but but but....... if small fish is panic selling, who is buying?
Selling?: Not small fish, but anyone with any sense a long time ago, above 1200. Buying?: Greater fools. Stop taking hopium and look at the chart?The denial here is incredible. Successful investors never use charts to make decisions! |
|
|
|
How low does Bitcoin need to go before Jihan BU stops signaling that shit?
It's not because of BU, it's because a transaction with ETH costs 0,02$ whereas a transaction with BTC costs 1$. Transactions with some other pump and dump coins cost even cheaper! |
|
|
|
|
but but but....... if small fish is panic selling, who is buying?
|
|
|
|
|
Nobody will use BUcoin except some socially engineered emotional psychopaths and a couple of suicidal mining pools who are already insolvent and don't risk anything.
|
|
|
|
HERE WE ASK AAAAAGAIN:
1. Prove you have the privkey.
2. Prove it is not yours.
Proving one has the privkey to a 80k BTC address discards the need for any further proof down the line. The laws of physics don't apply anymore etc. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_Cvtr86H5gAnd your notorious requirement of negative proof... almost looks like you beg for upgrading your title from mascot to jester. Rico Speaking of physics, finding a collision is similar to quantum particles, only the observer really knows, lol. Speaking of privkeys, finding a privkey is different to finding a collision, lol. Yes, but finding a privkey to an existing address with funds on it are proof of a collision. NO! It just proves you've "found" the privkey for that bitcoin address. To find a collision you have to find TWO privkeys to the same bitcoin address! Ugh, my God, you want a collision in EC. Ugh, yeah! I told ya from the very beginning.The name of this "project" is misleading! "Large Bitcoin Private Key Finder" It can serve both purposes! And that doesn't sound nearly as cool.Of course. I can understand this. A pool of "thieves" doesn't sound nearly as cool as pool of "researchers". Or you just pretend to be the Bitcoin Black Swan? lol Thieves? Wow  That's nice. This means each locksmith is a thieve thief because he is able trying to open your front door (without been asked to)? You've figured it right. |
|
|
|
HERE WE ASK AAAAAGAIN:
1. Prove you have the privkey.
2. Prove it is not yours.
Proving one has the privkey to a 80k BTC address discards the need for any further proof down the line. The laws of physics don't apply anymore etc. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_Cvtr86H5gAnd your notorious requirement of negative proof... almost looks like you beg for upgrading your title from mascot to jester. Rico Speaking of physics, finding a collision is similar to quantum particles, only the observer really knows, lol. Speaking of privkeys, finding a privkey is different to finding a collision, lol. Yes, but finding a privkey to an existing address with funds on it are proof of a collision. NO! It just proves you've "found" the privkey for that bitcoin address. To find a collision you have to find TWO privkeys to the same bitcoin address! Ugh, my God, you want a collision in EC. Ugh, yeah! I told ya from the very beginning.The name of this "project" is misleading! "Large Bitcoin Private Key Finder" It can serve both purposes! And that doesn't sound nearly as cool.Of course. I can understand this. A pool of "thieves" doesn't sound nearly as cool as pool of "researchers". Or you just pretend to be the Bitcoin Black Swan? lol |
|
|
|
HERE WE ASK AAAAAGAIN:
1. Prove you have the privkey.
2. Prove it is not yours.
Proving one has the privkey to a 80k BTC address discards the need for any further proof down the line. The laws of physics don't apply anymore etc. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_Cvtr86H5gAnd your notorious requirement of negative proof... almost looks like you beg for upgrading your title from mascot to jester. Rico Speaking of physics, finding a collision is similar to quantum particles, only the observer really knows, lol. Speaking of privkeys, finding a privkey is different to finding a collision, lol. Yes, but finding a privkey to an existing address with funds on it are proof of a collision. NO! It just proves you've "found" the privkey for that bitcoin address. To find a collision you have to find TWO privkeys to the same bitcoin address! Ugh, my God, you want a collision in EC. Ugh, yeah! I told ya from the very beginning.The name of this "project" is misleading! |
|
|
|
So basically your target is ~$800 and if it goes below that, hello bear. I will jump in if it goes below 900$. But 800$ is possible but i have to admit that i dont have the guts to wait that long. Ok, thank you. Now we will see if it comes to pass.  Personally I think it's quite possible that the market's nerves around BU and the failed ETF bid are still to play out. BUcoin is dead. ETF is not an influencer anymore. The true reason for this range trading is end of March. Bitcoin businesses have to pay taxes. They are net sellers. Once March is over, uptrend will be reinstated with full power. Best time to buy back their bitcoins for average traders and whales that panic sold at the bottom is this weekend. That will be their last chance! With every day we come close to the end of month this window of opportunity is disappearing for that unfortunate group. Bitcoin down, ethereum mooning. I already earned 1 btc today. Not bad. So i keep watching and playing this funyn game. See you at 900$  You have to work extra hard this year to recoup your losses from last year! You're very inexperienced trader and you'll need a lot of luck. |
|
|
|
HERE WE ASK AAAAAGAIN:
