reborn ... remember to change your signature.  THanks OP and please check my post 957 am I right about Casino or no mean using units or BTC It uses units obviously This thread is about the RGD signature campaign though, you may want to write your RGD questions on an other thread or contact the casino support |
|
|
|
Hahaha, j'ai fais la même expérience sur une plateforme internet d'échange d'objets 3D. J'ai voulu faire travailler des indiens sur la sécurisation du site en PHP.
Dés qu'une fonctionnalité était en place, une autre ne fonctionnait plus. Tant que j'alignais les biftons, il y avait toujours quelqu'un pour réparer les dégâts... ce qui entrainaient de nouveaux problèmes ailleurs. Quand je râlais et exigeait une disparition des nouveaux bugs introduits sans payer pour cela, il n'y a avait plus personne (équipe partie en vacance, programmeur dédié parti aux obsèques d'un proche, pannes de courant (personne ne répondait ni aux mails ni aux appels skype tant que le mot dollar n'apparaissait pas), etc.
La stratégie indienne, c'est de présenter des petits tarifs mais de faire raquer au maximum l'occidental par la technique du "on creuse un trou d'un côté et avec la terre on rebouche le trou précédemment creusé"
Bref, j'ai fini par tout bazarder et payer (cher) une boite américaine pour la sécurité et un développeur français pour le reste.
+1 Rocou ils sont loins d'être stupides, et ne sont pas la pour faire plaisir. Pour avoir passé ne serait que 15 jours de tourisme "sac a dos" en Chine, entre les contrefaçons pourries qui lâchent en quelques heures (sacs, stylo, support mémoires, etc..sans parler des fausses montres), plus le fait que dire "non" n'est pas possible chez eux, plus la barrière de la langue, t'es juste content de rentrer chez toi, avec de l'air "ambipur" en comparaison ! Ensuite, si tu fais la somme de toutes tes petites dépenses, tu en aurais eu pour moins cher (et pour beaucoup moins de temps et de frustration) d'acheter direct de vraies choses en Europe. Clairement, on est vu comme des "poches" dont il faut se faire un plaisir de vider...Ca donne envie de les taper et d'être vraiment désagréable. Un pote qui fait de l'import me disait que si tu n'as pas quelqu'un pour checker au départ des containers, tu te faisais enfler à tous les coups... oui oui qu'ils disent... En revanche, pour faire plier un chinois, y a rien de mieux de lui dire qu'un autre chinois est moins cher que lui. Quand es-tu allé en Chine? Il n'y a pas que des contrefaçons, ils produisent énormément et de la qualité; la classe moyenne augmente et sera composé de centaines de millions de personnes quand leur monnaie s'appréciera donc ils pourront consommer ce qu'ils produisent et être vivre comme des rois à l'étranger |
|
|
|
Hello all, i am offering 0.0001 BTC to the first guy who replies to this post, i'm giving it in a referral link, so you will be able to play with 0.0001 BTC to test the page.
Yes please...  ammount sent i am offering now same ammount to 3 new guys, so place your posts to send them (will send today, now i'm off PC). I'll take one! sent, 2 left, cmon, who wants 0.0001 BTC ? Got it. And lost it Lost 5 times in row...  409263 P-2498 16:06 68.3358 <49.0000 0.00002000 2.02061224× 0.00002000409260 P-2498 16:06 72.6435 <49.0000 0.00002000 2.02061224× 0.00002000409258 P-2498 16:06 97.2030 <49.0000 0.00002000 2.02061224× 0.00002000409255 P-2498 16:06 49.5456 <49.0000 0.00002000 2.02061224× 0.00002000409252 P-2498 16:06 70.4816 <49.0000 0.00002000 2.02061224× 0.00002000omg, really bad bad luck ... i'll give more later today, keep updated i still have 2X 0.0001 to giveaway, but i can't give it again to you, in next round of giveaway i'll give 5X 0.0001 Okay, sounds awesome! I hope I win next time  It is always nice to make a give away but you should maybe create your own thread to do it, it is very unlikely to get a whale from a 0.0001 link but it is not impossible Each time you post to give away 0.0001 you make 0.0005 (0.0006 to post for PD-0.0001) |
|
|
|
Still waiting for bitcoin death:) Just a bit more, few months maybe
I know i am just a bit impatient:)
It would make more sense to invest some time in something you believed in instead of being Bitcoin Mister Doom |
|
|
|
I'm not sure what the people that invested here expected. It's the same thing that goes on with the other ponzis. Invest early and get out while you can while people are still playing. When it slows down, get the fuck out!
