why on earth would they defend him and keep him around.
Why on earth would you attack him so persistently? You're not even a customer of his. |
|
|
|
I think you need to work on your reading comprehension. Go read the post by Jasin you just linked me to. Interchains, not sidechains.
If you have evidence to back up your case, for heaven's sake link it. Otherwise this all just looks like hot air.
Your gut feelings have no role to play when making serious allegations against a person. Think about what you're doing here.
Lastly, you'd better re-read the posts you link to here in case you've misread them (as per "sidechains") and they're actually not about Jasin's alleged scamming.
Or you could just give up and start addressing your problem in more productive ways.
does Jasinlee pay for part of the funding (possibly from ASIC funds) as well? No. And once again, speculation has no place in a compilation of serious allegations against a person. Serious allegations must be provable, or else you're doing a horribly unethical thing. Just think about how awful a thing it is to be accused of what you're accusing. It's incredibly irresponsible to throw these accusations around lightly. PROVE IT, or go away. |
|
|
|
What is that opening post supposed to amount to?
You have nothing resembling a case against a scammer here.
- You have no evidence whatsoever that Jasin can (or wants to) steal XC's code.
- You have given no evidence of any kind about dumping/selling Cachecoin
- You have given no evidence at all of a sockpuppet account.
- Is it supposed to be a bad thing somehow that XC is mentioned on Fibonacci.io? What's wrong with that?
- Jasin is not an employee of XC.
- You've even got your facts wrong about sidechains. Jasin's technology is *interchains*, which *supersedes* the concept of a sidechain.
This thread is pretty ridiculous.
Please just delete it.
First of all I have plenty of a case. It would just make this thread MASSIVELY long. If you read the threads I posted in detail about Jasin being a scammer it has the proof of his sockpuppet/wife's account. You will see all the proof listed for everything. I am the one who lost thousands of dollars at the expense of your developer. So no, I'm not in the wrong and I am not going to delete this thread. Perhaps refine it over time. You guys are the ones saying your coin runs like a company. So I'm simply warning possible investors. I was under the impression sidechains were coming to XC. But Jasin says they are coming to Cachecoin. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=400389.msg7959360#msg7959360My (gut feel) is that all of Jasinlee's posts about private chats / transactions coming to cachecoin will be coming from the XC code base. However I do admit those are my gut feelings. Maybe he's going to rewrite anonymization tech from scratch. I think you need to work on your reading comprehension. Go read the post by Jasin you just linked me to. Interchains, not sidechains. If you have evidence to back up your case, for heaven's sake link it. Otherwise this all just looks like hot air. Your gut feelings have no role to play when making serious allegations against a person. Think about what you're doing here. Lastly, you'd better re-read the posts you link to here in case you've misread them (as per "sidechains") and they're actually not about Jasin's alleged scamming. Or you could just give up and start addressing your problem in more productive ways. |
|
|
|
Is jasinlee really planning to "port" XC's code over to cache? Can an XC team member comment on this please? Thanks
I'm warning you it's in his plans. I referenced upthread on him talking about sidechains. He's also referenced private chat and anonomizing currency. If he would have the standards to wait until it is open sourced - I don't know. He took in massive amounts of cache in the presale though. This post is strictly in the best interests of the smaller investors of XC. I have nothing to say to teka/synchillis/whoever. I know you guys hate my "fud" - just like I hated the "fud" surrounding the ASIC scam until it proved to be true. Imagine if real companies had to actually address FUD attacks like alts has to. I guess time and size will help.
Real companies hold themselves to much higher standards. Shall I repeat myself? You are in no position to make the claims you make, and your absence of substantiation is frustrating. The reality is more like the opposite: Jasin's been a generous and energising collaborator who is always keen to tell us his ideas. Interchains and PoBC are his, but XC will benefit from them. Come on. Stop spreading FUD. |
|
|
|
|
What is that opening post supposed to amount to?
You have nothing resembling a case against a scammer here.
