Gold in asteroids might have other properties, due to it being in space. Maybe cosmic rays can change its characteristics. But then it will not be gold anymore, but another metal.
Um. gold is an element is it not Yes, gold is an element. If a cosmic ray hit a gold atom, there is a chance that it could transmute it into another element. However, since most of the gold would be beneath the surface of an asteroid, I doubt the cosmic rays will be able to penetrate very far. |
|
|
|
We are testing resistance at $7580. Bullish if we break it, bearish if we test and cannot break through.  It appears that we did not break through.  |
|
|
|
This is a suckers rally....
Haha, tell that to all the leveraged shorts @bitmexrekt. I wonder how many shorters on Finex got their stops triggered. |
|
|
|
This is a suckers rally....
Keep trying to short the top! You are bound to be correct at some point.  |
|
|
|
|
I think it is probably time for all the margin whales to prime the pump a bit. Might as well use this EFT time to go long. They can then short the top after we finally get the ruling from the SEC.
|
|
|
|
Is there a possibility for the devs to change mining algorithm in the future? I didn't find any information. Keccak algorithm is rather primitive and straightforward. It's quite a piece of cake for BITMAIN to build such an ASIC. Although keccak's market is too little, for a giant like BITMAIN this maybe a good venture investment.
I really doubt that Bitmain would bother spending at least 10 million for research and development to develop an ASIC for Keccak. It is probably some good size GPU farm(s) or some entity that has programmed a FPGA to mine this. If someone knows what they are doing, I am sure they can modify the firmware on one of Baikal's miners to mine this algo. |
|
|
|
No, that's due to how the brain develops in response to a given environment. The easier and safer life is (thanks to wealth produced by capitalism), the more people think like children (instant gratification and narcissism).
It always ends in a lot of people dying. The romans did it, the soviets did it, the west is doing it today. It can't be stopped on a national level, only on an individual one.
I'm sorry, but if I am having a heart attack, "instant gratification" would be preferable. Plus, while I am incapacitated, I would hope the people rendering care to me will extend me the credit, and treat me, rather than secure payment for the services before treatment begins. |
|
|
|
The problem with the healthcare industry is that it just not sustainable to try and operate it at a profit or even at break even. It is rather difficult to make a profit or break even when your main customers are among the chronically ill and/or dying. Unfortunately, it can really only operate at a loss, in the long run. It must be a subsidized enterprise, either voluntarily through charity and/or mandated by some sort of taxes.
Abolish the welfare state and let people pay their own way. It will be cheaper on average. Centralized economies are not efficient and can't be. Centralized economies are not efficient? LOL. What do you think civilization is based on?  Do you really think the tribal economy of the paleolithic was somehow more efficient? Why on Earth do you think "the market" ends up creating oligarchies? Large corporations, due to economies of scale, always will have an advantage over mom and pop operations. The only hope for the mom and pop operations is to somehow have an advantage either through specialization, innovation and/or access to resources. Then the mom and pop organization will have a chance to actually become one of the large corporations. Civilization is a lot of people living together without murdering the fuck out of one another. It's anything that is not tribal warfare. And it's not a debate. We have a century of data and the numbers are in. Capitalism produces more wealth than socialism and has less economic inequality and more personal freedom. It is not a matter of opinion. Is that why every single country on Earth is socialistic and zero can be considered libertarian?  |
|
|
|
The problem with the healthcare industry is that it just not sustainable to try and operate it at a profit or even at break even. It is rather difficult to make a profit or break even when your main customers are among the chronically ill and/or dying. Unfortunately, it can really only operate at a loss, in the long run. It must be a subsidized enterprise, either voluntarily through charity and/or mandated by some sort of taxes.
Abolish the welfare state and let people pay their own way. It will be cheaper on average. Centralized economies are not efficient and can't be. Centralized economies are not efficient? LOL. What do you think civilization is based on? Do you really think the tribal economy of the paleolithic was somehow more efficient? Why on Earth do you think "the market" ends up creating oligarchies? Large corporations, due to economies of scale, always will have an advantage over mom and pop operations. The only hope for the mom and pop operations is to somehow have an advantage either through specialization, innovation and/or access to resources. Then the mom and pop organization will have a chance to actually become one of the large corporations. |
|
|
|
|
The problem with the healthcare industry is that it just not sustainable to try and operate it at a profit or even at break even. It is rather difficult to make a profit or break even when your main customers are among the chronically ill and/or dying. Unfortunately, it can really only operate at a loss, in the long run. It must be a subsidized enterprise, either voluntarily through charity and/or mandated by some sort of taxes.
|
|
|
|
I would take current capacity with a grain of salt. Word on the street is the shitcoin.com guys are going to yank all their channels at once and see what effect it has on the network. shitcoin.com alone is funding approximately 49% capacity, at present. Well, I suppose that it is a good thing that in their effort to discredit LN, they are going to provide some valuable stress testing. |
|
|
|
deleted
Infofront, was that you? |
|
|
|
Do some of you people get paid to post here? It's the same retards who can't shut the fuck up. Stop posting, find a hobby.
