Now 5 MN is run up. Obviously its dev's MNs.
He use premine for hidden increase premine.
Alarm! Cheating detected!
The devs setup a few masternodes to help the network. The rewards for masternodes are currently zero, so I'm not sure how this is 'cheating'. How do you know that rewards for masternodes are currently zero? Blockexplorer is missing, we do not see the movement of coins  well it's in the code that they don't start until about block 27,500, and basically every yiimp pool has an explorer so....... How about pic on OP that says? Masternode block rewardBlock 1 - 28,799: 80% PoW/ 20% MN Please correct graphic in OP. Also, a link to the particular code on Github would be nice. Not all of us are adept and searching through the code on Github. |
|
|
|
I see the coin per block increase every block, what is your max coin per block in POW?
50. But the Masternodes will take 20%, So 40 for miners. The Masternode share will keep increasing though. So less for miners, until after about a year when this coin will switch to POS. |
|
|
|
That only tells me that 45% of the hash power is by a mystery other. Who is the mystery other and why aren’t they identifying themselves? Bitcoin.com 15.28%- Owned by Roger Ver BTC.TOP 13.89% -Ally of Bitmain ViaBTC 11.81%- Partially owned by Bitmain BTC.com 6.94% - Owned by Bitmain Antpool 5.56% - Owned by Bitmain Suprnova .695% - OCMINER (Not affiliated with Bitmain in any way) "Other Mining Pools" 45.83% - controlled by two mining farms mining to address 13DMgTu721eoYFoxHVE1wZ7k5yixmfRiPQ & 17Wk4GPKw9nZ9PbspzaxN3fv1L2m9NA9dg. Other addresses used in the past. Have about 500 Phash between the two of them. Likely Bitmain. Bravo. Compare and contrast: https://coin.dance/blocks/todayI know Bitmain controls a good portion of BTC mining too. At least Slush Pool 13.9% and F2Pool 11.81% keep him in check. I wonder what happened with Bitfury. That 2.78% is really paltry. What is most disconcerting about the Bitcoin Cash chain is the fact that the unknown miners are only two mining farms. They are not pools where independent miners can join the party. Over 45.83% hash controlled by only two mining farms? That is just not very healthy. |
|
|
|
That only tells me that 45% of the hash power is by a mystery other. Who is the mystery other and why aren’t they identifying themselves? Bitcoin.com 15.28%- Owned by Roger Ver BTC.TOP 13.89% -Ally of Bitmain ViaBTC 11.81%- Partially owned by Bitmain BTC.com 6.94% - Owned by Bitmain Antpool 5.56% - Owned by Bitmain Suprnova .695% - OCMINER (Not affiliated with Bitmain in any way) "Other Mining Pools" 45.83% - controlled by two mining farms mining to address 13DMgTu721eoYFoxHVE1wZ7k5yixmfRiPQ & 17Wk4GPKw9nZ9PbspzaxN3fv1L2m9NA9dg. Other addresses used in the past. Have about 500 Phash between the two of them. Likely Bitmain. |
|
|
|
no luck with Alexis. Tried -i21 on Tsurv version and i'm getting +/- 35 Mh/s up from 28-30 so i guess that's an improvement :p
I tried this miner and my hashrate is up from 35MH to 45MH. https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/ |
|
|
|
sync failed  Me too. However, my blocks seem up to date. I wonder if the error we are getting is because there are no masternodes running, yet.  You are correct, sir. It'll all work itself out organically as we get further along. Everything in the wallet works 100% as intended even if it's displaying the 50% sync status. Thanks for letting me know so I don't rack my brain trying to "fix." I'll just ignore the message for now. |
|
|
|
sync failed Me too. However, my blocks seem up to date. I wonder if the error we are getting is because there are no masternodes running, yet. |
|
|
|
According to my debug file, I keep getting this error. Can anyone help me? Does this error even matter at this point? 2017-12-02 03:29:33 CMasternodeSync::Process - ERROR - Sync has failed, will retry later
2017-12-02 03:29:50 receive version message: /Bulwark Core:1.2.0/: version 70810, blocks=234, us=[2001:0:9d38:90d7:2c46:2a64:b666:4103]:52543, peer=24
