Gdzieś wczoraj czy dzisiaj czytałem, że jest jakiś gap niedomknięty na 8500$ i może cena spadnie do tej wartości, żeby rynek mógł zamknąć niedokończone sprawy przed następnym rajdem.

Ja sam nie mogę się tego GAPU nigdzie doszukać i mam nadzieję, że aktualne wsparcie na 9700$ wytrzyma.

Z drógiej strony jak spadnie do 8800$ lub nawet niżej, to na prawdę niezła okazja dla tych, którzy jeszcze nie kupili, bo to może być ostatnia taka przecena przed halvingiem.

I am happy that this question was already answered very detailed, not only by members who support this project but also by the Digital Gold team itself.

I can only add, that I don't see such transactions in my wallet, to be honest.

Here is a screen from my few last transactions in the ETH wallet with GOLD token:



As you can clearly see, I don't have such transactions you have mentioned in my wallet transaction history and don't remember to have such once in the past either, but maybe I am wrong here because just can't remember correctly.

So, there is no other way and I would have to open a new special thread to know why my posts were deleted?

I don't know if mod in the mining section is abusing his power or even if it was a moderator from this board who deleted my posts and that is the biggest problem.

It is clear that somebody removes posts from this section and many times is very hard or even impossible to find a reason for this, additionally, it happens frequently as other members stated in this thread. The mining board looks pretty bad in terms of discussion frequency, new posts, and threads, so such behavior is at least strange in my opinion.

Myślę, że powinieneś przeczytać ten artykuł, jeżeli nigdy nie zagłębiałeś się w odmęty tej sprawy, żeby zrozumieć, jak właśnie jest możliwe, że ta sprawa się nadal toczy, gdzie przecież dziecko by już wiedziało, że on kłamie.

A no da niestety się da w hAmeryce, bo w polskim sądzie by nie przeszło.

https://cryptobriefing.com/craig-wright-tulip-trust-bitcoin-lawsuit/

Tak jak widać, już nawet żartują: "A Garden of Tulip Trusts"  , myślę, że aktualna rozprawa będzie chociaż trochę rostrzygająca, kiedy sędzia i adwokaci zapoznają się ze wszystkimi nowymi dowodami, którymi zbombardowali ich adwokaci C.W. Może tam jest w końcu, to czego brakowało, żeby powiazać to w czałość, czyli wytłumaczenie adresów, funduszy, kurierów, działania. itd..

Jak nie, to w końcu się chyba sędzia wkórwi i coś zrobi, bo ewidentnie robią wszystko, żeby przeciągnać sprawę. Ale już są wnioski, że nie przedstawi całej masy dokumentów, bo złamie prawa międzynarodowe, a w ogóle są objęte niektóre klauzalami poufności, więc kolejny konflikt interesów.

Ta sprawa będzie się ciągnąć w nieskończoność, a i tak, to nie jest sprawa, czy on jesy Satoshim, tylko, że zginęło ileś tam Bitcoin, po śmierci Kleimana.
Ja nie rozumiem skąd się to wzięło, że ta sprawa ma udowodznić, że to on jest Satoshim, wcale nie?


Nie oksymoron, a żart z YouTuba. Jeden ze znanych YouTuberów Crypto Dailly pochwalił się, po którejś pompie, że ma i chce sprzedać BSV z dużym zyskiem, no i się wylała fala hejtu i musiał się tłumaczyć. No i teraz wiadomo, że jak masz BSV, to nic nie mówisz, a już na pewno na YouTube  .

https://youtu.be/SZH21KfmHl0?t=332

Masz zupełną rację, ale ja to bym raczej nazwał świadomą miskomunikacją, w efekcie, której BSV skoczyło o 200%.

Wyglądało to tak.

Wszyscy wiedzieli z rozprawy sądowej, że w tych dniach miał się pojawić tkzw. pierwszy "bounded courier", który miał dostarczyć pliki, na których rzekomo znajdują się wszystkie, lub tylko część kluczy do adresów, tkzw. grupy Satoshi. Oczywiście, kiedy pojawił się kurier, CW pisze tweeta, że dostał plik i zaczyna się FOMO, cena BSV zaczyna startować do nieba.

Za chwile, już grzmi na całych mediach społecznościowych, a przeciwnicy (hejterzy), tylko pomagają nieświadomie, rozsiewając te Tweety CW po całym necie, z różnymi informacjami/sprostowaniami, że to nie prawda, itd.

