|
If anon hasn't taken it, I'll give you BTC0.05, just let me know!
Cheers
|
|
|
|
No longer reserved  TAKEN! |
|
|
|
Will any of those artist proof 1 BTC coin be for sale? :O
I believe Bobby mentioned previously that these proofs went out to people as gifts. And some have already been redeemed. But yes would be nice to see if any would be sold by BTTC. I would definitely want one if Bobby has any left for sale. There were 100 for the 1 BTC + 5 for the 5 BTC, I wonder how many are left, if any. |
|
|
|
This is laughable... It makes no difference. Coins are graded on physical aspects.
My question has nothing to do with the grading of coins. I am asking whether a known spammer address such as 1Enjoy or 1Sochi, which back in 2014 sent transactions with miniscule amounts of BTC to coins, affects said coins values to collectors? Nope. The coins are physical, so that's what we care about... The address associated with it makes no difference, dust or no dust. The scarcity and collectibility is in the coin itself not the digital part. Thank you for your opinion, it is appreciated. It makes total sense if I think about it from that point of view. It still frustrates me though if I'm honest, as dazedfool says, if given the choice between an unaltered and altered coin I would choose the one without dust. So is this just a psychological thing for people? Yes an increase in utility increases use cases. This in turn increases demand, which increases value. Also, increased dust affects fees, more dust higher the fees, this will affect value as well. These changes could be nearly negligible, but technically, yes it affects value.
I did not take this into account. All those input scripts into an address means a bigger transaction fee ( if ever redeemed ). Thanks for your thoughts. |
|
|
|
This is laughable... It makes no difference. Coins are graded on physical aspects.
My question has nothing to do with the grading of coins. I am asking whether a known spammer address such as 1Enjoy or 1Sochi, which back in 2014 sent transactions with miniscule amounts of BTC to coins, affects said coins values to collectors? |
|
|
|
Hey! Right, this is something that I have often thought about. It was recently brought up in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1544929.0Mine doesn't say anything, it's just annoying AF.
Yep, it is indeed annoying having that altered balance, I try to take my own advice and not let it bother me. Gladly, that stuff isn't that popular recently. If someone was to destroy my halving-funded coins, I would probably be pissed like sh*t. Yeah it definitely slowed down once it started becoming cost prohibitive to spam thousands of addresses  I would be severely pissed as well. But there's nothing to prevent it from happening. It happened to 2 coins of mine in 2014. Nothing since. I'm sure a large portion of coin collectors have at least one "altered" coin. Is that a big issue if someone randomly sends dust (or more) to a physical bitcoin in terms of its value to collectors?
That is a question I have been trying to find the answer to myself. I believe it really shouldn't affect the value. Note this is my personal opinion. Take a site such as uberbills for example, where anyone can obtain the full address of coins made by Casascius. Anyone has the ability to send a single satoshi to every address on there, thereby altering all coins. Now, does this still affect the value in a negative way? ( None of this has anything to do with collectors having personal preferences that their coins are unaltered, like myself. But ultimately we cannot do anything about it if they are ) I would like to know collectors opinions on these dust transactions that appear. Please vote and discuss so we can get a better idea of how we all feel about this  |
|
|
|
We should make this into a new thread/poll... Good idea sorry for the derail people. New thread incoming |
|
|
|
Mine doesn't say anything, it's just annoying AF.
Yep, it is indeed annoying having that altered balance, I try to take my own advice and not let it bother me. Gladly, that stuff isn't that popular recently. If someone was to destroy my halving-funded coins, I would probably be pissed like sh*t. Yeah it definitely slowed down once it started becoming cost prohibitive to spam thousands of addresses I would be severely pissed as well. But there's nothing to prevent it from happening. It happened to 2 coins of mine in 2014. Nothing since. I'm sure a large portion of coin collectors have at least one "altered" coin. Is that a big issue if someone randomly sends dust (or more) to a physical bitcoin in terms of its value to collectors?
That is a question I have been trying to find the answer to myself. I believe it really shouldn't affect the value. Note this is my personal opinion. Take a site such as uberbills for example, where anyone can obtain the full address of coins made by Casascius. Anyone has the ability to send a single satoshi to every address on there, thereby altering all coins. Now, does this still affect the value? ( None of this has anything to do with collectors having personal preferences that their coins are unaltered, like myself. But ultimately we cannot do anything about it if they are ) |
|
|
|
He goes ranting everywhere about how he got scammed, then suddenly goes annoyingly silent or post off the point replies. With due respek to the people reading this, I must say fuck u jason
Thank you for the respek. You're an idiot. I've said all that I am allowed to say. Well it seems like you're content with what you received, which obviously came attached to a NDA. It was becoming clear you weren't going to get the jackpot that you were entitled to, and you've taken whatever amount you could get your hands on. In one respect, I don't blame you. On the other hand, it sucks that they got away with this so easily. |
|
|
|
Ahhh so there will be like a tiny text attached to the amount that says "Buy a Subway footlong" or something? lol
It depends. I think only blockchain.info allows & shows text messages/notes. Mine doesn't say anything, it's just annoying AF.  Yep, it is indeed annoying having that altered balance, I try to take my own advice and not let it bother me. The 1Enjoy address had 'Free, enjoy!  ' attached, which so far has done its job of winding me up!  |
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, apologies. Thanks Mitchell. The problem is that no one has received counterparty tokens from what I've heard, so they don't even know what book number they have. This is an error in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
0.55
Damn dude! I was coming in to make a bid, now I'm making a hastily retreat. I think I got it, glad you didn't get involved. Yep you got it Nah, thought I'd let you have this in peace |
|
|
|
any interest
?
If it was a private key, I'd be interested at the right price, but this coin is a 2FA Version of which I'm personally not too fond. |
|
|
|
Are you the original owner? Odd seeing a set like this from someone new to the board...
I thought that at first, but maybe he ordered through the website before the board became known to him. I have ordered a coin via the site and never had any interaction with smoothie here about it at all, everything was done via email communication. Lastly - did smoothie ever even sell numbered sets, or just auction them like he does nowadays? thanks - I also have a Cas coin with a dust tx from 1Sochi. Kind of pisses me off, but what can you do? So what's the incentive for someone to give their BTCs away? Basically these addresses spam the network with loads of miniscule amounts of BTC, with 2 separate agendas, firstly some did it in the hope that the people who receive the dust then consolidate the funds into different addresses, thereby linking addresses together and trying to track which addresses own what - but they won't be able to put a name to those funds. Secondly, they use it as a cheap form of advertising. They are paying for information, and marketing. |
|
|
|
Oh geez, that's a nice coin.
0.61BTC
Yes, it is. 0.65 BTCYou got that right. 0.7 BTC |
|
|
|
Yep, monbux is fine |
|
|
|
0.55
Damn dude! I was coming in to make a bid, now I'm making a hastily retreat. |
|
|
|
Will you escrow? If so, 0.55 BTCEdit: posting pics for OP.    |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