2017-12-02 03:29:50 Added time data, samples 22, offset -5 (+0 minutes)
2017-12-02 03:29:51 getblocks -1 to end limit 500 from peer=24
2017-12-02 03:30:23 ResendWalletTransactions()
|
|
|
|
I keep getting a synchronization failed message when I open my wallet. what do I need to do to get it to sync properly? |
|
|
|
Kraken asks me 0.001 commission to withdraw bitcoin segwit? 10.70 $ ?! wtf! yeah to move 0.2 bcore from my wallet to coinbase transaction fee $9... yep love using bcore... get ready for the bcore trolls... You really need to consult this site before sending a transaction with Bitcoin Core and use a wallet where you can set your own fee. There's a good chance you could have sent your transaction for much cheaper. https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#24h |
|
|
|
$15,000 nobrainer :-D weeeeee
quick maths: everybody in this thread is retiring early Not at this time. Perhaps another year or two for me at this rate. |
|
|
|
lols@ all segwet trolls here That money that has come into btc, will flow into BCH and take Bitcoin cash over $3k and prob around $5k each....  prob starting around now, till just after Bitstamp add BCH next week sometime.  You actually want all the Tethers to flow BCH way? |
|
|
|
hey guys...did I miss anything?
Naw, 100 sats now is worth more than a penny USD is all. |
|
|
|
on the front page of r/btc there are a grand total of two threads about, y'know, bitcoin reaching five figures.
they have attracted a grand total of five comments between them.
why no fun there?
All the fun would be at r/bitcoin instead.  |
|
|
|
Good news. POLYTIMOS is listed on first exchange. I would like to know Сoinsmarkets is the safe exchange? Never traded there. I never traded there either. However, just know that they divide bitcoin by 9 places rather than 8... |
|
|
|
Nearly 2.00a.m. here but glad I stayed up to watch the show. This is truly incredible, especially when we remember how we all felt in 2015 when this place was full of bears. Congratulations to all. $10,000 for one bitcoin. WOW!
I'm really intrigued to see how the next crop of psycho bears will approach the next fallow period. In 2014/15 there really was the possibility it was going to nothing. That's going to be a harder sell next time around. The FUD that is in fashion now can be found right here. https://twitter.com/Bitfinexed?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5EauthorChina ban Bitcoin is so blasé. Bitfinex Spoofy Tether FUD is all the rage! |
|
|
|
Just sold the minimum amount of BTC on GDAX. I could start getting used to this.  = .01BTC |
|
|
|
Can someone console me about the intense FUD concerning Bitfinex and Tethers? Since I already hate Bitfinex, I'm prone to be considering it as a possibility. However, I don't want to panic sell and miss out on 15000 USD BTC or 100000 USD BTC. I'm mining shitcoins with my GPU, but it could take quite a while to accumulate my BTC back if I panic. |
|
|
|
Over $9.8k both Stamp and Finex.
Go Bitcoin go.
 Hahahahahaha That does look like what would be a younger version of Jimbo...  Gawd no.  I'm not swishy and I have a full white beard. I look more like my avatar (Mr. Natural).    |
|
|
|
is this checksum secure? 782d0615b309231d9ec243407972b57a978c2640e19673f6a575347d8c69f53d it's from the qt.exe inside the installer not the installer itself
can someone check this please The correct hash is: 782D0615B309231D9EC243407972B57A978C2640E19673F6A575347D8C69F53D So, you have the correct bitcoin-qt.exe file. That said, you should really check the installer file. Not simply one file within it. If you still have the installer download, I would check that instead since it is the only known one to be hash checked. are you saying that the fake installer may have the same qt.exe? The installer could have dropped the correct qt but it could have also dropped another special payload. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
