SP30 management and main ("ASIC") boards:
The difference in engineering huge!!! is so much different from the Chinese and also the customer
support the offer.
I am so glad that they entered this game, look to be serious and reliable.
Hence for me only can affort these miners in second had only....
you'll need to be very lucky to find any SP-Tech rigs 2nd hand mate, once they are bought and hashing, (you would know if you had one) not many will want to sell 'em on! best miners I've ever had. I also think, even if you do find any 2nd hand, you won't be paying much less than retail value for it. Here is the first one 321424756419 on the bay This page may have moved or is no longer available. Nope. Is it August yet?
Almost  |
|
|
|
I'm able to access the shell, but how does one view the CGMINER screen while it is hashing? And to exit it, restart it while in the shell? I do like the graphical interface since it does have all you need, but more or less out of curiosity. Thanks.
If i'm not mistaken to see cgminer you have to type "cgminer -dr". To exit what? Cgminer? The shell window? |
|
|
|
The cloud mining contracts looks really attractive on price. If I counted right It's only 0.00425 BTC per GH/s which is really cheap. The ASIC miners are good on price too. Looking forward to your company.
Be careful about the "too good to be true" offers! |
|
|
|
Greetings all.
I'm still fairly new at mining but I have gotten my feet wet with 10 antminer S1s. I find it enjoyable and take pleasure in the planning and calculating.
I have a fresh infusion of cash and want to spend approx. $5000 USD on some new equipment. I'm just curious as to the what the community thinks would be a good buy at this point in time.
I was looking at the Spondoolies SP10 for one. Not sure if this is the best though.
Any input is greatly appreciated. Thanks.
So how did you spent your money? |
|
|
|
CLOSED! Tupsu I will refund you 0.05 extra for being the only one See you next GB! |
|
|
|
Hey Everyone,
I'm hoping someone can help me understand the ASIC stats page on the SP10. Specifically, what the columns mean and what "normal/expected" values/ranges are for the values. Here's what I just pulled from mine:
.........
I just restarted the MinerGate about 30 minutes prior to grabbing these stats.
Thanks in advance!
You can find some information here http://www.spondoolies-tech.com/blogs/technical-blog/14191245-quiet-mode-in-sp10-1-3-xx 77c is so nice looking! |
|
|
|
I was awarded a mining contract and told payments would commence 24 hrs after confirmation and payments would occur daily.
Now been over 48 hrs later and no payment to date.
Because they are a scam! How much $/GH you paid? |
|
|
|
I just read everything there and from my understanding is that they guarantee a ROI for only 1 BTC, not for 2. |
|
|
|
1.2Th/s at ~1440W |
|
|
|
<big ass post>
Why not delete the non-relevant stuff? Keep just the relevant stuff for which you made your notes. It makes it MUCH easier to read/reply. |
|
|
|
Hi Roadstress, I was asking about your specific question about the J/GH at the chip. I'm sorry, but I missed your other post but I will respond to it later. We are very well aware of what other companies have done
There is nothing to comment on the J/GH at chip level. If you are aware of what other companies have done then you should also know that Bitmine.ch also advertised 0.35J/GH and they ended up with over 0.7J/GH I think. As I said in my reply we had it all in the last year. Promises, lies, scams. What we've pitched contains about 5 times as much as all the past proposals put together with a lot more real data. We appreciate people got royally rooked by other companies, but that does'ntmean to say we will do the same.
This is the best that you got? Give me all your money and I will give you a 100TH/s miner in december and I promise that I won't scam you. See? I can raise funds too. We had TONS of lies like this in the last year. This gives 0 confidence! |
|
|
|
Don't invest until you have more proof about them or about their skills.
It's always good advice to be cautious, but first have a look at my 'update' post put on earlier today. Thanks for reminding me. Any comment on our J/GH figure in light of the info? I did: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=638729.msg7147207#msg7147207 but you seem to avoid replying to me. Quite simply, you are incorrect here. You are, and will remain, a buyer. If you were an investor, you would be sending money to the company, and would expect return on your investment from the company based on performance. People who purchase stock in a company are investors.
You are sending money to the company with the intent of receiving a product. What you then do with that product once you have received it is not relevant to the company. If it so happens that this product makes you some money, then so be it.
Your investment is in BTC. By purchasing a miner, you are making a decision to actively support the BTC network. That's what mining is: supporting and helping secure the network. You are rewarded for your efforts with generated coins.