- You have no evidence whatsoever that Jasin can (or wants to) steal XC's code.
- You have given no evidence of any kind about dumping/selling Cachecoin
- You have given no evidence at all of a sockpuppet account.
- Is it supposed to be a bad thing somehow that XC is mentioned on Fibonacci.io? What's wrong with that?
- Jasin is not an employee of XC.
- You've even got your facts wrong about sidechains. Jasin's technology is *interchains*, which *supersedes* the concept of a sidechain.
This thread is pretty ridiculous.
Please just delete it.
|
|
|
|
No, Cryptophi. Also Jasin has addressed production problems. He's one part of the xc team and any projects he does are outside of xc.
Frankly I feel pretty bad that a guy with this kind of reputation is on the XC Team.. Can you post please where he addresses this supposed delays in the release of the ASICS and what will be is solution for this? why he did not refund the people that ordered them? I am just asking questions. I think this story happened far after XC hired him for the XC project if I am correct.. One other item not mentioned as much as it should be is that he was using on sock puppet account here to sell inflated CACHE via his wife's nickname before/during when he opened up orders with a cache discount. Looking back and reading on your posts, it seems like you also have a problem with Jason. This issue might be justified but unless you have actual real proof for the above claims, please don't bother posting. Oh hello Organiser. Were you ever a customer of Jasin's, or am I confusing you with someone else? Kindly discuss Jasin elsewhere. What makes you come here anyway? |
|
|
|
|
***The XC Daily Update***
- Dan is pretty close to getting the multipool done.
- Work on the new UI continues.
- The Halycon Coin code is complex and may need a bit of time to review.
- We're still on track for the final Rev 2 update. Bring on the 15th!
|
|
|
|
Ok, I'll see what I can do about that but its seems like its more a site for Jasins projects since cryptophi was his idea.
Forget it. I'm nearly positive there is way way more going on here behind the scenes with Cachecoin and the tech from XC than what meets the eye. Because he's basically stolen hundreds of thousands of dollars and you're totally cool with it\being associated with him. Use HIS website to promote your coin, work with him jointly on a website, go to shows together, etc. I don't really expect anything else. I won't FUD your thread anymore - I WILL try to keep people from XC because I'm fairly certain if you are happy keeping Jasin as a close dev this entire coin is going to blow up on newbies. You are either in willing ignorance or collusion (no idea which). I'll take my case elsewhere. Keep an eye on cachecoin XC fans - it's a sleeper and it will have your technology before you know it. I'd rather see you get the benefit than Jasin  You do not have sufficient access to the relevant facts to make any of the claims you've made here. Furthermore, if your problem is with Jasin, why would you go on to spread FUD around XC? What are your intentions? Lastly, your claims above are simply incorrect. Please leave. |
|
|
|
I'm confused as to what to expect. What would coordinated PR involve?
Nobody spilling the beans early. And both teams working according to a single plan. |
|
|
|
***The XC Daily Update***
- XC is fast becoming the go-to project for gaining legitimacy. Dan will do a code review of Halycon Coin's tech in the very near future.
- Your previous comments or complaints were heard. Unlike previous code reviews, we're co-ordinating the PR for this, which means that the XC community can get in on this one.
- There will be a press release going out early next week about the code review.
- Dan continues finalising Rev 2. At present we're all on track for the deadline.
Thank you Synechist for taking our feedbacks in I was ready to wine again and then I read this just after the first post. nicely done. in the future be sure to do not let the other thread announce the review before it is announced in here. Yeah, ideally this stuff should be co-ordinated, but when you haven't worked with someone before there's generally all sorts of initial looseness. The forthcoming PR should be pretty well co-ordinated though. |
|
|
|
Cool, thanks.. From Next Monday then I really think it will start hotting up... One plea synechist while you are here and so I get in early.. When we do release it, please can it be done at say 6pm GMT not midnight like the last one.. I would rather wait the extra day and release it at a good time than do it in the middle of the night  Yeah, I'm all for that too. ;-) |
|
|
|
***The XC Daily Update***
- XC is fast becoming the go-to project for gaining legitimacy. Dan will do a code review of Halycon Coin's tech in the very near future.
