This is interesting.
Probably similar to movie producers  using the "likeness" of real people for the movies. I wonder if that is copyrighted or whether they need permission from their owners to do so. Well, for certain reasons, I don't think I will allow people to do thesame thing with my "likeness" without my permission.
Hopefully, the player is doing that for good/moral reason rather than for money.

I guess they are meant to publish the "server seed tx" as proof they really used provable fair but they didn't publish it, right? You should also ask them why it wasn't published. If they claim provable fair on their site but didn't use the provable fair for your bets, that means the bet probably can't be trusted. But you should first all  inquire to be sure whether they use or didn't use the feature

How can Companies that are open to the public, serve the People of a Nation and supposed to be subjected to national laws be called Private Companies? They are Public Companies owned and run by individuals or group of people "once they are opened to the Public." No need to be called "Private" anymore as they are now serving the Public & have to be transparent/accountable to them. What do they need to be private for when they serve thousands/millions of people? What are they hiding? They should be subjected to all good/reasonable laws of Nations they serve . All rules made by such companies should be in harmony with the basic national laws and principles. This won't stop them from running very effectively and profitably.

If you allow such companies to be run privately(instead of openly/publicly) you could be indirectly excluding them from just laws that could make them to be very transparent, accountable to the public/law, etc .. Imagine an evil, non-transparent and non-accountable company growing too large and powerful in a country that values transparency and accountability. That is dangerous.

Isn't the One Coin an Alternative Coin/cryptocurrency(Altcoin) rather than "fake Bitcoin"? Your use of "Fake Bitcoin" make things sound like she made a replica of Bitcoin to deceive people into thinking it's Bitcoin. Or did she call it Bitcoin?

He's probably taking a big risk if he considers the Return on his minining Investment and investing when mining is not very profitable. I'd only consider such investment if I have other more profitable businesses that the solar power can be switched to when coin mining becomes unprofitable. In my opinion, Mining equipments  should be built to serve other purposes, just in case mining becomes unprofitable. Multi purposes usage of these equipments could make them profitable and very useful long-term

How often will the 1-2% be paid, when price reaches a certain height or anytime price goes up? What if price goes up multiple times a day? What exactly will the funds be used for and how do you access them, considering you said that investors own/hold their funds in their wallets.

Ofcourse. And a true Crypto world should be very  mobile and distributed around the world.
Cryptocurrencies should encourage mostly mobile-friendly network developments and participations . I would be worried once part of a Cryptocurrency main system/infrastructure is becoming fixed, hard to easily move to different locations, less mobile or non-mobile.

I guess they are anticipating a shortage in goods and services due to high demand from customers, or due to Increase in consumer's spending. Well, I'd encourage consumers to save more aggressively and work-harder to produce more goods/services(mainly local/home-made goods and services).

I guess the poker site has option to cash out (or pay customers) in multiple currencies and it seems many more of their customers recently started demanding to cash out in Bitcoin due to the price rally... so the site has to buy lots of bitcoins to meet customers demands. That is very interesting.

interesting. 
Will likely try free mode too to better understand the game. Just felt the need to test  it after watching the video tutorial. There are features I expect are included on the platform...  Hope they are included.

Happy for you. Hope you are careful next time especially with the amount of money you deposit. I wouldn't deposit lots of funds on any platform without making sure I properly understand their ToS and that I meet the requirements.  Also, better to only deposit what you can afford to risk.

Does it matter if big/small investors buy 1million dollars worth of bitcoins or $10 worth of bitcoin?  It will be accessible as there will always be people willing to sell at their desired prices. Besides, both the small and big investors will gain or lose bitcoins in proportion to their investments during price fluctuations.

Well, you can't show them(or anyone else) your coins until they prove they are within their legal/moral limit to confiscate them. If they are trying to seize the coins illegally, you have the right to refuse to tell any of them you own any coin (without lying), whether you really own bitcoins or not. But if they are within their legal/moral limit and ask what the law allows them to ask, I will tell the truth. I will have to be sure they have the right to ask every question they ask.
If you are trying to seize the bitcoin illegally, and ask me if I own bitcoins or how much I own & where they are, I will simply reply that whether I own bitcoins (or any other asset) or not is a private matter.

Is the "few buck" all you have left in your entire savings or just in Crypto space? If yes, I would advice you use it for better things or invest it in something that will most likely yield you profits in the future rather than gamble with it for fun or on projects you are not sure about their successes.
 I guess you want to invest, in hope to be lucky with huge gains? I'd probably invest long-term in such projects (good projects) with the "few buck" once I'm sure they will do well in the future.

I would say affected Network Users should secure their devices (should be mobile and light devices) with synced Bitcoin/crypto nodes and other decentralized networks nodes.. . so that users can probably continue using Bitcoin/crypto and other decentralized systems/networks locally when things return to normal where they reside.   I think Decentralized Networks/systems should be built in such a way that local usage (without global users) can be possible. Local users can reestablish/connect with global users (as long as their applications haven't been tampered with.) once internet is possible or restored worldwide.


Ofcourse, we need to have secured sources for food, water, medicine etc... the decentralized network would also help lots of people reestablish normal life quickly.

 I was very much interested in the thread when it started, to be certain that what happens in wrestling (I read the wrestlers are acting or something) doesn't happen in football/soccer & NBA, or that matches aren't fixed or rigged in favour of a team.
Ofcourse, I have heard/read on national news media many years ago of teams/referees getting penalized for cheating/matche-fixing. So, they clearly happened in the past and could still be happening in any sports/competition. It's OK to ask questions.

The $19 could be considered very risky bet by average bettors, worst still is losing all the money if a bet is lost. Betting sites should always consider making bets as less risky as a possible to all their bettors otherwise they would be violating rules on safe/responsible betting by encouraging bettors to take big betting risk (or gamble)

Have you used the site multiple times before without problems?
I guess what you mean by verification documents (below your post) is kyc,right? If yes, what reply did the site gave you concerning your kyc... did you qualify or no?

In regards to using up the whole balance, I don't think that is mandatory. They probably said that to get you gamble all the fund away and avoid passing through kyc which is likely required for people withdrawing such big amount or withdrawing above certain withdrawal limit.

Doesn't mean anonymity is a bad thing. Afterall people go to physical market to buy things anonymously, and it is not considered illegal to do so for thousands of years.

The site could be the problem if it really allows buying and selling of illegal/dangerous things. If those things are legal but dangerous, it will be best to use some sort of decentralized kyc on buyers/sellers while they remain anonymous(if they wish). But people's Verified Identities shouldn't be stored Centrally. They should be thoroughly encrypted, stored on decentralized/shared system, be immutable and should only be known/controlled by their owners. If a buyer/seller commits serious crime, the identity can be unmasked via network consensus.

Well, the world generally is the enemy of true christains, not just one country because our faith goes contrary to what the world believes.

True Christains will not engage in physical war. The coming physical battle will be the world fighting themselves and getting conquered/defeated by a king from West.