How's bitfinex processing express USD wire transfers these days? Anyone still use them? Or should I look at other exchanges? Please post feedbacks.
Looking at how nobody is complaining about anything, guess bitfinex is tip top. *lol* That was a good one. I would say the persons complaining simply gave up, resignating. Though it might really be possible. I don't know anymore since bitfinex, with all these obvious coding errors, looked way too dangerous for me to hold any reasonable amount of coins there. If small or bigger hints are already given then i could not ignore that. |
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to upgrade from v0.9.1.74 to the most recent version without losing all the blocks? Last time i did it claimed the blockchains are corrupted. Or is that update without problems on that level?
|
|
|
|
Gabriel had some real life shit to do recently but he'll be back in a few hours probably, we have plans for an in-wallet exchange, cutting out the middle man and allowing for 0% fee p2p trading. It's always good to have exposure on an exchange , but c-cex isn't huge. The new wallet is really marketable, it's a lightweight Bitcoin AND Credits wallet, all in the small trimmed working directory.
Just because a coin isn't hyped, doesn't mean it has no value. CRE has a ton of value, and arguably has the highest potential of any crypto in existence right now. I plan on sticking with the coin and community, you never know what might happen. I think it might be useful to get another/multiple other people that can develop for the coin as well, since Gabriel understandably has his hands full doing all the wallet work himself.
Anyways, I'm happy to see you guys around and I'll try to get gabriel in here asap!
LONG LIVE CRE
+1 In all honesty i don't beleive we will be de-listed from c-cex.. But in the event we are. Another exchange will likely take us on. I'm sitting on my CRE for now until someone develops a service where I can give it to miners for a chunk of their profit.. LONG LIVE CRE I'll explore that possible service  Defo needs a service of some kind. I've bumped volume to just over 3btc and have personally bought nearly 2 btc of coins. I do what I can to help to promote and keep the coin exposed. Let's see I think gabriel is coding on some nice features that will make credits marketable. Though one thing about it is that i think credits are exploitable and therefore might never get a high value. Let's say someone owns 100 bitcoins. He then sends these bitcoins from one address to the next each 10 minutes or each block. 3 months later he will possibly get 100 credits * 6 per hour, * 24 per day = 14400 credits per day. I think the possibility to artificially raise the amount of credits might be a problem for the valuation of CRE. Am i wrong? I believe you are incorrect SebuJ. Now, It is my understanding that a person *could* take a BTC. Claim the CRE from it. Then sell the BTC on an exchange and purchase another BTC, Then claim the CRE from that one, rinse and repeat. However. I think the time it would take to do such a thing might be counter productive for profiting in such a way. Ah right, i meant it that way. Didn't know why i left the exchange part out. Though yes, the exchange would be needed and that would mean added fees for each transaction. Ingoing and outgoing. You have to beat the fee first. Then it would be work, timewise. Even though there are exchanges that only need one confirmation. And it would be a risk since you don't know what the price of CRE will be in 3 months. At least when this timeframe will remain the same. So when thinking that over, the low price of CRE makes it not viable at the moment. But i think it somehow means that the price can't go higher than a certain level. That would be when this kind of "work" would actually be worth it. More would do it and pushing the price down when selling the CRE to get their payout. Though credits are far away from that yet. |
|
|
|
<snip> Though the normal spam attack... they really get me every time. When i stop checking the unconfirmed transactions before sending because it was calm for a long time... then they start again and catch my transactions in limbo.  What scares me about the spam attack is the attackers began giving away the tiny fractions of bitcoins they used in the attack, then changed their minds and sent what remained back to the same address. Why did they change their minds and stop the giveaway? Was it because they intend to use those coins to mount another attack? They collected it? Weren't these "giveaways" so strange that you would need a higher fee to take them out of their addresses than the actual value is worth? So i doubt they collected them. It even wouldn't make sense if they have miners that can include these transactions. Since they would lose money by doing so instead including real transactions. |
|
|
|
Ich denke praktisch jeder Bitcoiner hat auch schon von Anfang an angenommen dass alles Geld was über das eigene Bankkonto geht dem Staat bekannt ist. Allein schon weil er Steuern will. Aber schön wie man das rechtfertigt... Terror und Kinderporno. Klappt immer gut sowas.  |
|
|
|
Na auf Emails von meinen Banken reagiere ich eh nicht. Dazu bin ich schon zu lange dabei.
