insight into what the heck is going on and whether there will even be a live product this quarter or this year.
Interested in everyone else's thoughts.
I mostly agree, time to shift from MOUs to realizations. remember, this period is globally difficult.
|
|
|
team Will release in next 48hrs as we run last test. but there is no exactly time for 🚀🚀🚀 .i am waitting ! very few reaction to this important announcement; I know, we are in a depressed market. But see for exemple the case of VERI, that reacts importantly to the rumors (not the realizations) even if bearers recognize that SEC could ruin their hopes.
|
|
|
impressive, in this organisational scheme, still no room for ICN bearers, that should constitute a whole main axis, with the same importance as DAA, users and platform.. we are tired to say the same thing all the time. but the current price of the token says it all.
|
|
|
We need relaunch this coin, I hope someone able to take the project to the moon. yes, definitely. one of the oldest coin, interesting project,but permanently sleeping; low number of pages on this site, low collective interest.
|
|
|
time to sell rest of coins Nothing new, POA promised NOV-2016 and still nothing. Have no reason to wait till Q2 2018, a lot of good coins around. I have not been there for a while, but I see that XDN price is still very low at 101 satoshis. can anybody summarize if something important has occurred with ICCO project ?
|
|
|
Do BTCA have an official discussion forum where they come out with news??? like telegram or slack?
no it's just yet another Scam so, you mean BTCA is now not different from another dead coin?
|
|
|
@SparkIt. Aeon is presently back in a situation of uncertainty and it could clearly go below 20k satoshis. It's also showing that the code rebase will not change anything, but let's see what the community decides on ASICs. It might be Aeon's chance to get out of Monero's shadow and get the market's attention.
I am not sure. as you say uncertainty is now the situation, and aeon needs to consolidate first. afterwards initiatives could be launched, worth it only if the global market improves.
|
|
|
|