@smooth. I am sure that you have already read this whitepaper on Monero's traceability. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.04299/I went to the Monero subreddit and what I saw was some Monerotards calling FUD quickly without properly thinking about how this seriously affects Cryptonote coins. Can you give us your thoughts on the situation and how that affects Aeon? Would a simple sub addresses feature help? @bbc.reporter,shifting to reddit and whatsapp is a general present phenomenon, evidenced by audience studies, as well as facebook decay. so i agree (with you,I think), that it is important to keep bitcointalk alive. |
|
|
|
Waves price today gives me an opportunity to stack up some stake of mine. In my mind, the 2016 highest grossing ICO will soon take its course and be with the elite.
Yeah, I'm taking advantage of the prices right now too. I hope it goes up soon. Hopefully in the next month. Now is the best opportunity to buy Waves at the very bottom. Then the wild growth will begin. Then many will regret that they did not buy Waves. The price of $ 1000 for this coin is achievable. I feel like $1,000 is a crazy amount. But I could definitely see it going up a *lot* in the next few months. It's an excellent time to buy, I completely agree. Think for yourself. Very promising project. At the same time, insignificant capitalization - only 425 million dollars. The coin has a huge potential for growth in dozens of times. there is a rapid expansion in the number of total and funded waves accounts: 496,977 Total number of accounts 243,629 funded accounts http://www.wavesgo.com/statsi have been there since ico, and believe me, it's spectacular. however overall activity is limited, but we are currently in a global crisis. take this into account, better days are coming. |
|
|
|
|
11 coins added in march !
its a pity that they are so confidential, detrimental to their activity.
wait and see cautiously.
|
|
|
|
If you have your doubts about them, believe me, they are real and legit!
so we may have really legitimate doubts ? |
|
|
|
I can't believe I need to spell everything out here. The point is not to criticize the company or whatever. Investors need to know and accept facts and reality instead of living in a bubble. That's all I ask. There are many good things and many bad things done by the team. The responsibility of investors is to look at both.
fully agreed. |
|
|
|
|
in the new waves client, you can make evidently more transactions than in the "old" lite client.
so do not hesit to upgrade.
|
|
|
|
Veritaseum is up almost 100% today. Not bad, not bad at all.
yes i agree, but is there a reason other than some general improvement in the markets ? |
|
|
|
|
very quiet here, not any recent news to surface this month.
so i repeat my question:
I wonder if goldman sachs setl.io is not based on same approach as fincoin ?
|
|
|
|
i would say: unrelated reference. |
|
|
|
Btctalk name : estenity
Rank: Hero Member
Current post count: 747
GBYTE address : RZR5ZJMCYCJD4NCI3PSWSWZ2WGBILL4H
Wear appropriate signature :yes
Wear avatar :no
number 25 on spreadsheet, thank you so much ! but transcription error in my name: i am estenity and not estinity. |
|
|
|
|
Btctalk name : estenity
Rank: Hero Member
Current post count: 747
GBYTE address : RZR5ZJMCYCJD4NCI3PSWSWZ2WGBILL4H
Wear appropriate signature :yes
Wear avatar :no
|
|
|
|
Next week the G20 is coming up and they will also talk about crypto. As stated in the public document of the G20(: https://back-g20.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/media/finance_ministerial_highlights.pdf) they understand that crypto has the potential to promote financial inclusion but at the same time they will try to analyse implications to financial stability, tax evasion and financing illegal activities. These statements are nothing new and very similar to what was said previously at the US senate hearings. Could this have implications on Monero? The other day I asked about the impact that the G20 might have on Monero and didn't get much attention. I guess that the line of thought is that no one really cares about what the G20 has to say about BTC or XMR since they can't stop us from having and using XMR. What scared me though is that BTC (XMR followed) went on a run on the news that there won't be any special regulations coming up soon. This is strong evidence that govs and central banks have a very strong impact on crypto and can do whatever they want(weren't BTC and XMR born to be out of this system?). The fact that XMR price is so dependent on regulations is scary and this is a fact shown by the price movements following the news. Having no tight regulations is of course positive but what will happen when a crackdown arrives?. BTC and XMR just showed that they are super dependent on what govs and central banks say. In the hypothetical scenario of upcoming regulations for privacy coins (bans on exchanges for example) XMR will be strongly affected as shown by positive response to G20 news. I thought that XMR was way more resilient to regulations. Unfortunately correlation works both ways, up and down no problem with the last G20 meeting: https://news.bitcoin.com/g20-watchdog-says-cryptos-not-risk-resists-calls-new-rules/ |
|
|
|
|
2 dev meetings showing a good cooperation and high interest in aeon development..