Aber danke für die Info. Ich hoffe du hast nur dein Tradingkonto verloren. Ich kann mir vorstellen dass es ein echtes Problem ist wenn man sein normales Girokonto verliert.
wenn du zuviel zeit hast, kannste gerne meinen damaligen Thread dazu lesen: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=308957.0 (auflösung was wirklich passiert war erst auf den hinteren seiten) Und wenn du dann noch nicht genug von horrorgeschichten hast, brauchst du nur "Konto gekündigt" und ähnliche Schlagworte suchen  Da gibts auch einige Threads von Fidorkunden, dessen Konten gekündigt wurden Aber um es kurz zu fassen: Wenn du keine Überweisungen von zweifelhaften Personen erhälst, wird dir dein Konto auch nicht gekündigt. Wenn du es doch tust und sie von einem gephishtem Konto kommt, wirst du dein Konto (und mit hoher wahrscheinlichkeit auch das empfangene Geld) verlieren, egal wer schuld hat oder wie du dich abgesichert hast. Deswegen handel ich auf bitcoinde auch nur noch mit verifizierten Usern, bzw auf Börsen, und biete keine bitcoins gegen SEPA im Forum oderso an. Das Risiko ist mir einfach zu hoch. Klingt gut.  Das Risiko bei etablierten Börsen ist also nach wie vor gering. Das klingt ja schon mal gut. In letzte Zeit liest man ja ab und zu Sachen wo Banken gegen Bitcoin "vorgehen". ZB eine Bank die keine entsprechenden Überweisungen mehr weiterleitet. |
|
|
|
@SebastianJu
Also bei mir spukt nichts im Kopf.
Wenn die Regierung was sagt - ständig, wenn man sowas im Fernsehen sieht - ständig. Ich habe einen eigenen Kopf zum Denken.
Und auch wenn Du ständig schreibst, die Kriminalität ist in der Nähe von Flüchtlingsheimen höher als... wo eigentlich? Bei mir spukt dennoch nichts im Kopf. Ich war schon in zwei Flüchtlingsunterkünften, auch ganz ohne Hundertschaften der Polizei. Nix passiert...
Ich behaupte jetzt mal, die Kriminalität in diversen Konzernen, Banken und Regierungsabteilungen ist tausendfach höher als die scheinbar in der Nähe aller Flüchtlingsheime zusammen. Nun hat sich der Kreis wieder geschlossen: ich verstehe die Aufregungsmentalität immer noch nicht.
Na wenn es so schlimm wäre dass du nicht mal da hin gehen kannst ohne beklaut oder geschlagen zu werden dann wäre es ganz übel. Du musst es so sehen, wie lange kannst du in einer normalen deutschen Stadt umherlaufen oder wie lange kannst du im nächsten Dorf umherlaufen bis ein Verbrechen an dir passiert. Da geht es nicht darum dass sofort was passiert, nur darum dass die Häufigkeit höher ist. Und klar geht es da nicht um Verallgemeinerungen wie Mehmet den Serientäter der gleich das Bild für alle Türken prägt. Es geht nur rein um Statistik. Und wenn die Polizei sagt dass Verbrechen in der Nähe von Flüchtlingsheimen überproportional häufig vorkommen passt das ohne Probleme mit deinen problemlosen Besuchen in Flüchtlingsheimen zusammen. Ich hab auch nicht behauptet dass bei dir was im Kopf spukt. Wie kommst du darauf? |
|
|
|
Yes. You probably know the US law system is nuts. If you drive to a party with your car, party there, then your buddy asks you if he should drive to the shop to buy some more beer and you give him your keys. He then robs a shop or something and what happens? You land in the jail. Because you helped making the robbery possible. Fully unguilty. They are really insane over there. Hope that kind of insane law system apply in my country lol. I think that kind of system can make somehow our nuts people to become disciplined. Until you borrow your friend a cutter knive because he wants to work in his flat and at the end he kills his cheating wife. Then you are buddies in jail. No... that system is surely not able to punish wrongdoers, it beats innocent persons. |
|
|
|
Yes trading can be done either in exchange or with real people in your street.