What Novello is stating is the following (and yes, I'm taking their entire plan and compressing it to a couple of sentences): We are going to build mining hardware that will be competitive and allow the "little guy" to remain in the mining game. We are going to do this by providing great price-to-hash value in the hardware, and by providing relatively inexpensive ways to continuously upgrade your existing hardware. To achieve our goal of great hardware at a great price, we need capital; and, to receive that capital we are looking to the mining community to believe in us and pre-order our hardware.
Whether or not they succeed with their mission remains to be seen. They have a long, tough road ahead of them, both to secure funding and to produce the hardware on time and on budget. As can be seen throughout this post, MANY of the very people they are hoping will invest are extremely skeptical from being burned so many times in the past by other companies.
As Majixagi pointed miners don't do it 100% for altruistic purposes. Even if they do miners still need to invest big in mining equipment because technology hasn't leveled off and technology is evolving very very fast. My 110GH rig that I received in August 2013 is good for trash now, but luckily I was able to regain my investment in in and got a Jupiter which allowed me to stay in the mining game. If it didn't then I was out. So miners need their ROI in order to be able to get better equipment which protects the network better. |
|
|
|
Hello,
I am considering funding your project but I would like know what the difference is between the 49' and the 500' options. I went through your website and I would strongly recommend having a more professional website created as it looks..... Well it looks bad is all I can say. I really appreciate the balance your organization is looking to return to the mining market. This is the main reason why I am considering funding you. I feel like you are bringing a business perspective that is not entirely profit driven and I can really get behind something like that.
I think your investors will be people like me so focus on what your strengths are and don't let the naysayers discourage your efforts; though I do think you still fall short as far as passing the smells test. There have been good suggestions made previously about increasing your credibility. Maybe some more specific engineering data that can be verified by forum members. (Wish it would mean something to me, other than independent verification)
Good luck!
-cheers
Don't invest until you have more proof about them or about their skills. |
|
|
|
The solution was finally a noise-reduced rack: Two miners in it are perfect. I exchanged the two backside fans by three better, noise reduced high speed fans and put in two additional fans in the front. So the air flow is perfect.
The costs for the rack was about 1 BTC, for the fans about 0,15 BTC. And it is no problem to run them in medium during the day and on low during the night. Finally, my babies work for me :-)
Link for the rack? It's more accessible than the acoustic rack that Zelek Uther got. Why not fit 3? Heat? Space? |
|
|
|
Until more proof I call it scam.
Again the only way it becomes a scam is you add money. Has anyone put anything in? Doubtful. They got $4,500 on indiegogo |
|
|
|
|
Until more proof I call it scam.
|
|
|
|
So no, we are not going to give you any other details about our staff. At least we're being up front about it instead of pulling in some guys (and gals) off the street, doing a photo shoot and giving you a load of baloney about their background.
Having over 120 years of accumulated experience then it means that you can be easily checked about your background. Saying that you won't give any details about your staff is very very weird. I don't see how can you give us a lot of baloney when people could easily check. Maybe LinkedIn or another way. May I ask you about your Bitcoin background? Like when you found about it, how many bitcoins do you own etc. You seem to know some stuff about this forum, but you don't know much about the past companies and the past fails/scams. Labcoin even managed to print out some fake PCBs just to convince people to give them money. They stole 7000 BTC. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=263445.0TerraHash managed to have some third party chips on their PCB board, but they still scammed people and didn't ship anything. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=198489.0And I can go on. BFL has a over 9 months delay at this moment (or is it more?) and only a few refunds are going to the customers. HashFast ( http://hashfast.com/team/) is in bankruptcy after raising more than 20M and having 40k chips in hands after numerous failed PCB revisions. BA is currently in a 4 months delay (Feb-June). So yes the team is important since we had/have a lot of pretty projects at start and nice marketing and nice presentations and LOTS of promises. We need more tangible proof and the team would be a start. We will need even more proof after the team, but the team sounds the most easy/accessible one. If you can't provide that how do you expect to provide on time and on specs cutting edge technology in a very fast moving market? |
|
|
|
There is nothing anonymous about the company or it's director.
But thanks for answering our question, good to know you've got something to keep you occupied.
Ok we know the director. Please share with us the rest of the team. I'm assuming that the director isn't handling all the stuff. Who is your HW director? Who is your SW director? Who is your marketing/sales guy? Who is your chain-supply guy? And so on. You seem to fail to answer straight simple questions. Even if they are in the documents (which they aren't) it only takes you 1 minute to write a couple of names. You were pointed to 3 other companies who have their team available on their website. You got nothing. So either show us the whole team or this will be just another fail/scamming company. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