Use strategy for win ! It is always the same story, the newbies that play their first ponzi want to believe the ponzi owner and that the game will last forever
I have not seen this ponzi owner stealing anything but it doesn't mean he didn't, I just don't know
I was called scammer 50 times in this forum, but I am honest. I handled 3-5BTC many times and don't run away with your money... I don't know how to prove my honesty ?
Round 3 is coming ! On monday, April 28th.- 80% refund guaranted.
- Last 2 deposits : 100% REFUND GUARANTED !
- 0.01 min and 1.5 BTC max.
- Game will stop after 20 hours if no more deposits.
- 115% payouts.
- 5000 Bitvisitors will be bought BEFORE the launch and 5000 after the launch.
- Blockchain wallet.And you still keep player's btc in round wallet? Round 1 : https://blockchain.info/address/121jfy7iR2Q6HCNL3oZFDK2WTjigFZRAVb 0.07106076 BTC Round 2 : https://blockchain.info/address/121x1rbwtPk4jg48V42zv1CprdY5Lm1ozb 0.01552888 BTC Round 3 : https://blockchain.info/address/113rKL7VkwZapYhWdBjwJYZuz5mNSx28wm 0.07396652 BTC Round 4 : https://blockchain.info/address/12v9RSJAEz7HUA8iD6ePsMeGGcaZVGZq4G 0.29213522 BTC Total : 0.45269138 BTCIT"S NOT EVEN YOUR FEES THAT WHY YOU SHOULD GET BAN. YOU NOT TELL ANYBODY ABOUT REMAIN BTC IN LAST ROUND WALLET. SO CAN YOU BE SCAM ENOUGH? I am interested to know his answer about the remaining funds in the previous addresses but did you calculate how much he should get from the fees? 1% of 60BTC=0.6 - what was supposed to be invested from his fees in Bitvisitor visits Money send when the round is finished could be kept by him or use to reimburse future players, nothing has been said on that |
|
|
|
If you wouldn't make more money after 300-500posts or so that would limit the rubbish posts?
I am surprised that the sponsors pay for posts above this amount. I actually have a hard time getting to 50. Not saying that my posts are never rubbish, but they are always as thoughtful as I can make them. I do wonder what the sponsors would do if you PM'ed them and said, "good news, I saw an ad for your casino, bad news, the source spams the boards so excessively I will never visit you, sorry" what kind of response you'd get or if they would follow your advice and not pay for more than 300 or so posts a month? Exposure is good but I think most operators are very self conscious of having a positive image as well or as positive as possible considering they are running casinos... They would respond that they don't allow the members to spam and they will investigate your allegations Allowing members to get money from their signature is great but it results in more rubbish posts but disallowing members to get money from their signature would eliminate a great thing to avoid getting a few more rubbish posts |
|
|
|
Hope no! It would bring the world's economy to an end.
Na it would just mean we have transitioned from a cash based society to a card based one and then onto a digital one with cash elements Digital money is already very present but we are still using fiat currencies and outdated systems The question is will we reach 1,000,000$ or not within 20years : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=537916.100 |
|
|
|
IF we don't have any serious problem like Mtgox/ or countries banning bitcoin with in six month we can reach $1000 easily.
I think you are right : the price would rise if the atmosphere around Bitcoin improves and if we don't have any negative big news for a while |
|
|
|
I kind of understand that, but i would like to give an example so I'll see If i understand It really.
If I created an account and was making 1 post every two days period from the day I created the account, after a month (let's say every month has 30 days) I would have 15 posts and 15 activity? After 5 months (150 days) I would have 75 posts and 75 activity? Now, If from now I made 15 posts a day, how my activity would increase? I guess I would also get 15 activity a day till how many activity? If i understand correct you get 28 activity every month so for 5 months you would get around 140 activity? But people say that you need like 6 and a half month for a Sr. member but 6.5*28 = 182 activity. I'm sure I misunderstand something but could you answer me using my example, how long would It take to get Sr. Member If I make 1 post every 2 days period for 6 months and later I just make 50 posts a day, would my activity increase 50 a day also till I reach my activity limit according to my registering day?
My main question is: If I'm not very active on forums and posted 1 post every 2 days period for let's say 10 months, then i should have 150 posts, now i decided to be very active on the forums and post maybe 30 posts a day, how my activity increases, also 30 a day till my activity limit reached according to my date registered? Or I'm not right?
Thanks a lot.