First time that I hear about this thing. How is possible that? Staying in the street and seeing how is going the market at the television placed at the showcase of the supermarket near your home and then give and take the money in the hands of everyone following the verification of prediction made before? Or what? In which way is made this thing? Because is interesting to know that. LOL are you really serios with this post? I like to say what kind of sentence is that but I don't know lol. He means that trading can also be done outside internet world. It is like buying btc thru meetup. yeah but it's dangerous if your're in the usa without a license, they may arrest you with the excuse of money transmitting, i would do it privately with someone only if he is a friend, and anyway not in the street Really it happens there even with a 100% proper deal? Well here in our country there are no laws about that and we are making sure that both parties are in safe and approved deal before doing a meetup. That kind of transactions always happen here even without money involved like trading spare parts , bike accesories , cards game etc. Yes. You probably know the US law system is nuts. If you drive to a party with your car, party there, then your buddy asks you if he should drive to the shop to buy some more beer and you give him your keys. He then robs a shop or something and what happens? You land in the jail. Because you helped making the robbery possible. Fully unguilty. They are really insane over there. Teenagers problem :3 so its better to stay to your home and keep earning and you can also join in some party but don't abuse yourself and you must responsible in every decision that you make. Even then... going to jail for one of your friends going crazy is so very wrong that it is unbelieveable. I mean you can't be safe at all in the US. Everything you do can help someone somehow to do a crime. Insane... nothing more. |
|
|
|
So what kind of stress test is going on today again? Oo Man, i'm tired of this. Bitcoin payments will slowly get a slight harm as not being reliable.
I thought the last malleability attacks are only transactions with a too low fee to get included. Do they get included now before other transactions because their waiting time is so high or what is going on?
They are two distinct "attacks" going on now. One "attack" is just another "stress test" whereby some entity ("coinwallet.eu"?) issues a huge amount of spam transactions, so far paying very low fees. It only affects some relay nodes (that have to hold all that spam in their queues) and clients who issue transactions with even lower fees. The other is a "malleability attack" whereby someone else takes your transaction and issues an "evil twin" duplicate of it. The duplicate moves the same coins to the same addresses, but if it gets confirmed instead of the original it may thoroughly confuse some wallets, including some popular ones. Thanks for the answer. The second attack is most probably run by amaclin. See: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1198032.msg12579271#msg12579271Though the normal spam attack... they really get me every time. When i stop checking the unconfirmed transactions before sending because it was calm for a long time... then they start again and catch my transactions in limbo. |
|
|
|
Gabriel had some real life shit to do recently but he'll be back in a few hours probably, we have plans for an in-wallet exchange, cutting out the middle man and allowing for 0% fee p2p trading. It's always good to have exposure on an exchange , but c-cex isn't huge. The new wallet is really marketable, it's a lightweight Bitcoin AND Credits wallet, all in the small trimmed working directory.
Just because a coin isn't hyped, doesn't mean it has no value. CRE has a ton of value, and arguably has the highest potential of any crypto in existence right now. I plan on sticking with the coin and community, you never know what might happen. I think it might be useful to get another/multiple other people that can develop for the coin as well, since Gabriel understandably has his hands full doing all the wallet work himself.
Anyways, I'm happy to see you guys around and I'll try to get gabriel in here asap!