Później, oczywiście okazuje się, że tak naprawdę, jest to, tylko jeden z kilku zaszyfrowanych plików, jakie CW ma dostać w związku z "Tulip Fund", na których będą adresy, potem części zakodowanych kluczy, itd, co może potrwać całe lata, a i tak nie ma, żadnej pewności, czy w końcu odzyska fortunę. Sprostowanie to publikuje adwokat CW na Twiterze, co kończy sprawę, na 200% zysku dla BSV  .

CW napisał w Tweecie dosłownie, tylko tyle: "Właśnie pojawił się bounded kurier", no i teraz można go skarżyć i sądzić za pompowanie kryptowaluty, życzę powodzenia.

Dopracowana, już po wielu wcześniejszych próbach do perfekcji manipulacja rynkiem, przy wykorzystaniu medii społecznościowych, a co najważniejsze, mistrzowskie rozegranie hejtu na swoją korzyść. Zauważcie, że przecież wszyscy go nienawidza, a cena BSV rośnie, bo każdy poważny inwestor ma ze 3% BSV w swoim portfolio i o tym nie wspomina, tak na wszelki wypadek, właśnie takich pomp.

Muszę się z Tobą w zupełności zgodzić, że Tytanowy Janusz posiada niesamowite i oryginalne zdolności, a jego tok myślenia jest nowatorski i zaskakująco precyzyjny, już nie raz byłem zaskoczony i pod dużym wrażeniem po przeczytaniu komentarzy naszego kolegi.

A to tylko początek, dodatkowo jest bardzo wartościowym człowiekiem, z którym bardzo lubię się nie zgadzać i dyskutować  .

Zawsze chętnie pomoże i doradzi, na prawdę można na nim polegać.

Powiem tak, czytam wszystkie wiadomości jakie znajdę i czytałem wszystkie dostępne skrypty z posiedzeń, które tutaj nawet linkowałem na lokalu.

Ale żebym czekał specjalnie na dni, w których mają się odbyć kolejne rozprawy, żeby być super na bieżąco, to nie, aż tak jej nie śledzę.

Myślę, że można spokojnie powiedzieć, że wiem o niej i przeczytałem, jak na razie wszystko, co było dostępne online i wpadło mi w ręce.

Too long??? It took literally 3 minutes in total!!! Just look at the screen.

It is a really convenient and very easy way to buy, sell or exchange the GOLD token for ETH or BTC.

If you are a real gold investor you should like the Digital Gold project very much and I encourage you to dive into the subject because tokenized gold is the future of gold investments.

Such companies as Tether know exactly what they are doing and what are the crypto market needs, that is why the next product they are now launching is an exact copy of the GOLD token and they aiming at the tokenized gold niche with it .

---

This is really strange that in section as mining moderator is "heavyhanded" and "over delete" because it is obvious from the first look that this board suffers from low user attendance, lack of new threads and interesting discussions.



I would be able to understand such behavior and even accept many mistakes in boards like Altcoin Discussion or any other with high amounts of spam, new threads and very high writing frequency, but it is enough to look at the screen above to know that the mining section is just the opposite and literally needs more posts and frequent writers.

Until today, I thought that my local section suffers from low frequency, but compared to mining we are standing really strong, have multiple active threads with many updates and active discussions, despite there are only a few frequent users there.

Now I am speculating, but it is possible that the mining section is in such a bad condition, just because too many good posts are removed for no reason, which obviously scares off every user from writing another post in this section. For me, it is enough to avoid this board and from this time I haven't posted there, despite we could have an interesting discussion with the OP in the The winter mining setup thread.

---

This is something new for me, despite Legendary   from now I will try to know my exact post count number because this is true that sometimes I had problems to track the post count in signature campaigns, they just don't match from time to time and I thought it is because of posts I have deleted.

I was sure every time our work is removed we got a notification and it would be great if somebody from the staff confirms this information?

Of course, I understand that the suggestion about providing mods usernames will be the most discussed one, but I have to mention that I have seen this already implemented on another forum, where I am a moderator and there were no problems because of this for mods.

Even if there were any attempts to get revenge on mods involved in deleting posts from the spammers' gang, it was immediately detected and ended with a ban for a big group of abusers.

I think mods don't have to be afraid because they stand really strong on this forum and until there is nothing wrong with the work they provide there should be no harm at all for them, but if somebody makes too many mistakes (I don't want to say that is doing this for purpose), then maybe he shouldn't be a moderator in the first place and this will be a perfect way to sift the wrong grain?

Further, I understand that there could be more PMs sent with stupid questions from spammers whos posts were deleted for good reason, but this can happen only once because we have the IGNORE function, so overwhelming amounts of additional work could be easily minimized. Additionally, if usernames would be provided, then there could be additional forum rules implemented regarding the communication with moderators to avoid spam and unneeded work.

