No you can not include gambling in the list because when the chances to raise your bitcoins with that are so that you in fact have a higher chance to lose your bitcoins then it can't be considered an investment or something you would use to grow your bitcoin. No sane person would invest when he does not think that the chance to get his coins back plus more is lower than getting less back than he invested.

I know many gamblers believe they can cheat luck with some system but that's proven wrong. Except there are some gambling games where you can, with much learning, increase your chance to yor favor.

You can't see gambling for the overwhelming part a way to increase your bitcoins because statistically it is a way to decrease your bitcoins.

Right, didn't think of that at all. It's from a well established and related place with bitcointalk. So it's a good thing for him. I wonder if it has a huge effect. After all the text around it is the same on each page, so might be recognized as advertising by google. Their rating engines are quite smart nowadays.

I'm not sure you thought your statement through isvicre and i hope you don't judge from yourself on others. I surely have no price. Maybe others can live happily after scamming others but i certainly would not be able to.

I didn't think about the escrow part, that's right. But a shop can be registered relatively anonymous with private whois. Though sending packages might reveal your identity anyway.

Well, like i said, i did not think it to the end, only thought handling might be easier.

But there is simply NO way around it if we really want broad adoption. It is, in my eyes, no solution to start to NOT use bitcoin anymore so ofte, like what it means with using lightning network. Segwit is interesting but it seems very limited in it's effect.

For what do you need a big bank? Because of ATM to get cash? Then check out those banks that are owned by a bigger bank. You can use the atm of the big bank then too. Or search for a bank that is part of the cashpool, which allows you to withdraw for free from many other banks atm too.

The basic nature of bitcoin is safety through encryption or 21mio coins max. But surely not an arbitrary setting that everyone knew would have to be taken out at one point in time in order to not hinder adoption.

I wonder how you imagine that satoshi envisioned a widely adopted bitcoin without taking out that temporary spam protection.

It's in the work though it's hard to do at all since cryptostocks hasn't the best ways to find the shareholders. For example other exchanges created list with shareholders that were sent to the issuer so they can know who owns the shares. But cryptostocks send out email addresses for the shareholders and still you don't know all users because you only have those in the list that allowed the shareholders to see the investors email.

It's not easy.

But that the wallet is offline is pretty bad. Was not the case before. Or is it online again?

No need to do it again since the issuer knows then already the bitcoin address you want it attached to and you were verified by email i guess. So the issuer only needs to check the newest list sent from cryptostocks and will know that something changed and he can adapt.

Again a reminder to shareholders that filled the form. Since there are still 4 users who filled the form, put their bitcoin address and email address in there but did NOT check the email address's inbox. There is an email in the email address inbox that you use for cryptostocks. Check it and answer to it to verify that the real owner of these shares claimed them. That's important!

Maybe an error in the wallet when it is such a special value where it breaks.

Lucky Blocks, can you explain what happened?

Though it seems the error is not for everyone. I wonder what is different for you.

I think that think those people too that spam the trading subforums with posts like "Bitcoin is doomed" and such. Trying to push the price in the direction they prefer. Doesn't work i think.

And i think it depends who you hear speaking. When the masses start to think it's time to buy then it's likely that it's time to sell actually. The masses lose mostly.

I know that alot early adopters and such have a strange kind of ethics, examples probably everyone knows, but what i mean is they surely are not all this way. If he met with one shareholder, well, the risk that one person is corrupt is 50-50%. But having to take on 6 or more big shareholders sound like a problem. It's very unlikely that all are corrupt.

Was Jutural running an asicminer pt or was he only a big fish?

In any case, there should be alot big fishes. And nothing is heard of them. Either they work in the background or not at all. Which would be strange. They might have earned more than they lost with asicminer but still.

I see what you mean but when the average person on the street is asking you "And for what do i need bitcoin?" then this most likely is not a good argument since it sounds very much like the dark side of bitcoin everyone fears bitcoin for in the real world.

It's not the same as autorenew. With autorenew you might wait a long time until your order gets taken. But margin bot sets your offers so that they are always at places where they will be taken fast and where they will bring the most profit most probably. Try it, it's a nice tool.

Naja, der Meinung bin ich nicht, ich denke wir haben eher eine homöopatische Demokratie. Die Demokratie ist so verdünnt dass sie praktisch schon nicht mehr da ist.

Na, man kann hoffen dass wir irgendwann demokratischer werden. Merkel scheint Volksabstimmungen ja zu meiden wie die Pest. Man muss sich ja nur mal fragen wie es ausgehen würde wenn die Deutschen gefragt werden ob sie mit ihrer Ausländerpolitik einverstanden wären. Das Mindeste was die deutschen wollen würden wäre Asyl bis der Krieg vorbei ist aber keine deutsche Staatsbürgerschaft so schnell. Garantiert kämen auch Mindestgrenzen. Tja, gute Frage ob die Weisheit der Masse, die Schwarmintelligenz wirklich so intelligent ist oder leicht steuerbar.

Trotzdem denke ich dass wir sehr vielen Unsinn den unsere Politiker sich erlauben uns ersparen könnten.

In fact most german banks want a fee if you don't get your payment from job into it each month or something like that. But there are other banks that don't care about that. There the incoming money only has an effect on the automatically calculated size of the dispo credit.

I know the times when transactions would cost a fee but that is long gone.

I believe america might be different because it is the land of credit cards. In germany, or europe generally, credit cards are pretty uncommon. Most don't even have one. I, for example only have a vcc on a website. It's sufficient for when i need a credit card but seldom needed.

Didn't try but i would think so or do you think some kind of observation program will start to check where the money comes from? Besides that there are no higher fees for higher transactions that i know of.

You don't have?  I have one since ages and when you search comparison websites then you will find alot of these banks. Mostly internet banks where you can use atm from other banks or atm that are part of cashpool.

For example i use netbank since years and they are fine. The only disadvantage for me is when i want to put in cheques. I have to mail them to them. Though that did happen only twice in all the time when i received cheques from escrow.com.

Because it would mean not accepting smaller trades, because you are too expensive, if you would do it for less at all of course. And when it comes to high amounts, would you take one million usd in escrow just for 10USD fee? The risk is way way too high to make sense out of this. So a fixed fee is disadvantageous in both ways.

I think you post so much that you easily would earn more putting such a signature in your signature instead promoting your own website.

Though i think you see it idealistic somehow.