Would You, my-local-people, agree to un-ban account, disable signature and remove regulus from merit source? It's not that it's going to happen anyway. So lets make it clear here
if instead
"Electrum Dark will be usefull on trading once its platform become live. My full support on the project and will contribute for your success."
he wrote
""Electrum Dark will be usefull on trading once its platform is alive. I fully support the project and will contribute to its success.""
it would be OK, if we will be strict about following rules?
najveća krivnja mu ispada što nije kupio posting bota da mu malo ispremiješa tekst prije postanja
? Testing grounds for text spinner? Well, that is fastest way to get permaban. Surprising.  It seems to me that more people have a burning desire to get banned and neg. rated. |
|
|
|
But if you fought for someone before, and now insist
RegulusHR should be banned because someone else you liked was banned for same thing. , thats
hypocritical in my book.
No, it is not. It is called accepting the forum's policy and trying to be consistent afterwards. So lets make it clear here if instead "Electrum Dark will be usefull on trading once its platform become live. My full support on the project and will contribute for your success." he wrote ""Electrum Dark will be usefull on trading once its platform is alive. I fully support the project and will contribute to its success."" it would be OK, if we will be strict about following rules? I don't think so, no. You'd have to quote and include a link to the source. |
|
|
|
But if you fought for someone before, and now insist
RegulusHR should be banned because someone else you liked was banned for same thing. , thats
hypocritical in my book.
No, it is not. It is called accepting the forum's policy and trying to be consistent afterwards. I hope I am one of the users you recognize.
Indeed. I like to believe that he would receive same support even with merit out of the question. He would have mine support for sure but there is no way to prove such claims so "back to the loop".
That's one of the problems. There is a very strong incentive for people who received (or may receive) merit from OP to complain about his ban and ask for an exception. Given the lack of involvement outside of the section and general lack of contributions to the community, there is no way to judge what the actual agenda of each user is. That perception was actually my concern as well. I am aware how it looks to "outsiders".
Yup, and I've had bad experiences with local users trying to play white knights before. The last one I remember was when I tagged someone active in the Turkish section (there was a thread in the reputation section IIRC). At least the users here seem to be acting in a proper manner.  |
|
|
|
|
I don't like this "This user recently woke up from a long period of inactivity.". Please sign a message quickly as requested above.
Update: Account is not compromised.
|
|
|
|
|
It would help if someone could find something more than circumstancial evidence for this.
|
|
|
|
Eventually, as mentioned before, it will be the way you choose it to be. I just hope you take my opinions as a incentive to reconsider, not to fight.
That is fair, but you should have empathized that it is a possibility rather than a statement of how things are. The way that I've read it, it felt like a direct attack. All I see is users which are hungry for merit whining that their merit farm source is dead due to stealing posts.
Oh God, I just saw this.. I'm 32 years old, have a steady job, do 3 more jobs in my free time, I live a happy and satisfying life. Do you honestly think I care about merits, some forum reputation or whatever? If I did, I would not be here, conflicting you. Would I? I do not know, but my statement stands (note the "I see"). Out of all the names that were voicing their support for OP, I may have recognized two of them. This is usually not a good sign. Out of curiosity, what did RegulusHR lied about?
Nobody was talking about Regulus. It would be funny to see them wear a signature of shame for a year or two. Thermos would probably figure out something hilarious.
This - promoting issues around plagiarism or similar.. if he got to waste his time on this shit then people should be punished Who knows, he may surprise us like he did with the DT system. |
|
|
|
Last time people were asking for an exemption (which included me), it was rejected. Let's see whether the staff will remain consistent or change their stance. The same rules apply to everyone, so any exemption for any user would make a precedent. RegulusHr is made a mistake in the past, accidentally in ignorance or fully aware that he is copy/paste posts of other people - I think that does not really matter now. We can see that every day at least 10 users ask/post about they ban, some even Hero or Legendary - so it is not only what you will do in future posting, but also what you do in the past. Correct, but setting a precedent might be a bit problematic given that they would probably have to review dozens of users again. In addition to that, plagiarism cases can greatly differ. Although you can argue that all plagiarism has an incentive since the introduction of the merit system. The exemption should be for all senior members who have community backing, IE not just 12 newbies banging on about it, they should be made to look like fools with the signature being set my the forum though, hopefully it would be a bit of an education and may prevent further Copy-pasta lovers
It would be funny to see them wear a signature of shame for a year or two. Thermos would probably figure out something hilarious. |
|
|
|
Last time people were asking for an exemption (which included me), it was rejected. Let's see whether the staff will remain consistent or change their stance. ...... it is a shame that OP is banned seeing all the vouches he is getting, but yes it is chi all over again, so ill say the same thing I said to him and every other copy-pasta lover.. READ THE FUCKING RULES.. However I do believe that people with a decent backing of obvious non-alts should be given some way back onto the forum, 100% they shouldn't be able to wear a sig for 12 months - or even better the sig should be - READ THE FUCKING RULES or similar, But a small mistake (however grave in the grand scheme of things) shouldn't be punished for life if the net gain to the forum is far greater, especially taking into account the forums official stance on scams. Revoking OP's ban would be fine if other bans of notable members (such as chi) were revoked. Since they weren't, revoking OP is also out of the question for me. I believe there was also another case not too long ago where I have said the same thing (i.e. voiced my strong opinion against making an exemption). |
|
|
|
|
It would be helpful if someone quickly pulled the plagiarism into this thread. The user seems like a classic shitposter.
|
|
|
|
I know I'm risking something (probably dissecting all my posts, getting negative trust or whatever)
You do risk negative trust by lying not by voicing opinions. From your post (and from previous, although rare occasions i saw you on BTT) I can see you are Croatian and that you hold a grudge.