I will be happy also with such a solution for the reasoning of deletion:


PS
I still hope to hear an answer/reasoning from the moderator who deleted my posts.

---

EDIT


I agree with you and I will be happy with any implemented solution because it would be better than the actual state of things.

"A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator."

This is literally all information received by a user whose post has been deleted, and we can't forget, that in some cases, these are long working hours that have been irrevocably removed.
Of course, in 99% of cases, this is enough, because the spammer was punished, but in 1% of the cases, hours of someone's work disappeared and there is no easy way to find out why?

Information: "A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator." is not sufficient and there should be at least a link provided to the thread from which it was removed.
TBH, there should be username added of the moderator who removed it, to be able to communicate with him, additionally, an annotation in the thread too, that the post was removed.

This could be really hard to even find the proper thread from which our posts were removed without all this information or to look further for help, especially in cases that really need this second look.

---

As an example, I can throw here my 2 (exactly 3) posts that were recently removed.

Two weeks ago two of my posts were deleted by a moderator and I found that this is really hard or even impossible for me to find out why they were removed, so I started to look for help, but to my surprise, there is not much I could do .

Both posts were published in the Mining Board, where we can see at the first look, that mining had really hard times lately, majority of threads in this section are locked and not much is going on there at all. Anyways, I was able to find two threads that were interesting for me and I knew a lot about the subject. Both threads were opened a long time ago, but still frequently updated with new comments. Of course, because there is not much going on, sometimes answers in these threads were posted with long monthly breaks.

As always, before I commented there, I have read both threads fully and prepared really high-quality on-topic answers. Both threads were updated with new comments about a week or two ago and are still open and running. Both removed posts were (additionally) already merited by few members (just after publishing) and one of these posts got an answer from the thread OP in which he stated that he is interested in the info I just provided. In short, the discussion was started again.

I have to add that this reply from OP was also removed.

---

To better understand what I am talking about, here are screens from both posts, with links to threads.


The winter mining setup


Bitcoin Mining on an APPLE II Computer! Highly Impractical Other Devices? Poll!

As I already mentioned, both posts were immediately merited by few members and the thread OP, here screen:



These are my first merits for deleted posts .

First, I asked few members, I know here on the forum personally for help to look at these posts to find the reasons for removal, which I could have missed, but nobody was able to find it either, even other moderators, so I started by sending PM's to mods from the mining board: Gmaxwell and Frodocooper, kindly asking for explanation and help.





Only moderator Gmaxwell was so kind to answer and did it very fast after only one day:



As you can clearly see even moderators can't see the reasons for deletion

I have waited good two weeks for the answer from Frodocooper but never received it .

---

I started this thread to discuss in a wider group the need to enrich the information that the user receives after his post is removed, but also quietly counted to find out the reason for deleting my posts, because I do not want to spam, a few additional moderators with PMs if I still even don't know who did it?

As I already mentioned the provided information: "A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted..." is not sufficient when there is a problem and one has to look for help.

My suggestion will be to add an additional piece of info like:

- username of a moderator who made the deletion (for an easier contact),
- add a link to the thread from which post was deleted (to make it easier to find),
- add an annotation in the thread from which post was deleted (to inform about deletion OP and other readers),
- add the reasons for deletion (to avoid unneeded questions and additional work).

I hope to discuss these suggestions with the community, additionally counting for a response from the moderator who removed my posts and that he provides valid reasons for it to let me avoid such mistakes in the future if I made any.

Believe me such simple info as a link to thread can save hours of searching. I was lucky to write in mining, where threads from 2018 are still easy to find, but if someone has post deleted from an old thread in the altcoin section and he doesn't remember the title exactly, he will need a lot of luck to find it using the search function, believe me, that you won't remember the titles of the threads or even who published them, after a few hours, don't mention days or weeks.

PS
To be fully honest, I have to add that when I get to know that 2 of my posts were removed in a row (which happens to be very rare or even never happened before), I have written another 3rd post in The winter mining setup thread, which also was removed.



I haven't mentioned this one because I can understand that it could be removed as an off-topic (which also could be discussed  ).

Of course, no answer or reaction from the moderator who deleted it.

Great thread @Tytanowy Janusz, just found it and keep reading from the beginning.

Unfortunately, I am not a martingale expert and even don't have so much experience with implementing it to my play because every time I tried to get an advantage and used usual martingale in my betting, it ends up always with a total loose sooner or later. There was always this moment when 16 or 20 black or reds show up in a row, which drained bankroll to zero.
Of course, I tried different settings and adjustments, but the end was always this same, many blacks or reds in a row, sometimes with zero between them  .

