|
I'm buying. Thank you for the cheap coins.
|
|
|
|
Maybe it was unnoticed, does anybody know the current size of ETH blockchain? Thank you in advance.
What's the problem? Next fork will deal with it. |
|
|
|
900 EUR barrier broken  Where is this going to end?? The sky is falling, the sky is falling! Run! |
|
|
|
This is not about Bitcoin Core or BU anymore...
It has never been. BU psychopaths just don't care about Bitcoin or BU success, or XT, or Classic, or whatever will come after BU is gone. They only wish Bitcoin Core to be destroyed. Things are really simple. Out of 100 core devs there are couple of devs that feel insulted that they are not among 5 core devs hired by Blockstream. Just imagine what will some people say if Blockstream hired more core devs? |
|
|
|
You were right after all, yorkey.
Every broken cloak is right twice per day. It doesn't mean it is useful indicator. |
|
|
|
|
Certainly, I don't mind if someone decides to give me BUcoins for free. Whatever their price may be after the fork I'll sell them and increase my BTC stash.
|
|
|
|
|
Bubble is going to burst soon. Sell ETHF and buy ETHC!
|
|
|
|
|
Troll fest is always an indicator bottom is very close.
|
|
|
|
If we are seeing this exorbitant fees in 2017, then think what we will see after few years. A solution is needed now to save bitcoin's interest. Otherwise, people will start using other coins like ETH or dash for their payments which some people have already started using for future.
Bitcoin is not for everyone. Bitcoin is the Rolls Roys of cryptoworld. Poor people can't afford it and should use cheaper alternatives like altcoins. Most creative individuals will develop payment/settlement pools for offchain bitcoin transactions and thus offer veeeery good Rolls Roys replica to poor people at symbolic transaction fees. However, to trigger such an innovation drive bitcoin transaction fees must be really high. Conclusion: until this happens carefully plan your bitcoin transactions to save from transaction fees! |
|
|
|
Awwww.
Can't we shake these weak hands a little further?
It is too risky. Shaking weak hands means also giving cheap bitcoins to strong hands. |
|
|
|
Do you think the transaction fee will kill bitcoin? This is a very stupid question! Here is why: Transaction fee is high because competition for blockchain inclusion is high. Saying that too much competition will kill bitcoin is like saying a place is not attractive to people because it's overcrowded... |
|
|
|
|
Looks like dump has started. Hangover will be severe.
|
|
|
|
the devs war isn't our problem...
There is no devs war! There is a teenage psychopath in China w(h)oo thinks he rules Bitcoin. Now he is going to find out he isn't the hard way! |
|
|
|
In the hopes we can start an actual dialog and quit throwing insults at each other: C'mon! Stop talking BS and fork it! you first I don't need a fork! I don't need unlimited spam on the blockchain! |
|
|
|
In the hopes we can start an actual dialog and quit throwing insults at each other: C'mon! Stop talking BS and fork it! If you don't, just STFU! |
|
|
|
Miners will include everything that contains a transaction fee, even one satoshi. Why? Because even one satoshi is one satoshi. And then came spam...................
One could add 100GB to the BU blockchain, just by spending 1 BU coin.
This is not a reasonable game theory interpretation of what will happen. They will set the block size to yield the highest total fees, which would require the exclusion of very low fee transactions. Yielding highest total fees requires inclusion of low fee transactions, not exclusion! No, because you remove the competition for block inclusion. If every transaction gets included, no one needs to compete. So the most profitable choice is setting the fees low enough to increase transaction volume but high enough to still have block inclusion competition, which gives you a bell curve. So, the most profitable choice for users (not miners) is to spam the BUcoin network with lowest possible fees as much as they can, for transactions they don't care about if excluded, to cause a very low bell curve so that "legit" transactions get included with relatively low fees? |
|
|
|
Miners will include everything that contains a transaction fee, even one satoshi. Why? Because even one satoshi is one satoshi. And then came spam...................
One could add 100GB to the BU blockchain, just by spending 1 BU coin.
This is not a reasonable game theory interpretation of what will happen. They will set the block size to yield the highest total fees, which would require the exclusion of very low fee transactions. Yielding highest total fees requires inclusion of low fee transactions, not exclusion! |
|
|
|
Dont be so butthurt because you lose money because of HODLing. Sometimes you need to let go and trade mate.
Yeah, I can smell that you "let it go". Don't be so butthurt and dream for 900 eur because you can't trade now! |
|
|
|
Which bottom ? You mean 900 EUR?
How about the 5 cat bounce law? Isn't it better than the 3 cat bounce law? |
|
|
|
Triple digits reached  If you have sold out your bitcoins at the bottom, I feel sorry for you! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