Everything from here on out is a lie. I have no idea who this guy is, and thus can't hold a grudge against him. What you just did is personal and, in my book (and probably everybody else's from current local board) definitely not ok. We need people who scan the forum and do the 'dirty work', but there needs to be a line where you cannot freely use your 'power' for personal revenge, or whatever it is that is driving you to do this. Or let me rephrase that, you can and you just did - but you, as a reputable member of this forum, should know better than to act like that.
Trying to taint my name with this nonsense again? Not the wisest decision. I'm definitely not the one to tell anybody how to behave and what to do, my time here is far too short and my significance to this forum far too small to matter, but what I can clearly see is that after all of our support to RegulusHR, the situation now is even worse than it was before. This is politics, this is a witch hunt and this is wrong.
All I see is users which are hungry for merit whining that their merit farm source is dead due to stealing posts. |
|
|
|
Last time people were asking for an exemption (which included me), it was rejected. Let's see whether the staff will remain consistent or change their stance. |
|
|
|
Xal0lex please clarify whether this is true or not.
Is he knows about this thread? Did someone notified him? I just did. |
|
|
|
|
Xal0lex please clarify whether this is true or not.
|
|
|
|
Incompetent children rushing i.e. forcing a fork. #Decentralized smart contracts. Thanks for sharing, indeed a worthwhile tweet storm. Seen some of the quotes before, but interesting when all put together.
Whenever someone uses Satoshi's Vision as a counter argument you can automatically assume that they've lost. This is science, not a religion. The tweet storm was nicely written. |
|
|
|
~snip~
So you are brand new to the forum, and know the way it "Should work"  Lol....  Must be someone who noticed that their trust score just turned red with all the untrusted feedback now becoming trusted feedback.  Maybe it's just another alt of Quickscammer. It would be best to avoid manipulative advice. |
|
|
|
I really don't. It makes no difference whether you knew or not, except that if you did, and the casino could prove it, you'd be arrested for fraud. But either way you don't get to keep your winnings.
You'd get stripped away from all winnings and get kicked out. It would be similar to how they handle people that attempt cheating in 'traditional' ways.
Also, the issue here is that verusfides won their 20 BTC on a non-malfunctioning game (Plinko). They got the balance to win from the malfunctioning game. How do you think that should be handled? (which is the whole point that we're debating)
OP couldn't have won any real bitcoins, because they didn't wager any real bitcoins; they wagered void credit, so that's what they won. Which is why I'm strongly inclined to align with the casino on this case. He was betting with something that shouldn't exist to begin with, so the win should never have existed either. Plus, once you take a bug bounty compensation it makes your case even weaker. Please, stop this cacaphony, FJ was fair giving you a large bug bounty and your initial deposit back, also free spins. your problem is that, you have lost them in minutes and now trying to get more.
This is also what bothers me about OP. Did you lose the bug bounty on FJ as well? |
|
|
|
I am not picking sides here..
Please don't or you will officially be a member of The Cult of Lauda. This trust system is giving so much hassle, lolz.
Tell me about it. On the left side you have ratings and disputes, on the right side you have to watch over 400+ DT2 members.
Lol, that would be quite ironic Maybe you are my alt too and I'm just trying to lower suspicion, who knows. |
|
|
|
|
If I agree with a reasonable thread made by you, is this proof of me colluding with you?
|
|
|
|
Actually I read through some archives and they do have some program called a PBA? Which is short for Player Bet Analysis. I'm guessing it gives insight into whether players were betting very erratically as if they had acquired funds through exploits of casino grounds. It's in one of the resolved posts in AskGamblers FortuneJack complaints and mentioned in a staff members response to a player. Prior to that I had no knowledge they had that kind of software for players.
FJ should clarify why this was not caught by this detection system (if it exists/is being used?) or the staff sooner.
Also I'm reminding you again to merge posts.  |
|
|
|
Not disagreeing with you, but it is pretty reasonable to have staff monitor a newly released game that was basically in a beta state where players were betting real money.
Quite reasonable, but these thing happen in every industry (see teeGUMES's post while I was writing). If there was no malice, then it was handled properly. However, if there was malice then the casino deserves consequences. Given that they had very little to gain from this, I highly doubt someone intentionally acted malliciously (given that you could destroy your reputation for pocket change). Especially ones who make a 0.009BTC deposit?
There have been and currently are companies large and small, that grow too fast too quick. They see the influx of money and profit coming in and they get greedy. They do not hire the correct amount of staff, instill the proper securities, and instead spend the money on marketing.
Could say the same for Facebook, heh. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