This thread is different from every martingale discussion because I see here many variations that I have never seen before and want to ask if OP has tested all of them already?


Which one is the best and gives the best chances? Is there any which actually works?

PS
I see explanations about these variations in the thread, but it is hard to understand them correctly if one has not too much experience with martingale and that is why I want to get a straight answer if possible?

I think you nailed it here.

I am sure that the name"Stablecoin" was carefully chosen by professionals for the first pegged cryptocurrency (Tether) and past perfect for their marketing needs.
Of course, the name "stable" gives the "sense of security" and I am sure, that it was their main goal, which was achieved without any doubts.

There was a need for such an alternative on the crypto market to be able to secure ourselves from volatility but nobody thought that so much money will be printed from the thin for so long.
I just can't understand how Tether was able to do this when SEC and other watchdog institutions are actively scanning the market?

So many projects have already court cases ongoing just after ICO and Tether team was able to print billions of $$$ before somebody even asked for any audits.


Thanks for your kind words.

I am always happy when there is a quality discussion and that is why I was missing valuable comments during your last detox   from the forum.

Can you tell me which wallet you have used or some other insights?

I am also experienced in ETH transactions and wasn't able to send 6,50 GOLD tokens to the Digital Gold Marketplace for less than 120000 Gwei.
I tried 2 times and had to finally send it with such a high amount because I got the message "not enough gas" which was true because gas was fully used.

Here you can see the first failed transaction: 0x3601c7ebb56559e762b01f0a32abbf4923a093074aa52f377a76003322ec6791

After this one, I mistakenly have sent 0 GOLD with this same gas amount and it succeeds: 0x69c6c8a3ffa684c589684fd0b2d9b4b08cc997df89d1ce80123433f299f77767

And here I have sent 6,5 GOLD with much higher amount of gas and was finally successful: 0x364e69246be17b08bf085f3f8c3aa3af04e30be3710b73b3e7a99dcd4799783c

I have to say that this isn't the first time it happens to me because I have always the low amount of gas in my wallet settings and always the first transaction is rejected because of too low gas despite it should be high enough with ease. This is why I am curious how you are exactly doing this?

I am using Metamask with adjusted settings.

I want to ask if any decisions regarding the place where this private tournament will take place were already made? Is Sportsbet the final place for the tournament on 16th?

If nothing is decided already, then I think it would be good to open a poll where all interested members could vote on Sportsbet, CsW or any other poker room which allows private tournaments.

If there is a poker room that is accessible to all members and without KYC, like CsW it should be no brainer, I think, but voting is also a way to go.

There is not much time left if we want to play on the 16th, so we need to hurry up.

Little late but I think 1122 is a nice number to share here  .

Tak, dokładnie zrozumiałem o co chodzi dlatego opisałem jak ja aktualnie "hedżowałem" (cholera wie jak to po naszemu napisać?), ale myślałem, że będzie mniej trejdów.

Teraz widzę, że i tak by trzeba by było na bieżąco reagować, śledzić rynek, żeby właśnie hedżować, kiedy to potrzebne, czyli i tak, żadnego spokoju.

Ale masz rację, że to kolejny dobry produkt właśnie do hedgingu.

Another very fast and successful transaction in the Digital Gold Marketplace, it took literally 5 minutes and only because transactions on Ethereum blockchain are taking so long.

The time should be also improved when Ethereum will be finally POS mined and scalability problems resolved.

Then GOLD token transactions could be even nearly instant, how cool is that?



This is such a super-easy way to buy, sell and exchange GOLD token that it should attract many people to invest in tokenized gold.

I am sure that we will see a significant spike in GOLD token usage when the real gold begins to rally again.

I just want to confirm that I have received my bounty payment for this month, thank you CM and Digital Gold team.

I think it is worth to add that this bounty campaign is managed in a very professional way and all payments were made on time until now.

Additionally, CM is very helpful, responsive and available on many channels, so there is no problem to get in touch with him if there is any problem.

I participated in many bounties and have to say that this one is managed on a very high and professional level.

Zgadza się dzięki za podpowiedź, ominą mnie setki dolarów w kosztach transakcji, płacę dość dużo i co miesiąc ta wielkość tylko rośnie, bo handluje coraz więcej, szczególnie na ruchliwym rynku.

Ja ostatnio używałem w tym celu BULL, BEAR, ETHBULL i ETHBEAR, które niezbyt sprawdziły się jako instrumenty do trejdingu (za duże skoki ceny podczas mocniejszych ruchów lewar 3 lub nawet 5x), ale jako zabezpieczenie (hedge) nadaje się całkiem nieźle.