Perhaps you should post the deleted posts, the thread they were in and why you believe they follow the rules.

You are not going to get what you are asking for. You are also not going to get anything by bickering and complaining -- you will need to make an argument as to why your posts should be reinstated.   

Lets be realistic, if someone is going to try to ask for a bribe or extort someone, they are not going to want to provide irrefutable evidence they are the one asking for the bribe and/or trying to extort you. They would rather provide circumstantial evidence that shows you that you are talking to who they claim to be.

Similarly, trading with someone who does not ask for a signed message is not a license to scam the person.

I agree it is a best practice to always get a signed message prior to sending money, and to always work out all the little details before finalizing an agreement to trade. There are many imposters on various social media and communications platforms who will try to steal your money.

At least one of these things is not true.

I am not a fan of regulating companies in telling them how to run their business. They can run it as they see fit, and if they wish to make their private information public they can, and if they don't they shouldn't be forced to.

No. If you have a concern with why a post was deleted, you can PM a global mod, or admin. If you don’t get a response, or if you cannot agree you can open a thread in meta about it.

At the end of the day, the mod is responding to a report from someone (most likely), and is taking action based upon the forum rules. The same action should have been taken regardless of which mod responded to the report.

Perhaps he reviewed how the new system would work and adjusted accordingly.

I look forward to seeing my name in the 250+ merit “club” and look forward to joining higher clubs as I make extraordinary posts

I don't want any agenda being pushed by political operatives without warning. Left or right wing. I am currently seeing what I believe to be left wing operatives in PS currently.

The issue is not disliking someone's opinion, it is that I believe propaganda is being spread in PS. A warning that propaganda is not removed and that political operatives may be posting would not stop anyone from posting their opinion, it may however make said propaganda less effective by encouraging people to independently verify claimed facts, and approach conversations with a critical eye.

If you believe both sides are pushing propaganda, then perhaps a warning to verify information read may decrease its effectiveness. An operative may operate in many forums under many personalities as writing on a forum is a very efficient way to communicate.


I am not asking these people to be censored:

I have seen some people post in what I believe to be bad faith, and what I believe to be outright lies that have no basis in fact. Perhaps they actually believe what they are posting, but I believe they are pushing disinformation.


The anti-vax movement is able to spread solely because of propaganda and lies. If those who believe these lies knew not to take what is said to them at face value then perhaps they would get their kids vaccinated.



There are warnings about scammers all over the marketplace subs. I don't see why there shouldn't be warnings about other people being up to no good other places they might try to create mischief. 

I'd be willing to take an "OTHER PARTICIPANTS" spot if possible.

Yes, this should be implemented.

No.

I am saying there should be a warning that propaganda and disinformation posted by professionals may be posted.

Discussion with some of these people is not the same as having a discussion with your neighbor, friend or acquaintance.

I am not surprised to see you write that...

I would like to start by thanking Flying Helfish for cleaning up the PS sub (and theymos for getting a mod for the PS sub) as political discourse is now allowed, verses previously when there was so much garbage, it was effectively impossible (or very difficult) to have an intelligent discussion.

With the above being said, I have noticed a decent amount of what I believe to be pro-Madura (the illegitimate president of Venezuela) propaganda by a number of posters. These people are effectively posting disinformation.

I have also noticed a number of what I believe to believe left wing political operatives posting. I am unsure if they are the same person/associated with the same entity. They are posting disinformation to push a left wing agenda.

My question is what should be done about this? I obviously believe people should be able to post their opinion, and it is best if the forum doesn’t moderate for truth (and accurate conclusions based on a fact set). 

If nothing else, this thread can serve as a reference to this activity. Perhaps there could be a sticky warning that propaganda and political operatives may be posting in the PS sub and that people should do their own research to form their own conclusions and opinions.

This is ridiculous propaganda.

There are multiple faucets for the testnet that give away fairly substantial amounts of coins for free.

It is generally frowned upon to attach any value to testnet coins. I believe at one point many people were buying/trading BTC testnet coins, and to discourage this, a new testnet blockchain was created.

It appears selling a YouTube channel is against their TOS, and as such the account may get closed if google finds out about it being used as collateral (or of a transfer).

Further, YouTube channels make money because their owners create content that generates ad revenue. However if a channel is transferred, the prior owner would almost certainly not be creating additional content, and without ongoing additional content, the number of views your videos will get will decline (a lot) over time. When the video views go does, so does the ad revenue.

I am interested joining.

36wD9WZri7utFL2x7Y8kMqB2piHcfqM6S2

I am 51 in total merit and 109 in total merit received, and have the 31st most number of posts.

telegram

He was asking to have the loan sent to the same address he posted 1.5 years ago. I don't think I understand the logic in asking for a test transaction out of the address you are sending the loan to. Also, as an FYI, it is possible to sign a message from an address in a blockchain.infocom wallet -- you would need to export the private key, or xprivkey via the console then import it into a wallet that can sign messages, or at least this was the case in the past.

---

---

I was also informed that 2double0 changed his password one time in May 2015, within one day of when marco changed his password. I don't think this is an indication that either account was sold, and think it is more likely marco was changing all/many of his passwords.