That guy just really irks me.

He is a spammer.

He doesn’t read threads prior to posting, but he clearly knows how to read English.

He appears to have the capacity to learn, but doesn’t appear to know what he is talking about most of the time.

I don’t know this for sure, but I speculate he doesn’t rely on his signature earnings to live. His signature spam appears to be the sole result of nothing other than greed.

TP has previously said he won’t go back years after the fact to tag accounts for this and to my knowledge he hasn’t. AFAIK, he is one person who has been consistent in this regard. 

Yes you can use your own thread. You can also monitor this thread in addition to running your own thread. Or you can only monitor this thread. Or you can be on the 👀 lookout for merit deserving posts when you are reading threads you are interested in.

Don't get me wrong, I am all for a free market, and you guys can pay whatever the market will support.

With the above being said, most campaigns do pay for posts in the off topic section, but even if they didn't, participants in the off topic sub would need to make 90% of their posts in this section for it to make sense to participate in your campaign if they qualified for a better paying campaign.

In general, your campaign is paying roughly 10% of what other campaigns are paying. This means a participant would need to make 500 posts in your campaign in order to make the same amount of money in a higher paying campaign that maxes out at 50 posts/week. Looking at the various other campaign spreadsheets, most people do not even make 50 posts in a week.

Even if one were to assume they received the highest bonus (only one person gets it per week, and you only give bonuses to 5 people/week), they would only be making approximately 20% of what most other campaigns pay.

The result of the above means that anyone who will qualify for any of most other campaigns will not participate in your campaigns, which leaves you with a bunch of spammers advertising for you. Take a look at this post for example, in what appears to be the span of a couple of days, one person was able to make 184 reports against 4 users in your campaign that were marked "good" by the moderators.

You really need to either personally or hire someone to manage your campaign more closely, and either not pay for spammy posts, or remove participants who make a lot of spammy posts. You should also do more to screen against poor quality posters. This will probably result in you not having many participants at your current rates, but I don't think there is any real benefit to having as many posts with your ad as you currently have.

I’m sorry, this thread is about you, there is no reason for ad-hominem attacks.

Your comment doesn’t sound very tongue in cheek to me, but if you say so. It sounds more like you trying to flame someone, trying to derail their thread, not unlike what you are doing here. 

I am calling it as I see it.

Do you care to defend the use of torture?

I generally prefer for people to submit more posts for me to review than the number of merit I will give for the submission.

It appears that LFC_Bitcoin is in favor of using torture to recover money stolen.

He said it is an experiment. I am speculating what the experiment is.

that is a reasonable conclusion based on the available facts.

FYI, there was no signed message, there was an encrypted message that no one except lauda could decrypt that detailed his plan.

The first four posts are for context.

---

---

I think this response is pretty good evidence that you haven’t read the thread.

their intentions were to extort Zeroaxl and claim it was a sting operation of called out. What they did would in no way show evidence of wrongdoing if he paid the extortion and someone not paying taxes is not an excuse to extort money from them.

1- this thread has never been locked
2- everyone involved has denied extorting anyone and claims they were engaging in a sting operation, which doesn’t make sense
3- this thread serves as a warning to anyone considering doing business with anyone involved
4- zeroaxl was threatened with continued harassment, of course he doesn’t want to pursue the matter, the consequences for him would be very bad if he did. If you want you can publish your Mom’s phone number so others can call her to harass her and tell her that you are evading paying taxes.

<>

I had sent this person a PM asking for a second post. I eventually received the following response:
This person can resubmit once he can provide two posts of his for me to look at.

Also, QuestionAuthority I believe was removed from being a merit source, as was stingers. Neither of them are bold in the OP, so I am not sure if you already know this or not

It appears you have a lot of alt accounts. Are any of them banned?

Examples sent BTC to your poloniex address.

Vhern, supercops, and swogerino also sent BTC to your poloniex address. This group of accounts is also linked to possible account trading, so any other accounts linked to these may not all be the same person.

There is one other person I think you might be, but I am not wanting to ask you just yet.

Minerjones has a history of being involved in transactions in which money is missing. The fact that he has successfully completed other transactions does not change this fact. Nor does the fact that coercion was done for lists to be setup in specific ways such that his rating shows as being very high. 

This does not even consider the fact that minerjones has advertised (I am not sure why this thread is in the trashcan, I don't think it should be there) for an obvious ponzi

bumping for relevancy