WOW. We are at 0.0882$, and 0,00007btc........
We are just meeting with Paddy from iCoinPaddychat group from telegram. He is predicting Naga to rise in price to 3-4$ in the next 10 days Im curious for the reason of the price rise,do you know? did they tell the catalyst? yes malreynolds, who started this official thread, but has not posted here for 3+ months, has probably desinvested before or during the fall from 6.4+ usd to 0.64- usd.. however i am not sure... I think they not active here but If you check twitter and social , they are alive. when you lure people into something, you have to show a minimum of constance afterwards... as well as twitter and social are not presently "true" places by any means.. |
|
|
|
Yes, this are long awaited news! Hope we will see the volume and value rise for ICN now... or rather once the market will recover.
these new uses are only "to play with the direction, and inside management of DAAs" so nothing in relation with the fact that ICN holders would be supposed as the real owners of the "company" a big blow of sword in the water... |
|
|
|
Anyone else here expecting top 10 by market cap for Waves within the next couple months?
That definitely seems like a possibility. Everything I see makes me believe Waves is still very undervalued. And also, an additional note, if you can check the chart of Waves in the past year, its bull run started at this same timeframe. So yeah, I'm also seeying Waves in the top 10 group by market cap in cryptocurrencies in the coming months. They are continuously giving updates and doing improvements in their platform without being affected by the price of it right now. The devs just focus on making this coin a better one compared to the other coins. I'm currently stacking up Waves at these prices. Think about it, Waves' ATH is in 250k sats and now, we are at 62k sats. Too much room to grow.  I'm glad to see others feel the same way about Waves as I do. I can see nothing but more success ahead. Especially with smart contracts coming up and such dedication of the team. Considering how other projects have 2-5x the market cap of Waves but dont even have their own chain yet should say something.... I think that what drives these markets is not tech and updates, more hype than anything I could see a scenario where projects like EOS, Tron, ADA and ICON loose portions of market cap overtime after they launch their main nets and projects like Waves mature in market cap. Remember that an ath of 250k sats now would put waves at around 20$, only 4x in USD what it is now, so the prices of these altcoins in USD is heavily dependent on bitcoin. After initial ETH success, new ICOs in 2015-2016 resulted in excellent creations, with functionalities, who have now full capacity (among them, Waves). 2017 Icos are hyped, too much money often for very little. a new ranking will appear with time. |
|
|
|
WOW. We are at 0.0882$, and 0,00007btc........
We are just meeting with Paddy from iCoinPaddychat group from telegram. He is predicting Naga to rise in price to 3-4$ in the next 10 days Im curious for the reason of the price rise,do you know? did they tell the catalyst? yes malreynolds, who started this official thread, but has not posted here for 3+ months, has probably desinvested before or during the fall from 6.4+ usd to 0.64- usd.. however i am not sure... |
|
|
|
from last post of smooth, encouraging news: citation begins "stuffu has already merged the Monero PoW v2 changes and scheduled it for AEON testnet. Once everything tests out we can schedule a main net hard fork which will also be the mandatory switch over point for the new rebase code base (includes LMDB for reduced memory usage along with many, many new features and enhancements from 3+ years of Monero development)" citation stops https://www.reddit.com/user/smooth_xmr |
|
|
|
when reading the forum, the question is really Nexus a creative project, outside of a "current" CC ? then comes the question of putative satellite diffusion, that could begin this year.. will it really? I do not know if Colin Cantrell, or somebody from his team, reads this forum from time to time, people here do not seem to be fully convinced. I saw this interesting paper: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-08/why-microsoft-co-founder-building-worlds-largest-airplanePaul Allen, one of microsoft's founders, constructs a really innovative reusable "plane" to launch small satellites, that could destruct the Space x program by its economical model. very innovative, what does think nexus' team about it? |
|
|
|
WOW. We are at 0.0882$, and 0,00007btc........
We are just meeting with Paddy from iCoinPaddychat group from telegram. He is predicting Naga to rise in price to 3-4$ in the next 10 days Im curious for the reason of the price rise,do you know? did they tell the catalyst? Probably not due to malreynolds, who started this official thread, but has not posted here for 3 months. Has he desinvested from NAGA ? |
|
|
|
after this launch, will the system be definitely functional? even if partial. |
|
|
|
How is it possible waves volume on Tidex (almost unknown exchange) and on Yobit is much higher than on Bittrex or Binance? Waves volume today on: Tidex: 12M USD Yobit: 5M USD Bittrex: 1.2M USD Binance: 0.9M USD https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/waves/#marketsThat is strange. Is Tidex affiliated with Waves? Waves makes up half of Tidex's total market. yes, there is a "genetic" link between tidex and waves.. |
|
|
|
I’ve noticed a lot of people saying that Waves is the next Ethereum. Do you guys really think it has the potential to surpass ETH? Why? I ask because I’ve always thought ETH was a really good investment and a really solid project, but now I am thinking of branching out and investing in Waves.