LONG LIVE CRE
+1 In all honesty i don't beleive we will be de-listed from c-cex.. But in the event we are. Another exchange will likely take us on. I'm sitting on my CRE for now until someone develops a service where I can give it to miners for a chunk of their profit.. LONG LIVE CRE I'll explore that possible service Defo needs a service of some kind. I've bumped volume to just over 3btc and have personally bought nearly 2 btc of coins. I do what I can to help to promote and keep the coin exposed. Let's see I think gabriel is coding on some nice features that will make credits marketable. Though one thing about it is that i think credits are exploitable and therefore might never get a high value. Let's say someone owns 100 bitcoins. He then sends these bitcoins from one address to the next each 10 minutes or each block. 3 months later he will possibly get 100 credits * 6 per hour, * 24 per day = 14400 credits per day. I think the possibility to artificially raise the amount of credits might be a problem for the valuation of CRE. Am i wrong? |
|
|
|
That said back on Euthanasia I'm against people asking others to kill them, a license to self suicide if supported makes more sense. Thanks for the clarification, but as for the suggestion for a license for suicide, how would that impact anything? would having such a license permit a holder to a facility that would assist in that person's suicide? if so, how is that any different from euthanasia?
No problem and the benefit of a license is that people will need to decide for themselves without involving the guilt of others who survive after the person is dead. If they are unwilling to do so then they must live on, in the end it's their ultimate choice and they should be held responsible for their own outcome and not put it into the hands of another. Basically I'm implying a License to Kill (YOURSELF) Euthanasia in my opinion forces doctors to do the task, which is against their code of well trying their best to keep people alive. That said if the doctors want to have the right to do it in some cases that would be acceptable but not for perfectly well and fit individuals like in the OP, more for vegetable state individuals etc. http://www.macleans.ca/society/health/why-doctors-want-the-right-to-pull-the-plug-2/why would people need a license to kill themselves? that's called suicide and is executed out of free will already. no one else is involved already, why complicate it with a license? i really dont see the point here. I think it's not a bad idea. It would simply say that this person had gone through all the psychological and other tests to say that there is no doubt that he wants that and he is fine with forfeiting the chances of being healed in the future. So they could go to a doctor and ask for a poison. Such certificate should lose it's validity after 6 months or so. Not that someone wears that all the time and when the next time a woman hurt his heart he gets poisened even though a day later he would be fine. |
|
|
|
That said back on Euthanasia I'm against people asking others to kill them, a license to self suicide if supported makes more sense. Thanks for the clarification, but as for the suggestion for a license for suicide, how would that impact anything? would having such a license permit a holder to a facility that would assist in that person's suicide? if so, how is that any different from euthanasia?
No problem and the benefit of a license is that people will need to decide for themselves without involving the guilt of others who survive after the person is dead. If they are unwilling to do so then they must live on, in the end it's their ultimate choice and they should be held responsible for their own outcome and not put it into the hands of another. Basically I'm implying a License to Kill (YOURSELF) Euthanasia in my opinion forces doctors to do the task, which is against their code of well trying their best to keep people alive. That said if the doctors want to have the right to do it in some cases that would be acceptable but not for perfectly well and fit individuals like in the OP, more for vegetable state individuals etc. http://www.macleans.ca/society/health/why-doctors-want-the-right-to-pull-the-plug-2/I think only some doctors are ok with doing that anyway. No doctor is getting forced to do that at least. It would be really wrong to force them to do such thing against their hippocratic oath. |
|
|
|
|
So what kind of stress test is going on today again? Oo Man, i'm tired of this. Bitcoin payments will slowly get a slight harm as not being reliable.
I thought the last malleability attacks are only transactions with a too low fee to get included. Do they get included now before other transactions because their waiting time is so high or what is going on?