That was confusing to read, but simply put, you can only get 14 points every two week period. The periods don't start when you sign up but are fixed. The next one starts on tuesday and then changes every two weeks after that. You only need to make one post every two week period providing your activity is higher than your post count. You don't need to post, you just need to log in to get 14points providing your post count is higher to your activity, not the other way around To answer gagalady : you can't get more than 14point every 2weeks |
|
|
|
still up, up, up! update 27.03.2014 invested 0.50274831 BTC, ~0.5730%. someone invested around 10 BTC site bankroll 87.729964 & site profit 7.5761368 update 29.03.2014 invested 0.50119015 BTC, ~0.5799%. -- site bankroll 86.413821 & site profit 7.3096741 update 31.03.2014 invested 0.50105838 BTC, ~0.5818%. -- site bankroll 86.111018 & site profit 7.2879652 update 01.04.2014 invested 0.49928940 BTC, ~0.6559%. someone divested around 10 BTC site bankroll 76.112282 & site profit 7.0671325 update 03.04.2014 invested 0.49568540 BTC, ~0.6559%. -- site bankroll 75.570088 & site profit 6.5321816 update 05.04.2014 invested 0.50258219 BTC, ~0.6748%. -- site bankroll 74.468509 & site profit 7.5569766 update 06.04.2014 invested 0.51373044 BTC, ~0.6751%. someone lost a good bunch site bankroll 76.089872 & site profit 9.2192624 update 08.04.2014 invested 0.51381687 BTC, ~0.6748%. site bankroll 76.142872 & site profit 9.2322916 update 10.04.2014 invested 0.51486498 BTC, ~0.6749%. site bankroll 76.278760 & site profit 9.3902180 update 11.04.2014 invested 0.51932647 BTC, ~0.6750%. dan&diceclay on a roll site bankroll 76.925722 & site profit 10.061522 wooohooo two digits! update 13.04.2014 invested 0.52600862 BTC, ~0.6710%. site bankroll 78.382643 & site profit 11.099135 update 15.04.2014 invested 0.55111937 BTC, ~0.6695%. someone lost big (thresher?) site bankroll 82.317594 & site profit 14.909130 update 17.04.2014 invested 0.54708222 BTC, ~0.5726%. lots of gambling, more invest site bankroll 95.540405 & site profit 15.189882 update 19.04.2014 invested 0.56231407 BTC, ~0.5714%. site bankroll 98.221269 & site profit 17.802014 update 21.04.2014 invested 0.56342385 BTC, ~0.5683%. site bankroll 99.127337 & site profit 18.009710 update 23.04.2014 invested 0.57325047 BTC, ~0.5670%. site bankroll 101.08858 & site profit 19.857015 update 25.04.2014 invested 0.61408114 BTC, ~0.5368%. site bankroll 114.39544 & site profit 27.106403 wow! update 27.04.2014 invested 0.61630111 BTC, ~0.5209%. my % of the br is shrinking site bankroll 118.31066 & site profit 27.534323 0.116 profit in a month, pretty good return! Hello all, i am offering 0.0001 BTC to the first guy who replies to this post, i'm giving it in a referral link, so you will be able to play with 0.0001 BTC to test the page.
Yes please... Nothing like winning 2cents  |
|
|
|
|
Ok fair enough
THis work is very interesting
|
|
|
|
Being too loose with early BTC that I mined or bought for cheap. Examples:
- Opened an SR account and deposited 100 BTC in 2011 even though I don't do drugs. Never bought anything and forgot all about it until the Feds shut down SR and seized the funds.
- Left around 500 BTC in a Pirate Pass through account before he defaulted.
- Had around 200 BTC in a Starfish BCB deposit account before he too defaulted.
- Bought 2 AM blades (13 GH/s) for 50 BTC each.
On the other hand, I made plenty of good decisions that more than offset the bad ones.
When we didn't bought we regret not to and when we did we regret not to buy more, to have sold too early or to have invested badly The truth is if it was a mistake not to buy then it is a mistake not to buy now |
|
|
|
This is why I try to not keep more than 1 BTC on any given site. Even then it was bitbookk. They caved but at least they let you get your BTC back before they closed.
A good rule could be not to leave more than 5% on any given site, 10-15% if you have reasons to trust the website |
|
|
|
|
It is always the same story, the newbies that play their first ponzi want to believe the ponzi owner and that the game will last forever
I have not seen this ponzi owner stealing anything but it doesn't mean he didn't, I just don't know
|
|
|
|
The admin left this forum because he was accused of scamming and he left this forum to prove himself ,i have met him in his site before reading this thread ,all i can say is that these negative comments are misleading I have been using 999dice for months never had any problems ,actually i find it better than other dice sites .
