I'm always interested to hear a coherent argument against something that appears completely natural and obvious to me Free blockchain space for everybody is neither natural nor obvious. The so called "classic" fork is not a solution. It is merely kicking the can down the road approach that makes future solution even more difficult to find. I'll stick to Core and bitcoin main branch. Good luck with the classic free-money-to-everybody! You could stick to Core till the fork, after that, you will need to use a client compatible with big blocks, the other chain is going to die quickly. It'll be good if big block fork finally happens. Bitcoin Core will finally clean itself from viruses and government sponsored actors. Everybody knows Gavin works for the USG. Don't be a fool! Big banks are getting behind Bitcoin "Classic" fork. That is their next move. https://twitter.com/jerallaire/status/688232046951403520Big banks behind Bitcoin. Lol. You guys are too much. Hmmm... Bitcoin "Classic" fork is not Bitcoin.
|
|
|
I'm always interested to hear a coherent argument against something that appears completely natural and obvious to me Free blockchain space for everybody is neither natural nor obvious. The so called "classic" fork is not a solution. It is merely kicking the can down the road approach that makes future solution even more difficult to find. I'll stick to Core and bitcoin main branch. Good luck with the classic free-money-to-everybody! You could stick to Core till the fork, after that, you will need to use a client compatible with big blocks, the other chain is going to die quickly. It'll be good if big block fork finally happens. Bitcoin Core will finally clean itself from viruses and government sponsored actors. Everybody knows Gavin works for the USG. Don't be a fool! Big banks are getting behind Bitcoin "Classic" fork. That is their next move. https://twitter.com/jerallaire/status/688232046951403520
|
|
|
I'm always interested to hear a coherent argument against something that appears completely natural and obvious to me Free blockchain space for everybody is neither natural nor obvious. The so called "classic" fork is not a solution. It is merely kicking the can down the road approach that makes future solution even more difficult to find. I'll stick to Core and bitcoin main branch. Good luck with the classic free-money-to-everybody! You could stick to Core till the fork, after that, you will need to use a client compatible with big blocks, the other chain is going to die quickly. It'll be good if big block fork finally happens. Bitcoin Core will finally clean itself from viruses and government sponsored actors.
|
|
|
I'm always interested to hear a coherent argument against something that appears completely natural and obvious to me Free blockchain space for everybody is neither natural nor obvious. The so called "classic" fork is not a solution. It is merely kicking the can down the road approach that makes future solution even more difficult to find. I'll stick to Core and bitcoin main branch. Good luck with the classic free-money-to-everybody!
|
|
|
Unpleasant Fact #3: Pleasant Fact #1: Thanks for the cheap coins, $iteater22.
|
|
|
... I asked you how you plan to do that with less than 25% of the hashrate of Classic.
Obviously you're slow. I'll repeat it once again for you. We'll stick to main bitcoin branch. Period. You're free to fork it under whatever name you wish - XT, ClassicBitcoin, UnlimitedBitcoin whatever. Percentage of current hash rate you'll take after forking is irrelevant. Bitcoin doesn't care. Bitcoin existed and flourished with far less hash rate few years ago.
|
|
|
From what I can tell BitcoinClassic has 50% commitment and they're about to add another 23 ...
From what I can tell there will be a ClassicBitcoin fork. Hope every want-free-bitcoin-space idiot will join them. R u guise planning on forking at the same time to lower the difficulty and change the PoW for your <25% cripple chain side? We'll stick to the main bitcoin branch guise. I thought after XT altcoin fork got rekt you're planning the next one - the BitcoinClassic fork.
|
|
|
From what I can tell BitcoinClassic has 50% commitment and they're about to add another 23 ...
From what I can tell there will be a ClassicBitcoin fork. Hope every want-free-bitcoin-space idiot will join them.
|
|
|
People that are censored don't get featured in NYT articles and mentioned in R3 testimony broadcasted from every tv channel, bud!
Why can't the mainstream press just leave our Bitcoin alone? Mainstream presstitutes are just property of the financial oligopoly. Do I need to tell why banks can't leave bitcoin alone?!
|
|
|
Drama queen or not, he had some valid points - not necessary technically, but about the whole deadlock situation and censorship.
People that are censored don't get featured in NYT articles and mentioned in R3 testimony broadcasted by every tv channel, bud!
|
|
|
So Cryptsy was really not whole ? Pulled a Gox? If that is true then guess what? BTC image is going to be damaged big time, and much worse than Gox era.
No one gives a shit about Cryptsy. I don't think there was single moment in time where they weren't a shit hole experiencing problems. Also, they were hacked a year and a half ago, and the coins have been sitting since. So this is all because of Mike? Hearn, Cryptsy, NYT article, R3 testimony, Bitcoin "Classic" fud, constantly spamming blockchain to reach the 1MB limit and mobilize XT altcon suckers and want-free-bitcoin-space crowd, and finally dumping stolen bitcoins from Cryptsy. It is well coordinated attack. But... thanks for the cheap coins!
|
|
|
$ 366,12... Man, what is happening with the Bitcoin? XT altcoin suckers want to give free bitcoin space to everyone.
|
|
|
Consensus is forming, brace yourselves
The 21 million cap should also be raised. It is an obstacle for bitcoin growth and adoption. People have no incentive to own bitcoins if they can't afford to easily purchase at least 1 bitcoin. This is why this cap should be removed. First double it then quadruple and then "classic" unlimited bitcoin will be the final solution.
|
|
|
Price is dropping because Bitcoin Classic hardfork is being priced in.
Market is telling us what is good for bitcoin and what is bad.
|
|
|
An Open Letter from Sam Cole (CEO of KNC Miner) Post reputation: 4 Quote Fri Jan 15, 2016 4:49 pm
Sam Cole, CEO of KNC wrote: All.
... The issue is by doing nothing we are actually forcing it to stop growing and stay where it is. ...
Thanks, Sam
Med vänlig hälsning | Best regards Sam Cole KnC ... To put it in plane language... I don't know what has to be done, but I feel something has to be done. So, let us do what we can do, ruin bitcoin by granting free space to every spammer on the blockchain.
|
|
|
Instead of shooting the messengers, we could also fix the problem. Adopting Bitcoin Classic would be a good, first step. Bitcoin "Classic" is suggested by the same person that couple of years ago opposed the translation of Bitcoin-Qt GUI into Farsi because US government imposed sanctions on Iran... I don't trust this person at all. It was obvious from the beginning who were the rotten apples in core dev team.
|
|
|
Last chance of corrupted government(s) to kill bitcoin using their puppets in core dev group. A major, major economic crisis is knocking on the door and their time to ruin bitcoin is running out fast.
|
|
|
The only money that's going into transaction fees is the money that's coming out of BTC market cap.
Woooot? You're effectively getting a negative return on the blockspace you're selling.
Correct. This is why getting a positive return requires not increasing but decreasing blockspace! Thanks for proving my point.
|
|
|
He's basically claiming that if the blocks ever fill up, then Bitcoin has failed. I have always suspected this guy is a clueless zombie. Quite the opposite, filled up blocks is not a failure but success! Economy is always about supply and demand. Success of a product or service you are offering is measured by how much demand is surpassing supply.
|
|
|
The Bitcoin Believer Who Gave Up
... for bitcoin to drop below 300...
|
|
|
|