Reddit's circlejerkign hugbox is probably better than reading the same three posters ITT
This is my hobby. I certainly wish that I got paid for this. |
|
|
|
Oh bro. That's sad I can say. But you mining and refusal to dump at the said price was based on your "love" for the project and desire to hold long term. Thus if you aimed for long term, I would say you shouldn't conclude at the current price of XDNA in the market. Most coin were struggling today with their prices and the price in the market is largely dependent on the sellers and buyers not solely the coin dev. team.
Some coin holders sometimes decide to dump price at the ridiculous low buy orders of buyers. This is just a sad reality. Dumpers will always dump. But a good coin will survive over time.
It has nothing to do with "love." Just folly for getting involved in the 1st place, foolishness for HODL, and stubbornness on not wanting to dump for a loss. I am not confident that this PIVX clone has enough distinctiveness or "innovation" to make it stand out enough from the myriad of other PIVX clones out there. I guess that I just wanted to try masternodes again, and compared to other PIVX clones, the 1000 coin collateral requirement is rather low. |
|
|
|
desmonddesk1, you need to watch yourself. There is a rule against posting in the same thread multiple times in a row. Your last stint was 3 in a row. Wouldn't want to see your cheerleading account banned.... It's too bad that it appears this thread is now dominated by the same handful of cheerleading accounts. I suppose that I could join the cheerleading squad to try and help give this thread get a little more credence. However, it's really hard to cheer when I am now nowhere close to ROI on the BTC that I spent at nicehash mining this coin. At least my BTC is in the hands of other miners and nicehash, though. The only reason that I even considered getting involved in this coin is because suprnova tweeted that they listed it at their pool. I thought ocminer had good taste. My bad. Bones261 bro. Did you invest in the ICO? can you tell me how you are nowhere close the your ROI bro? And when you joined the XDNA project. Crypto requires patience. It may not come so fast but patience can give some faith in the project. My good btc is also locked down in a coin a believed so much in. I intend to sell off with even 10% profit because even shared mn services are refunding coin because of low price. It happens this way some time. That's the volatile nature of crypto. This wasn't an ICO. What are you talking about? You did have the option to buy enough coins from the dev team for a masternode, at the beginning. I spent my BTC buying hash from Nicehash. I mined just enough coins to get a masternode. If you compare what I spent in BTC for hash compared to what this coin is going for now, it comes out as a loss. I should have just mined this coin and dumped when it was going for 20K+ sats. At least I would have shown a small profit. However, now I'm bagholding. |
|
|
|
Other coins are just saying that there coin will go 50% up 100% up but XDNA is not saying XDNA is just achieving all target's
What? Is their target to go down by more than 50% from their all time high? |
|
|
|
desmonddesk1, you need to watch yourself. There is a rule against posting in the same thread multiple times in a row. Your last stint was 3 in a row. Wouldn't want to see your cheerleading account banned.... It's too bad that it appears this thread is now dominated by the same handful of cheerleading accounts. I suppose that I could join the cheerleading squad to try and help give this thread get a little more credence. However, it's really hard to cheer when I am now nowhere close to ROI on the BTC that I spent at nicehash mining this coin. At least my BTC is in the hands of other miners and nicehash, though. The only reason that I even considered getting involved in this coin is because suprnova tweeted that they listed it at their pool. I thought ocminer had good taste. My bad. |
|
|
|
I thought that trezor was kind of the gold standard, and other hardware wallets are not quite up to snuff... Trezor also have just come out with the new version model T. Second, I also thought that it was best to attempt to purchase any hardware wallet directly with the manufacturer, so I am not sure if going through Amazon is necessarily acceptable... a problem with some of these wallets and their being tampered with. You are correct. Buying the Trezor from a third party puts you at risk. The person could somehow compromise the firmware to make the device insecure and let you be open to getting your BTC stolen. I think simply updating the firmware when you get the device should mitigate the risk. However, hackers are a tricky bunch. (I suppose Slush could do the same thing. Create a backdoor to his own device. So in the end, it is a matter of trust. The only way to be completely trustless is to create a paper wallet on an air-gapped computer. Edit: that isn't completely trustless either because you are trusting the program that helps you make the paper wallet. I guess you can just make a random private key using dice slips of paper that you wrote yourself and calculate by hand the public key and the BTC address.. ) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