Again an account difficult to trust The website is cheatin.g on the site stats but maybe it is not rigged, that is 2different things |
|
|
|
Qu'est ce qu'on s'en tappe ptdr c'est juste epic ce qu'il vient de se passer là, le mec arrive en grand patron et se plante comme la pire des merdes mdrrr mais n'imp sérieux im done c'est trop drole ici Augmentation des aides pour les pauvres => augmentation du nombre de pauvres mdr la logique voudrait l'inverse pourtant ? ah j'y suis !! les pauvres sont des feignasses de première, et les mecs un peu au dessus du seuil pour toucher les allocs se foutent carrément au chomage ! sans remords, ça vaut pas le coup de taffer pour si peu... Putain nous font chier ses pauvres, sont chelous on dirait ils ont pas envie de rouler en gros fer et d'une villa sur la cote. Vraiment chelous ces mecs + d'info sur notre monde. J'ai cliqué j'ai vu le trailer de 2012 j'ai quitté, tu m'en veux pas ? Les gens ne veulent pas travailler, ils veulent l'argent pour pouvoir s'acheter des choses; travailler a un coup et n'est pas amusant donc bcp de gens font le choix de ne pas travailler légalement et de toucher les aides avec un travail au noir à côté, ce qui n'est pas le bon choix pour eux pour le long terme mais un choix qu'ils sont poussés à faire par des lois débiles Pour baisser la pauvreté il faut favoriser l'entrepreunariat et enlever le salaire minimum pour que ceux qui ont le moins de compétences puissent trouver un premier boulot qui leur permettra d'obtenir des compétences qui leurs permettront d'obtenir un deuxième boulot meilleur puis un troisième; les empêcher par la loi d'obtenir ce premier boulot les empêche de progresser; ce qui arrange bien la classe bourgeoise |
|
|
|
Let us not forget how far and high this thing has flown already. A little downtime to cool down a bit before another overdrive is healthy for the economy IMHO
Of course it is, a healthy correction was needed So according to your chart, the next top will be late Jul ish and around the $4k mark?!
I don't know anything about trading and charting, but that prediction (800% increase in 3 months?) sounds a bit odd to me. It is possible but unlikely |
|
|
|
I like the referral aspect. I have some friends that love games and gambling with bitcoin, so I'll let em have a look and earn some cash.  Win win situation Or lose win situation, it depends how you look at it It must be nice to have a lot of refs that "work" for you |
|
|
|
The new information is in the distribution parameters that were updated based on the Mt.Gox data.
The Mt.Gox leak was the data after accounts were frozen right? Considering there were many hints of Mt.Gox's impending failure well in advance (goxing was a verb a long time ago), I expect a large percentage of people withdrew their funds either completely or mostly (my case). Therefore, I am not sure how useful raw Mt.Gox numbers would be for finding the overall distribution. 20 pages back in this thread, when the methodology was created, we used the distribution data from a certain company called Silvervault as a basis for some assumptions of this model. Even impaired Mt.Gox data is an improvement. An example problem where we have better answer now, is: 1.0 million coins belong to people with 100-1000 coins There are 45,000 people with 10-100 coins. How many people own 100-1000 coins? 1million coins belong to people with 100-1000coins : if they each have 100coins, they are 10,000 if they each have 1000coins, they are 1,000 so people having 100-1000coins are between 1000 and 10,000 Yet you wrote : 13k BTC100-1k that would mean each person has less than 100coins Without fudging the numbers, you would guess too easily The problem above can actually be answered statistically, and much better with Mt.Gox data than without it. Hmm  Do you mean you are fudging the numbers? I just applied basic logic; would you elaborate? Maybe all numbers are approximative and you prefer to keep the numbers you find instead of changing them just to make them work together better |
|
|
|
Oh, finally it confirms!
I see you won some huh? nice and clean Yeah, I won back that 0.1 I did lost earlier today and 0.02 more. My stats now My Statistic Bets 7360 Wins 2833 Losses 4527 Total Wagered 7.56496875 Total Wins 3.47550426 Total Losses 3.35048526 Total Profit 0.12501900 You can bet 0.12501900 now Regarding signature advertising..i have signature for two weeks now, and 7 players came as referals, but noone played any real btc. It's working, but i didn't have luck. ;-) anyone wants to try my referal link in signature for real?
I've referred 24 people, but no whales yet. You'd think 24 people would get you at least a little something decent. You saying it doesn't? I'm just jealousy of the one who made 0.33BTC by simply referring player 1DiCe1. Maybe no one referred him Admin told us that he was referred. lucky.. This is indeed pretty lucky if he didn't cheat and self referred himselfIf he keeps playing like that for months, the ref revenue will amount to a huge sum |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