welcome to waves. |
|
|
|
good to see iconomi bouncing back. its about time that @TEAM announce something regarding the use of ICN
Yeah once can hope. They claimed a use many months ago but we haven't seen anything yet. It is rough seeing their assets under management increase and the team getting paid really well while the ICN price lags. Per their original whitepaper, ICN holders 'own' the company and all that. I fully agree with that. Holders must be rewarded. |
|
|
|
ongoing sale with 20 percent discount today on waves DEX The DEBIT Asset The DEBIT Asset launched on The Waves Platform is meant to provide the ability to transact on and off chain as well as bring more transactions to the DEX and the Waves Blockchain as a whole. This is a utility asset for the Waves Community and primarily used for Buying, Selling, and Transacting, in the fiat world. The mechanics of the DEBIT Asset is based on buying the DEBIT Asset from the open market and depositing it into your WavesDebit App and spending it with your WavesDebit Card. ASSET ID: 4djvyCBpWRdsbUhLXWY6CrP3JjmJvvFvPGe9GBmkt2q8 http://wavesdebit.com/index.en.html?the waves debit card ? or a new mechanism? could be finished already next episode on the site: Main Asset Sale Start Date: February 27th 18:00 GMT Assets Distributed: 24,000,000 Debit Goal: 3,262,500 Waves Currency Accepted: Waves, WBTC, WLTC, WETH, WZCASH occurring today, or not ? |
|
|
|
Yep, 2FA is not the optimal for DEXes, something like ledger/trezor login would probably be better.
If they can integrate it with Ledger/Trezor, that would be great and would be very beneficial for many people. yes for sure there will be soon a new hardware wallet https://medium.com/domraider |
|
|
|
|
so domraider collaborate with archos to market a new hardware wallet in june 2018 with a price around 50 euros (journalducoin.com)
|
|
|
|
WAVES se déplace toujours comme un chariot. Regardez, les nouveaux plans de Stratis se déroulent lentement, mais je ne pense pas que le wavestock tourne, donc il n'y a toujours pas de nouvelles de l'équipe. WAVES, pop up et rendre la plupart des gens riches!
a propos de chariot les contrats waves sont en cours de développement, et ce sera une étape très importante pour l'adoption à grande échelle; nouveau commit: https://github.com/wavesplatform/Waves/wiki/Waves-Contracts-Language-Description |
|
|
|
the rebase's bounty has been distributed: https://www.reddit.com/r/Aeon/comments/7yk668/rebase_bounty_incentive_awards_will_be_as_follows/however for us all, most important is the bottom message:citation begins "I'd like to thank everyone who participated for their extreme effort in this project, and all the hours of hard work they put into it. I hope both community and the participants realize that our intentions are for the good of Aeon, always. Ultimately it is critical we make the most elegant possible changes to Aeon's code to keep it as compatible with Monero as possible so it will be easier to merge additional features. I truly hope all participants will continue to work on improving the Aeon protocol, while remembering that in this game we must completely check our egos at the door - it's not about who gets credit, and who's name is up in lights. It's about what's best for the movement above all. Aeon is a neutral technology that transcends identities, and we need to unite under its banner as one force, indivisible. Always remember that this technology will help change the destiny of billions of people on this planet - all of us reading this are simultaneously so inconsequential in the face of this vast mission, and yet also so incredibly important to its realization. Unite and be one team. Stay one team. We must become of one intent, and that intent must be priority above all. Together we have the awesome destiny of reshaping this world into something better, and I can't imagine a more humbling charge in all the Earth today". citation ends. i would add that things have moved on, and this is very important also. then comes smooth's post: https://www.reddit.com/r/Aeon/comments/7y0wnj/smooth_declares_stoffus_pr_as_the_winning/"There are still some discussions going on among the bounty sponsors and once we work out all the details I will post a complete explanation of the results and the process. I wanted to make a prompt notice on the PRs so the participants have an idea of the direction things are going in and do not misdirect future efforts". |
|
|
|
@stoffu. But the bounty was needed to encourage developers to work and to have the rebase done more quickly.
If someone stepped up before all the drama, we would already be enjoying LMDB. Running an Aeon node now is a pain.
I am not saying it's you. But I was surprised that there were capable developers on Reddit when the bounty was offered. Where were they before the bounty?
I've been following Aeon since April 2017, and as I understand it, the task of rebase has been kept to smooth himself only, and he kept saying something like "the work is almost complete, the pre-release will be up next Monday" or "because the task is almost complete, volunteer help from other developers won't be necessary nor useful". I don't remember the exact wording, but I'm pretty sure that was the state before the bounty started. Posts like this ( https://www.reddit.com/r/Aeon/comments/78nylr/whats_stopping_other_coders_from_helping_with/) were also common, without much response and progress. Then in late December, katiecharm made this post ( https://www.reddit.com/r/Aeon/comments/7laim2/20000_aeon_rebase_bountydev_contract_possibly/). This time smooth reacted differently, and released the task of rebasing to the community with the huge bounty. This immediately triggered DrParadoxically to speak up and make a lot of promising and ambitious words. I personally don't like competing with people, and their team sounded like somewhat competitive, so I just thought I wouldn't need to step up and let them do the job and get the reward. In other words, the bounty disincentivized me to work on it. I ended up stepping up because smooth implied in his recent post ( https://www.reddit.com/r/Aeon/comments/7v03ct/clarification_about_goals_and_process_of_rebase/) that the rebase effort may not be going too well, and some emergency help may be needed. If instead smooth declared that his rebase work isn't going to complete soon, and released the task to the community, but without any bounty, I would have started working on it immediately. The task itself turned out to be not that difficult for me, so we could've had the rebase done much earlier like September 2017. I'll keep refusing to receive the reward, not because the avengers falsely accused me of stealing their code, but because I want to demonstrate that the bounty can sometimes have negative impact. I'm not saying that other developers shouldn't work for bounties in general; I might even join a bounty race for some cases. I just wish there weren't a huge bounty for this rebase, so that this shit drama wasn't caused in the first place. thank you for the clear explanation (and naturally for your work). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