|
|
|
|
This coin has been here for almost 2 1/2 years now? I don't know the exact date of it but I'm sure my guess is close to the correct one. It's true that their project have been plagued by past problems also and some of them have been delayed many times but at the end of the day, they delivered it in a convincing way. Many people are trying to gauge the team's effort by using its price right now but that is actually wrong. You should know that the devs are working behind the scene without any care about the price of Waves at the moment. Their view is for long term and they just wanted to provide a product that will stand the test of time.
ico date was less than 2 years ago (april-may 2016) |
|
|
|
@iconominet banned me twitter, because of the question:
"50 active people on Twitter, is not good, where RP?"
investors blacklisted, it's just mega cool!!!
iconomi does not hold criticism
Yes they do that sometimes. They went on a ban frenzy on reddit some time ago. Community was also trowing shit at them or saying stupid things but banning it's not the way to go if you ask me. Not that your concern is stupid or anything. I'm personally not interested in twitter and how many followers they have. If we would measure succes in twitter visibility we would have Katty Perry on first and Justin Beaber on second place because of how many followers they have. (it's real you can look it up like i did) But... i too hope they will make themselves more visible at least in the right places. Right now they have these "Meet the managers Event" in London and Amsterdam if i'm not mistaking. hello MrHans, everyday twitter becomes a more scaring institution. last week binance was hacked and its chief used twitter as a mean of disseminating his reaction. to my stupefaction his twitter account has been controlled by other malevolent people for some hours,then he regained control. he concluded something as "dont' trust anything important on twitter" how to gain confidence there? |
|
|
|
The news hit the spot and they saying that "Further ICN usages will be announced in the future." hits the spot again. Me like many people here we're searching for a sane investment for the future that does not depend on a specific token but on a trend (crypto). This news does not have a huge effect at the moment but as more people get into crypto will have a snowball effect. Q1 2017 Report total fees for burning ICN 50,936$ Q4 2017 Report total fees for burning ICN 1,015,999$ (some 850k tokens at current price) That's 20 times more and the rate will be even quicker now in 2018 with more ICN fees. I can see the burn rate going x4 and making 1 mil in fees a month in the near future. Considering the road map i would say 20x increase in fees used for burning in year 2018 it's not even optimistic. They will get most of the services going this year: Fiat ramp up, debit card, more DAA's and even smaller DAA's. Many people buy it and hope for 10x over night. Because most projects who are as promising as ICN are doing a lot better even if at the moment they are just that. Promises! When they see it's not doing 10x and actually losing value in front of BTC/ETH they sell it and that's why there's a lot of ICN to buy and few people interested in it. This is not gonna last forever because getting in will get tighter and tighter. I'm happy we got official utility. I'l hold their word on that "Further ICN usages will be announced in the future." and soon will be starting asking questions again  ) @estenity I feel them a little scared because of regulations and some heads will fall when new crypto laws will come. I guess they don't wanna be caught on the bad foot saying something, then they can't hold their word up because new regulations says otherwise. And now they got lawsuits coming from people with broken promises and anything they said will be held against them. This scenario is a little pessimistic and suggests that some promise they made in the past will come in conflict with the upcoming regulation laws. "ICN holder is entitled to a share in platform and all assets" unfortunately is EXACTLY the thing that you don't wanna say when laws are not clear and you don't know what's comming. I think they play it smart and safe at the moment. Even if it's not official they never denied that first statement, even though it's not written on iconomi.net anywhere. Again glad to have some utility and a sincere thank you for the team there. I will get the Tim and Jani pictures down from my dart plate ) hello MrHans, i accept your reasoning, we can wait again a little more time... but I can tell you that from the ICO time, they look attracted by "finance" world, albeit choosing to play in "crypto" sector...but looking to join in every occasion... these people exist because ico subscribers gave them the monies to exist. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