|
|
|
|
Sebastian has escrowed 1.32 BTC for me, so far. That was in two trades (one is still active for 0.32 BTC, because DHL is sooooo slow in delivering the mail, heh - the other one was 1 BTC which was completed in a matter of hours, only). He is a friendly guy, and I'm certain that he takes his responsibility as escrow very serious. His ratings speak for themselves. Replies were sent qickly, and he includes helpful information in his messages, such as general escrow related things and signed messages for verification, so all parties involved can make sure it's really him they're dealing with. I was never that much into trading here, but in the last couple of days, I spottet two opportunities of trades I really wanted to do, and from reading in the forums, I had a good feeling with having my funds escrowed by Sebastian. And again, my good feeling didn't let me down. For everyone using his service, I strongly recommend tipping him. It takes time and responsibility to escrow for others, and he basically offers his service for free. Let's make a sign to the world that free services can continue to exist, because customers show their appreciation voluntarily!! Thank you for your nice and detailed review. Appreciate it. Let me know whenever you need an escrow again. |
|
|
|
CAN I HAVE MY MONEY BACK NOW? now your inboxing me that you wont talk to me anymore there is still a problem of you holding my funds you said a month its been close to a month can i have it back meow
I already mentioned that it looks like you really are incapable of reading. I told you more than once that, when no problems arise, you will receive your coins on the 15th. And no, don't lie, it is 10 days only now. Don't blame me on you not being able to provide proof. I somehow feel that i'm way too friendly with a person pushing an obvious scamcoin the way you did. |
|
|
|
Von hier: Postbank gab Probleme mit Kraken, Bitcoin.de und Fidor in der Vergangenheit soweit ich mich erinnere.
Weil ich kraken nutzen wollte... die Meinungen im Thread gehen aber auch relativ weit auseinander. Auch wenn niemand sagt es ist gefährlich ist es geteilt zwischen relativ sicher und relativ unsicher. Hm... ich werde es wohl riskieren. Ein weiteres Konto würde vermutlich auch dauern. Aber es kann nicht schaden, ich denke, wenn es kostenlos ist, werde ich wohl ein Extra Konto anlegen. Ich bin mir recht sicher, dass die erwähnten Probleme diese waren, dass es sehr viele Betrüger mit postbankkonto gab. Bzw. es wurden Konten von Postbankkunden gephisht und dann für Betrug verwendet. Sowohl auf bitcoin.de, was eben fuer viele Kontokündigungen gesorgt hat, so auch bei mir und weshalb die zwangs vollst. Verifizierung von bitcoinde fuer postbankkunden eingeführt wurde ... Als auch auf Kraken, wodurch Kraken.com deutlich vorsichtiger bezüglich deutscher Kunden geworden ist, weshalb Deutsche alle mind. Tier3 sein muessen (gab wohl auch noch ein paar andere Banken). Aber fuer dich als User ist eine Kraken ein-auszahlung ziemlich sicher. Nur solltest du dir aufgrund der zahlreichen Phishing-Vorfälle vllt dennoch eine andere Bank, als die Postbank suchen ^^ Na auf Emails von meinen Banken reagiere ich eh nicht. Dazu bin ich schon zu lange dabei. Aber danke für die Info. Ich hoffe du hast nur dein Tradingkonto verloren. Ich kann mir vorstellen dass es ein echtes Problem ist wenn man sein normales Girokonto verliert. |
|
|
|
Hm, buying trust obviously was not a good idea. I wonder if the mascot dies with that now.
It doesn't. I wasn't taking this site as a serious place at the time. I also wasn't thinking. I wasn't buying trust. I was flashing so people knew I wasn't lying about being female so they'd shut up and trust that I wasn't lying already. I now see that trust isn't for gender verification, but for trading purposes. Lmfao. Yes, the bitcoin community is very dangerous. Too many scams happening. That is why trust is needed. By the way... flashing and sending pictures is surely no way to proof that you are a girl. E-Whoring would not work if that could proof that you are a girl. E-Whorers already have prepared pictures with names and all before they start. Except you would do it on live cam. I did do it live. Lmfao. Ah ok, then it would be easy to proof. Hope you were a pleasant sight at least. |
|
|
|
Buy low, sell high. When there is panic, buy the shit out of everything when it hits rock bottom
Then where is bottom for you? How do you know that it will stop there and not drop down another couple hundred percents? And when you wait for a bottom to establish then it might already went up high. So what are you watching at? |
|
|
|
usually i just use price action strategy...
on daily and 4 hour time frame..i use my forex strategy and implement it on bitcoin trading...
Are you really successfull with that? I imagine that being successfull for forex but i think these things don't really work on the bitcoinchart since too few people believe in this. On forex that's probably a different story. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
