You sound like you think that this proofs he is a scammer then. EVERY legit dice site will always win at the end. That is why it has the 1% house edge. It means that there is a small percentage of the chance in favor of the house, so the casino. It's fully normal since they offer you a business and they need to earn money.

If you thought that the chance of winning was 50% to 50% in reality then i wonder what you thought how casinos can be a big business.

Every non addicted forum member will tell you that gambling is a bad idea because you are at a disadvantage. That is no hidden secret.

The answer are the first seconds. It's a gamble again though. But there are people that try to get their miners run the first seconds when mining starts. If they are lucky then they can find some blocks with having a relatively low hashrate. The hashrate will rise only after more miners jump on mining that coin. So if you are lucky then you can earn some bit.

But i think too many are trying that already.

Congrats for the repayments. Let's see what happens tomorrow.

lottery248, it is wishfull dreaming that he will get his negative trust removed. And honestly, i don't see a reason why a person that is not master-P should wish for that. There would be no reward at all for that.

The only explaination i can come up with is that you lost coins to master-P and for some reason you can't disclose that point to the public, so that you try to push master-P the positive way. But that sounds like a very vague story.

My assumption was wrong it seems so i will take out what i wrote in here.

I took a moment to check my escrow labels with this list of usernames. Since i noticed before that i had a trade with master-P involved and me as escrow where he bought a steam acc on 20150627. I asked the seller about it but did not receive an answer in many days now. The seller was iflewtoday32.

iflewtoday sold an amazon account on 20150415.

IronMarvel bought something and the seller might know his address in case it turns out he is really master-P.

I don't have details about the other users i think.

Any idea how to fix the label issue?

Was the server code checked for potential limits that could lead to loss of labels?

To be safe i don't use that old wallet now anymore though it would be good when i would have the labels that are missing back. Maybe only the connection is lost that these labels belong to that wallet?

Can a developer help with that?

Oh well, that sounds amateurish. Really might happen out of a sudden that he decided to scam now.

No info at all. It mostly depends on how the issuer is reacting. If we help setting it up or the issuer and so on. At least it is pretty easy to do and tutorials for everything are available and easy to understand.

Please check carefully, cannabit wasn't in the forum since some time. Iam only a shareholder working together with the biggest shareholders to push the issuer to keep his promises.

And yes, we shareholders put time and work in it to make this work too since the issuer most probably would do it in ages only otherwise.

We now try to negotiate with the issuer to make things run. As soon as i know more i will post about it.

I can confirm that areyouserious asked me to provide escrow for this trade. I know that legendary account and know that op controls it.

I wish good luck to the one who receives that old account.

I was asked by OPES, the issuer, to provide an Escrow address for the lottery of OPES he offers. I can confirm that i hold 200000 OPES on c-cex.

I wish every participant good luck.


Message signed with an old address of mine, that i posted may 2013 on bitcointalk. See my Servicethread: [ANN] SebastianJu - Free Legendary Escrow Service - Escrowed over 8150 BTC.

You can check a signed message very easy. The fastest way is to visit http://wallet-2sx53n.sakurity.com/#verify.

I took a look at counterparty and counterwallet and i have to say it looks like a great, intuitive and very easy system to use. Compared to that NXT is very difficult.

I have hopes that it will work out with counterparty. I already made some tests with receiving shares from another project and some divs and it works easy like a child could use it.

Next thing would be to check out the migration process though it looks like it has to be done manually. Though i think it will not be too hard doing it manually because cannabit has not too many shareholders.

I hope this can be checked out fast so that the dividend of this month, which normally should be paid today, can be paid out fast.

If a shareholder wants to check out counterparty, here is a page with a lot of counterparty tutorials: http://foldingcoin.net/resources/video-tutorials/counterparty-guides/

The videos don't work for the most part but the picture tutorials are the way tutorials should always be.

Iam only a shareholder who is with other shareholdersin contact ith the issuer. Normally it is the plan to have one dividend each month. Last month it didn't happen because a move had to happen for one farm, this month it seems we are at a halt because cryptostocks is down again.

But the issuer seemed to wanted to pay the monthly div. We had to push him so i think our pushing is effective.

Not as solid as we would wish for. The farms exist, we checked, the issuer had to be pushed to pay though the shares are still on cryptostocks, which is not cool. I will take a look at counterparty to see if it is worth something for this project.

coltlover, or let's say master-P, i'm sorry but i can't wrap my head around your twisted thoughts. It's getting too annoying trying to find a piece of common sense in you. Though when i read you so i have the impression we know already since a long time, you might be the user with the most accounts on bitcointalk and your nonsense seems to be always the same. I wonder if you really were able to impersonate master-P that well, it would need some shizophrenic abilities to handle it so good though when i read how the proven master-P writes now then it sounds quite possible.

Anyway... i don't care anymore.

Ich habe bis jetzt noch kein Multisig benutzt weil das Interesse einfach viel zu gering ist, es gibt einfach sehr wenige die sich so tief damit beschäftigt haben. Aber ist es nicht eher so dass zwei der drei Schlüssel benötigt werden um die Transaktion aus der Multisigadresse HERAUS zu machen? In dem Fall dürften sich die Schlüssel ja nicht beim Käufer sammeln weil die Transaktion ja zu MrLehmann, bzw MrDJ, gehen müsste.

Im Prinzip wird doch zwei aus drei so erstellt dass jeder der drei einen Schlüssel bekommt, ich frage mich gerade wie das gemacht wird ohne dass jeder ein neues Wallet erstellen muss und so dass jeder nur seinen eigenen Schlüssel kennen lernt, und die Adresse ist dazugehörig. Der Käufer schickt dahin und die Coins können dann da raus geholt werden wenn einer von den dreien seinen Schlüssel an einen der anderen beiden schickt. Wer zwei Schlüssel hat der kontrolliert die Coins.

Alles richtig?

Mustn't be considered money. It's something valuable stolen. Similar to paypal money taken from your account. Of course they would have to move in general.

And it doesn't matter that no 100% contract was established. Every judge will see what the purpose of sending the money to master-P was. If he can't proof against the private messages then that is the version the judge will believe. A written contract only is suggested for easier proof. But a spoken contract is valid too and we have even written details in private messages.

No, that is enough to proof that he did not get the coins donated.

Except he lives near that address. It's a not seldom pracitioned scam tactic to let things being shipped to other peoples addresses, then wait for the postman there and claim to be the recipient. Did a postman ever ask you for your id before giving you the package?

Carders do that often.

No, it's not that easy. A contract doesn't need to be written, it can be negotiated by a conversation only. It is only easier to prove having a conversation. And we even have that conversation in the form of private messages. His account is connectable to a living address too. That is enough to claim that the embezzlement happened.

And it's pretty clear what he should do. Escrow is a defined word on here and normally the details are negotiated between trading partners and escrow too.

He can be sued for sure. I only have my doubts that it will happen. The amount is so small that i think it will not happen at all. There are too many people on here who thinks to "not throw good money after bad money". And it's worse with this case. A lawsuit could cost much. Well, it might be possible to let the police investigate for free for the start.

I agree, it is a huge red flag for sure. He wants to pay back but not trying to get his funds back form the "hacker"? He should have given his pc to the internet criminal department of the police and they check it out. Though... they might find out that nothing has happened maybe...