- Your previous comments or complaints were heard. Unlike previous code reviews, we're co-ordinating the PR for this, which means that the XC community can get in on this one.
- There will be a press release going out early next week about the code review.
- Dan continues finalising Rev 2. At present we're all on track for the deadline.
Good news Synechist and nice to know peoples views are being considered... You say we are on track.. What is the release date? I know 2 weeks was mentioned a few weeks back... On Monday we said it would be two weeks until the release. If possible I'll update the OP tomorrow (but, thanks to Bitcointalk's inerrant fussiness, it takes damn ages to make it look half-decent, so I can't guarantee it.) |
|
|
|
|
***The XC Daily Update***
- XC is fast becoming the go-to project for gaining legitimacy. Dan will do a code review of Halycon Coin's tech in the very near future.
- Your previous comments or complaints were heard. Unlike previous code reviews, we're co-ordinating the PR for this, which means that the XC community can get in on this one.
- There will be a press release going out early next week about the code review.
- Dan continues finalising Rev 2. At present we're all on track for the deadline.
|
|
|
|
So are you folks keen on a bit more info on how Rev 2 works?
Press release coming out soon...
Hi Synechist, soon as in today? Possibly, but that depends on external factors. |
|
|
|
|
So are you folks keen on a bit more info on how Rev 2 works?
Press release coming out soon...
|
|
|
|
Thank you! I am agonizing to see Teka UI  ...Having seen what he have done with the Forum I am sure it will get approved. Is Trash Team doing the approval? as they are responsible for the logo and Branding if Im not mistaken Yeah Teka's done some good work. Thrash will indeed sign it off from a brand perspective. On this note, I'm going to sign off for the time being. It's my third wedding anniversary and my wife and I are heading out to dinner and a concert. |
|
|
|
I love this coin.
Only one beef.
Distribution sucks! !!
The top 100 needs to sell off some coins to turn this pond into an ocean.
I am hoping for some price fluctuations soon to spread the wealth, because the only thing holding this coin back is the size of its community.
swat happens when you pick a PoS to stabilize price and make early adopters rich. No community, no consensus = coin stagnates & dies (See NXT vs Litecoin which is a stupid clone) I think I recall your ranting about consensus a while back. However you weren't able to define terms clearly enough to persuade me of your view. The discussion revolved around the difference between marketing (and a market discovering a coin) and consensus (and a community owning a coin). I think the reason for your lack of clarity might've been because you were punting the notion of "consensus" in order to "market" cryptonote or Monero or something. Slippery ground, that. |
|
|
|
***The XC Daily Update***
- Dan is testing an update to Rev 2 which includes some features that will be included in the final Rev 2 release. The update may or may not be released publicly.
- Teka's UI work has been passed on to a specialist company to build XC's brand new UI. It'll be cross-platform.
- I'm preparing a press release - the first of a few - that'll introduce Rev 2's features to the world. So stay tuned for information on Rev 2, and quite possibly an update too.
Even if Teka's UI won't be used can we still see it? I suppose that'll be up to him. |
|
|
|
***The XC Daily Update***
- Dan is testing an update to Rev 2 which includes some features that will be included in the final Rev 2 release. The update may or may not be released publicly.
- Teka's UI work has been passed on to a specialist company to build XC's brand new UI. It'll be cross-platform.
- I'm preparing a press release - the first of a few - that'll introduce Rev 2's features to the world. So stay tuned for information on Rev 2, and quite possibly an update too.
Hi Synech any updates on when how the Qibuck collabaration will work for and how the payment system will work in this case for the xnodes? Thanks! When: rumour has it we'll start work on that after Rev 2. How: Xnodes will store content locally (in encrypted form) and get paid whenever they serve it to a client first. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