1. Prove you have the privkey.
2. Prove it is not yours.
Proving one has the privkey to a 80k BTC address discards the need for any further proof down the line. The laws of physics don't apply anymore etc. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_Cvtr86H5gAnd your notorious requirement of negative proof... almost looks like you beg for upgrading your title from mascot to jester. Rico Speaking of physics, finding a collision is similar to quantum particles, only the observer really knows, lol. Speaking of privkeys, finding a privkey is different to finding a collision, lol. Yes, but finding a privkey to an existing address with funds on it are proof of a collision. NO! It just proves you've "found" the privkey for that bitcoin address. To find a collision you have to find TWO privkeys to the same bitcoin address! |
|
|
|
So basically your target is ~$800 and if it goes below that, hello bear. I will jump in if it goes below 900$. But 800$ is possible but i have to admit that i dont have the guts to wait that long. Ok, thank you. Now we will see if it comes to pass. Personally I think it's quite possible that the market's nerves around BU and the failed ETF bid are still to play out. BUcoin is dead. ETF is not an influencer anymore. The true reason for this range trading is end of March. Bitcoin businesses have to pay taxes. They are net sellers. Once March is over, uptrend will be reinstated with full power. Best time to buy back their bitcoins for average traders and whales that panic sold at the bottom is this weekend. That will be their last chance! With every day we come close to the end of month this window of opportunity is disappearing for that unfortunate group. |
|
|
|
HERE WE ASK AAAAAGAIN:
1. Prove you have the privkey.
2. Prove it is not yours.
Proving one has the privkey to a 80k BTC address discards the need for any further proof down the line. The laws of physics don't apply anymore etc. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_Cvtr86H5gAnd your notorious requirement of negative proof... almost looks like you beg for upgrading your title from mascot to jester. Rico Speaking of physics, finding a collision is similar to quantum particles, only the observer really knows, lol. Speaking of privkeys, finding a privkey is different to finding a collision, lol. |
|
|
|
HERE WE ASK AAAAAGAIN:
1. Prove you have the privkey.
2. Prove it is not yours.
Proving one has the privkey to a 80k BTC address discards the need for any further proof down the line. The laws of physics don't apply anymore etc. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_Cvtr86H5gAnd your notorious requirement of negative proof... almost looks like you beg for upgrading your title from mascot to jester. Rico So, you can't prove anything! Why should we trust your claims? |
|
|
|
Imagine finding the private key for some of Satoshi's addresses...
That's the prime target of this so called "project". The "white" hacker Rico that doesn't have a single bitcoin in his wallet... Give me a break! Oh yes - everyone new here: Meet becoin, our local mascot. Rico HERE WE COMEEEEE! HERE WE ASK AAAAAGAIN: 1. Prove you have the privkey. 2. Prove it is not yours. |
|
|
|
100% there will be dump, below 900$
Mmm, if everybody starts agreeing with me, I might have to reconsider   No trust yourself. The law of the 3 dead cat bounces always works. Yes, correct. It always works except in those cases when it doesn't. |
|
|
|
Looking bearish
Yes. Big dump expected because we tested the support below 1000$ 3 time now. We would likely go furhter south it seems. Wow. You're real talent. 4 out of 5 predictions wrong. |
|
|
|
I have just come up with an absolutely crazy idea. I should probably be shot in the face! So here it is:
SegWit and LN would push a lot of the transactions offchain. So people running LN nodes would collect some fees. Ideally these would be much cheaper than today's on-chain trans fees, but there could be a lot more of them.
What exactly is preventing miners/pools from running LN nodes and earn some tasty fees? Lactose intolerance? Their inability to compile C++11 code? The fact that they have no more space for an extra virtual server for the LN node in their multi football field sized mining farm?
Please enlighten me!
Setting up LN node doesn't require ASICs produced by Bitmain. Thus I gather why miners don't like seg witness nor lightning? Yep. If you want to know the true centralization rate of bitcoin network you have to calculate the % of hash power produced by Bitmain ASICs. |
|
|
|
I have just come up with an absolutely crazy idea. I should probably be shot in the face! So here it is:
SegWit and LN would push a lot of the transactions offchain. So people running LN nodes would collect some fees. Ideally these would be much cheaper than today's on-chain trans fees, but there could be a lot more of them.
What exactly is preventing miners/pools from running LN nodes and earn some tasty fees? Lactose intolerance? Their inability to compile C++11 code? The fact that they have no more space for an extra virtual server for the LN node in their multi football field sized mining farm?
Please enlighten me!
Setting up LN node doesn't require ASICs produced by Bitmain. |
|
|
|
could it pull another x2 ?
Everything is possible. Pump and dump coins like ETHF can increase or decrease in value x2 in matter of hours. |
|
|
|
Imagine finding the private key for some of Satoshi's addresses...
That's the prime target of this so called "project". The "white" hacker Rico that doesn't have a single bitcoin in his wallet... Give me a break! |
|
|
|
How is it even possible that BU has got 50% if all the people on this forum hate it? Are the miners those 50% or do i miss a whole lot of BU supporters?
They do not. BU has 38.6% vs SegWit 28.2% see https://coin.dance/blocks ah thanks! But what happens if we just stay with CORE and dont use BU nor SegWit? Would the price stagnate because of no scaling solution found? That's the hope of many people. They hope to buy back the bitcoins they sold out. I feel sorry for this unfortunate group. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
